The cause effect: the impact of corporate social responsibility advertising on cause consumer engagement behavior after brand affiliation ceases

References

• Alhabash, S., and M. Ma. 2017. A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students? Social Media + Society 3, no. 1: 205630511769154. doi:10.1177/2056305117691544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelidis, J. P., and N. A. Ibrahim. 1993. Social demand and corporate supply: A corporate social responsibility model. Review of Business 15, no. 1: 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, P., and D. Ingenhoff. 2016. Legitimacy through CSR disclosures? The advantage outweighs the disadvantages. Public Relations Review 42, no. 3: 386–94. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, M. J., A. D. Miyazaki, and K. A. Taylor. 2000. The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28, no. 2: 248–62. doi:10.1177/0092070300282006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basil, D. Z., and P. M. Herr. 2003. Dangerous donations? The effects of cause-related marketing on charity attitude. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 11, no. 1: 59–75. doi:10.1300/J054v11n01_05.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. 2003. Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 8, no. 1: 12–29. doi:10.1002/nvsm.198.
   Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., and K. Q. Zhou. 2019. Cause-related marketing persuasion research: An integrated framework and directions for further research. International Journal of Advertising, online first 38, no. 1: 5–21. doi:10.1080/02650487.2018.1452397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenigk, S., and V. Schuchardt. 2015. Nonprofit collaboration with luxury brands: Positive and negative effects for cause-related marketing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 44, no. 4: 708–33. doi:10.1177/0899764014551280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. J., A. Ilic, B. Juric, and L. Hollebeek. 2013. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 1: 105–14. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brønn, P. S., and A. B. Vrioni. 2001. Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising 20, no. 2: 207–22. doi:10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887.
   Google Scholar
• Capriotti, P. 2017. The World Wide Web and the social media as tools of CSR communication. In Handbook of integrated CSR communication, ed. S. Diehl, M. Karmasin, B. Mueller, R. Terlutter, and F. Weder, 193–210. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, C., F. J. Boster, and K. R. Andrews. 2013. Functional attitude theory. In The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice, ed. J. P. Dillard and L. Shen, 104–19. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452218410.n7.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, A.B. 2008. A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. In The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, ed. A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, and D. S. Siegel, 19–46. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. dio:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• CDCP. 2017. Center for Disease Control and Prevention morbidity and mortality weekly report: Youth risk behavior surveillance–United States, 2017. Surveillance Summaries 67, no. 8: 1–479.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, C. L., and C. N. Morris. 1997. Hierarchical Poisson regression modeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92, no. 438: 618–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone. 2017. 2017 Cone Communications CSR study. Cone Communications. http://www.conecomm.com/2017-cone-communications-csr-study-pdf (accessed February 25, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Constant, D., S. Kiesler, and L. Sproull. 1994. What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research 5, no. 4: 400–21. doi:10.1287/isre.5.4.400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., and T. Yamagishi. 1992. Power in exchange networks: A power-dependence formulation. Social Networks 14, no. 3-4: 245–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crimson Hexagon’s Editorial Team. 2014. Examining why social cause campaigns work: Empowering women through social conversations. Crimson Hexagon. https://www.crimsonhexagon.com/blog/examining-social-cause-campaigns-work/ (accessed February 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Dare, J. 2016. Will the truth set us free? An exploration of CSR motive and commitment. Business and Society Review 121, no. 1: 85–122. doi:10.1111/basr.12082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deodorants and Antiperspirants - US. 2014. Brand share—Women’s deodorants and antiperspirants. Mintel. http://academic.mintel.com/display/692584/ (accessed January 10, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, S., R. Terlutter, and B. Mueller. 2016. Doing good matters to consumers: The effectiveness of humane-oriented CSR appeals in cross-cultural standardized advertising campaigns. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 4: 730–57. doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1077606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, M. D., and D. W. Supa. 2014. Conceptualizing and measuring “corporate social advocacy” communication: Examining the impact on corporate financial performance. Public Relations Journal 8, no. 3: 2–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K., and D. Harness. 2019. Whose voice is heard? The influence of user-generated versus company-generated content on consumer scepticism towards CSR. Journal of Marketing Management 35, no. 9-10: 886–915. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2019.1605401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enlyft. 2019. Companies using Crimson Hexagon. https://enlyft.com/tech/products/crimson-hexagon (accessed September 5, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Etter, M. 2014. Broadcasting, reacting, engaging–three strategies for CSR communication in Twitter. Journal of Communication Management 18, no. 4: 322–42. doi:10.1108/JCOM-01-2013-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, C., J. Kopecky, and M. Morawski. 2012. Inferring gender from the content of tweets: A region specific example. In Proceedings of the sixth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, ed. J. G. Breslin, N. B. Ellison, J. G. Shanahan, and Z. Tufekci, 459–62. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frenzen, J., and K. Nakamoto. 1993. Structure, cooperation, and the flow of market information. Journal of Consumer Research 20, no. 3: 360–75. doi:10.1086/209355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, A., and A. C. Pache. 2015. Research on corporate philanthropy: A review and assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 126, no. 3: 343–69. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1969-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go, E., and D. S. Bortree. 2017. What and how to communicate CSR? The role of CSR fit, modality interactivity, and message interactivity on social networking sites. Journal of Promotion Management 23, no. 5: 727–47. doi:10.1080/10496491.2017.1297983.
   Google Scholar
• Grégoire, Y., T. M. Tripp, and R. Legoux. 2009. When customer love turns into lasting hate: The effects of relationship strength and time on customer revenge and avoidance. Journal of Marketing 73, no. 6: 18–32. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.6.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hase, C. N., S. B. Goldberg, D. Smith, A. Stuck, and J. Campain. 2015. Impacts of traditional bullying and cyberbullying on the mental health of middle school and high school students. Psychology in the Schools 52, no. 6: 607–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. L., and K. W. King. 2014. The social exchange of viral ads: Referral and coreferral of ads among college students. Journal of Interactive Advertising 14, no. 2: 98–109. doi:10.1080/15252019.2014.942473/
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. L., K. W. King, and A. Ramirez, Jr. 2016. Brands, friends, & viral advertising: A social exchange perspective on the ad referral processes. Journal of Interactive Marketing 36: 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegner, S. M., M. Fetscherin, and M. van Delzen. 2017. Determinants and outcomes of brand hate. Journal of Product & Brand Management 26, no. 1: 13–25. doi:10.1108/JPBM-01-2016-1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman, K., and K. Maynor. 2012. Integrating your brand purpose: How Procter & Gamble’s Secret deodorant increased market share and profit through its brand purpose. Journal of Brand Strategy 1, no. 4: 327–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L. D., R. K. Srivastava, and T. Chen. 2019. S-D logic-informed customer engagement: Integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47, no. 1: 161–85. doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0494-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J., and J. Kandampully. 2015. Embracing CSR in pro-social relationship marketing program: Understanding driving forces of positive consumer responses. Journal of Services Marketing 29, no. 5: 344–53. doi:10.1108/JSM-04-2014-0118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEG Sponsorship Report. 2019. The most active sponsors of causes. IEG. http://sponsorship.com/report (accessed January 10, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H. J., H. Paek, and M. Lee. 2013. Corporate social responsibility effects on social network sites. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 10: 1889–95. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kann, L., T. McManus, W. A. Harris, S. L. Shanklin, K. H. Flint, B. Queen, R. Lowry, et al. 2018. Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 2017. MMWR. Surveillance Summaries 67, no. 8: 1–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul, A., and J. Luo. 2018. An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods. Strategic Management Journal 39, no. 6: 1650–77. doi:10.1002/smj.2705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesavan, R., M. D. Bernacchi, and O. A. J. Mascarenhas. 2013. Word of mouse: CSR communication and the social media. International Management Review 9, no. 1: 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Y. Cheong, and J. S. Lim. 2015. Choosing the right message for the right cause in social cause advertising: Type of social cause message, perceived company–cause fit and the persuasiveness of communication. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 3: 473–94. doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1006081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. 2019. Strategic CSR Communication in social media: The effectiveness of stakeholder information, response, and involvement communication strategies factoring corporate reputation. Public Relations Journal 12, no. 4: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, K. M., E. S. Borleis, L. Brennan, M. Reid, T. A. McCaffrey, and M. S. Lim. 2018. What people “like”: Analysis of social media strategies used by food industry brands, lifestyle brands, and health promotion organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20, no. 6: e10227. doi:10.3390/s18020402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komen, S.G. 2019. Corporate partners: Together we do more. Komen.org. https://ww5.komen.org/Partner-Landing/ (accessed January 9, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., and N. Lee. 2005. Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A., and D. R. Edmondson. 2009. Portraying the cause instead of the brand in cause-related marketing ads: Does it really matter? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 17, no. 2: 129–44. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679170203.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A., and R. E. Goldsmith. 2005. Cause–brand alliances: Does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause? Journal of Business Research 58, no. 4: 423–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A., A. K. Lueth, and R. McCafferty. 2016. An evolutionary process model of cause‐related marketing and systematic review of the empirical literature. Psychology & Marketing 33, no. 11: 951–70. doi:10.1002/mar.20930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. J., S. R. Thye, and J. Yoon. 2000. Emotion and group cohesion in productive exchange. American Journal of Sociology 106no.3: 616–57. no.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. J., and J. Yoon. 1996. Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review 61, no. 1: 89–108. doi:10.2307/2096408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., W.-Y. Oh, and N. Kim. 2013. Social media for socially responsible firms: Analysis of Fortune 500’s Twitter profiles and their CSR/CSIR ratings. Journal of Business Ethics 118, no. 4: 791–806. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1961-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J., and E. Haley. 2019. Role of variability in cultural dimensions across generations in the context of CSR advertising in an East Asian market. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 1: 116–38. doi:10.1080/02650487.2017.1405582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, D. R., M. E. Drumwright, and B. M. Braig. 2004. The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing 68, no. 4: 16–32. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.4.16.42726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel, E., S. Youn, and D. Yoon. 2014. Functional matching effect in CRM: Moderating roles of perceived message quality and skepticism. Journal of Marketing Communications 20, no. 6: 397–418. doi:10.1080/13527266.2012.715587.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J. D., and J. P. Walsh. 2003. Misery loves companies: Whither social initiatives by business? Administrative Science Quarterly 48, no. 2: 268–305. doi:10.2307/3556659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., and H. Wilson. 2016. Marketing plans: How to prepare them, how to profit from them. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, M. 2011. Facebook marketing: Secret’s ‘Mean Stinks’ campaign sees high engagement. Realtimereport.com. http://therealtimereport.com/2011/08/16/facebook-marketing-secrets-mean-stinks-campaign-sees-high-engagement/ (accessed February 25, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. R. 2013. On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice, ed. J. P. Dillard and L. Shen, 70–82. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, C., G. Zaltman, and R. Deshpande. 1992. Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust. Journal of Marketing Research 29, no. 3: 314–28. doi:10.2307/3172742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. M., and S. D. Hunt. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58, no. 3: 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, J. 1996. Why donors give. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 7, no. 1: 3–14. doi:10.1002/nml.4130070103.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. E., M. Öberseder, and G. R. Laczniak. 2013. Corporate societal responsibility in marketing: Normatively broadening the concept. AMS Review 3, no. 2: 86–102. doi:10.1007/s13162-013-0046-9.
   Google Scholar
• Nave, A., and J. Ferreira. 2019. Corporate social responsibility: Past research and future challenges. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 26, no. 4: 885–901. doi:10.1002/csr.1729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff, J. 2011. Secret’s anti-bullying campaign appears to get Facebook fans engaged. AdAge. http://adage.com/article/news/secret-s-anti-bullying-push-engage-facebook-fans/229195/ (accessed February 25, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Nyilasy, G., H. Gangadharbatla, and A. Paladino. 2014. Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics 125, no. 4: 693–707. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1944-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, J. D., D. D. Gadhavi, and Y. S. Shukla. 2017. Consumers’ responses to cause related marketing: Moderating influence of cause involvement and skepticism on attitude and purchase intention. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing 14, no. 1: 1–18. doi:10.1007/s12208-016-0151-1.
   Google Scholar
• Payseno, K. 2018. Top 20 corporate social responsibility initiatives of 2018. Smartrecruiters. https://www.smartrecruiters.com/blog/top-20-corporate-social-responsibility-initiatives-of-2018/ (accessed February 25, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., and H. Alani. 2014. Mining and comparing engagement dynamics across multiple social media platforms. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science, 229–38. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2015. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Setlak, J., and K. Hayward. 2014. Secret: Mean stinks – Biggest. Assembly. Ever. WARC.com. https://www.warc.com/content/article/warc-prize-social/secret_mean_stinks_biggest_assembly_ever/101357 (accessed January 13, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Shree, D., A. Gupta, and M. Sagar. 2017. Effectiveness of cause‐related marketing for differential positioning of market entrant in developing market: An exploratory study in Indian context. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 22, no. 2: e1573. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stomp. 2019. Bullying prevention partners. Stompoutbullying.org. https://www.stompoutbullying.org/about/our-supporters/bullying-prevention-partners/ (accessed January 10, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. R. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and advertising. International Journal of Advertising 33, no.1: 11–5. doi:10.2501/IJA-33-1-011-015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. R. 2019. What the business roundtable’s statement on the purpose of a corporation means for the study of corporate social responsibility in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 8: 1067–9. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1677047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga, R. S. 2010. Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior 26, no. 3: 277–87. doi:10.1016.j.chb.2009.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi, N., D. A. Asamoah, and D. Doran. 2018. Keep the conversations going: Engagement-based customer segmentation on online social service platforms. Information Systems Frontiers 20, no. 2: 239–57. doi:10.1007/s10796-016-9719-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ukman, L. 2011. Taking credit: P&G promotes cause with social and mobile media. IEG. http://www.sponsorship.com/About-IEG/Sponsorship-Blogs/Lesa-Ukman/October-2011/Taking-Credit–P-G-Promotes-Cause-with-Social-and.aspx (accessed January 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, J., K. N. Lemon, V. Mittal, S. Nass, D. Pick, P. Pirner, and P. C. Verhoef. 2010. Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research 13, no. 3: 253–66. doi:10.1177/1094670510375599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varadarajan, P. R., and A. Menon. 1988. Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing 52, no. 3: 58–74. doi:10.2307/1251450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., J. Dou, and S. Jia. 2016. A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society 55, no. 8: 1083–121. doi:10.1177/0007650315584317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik, S., and A. Hughes. 2019. Sizing up Twitter users. https://www.pewinternet.org/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/ (accessed August 27, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Zasuwa, G. 2016. Do the ends justify the means? How altruistic values moderate consumer responses to corporate social initiatives. Journal of Business Research 69, no. 9: 3714–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar