The effects of sponsorship disclosures, advertising knowledge, and message involvement in sponsored influencer posts

References

• Amazeen, M.A., and B.W. Wojdynski. 2020. The effects of disclosure format on native advertising recognition and audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers. Journalism 21, no.12: 1965–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, J.C., and S. Durvasula. 1991. Suggestions for manipulating and measuring involvement in advertising message content. Advances in Consumer Research 18, 194–201.
   Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O., D.M. Hardesty, and R.L. Rose. 2001. Consumer Self-Confidence: Refinements in conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research 28, no.1: 121–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., E.A. van Reijmersdal, and P.C. Neijens. 2012. Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and Brand responses. Journal of Communication 62 no.6: 1047–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., E.A. van Reijmersdal, and P.C. Neijens. 2014. Effects of sponsorship disclosure timing on the processing of sponsored content: a study on the effectiveness of european disclosure regulations. Psychology & Marketing 31, no.3: 214–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., E.A. van Reijmersdal, E. Rozendaal, and A.L. Dima. 2018. Development of the persuasion knowledge scales of sponsored content (PKS-SC). International Journal of Advertising 37, no.5: 671–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., L.M. Willemsen, and E.P. Van Der Aa. 2017. This post is sponsored’ effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing 38, : 82–92. (May):.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, S.S., and J.W. Brehm. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M.C., and A. Kirmani. 2008. I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. In Handbook of consumer psychology, eds. Curtis P. Haugtvedt, Paul Herr, and Frank R. Kardes, 549–71. Marketing and Consumer Psychology Series. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Celsi, R.L., and J.C. Olson. 1988. The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research 15 no.2: 210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicco, R.D., S. Iacobucci, and S. Pagliaro. 2021. The effect of Influencer-Product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising 40, no.5: 733–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, A. 2020. “How Much Money Do Social Media Influencers Make? | Fox Business.” March 11, 2020. https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/social-media-influencer-pay.
   Google Scholar
• De Jans, S., V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2018. How an advertising disclosure alerts young adolescents to sponsored vlogs: the moderating role of a Peer-Based advertising literacy intervention through an informational vlog. Journal of Advertising 47 no.4: 309–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisend, M., E.A. van Reijmersdal, S.C. Boerman, and F. Tarrahi. 2020. A Meta-Analysis of the effects of disclosing sponsored content. Journal of Advertising 49, no.3: 344–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N. J., and D. Park. 2015. Rethinking the persuasion knowledge model: Schematic antecedents and associative outcomes of persuasion knowledge activation for covert advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 36, no.2: 157–76.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, N.J., J. Phua, J. Lim, and H. Jun. 2017. Disclosing instagram influencer advertising: the effects of disclosure language on advertising recognition, attitudes, and behavioral intent. Journal of Interactive Advertising 17, no.2: 138–49.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. 2019. “Disclosures 101: New FTC Resources for Social Media Influencers.” Federal Trade Commission. November 5, 2019. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/blogs/business-blog/2019/11/disclosures-101-new-ftc-resources-social-media-influencers.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, M.L., P.W.J. Verlegh, A. Kirmani, and E.G. Smit. 2015. A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. International Journal of Advertising 34, no.1: 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21 no.1: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2018. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis, second edition: a Regression-Based approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holiday, S., R.L. Densley, and M.S. Norman. 2021. Influencer marketing between mothers: The impact of disclosure and visual brand promotion. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no.3: 236–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, L., M.L. Fransen, R. Wulff, and E.A. van Reijmersdal. 2016. Brand placement disclosure effects on persuasion: The moderating role of consumer self-control: self-control and brand placement disclosure. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 15, no. 6: 503–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B.T., and A.H. Eagly. 1989. Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 106, no. 2: 290–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karson, E.J., and P.K. Korgaonkar. 2001. An experimental investigation of internet advertising and the elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 23 no.2: 53–72.
   Google Scholar
• Laczniak, R.N., D.D. Muehling, and S. Grossbart. 1989. Manipulating message involvement in advertising research. Journal of Advertising 18, no. 2: 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, C., W. Ma, and Y. Feng. 2021. A sponsorship disclosure is not enough? How advertising literacy intervention affects consumer reactions to sponsored influencer posts. Journal of Promotion Management 27, no.2: 278–305.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and B. Naderer. 2016. Product placement disclosures: Exploring the moderating effect of placement frequency on Brand responses via persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Advertising 35, no.2: 185–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R.L., E. Moyer-Gusé, and S. Byrne. 2007. All joking aside: a serious investigation into the persuasive effect of funny social issue messages. Communication Monographs 74 no.1: 29–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M.R., M.L.M. Wood, and H.-J. Paek. 2009. Increased persuasion knowledge of video news releases: Audience beliefs about news and support for source disclosure. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 no.4: 220–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., P. Brinol, and J.R. Priester. 2009. Mass media attitude change: implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research. eds. Jennings Bryant and Mary Beth Oliver, 3rd ed., 125–64. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J. Cacioppo. 1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer Series in Social Psychology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1979. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing Message-Relevant cognitive response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, no. 10: 1915–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., J.T. Cacioppo, and D. Schumann. 1983. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: the moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research 10, no. 2: 135–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. A.J. Strathman, and J.R. Priester. 1994. To think or not to think: exploring two routes to persuasion. In Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives, eds. Sharon Shavitt, and T.C. Brock, 113–47. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Reijmersdal, EV A. V., M. L. Fransen, G. V. Noort, S. J. Opree, L. Vandeberg, S. Reusch, F. V. Lieshout, and S.C. Boerman. 2016. Effects of disclosing sponsored content in blogs: How the use of resistance strategies mediates effects on persuasion. The American Behavioral Scientist 60, no.12: 1458–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0002764216660141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, E., M.A. Lapierre, E.A. van Reijmersdal, and M. Buijzen. 2011. Reconsidering advertising literacy as a defense against advertising effects. Media Psychology 14, no. 4: 333–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santerralli, E. 2019. Sponsored Content: What You Need to Know (and 9 Examples!). September 30, 2019. https://www.activecampaign.com/blog/sponsored-content.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., X. Li, Y. K. Choi, and S. Yoon. 2018. Narrative transportation and paratextual features of social media in viral advertising. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirrah, A. 2019. Guide to native advertising. Columbia Journalism Review. September 6, 2019. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/native-ads.php/.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, N., and S. N. Singh. 2004. Measuring attitude toward the Brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 26, no.2: 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Trivedi, J., and R. Sama. 2020. The effect of influencer marketing on consumers’ Brand admiration and online purchase intentions: an emerging market perspective. Journal of Internet Commerce 19 no.1: 103–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, T.J., E. Kim, L. Wu, and N.A. Dodoo. 2020. Activating persuasion knowledge in native advertising: the influence of cognitive load and disclosure language. International Journal of Advertising 39, no.1: 74–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W., and N.J. Evans. 2016. Going native: Effects of disclosure position and language on the recognition and evaluation of online native advertising. Journal of Advertising 45 no.2: 157–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B.W., and N.J. Evans. 2019. The covert advertising recognition and effects (CARE) model: Processes of persuasion in native advertising and other masked formats. International Journal of Advertising 39, no.1: 4-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1658438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodroof, P.J., K.M. Howie, H.A. Syrdal, and R. VanMeter. 2020. What’s done in the dark will be brought to the light: Effects of influencer transparency on product efficacy and purchase intentions. Journal of Product & Brand Management 29, no.5: 675–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Y. Huang, R. Li, D. S. Bortree, F. Yang, A. Xiao, and R. Wang. 2016. A tale of two sources in native advertising: Examining the effects of source credibility and priming on content, organizations, and media evaluations. American Behavioral Scientist 60, no.12: 1492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Z. 2015. The role of motivation affecting the influence of narratives and exemplification in health messages. Master’s thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, C.Y. 2009. The effects of persuasion knowledge on click-through of keyword search ads: Moderating role of search task and perceived fairness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 86, no.2: 401–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F107769900908600209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. 1994. The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising 23no.4: 59–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., and B. Tan. 2007. Effectiveness of blog advertising: Impact of communicator expertise, advertising intent, and product involvement. ICIS 2007 Proceedings, 121. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2007/121.
   Google Scholar