Death in advertising: the last taboo?

References

• Alden, D. L., A. Mukherjee, and W. Hoyer. 2000. The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising 29, no. 2: 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, J., S. Solomon, T. Kasser, and K. M. Sheldon. 2004. The urge to splurge: A terror management account of materialism and consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14, no. 3: 198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. 2013. Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 3: 477–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D. E., and C. F. Longino. Jr. 2001. How older people think about images of aging in advertising and the media. Generations 25, no. 3: 17–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, no. 2: 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, C.G. 2003. Sex(haustion) sells: Marketing in a saturated mediascape. In Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal, ed. Tom Reichert and Jacqueline J. Lambiase, 133–50. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B. L., A. Martens, and E. H. Faucher. 2010. Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc 14, no. 2: 155–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-H. 2015. Advertising representations of older people in the United Kingdom and Taiwan: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Aging & Human Development 80, no. 2: 140–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffee, P. 2017. McDonald’s apologizes and will pull this tactless ad about a boy and his dead father. AdWeek, May 16. http://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/mcdonalds-pulls-a-nationwide-with-this-tactless-ad-about-boy-and-his-dead-father/?utm_campaign=nl_1&utm_source=sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=AW_Adfreak.
   Google Scholar
• Considine, J., and K. Miller. 2010. The dialectics of care: Communicative choices at the end of life. Health Communication 25, no. 2: 165–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M., and L. Dube. 2002. Humor in persuasion on threatening topics: Effectiveness is a function of audience sex role orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28, no. 7: 863–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology 13, no. 1: 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, D. W., K. D. Frankenberger, and R. V. Manchandra. 2003. Does it pay to shock? Reactions to shocking and nonshocking advertising content among university students. Journal of Advertising Research 43, no. 3: 268–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar-Nimrod, I. 2012. Viewing death on television increases the appeal of advertised products. The Journal of Social Psychology 152, no. 2: 199–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Meulenaer, S., P. D. Pelsmacker, and N. Dens. 2015. Have no fear: How individuals differing in uncertainty avoidance, anxiety, and change belief process health risk messages. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 2: 114–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. 2017. Forget sex, it’s death that sells these days. Digiday, May 26. https://digiday.com/marketing/deadvertising-lives/?utm_campaign=digidaydis&utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=social&utm_content=photo.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro, R., B. Shiv, and J. R. Bettman. 2005. Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die: Effects of mortality salience and self-esteem on self-regulation in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research 32, no. 1: 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, T.G., P. Mansfield, and K. Westbrook. 1996. The disposal of consumers: An exploratory analysis of death-related consumption. In Advances in consumer research. Vol. 23, ed. Kim P. Corfman and John G. Lynch Jr., 361–67. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, J. 2014. Lethal consumption: an exploration into the use of death anxiety within advertising communications. Journal of Promotional Communications 2, no. 1: 6–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gianatasio, D. 2016. Makers of the famous ‘dear brother’ Johnnie Walker spec ad just made a Volvo ad to die for. AdWeek, October 27. http://www.adweek.com/creativity/makers-famous-dear-brother-johnnie-walker-spec-ad-just-made-volvo-ad-die-174306/.
   Google Scholar
• Gulas, C. S., K. K. McKeage, and M. G. Weinberger. 2010. It’s just a joke: Violence against males in humorous advertising. Journal of Advertising 39, no. 4: 109–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, G., M. Stead, and J. Webb. 2004. Fear sppeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. Psychology and Marketing 21, no. 11: 961–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henley, N., and R. J. Donovan. 1999. Threat appeals in social marketing: Death as a ‘special case’. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 4, no. 4: 300–19.
   Google Scholar
• Huhmann, B. A., and B. Mott-Stenerson. 2008. Controversial advertisement executions and involvement on elaborative processing and comprehension. Journal of Marketing Communications 14, no. 4: 293–313.
   Google Scholar
• Karmarkar, U. R., and Z. L. Tormala. 2010. Believe me, I have no idea what I’m talking about: The effects of source certainty on consumer involvement and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 36, no. 6: 1033–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellehear, A. 1984. Are we a death-denying society? A sociological review. Social Science & Medicine 18, no. 9: 713–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, E., and S. W. Kopp. 2011. Resistance and risk: Examining the effects of message cues in encouraging end-of-life planning. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 30, no. 1: 100–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, S. W., and E. Kemp. 2007. The death care industry: A review of regulatory and consumer issues. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41, no. 1: 150–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiss, W., S. Kline, S. Jhally, and J. Botterill. 2005. Social communication in advertising: Consumption in the mediated marketplace. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manceau, D., and E. Tissier-Desbordes. 2006. Are sex and death taboos in advertising? International Journal of Advertising 25, no. 1: 9–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, A., B. L. Burke, J. Schimel, and E. H. Faucher. 2011. Same but different: Meta-analytically examining the uniqueness of mortality salience effects. European Journal of Social Psychology 41, no. 1: 6–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donohoe, S., and D. Turley. 2000. Dealing with death: Art, mortality, and the marketplace. In Imagining marketing: Art, aesthetics, and the avant-garde, ed. Stephen Brown and Anthony Patterson, 85–103. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Okazaki, S., B. Mueller, and C. R. Taylor. 2010. Measuring soft-sell versus hard-sell advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otnes, C., and L. M. Scott. 1996. Something old, something new: Exploring the interaction between ritual and advertising. Journal of Advertising 25, no. 1: 33–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounders, K. R., S. Lee, and M. Mackert. 2015. Matching temporal frame, self-view, and message frame valence: Persuasiveness in health communications. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 4: 388–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangan, P., S. N. Singh, M. J. Landau, and J. Choi. 2015. Impact of death-related television programming on advertising evaluation. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 4: 326–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, T. 2002. Sex in advertising research: a review of content, effects, and functions of sexual information in consumer advertising. Annual Review of Sex Research 13, no. 1: 241–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reichert, T., and J. Lambiase. 2003. One phenomenon, multiple lenses: Bridging perspectives to examine sex in advertising. In Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal, ed. Tom Reichert and Jacqueline Lambiase, 1–8. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sabri, O. 2012. Taboo advertising: Can humor help to attract attention and enhance recall? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 20, no. 4: 407–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sabri, O. 2017. Does viral communication context increase the harmfulness of controversial taboo advertising? Journal of Business Ethics 141, no. 2: 235–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri, O., and C. Obermiller. 2012. Consumer perception of taboo in ads. Journal of Business Research 65, no. 6: 869–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E. 2014. Agony and avoidance: Pixar, deniability, and the adult spectator. Journal of Popular Film and Television 42, no. 3: 150–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabbir, H., and D. Thwaites. 2007. The use of humor to mask deceptive advertising: It’s no laughing matter. Journal of Advertising 36, no. 2: 75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivulka, J. 2003. Historical and psychological perspectives of the erotic appeal in advertising. In Sex in advertising: Perspectives on the erotic appeal, ed. Tom Reichert and Jacqueline J. Lambiase, 39–63. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Theodorakis, I. G., and G. Painesis. 2018. The impact of psychological distance and construal level on consumers’ responses to taboos in advertising. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 2: 161–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, J. A., and F. C. Powell. 1988. Elements of death anxiety and meanings of death. Journal of Clinical Psychology 44, no. 5: 691–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorson, J.A., and F.C. Powell. 2015. A revised death anxiety scale. In Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application, ed. Robert A. Neimeyer, 31–43. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Twitchell, J.B. 1996. Adcult USA: The triumph of advertising in American culture. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vezina, R., and O. Paul. 1997. Provocation in advertising: A conceptualization and an empirical assessment. International Journal of Research in Marketing 14, no. 2: 177–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, D. S. 2005. A proposed response model for controversial advertising. Journal of Promotion Management 11, no. 2–3: 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T. 1991. Modern death: Taboo or not taboo? Sociology 25, no. 2: 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, T. 2012. Why different countries manage death differently: A comparative analysis of modern urban societies. The British Journal of Sociology 63, no. 1: 123–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M. G., and C. S. Gulas. 2019. The emergence of a half-century of research on humour in advertising: What have we learned? What do we still need to learn? International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 7: 911–56..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, J. G., J. V. Sparks, and T. M. Zimbres. 2018. The effect of exposure to sexual appeals in advertisements on memory, attitude, and purchase intention: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 2: 168–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar