Click, click, ad: the proportion of relevant (vs. irrelevant) ads matters when advertising within paginated online content

References

• Amodio, D.M., and J.K. Swencionis. 2018. Proactive control of implicit bias: a theoretical model and implications for behavior change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 115, no. 2: 255–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholow, B.D., and C.L. Dickter. 2008. A response conflict account of the effects of stereotypes on racial categorization. Social Cognition 26, no.3: 314–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanche, D., C. Flavián, and A. Pérez-Rueda. 2017. Understanding interactive online advertising: Congruence and product involvement in highly and lowly arousing, skippable video ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing 37: 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaduri, G., and J. Ha-Brookshire. 2017. The role of Brand schemas, information transparency, and source of message on apparel brands’ social responsibility communication. Journal of Marketing Communications 23, no. 3: 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Bronner, F., and P. Neijens. 2006. Audience experiences of media context and embedded advertising: a comparison of eight media. International Journal of Market Research 48, no. 1: 81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B.J., E.C. Malthouse, and U. Schaedel. 2009. An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23, no. 4: 321–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C.H. 2003. Factors influencing clicking of banner ads on the WWW. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 6, no. 2: 201–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho, C.-H., and Cheon. 2004. Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? Journal of Advertising 33, no. 4: 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, K.Y., J.H. Song, C.R. Hollenbeck, and J.H. Lee. 2014. Are contextual advertisements effective? the moderating role of complexity in banner advertising. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 2: 351–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciaramita, M., V. Murdock, and V. Plachoura. 2008. Online learning from click data for sponsored search. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, 227–236. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M. 2005. The medium as a contextual cue: Effects of creative media choice. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 3: 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., L. Friberg, and E. Nilsson. 2009. Long live creative media choice. Journal of Advertising 38, no. 2: 121–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlén, M., S. Rosengren, F. Törn, and N. Öhman. 2008. Could placing ads wrong be right?: advertising effects of thematic incongruence. Journal of Advertising 37, no. 3: 57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugherty, T., and M.S. Eastin. 2001. An empirical examination of the impact of context within Internet advertising copy testing. In American Marketing Association Conference Proceedings, 299. American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker, P., M. Geuens, and P. Anckaert. 2002. Media context and advertising effectiveness: the role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of Advertising 31, no. 2: 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinodia, P. 2017. Four types of programmatic buying. https://www.adpushup.com/blog/explainer-the-four-types-of-programmatic-deals/.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, E., and Y. Lee. 2016. Context, context, context: Priming theory and attitudes towards corporations in social media. Public Relations Review 42, no. 5: 913–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, B.R., and R.J. Faber. 2011. Missing the mark. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2: 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eMarketer. 2019. Digital ad spending worldwide, 2019–2023. https://www.emarketer.com/content/global-digital-ad-spending-2019
   Google Scholar
• Escalas, J.E., and J.R. Bettman. 2003. You are what they eat: the influence of reference groups on consumers’ connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, no. 3: 339–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R.H., J.R. Jackson, B.C. Dunton, and C.J. Williams. 1995. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69, no. 6: 1013–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, N.D., and P. Quester. 2007. Birds of a feather flock together… definition, role and measure of congruence: an application to sponsorship. Psychology and Marketing 24, no. 11: 975–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J.R., B. Park, and A. Lang. 2007. When available resources become negative resources: the effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research 34, no. 3: 277–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. 2019. Advertising: the contribution of applied cognitive psychology. Applied Cognitive Psychology 33, no. 2: 168–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., J. Bergland, and B. Gunter. 2002. Memory for television advertisements as a function of advertisement–programme congruity. Applied Cognitive Psychology 16, no. 5: 525–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, V.E., and A. Gilboa. 2014. What is a memory schema? a historical perspective on current neuroscience literature. Neuropsychologia 53: 104–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, K.Y., and J.W. Ping. 2014. Engaging consumers with advergames: an experimental evaluation of interactivity, fit and expectancy. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 15, no. 7: 388–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G.S. 1980. Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention. Cognitive Psychology 12, no. 4: 473–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwinner, K., and G. Bennett. 2008. The impact of Brand cohesiveness and sport identification on Brand fit in a sponsorship context. Journal of Sport Management 22, no. 4: 410–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkias, G., and F. Kokkinaki. 2014. The degree of ad–Brand incongruity and the distinction between schema-driven and stimulus-driven attitudes. Journal of Advertising 43, no. 4: 397–409. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkias, G., and F. Kokkinaki. 2017. Schema strength, processing opportunity, and the rewarding nature of incongruity resolution in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 3: 415–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, R., and P.A. Kumar. 1979. Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, no. 1: 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckler, S.E., and T.L. Childers. 1992. The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: what is incongruency? Journal of Consumer Research 18, no. 4: 475–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervet, G., K. Guérard, S. Tremblay, and M.S. Chtourou. 2011. Is banner blindness genuine? eye tracking internet text advertising. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25, no. 5: 708–16. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, A.Y., S.K. Lo, and Y.P. Chiu. 2016. Where to place online advertisements? the commercialization congruence between online advertising and web site context. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 17, no. 1: 36–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet Advertising Bureau (IAB). n.d. Programmatic and RTB. https://www.iab.com/guidelines/programmatic-rtb.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, W., P.D. Pelsmacker, and M. Geuens. 2012. Online advertising and congruency effects: It depends on how you look at it. International Journal of Advertising 31, no. 3: 579–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamins, M.A., L.J. Marks, and D. Skinner. 1991. Television commercial evaluation in the context of program induced mood: Congruency versus consistency effects. Journal of Advertising 20, no. 2: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E. 2015. How to recover your mobile ad revenue with pagination. https://technopreneurph.wordpress.com/2016/01/01/how-to-recover-your-mobile-ad-revenue-with-pagination-by-eyal-katz/
   Google Scholar
• Kellaris, J.J., A.D. Cox, and D. Cox. 1993. The effect of background music on ad processing: a contingency explanation. The Journal of Marketing 57, no. 4: 114–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononova, A., E. Joo, and S. Yuan. 2016. If I choose when to switch: Heavy multitaskers remember online content better than light multitaskers when they have the freedom to multitask. Computers in Human Behavior 65: 567–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononova, A., and S. Yuan. 2015. Double-dipping effect? how combining YouTube environmental PSAs with thematically congruent advertisements in different formats affects memory and attitudes. Journal of Interactive Advertising 15, no. 1: 2–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, E., S. Ratneshwar, and E. Kim. 2016. Brand image congruence through sponsorship of sporting events: a reinquiry of Gwinner and Eaton (1999). Journal of Advertising 45, no. 1: 130–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and R.J. Faber. 2007. Effects of product placement in on-line games on Brand memory: a perspective of the limited-capacity model of attention. Journal of Advertising 36, no. 4: 75–90. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., and H.Y. Lo. 2015. Do you recognize its brand? the effectiveness of online in-stream video advertisements. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 208–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., M.Y. Hu, and P.E. Grimm. 2010. Affect transfer in Brand extensions: the role of expectancy and relevancy. Journal of Product & Brand Management 19, no. 5: 317–26.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N.A., and C.D. Creelman. 2004. Detection theory: a user’s guide. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Maille, V., and N. Fleck. 2011. Perceived congruence and incongruence: toward a clarification of the concept, its formation and measure. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 26, no. 2: 77–113.
   Google Scholar
• Malthouse, E.C., B.J. Calder, and A. Tamhane. 2007. The effects of media context experiences on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising 36, no. 3: 7–18. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malthouse, E.C., E. Maslowska, and J.U. Franks. 2018. Understanding programmatic TV advertising. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 5: 769–84. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. 1982. The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In Affect and cognition: the Seventeenth Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, eds. M.S. Clark and S.T. Fiske, 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Manjoo, F. 2012. Website pagination: Stories should load into a single page every time, Slate, http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2012/10/website_pagination_stories_should_load_into_a_single_page_every_time_.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel, S.P., and J.J. Kellaris. 2003. Cognitive determinants of consumers’ time perceptions: the impact of resources required and available. Journal of Consumer Research 29, no. 4: 531–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., A. Everard, P. Polak, and D.F. Galletta. 2007. The effects of online advertising. Communications of the ACM 50, no. 3: 84–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., T.A. Louie, and M.T. Curren. 1994. How does the congruity of Brand names affect evaluations of Brand name extensions? Journal of Applied Psychology 79, no. 1: 46–53. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R.S., C.A. Stammerjohan, and R.A. Coulter. 2005. Banner advertiser-web site context congruity and color effects on attention and attitudes. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 2: 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, M., P.C. Neijens, and E.G. Smit. 2002. The effects of magazine-induced psychological responses and thematic congruence on memory and attitude toward the ad in a real-life setting. Journal of Advertising 31, no. 4: 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, M. July 23, 2014. The fundamentals of programmatic buying: the latest digital advertising guide from Kantar Media. Kantar Media, https://www.kantarmedia.com/us/thinking-and-resources/blog/the-fundamentals-of-programmatic-buying-the-latest-digital-advertising-guide-from-kantar-media
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J.H., I.C. Cunningham, and G.B. Wilcox. 1979. The impact of program environment on recall of humorous television commercials. Journal of Advertising 8, no. 2: 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, S.D., M.B. Royne, and G. Deitz. 2014. Programme–ad congruence: Integrating advertising and entertainment. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 1: 61–90. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E.J., D.E. Stem, Jr, and D.E. Sprott. 2004. Banner advertisement and web site congruity effects on consumer web site perceptions. Industrial Management & Data Systems 104, no. 3: 273–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, J.W., K.Y. Goh, and H.H. Teo. 2010. Engaging Consumers with advergames: an experimental evaluation of interactivity, relevancy and expectancy. In International Conferences on Information Systems, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA, December 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ponikvar, A.B. 2015. Ever-blurred lines: Why native advertising should not be subject to FFederal regulation. North Carolina Law Review 93: 1187–210.
   Google Scholar
• Rieger, D., F. Bartz, and G. Bente. 2015. Reintegrating the ad. Journal of Media Psychology 27, no. 2: 64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers, S. 2003. The effects of sponsor relevance on consumer reactions to internet sponsorships. Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C.A. 2002. Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: the role of modality and plot connection congruence on Brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research 29, no. 3: 306–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev, S., W. Wang, and J. Fernandes. 2014. The effects of ad–context congruency on responses to advertising in blogs: exploring the role of issue involvement. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 1: 17–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamdasani, P.N., A.J. Stanaland, and J. Tan. 2001. Location, location, location: Insights for advertising placement on the web. Journal of Advertising Research 41, no. 4: 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M.A. 1994. Signal detection measures of recognition memory. In LEA’s communication series. Measuring psychological responses to media messages, 133–48. New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M.A., and J.R. Fox. 2002. The role of typical and atypical events in story memory. Human Communication Research 28, no. 1: 109–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, M. 2014. BuzzFeed’s Peretti: Mobile is a better ad vehicle. http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/buzzfeeds-peretti-mobile-better-ad-vehicle-155109.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E.R. 1998. Mental representation and memory. In The handbook of social psychology, ed. D.T. Gilbert, and S.T. Fiske, 391–445. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, R. 2001. Information visualization. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Srull, T.K., and R.S. Wyer. 1989. Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review 96, no. 1: 58–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangor, C., and D. McMillan. 1992. Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: a review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin 111, no. 1: 42–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., and N. Todorov. 1999. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31, no. 1: 137–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Statista Internet Advertising Spending Worldwide from 2007 to 2021. 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/276671/global-internet-advertising-expenditure-by-type.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H.A., G. van Noort, D.G. Muntinga, and F. Bronner. 2018. Engagement with social media and social media advertising: the differentiating role of platform type. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 38–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. 2011. The contextual effect on financial advertising. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 16, no. 1: 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., I. Cetindil, S. Ji, C. Li, X. Xie, G. Li, and J. Feng. 2010. Interactive and fuzzy search: a dynamic way to explore MEDLINE. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, no. 18: 2321–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A.M., Z. Klyszejko, J. Sarzynska, A. Szóstek, K. Chmiel, T. Soluch, and A. Brzezicka. 2014. Mode of text presentation and its influence on reading efficiency: scrolling versus pagination. Studia Psychologica 56, no. 4: 309–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W., and H. Bang. 2016. Distraction effects of contextual advertising on online news processing: an eye-tracking study. Behaviour & Information Technology 35, no. 8: 654–64. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaveroglu, I., and N. Donthu. 2008. Advertising repetition and placement issues in on-line environments. Journal of Advertising 37, no. 2: 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y. 1991. The influence of contextual priming on advertising effects. Journal of Advertising22, no. 1: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, C.Y. 2009. Effects beyond click-through: Incidental exposure to web advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications 15, no. 4: 227–46.
   Google Scholar
• Youn, S., and M. Lee. 2012. Game advertising and advergames. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zanjani, S.H., W.D. Diamond, and K. Chan. 2011. Does ad-context congruity help surfers and information seekers remember ads in cluttered e-magazines? Journal of Advertising 40, no. 4: 67–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar