The ethical ramifications of surveillance in contemporary advertising for the industry, consumers, and regulators: current issues and a future research agenda

References

• Araujo, T., J. Ausloos, W. van Atteveldt, F. Loecherbach, J. Moeller, J. Ohme, … K. Welbers. 2021. OSD2F: An open-source data donation framework.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., S. Kruikemeier, and F. J. Zuiderveen Borgesius. 2017. Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 3: 363–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchi, M., N. Festic, and M. Latzer. 2022. The chilling effects of digital dataveillance: A theoretical model and an empirical research agenda. Big Data & Society 9, no. 1: 205395172110653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M, and I. Szmigin. 2000. The ethical advertising covenant: Regulating ageism in UK advertising. International Journal of Advertising 19, no. 4: 509–28.
   Google Scholar
• Chonko, L. B., S. D. Hunt, and R. D. Howell. 1987. Ethics and the American advertising federation principles. International Journal of Advertising 6, no. 3: 265–74.
   Google Scholar
• Christl, W. 2017. Corporate surveillance in everyday life. https://crackedlabs.org/en/corporate-surveillance
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P.H. 1999. Ethics of Advertising. In The advertising business, ed. John Philip Jones, 499–513. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Degeling, M., C. Utz, C. Lentzsch, H. Hosseini, F. Schaub, and T. Holz. 2019. We value your privacy. Now take some cookies: Measuring the GDPR’s impact on web privacy. In Proceedings 2019 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium:1-20. San Diego, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dignum, V. 2018. Ethics in artificial intelligence: Introduction to the special issue. Ethics and Information Technology 20, no. 1: 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drumwright, M. E, and P. E. Murphy. 2009. The current state of advertising ethics. Journal of Advertising 38, no. 1: 83–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Data Protection Authority. 2013. Opinion 03/2013 on purpose limitation. https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2013/wp203_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finn, R. L, and K. Wadhwa. 2014. The ethics of “smart” advertising and regulatory initiatives in the consumer intelligence industry. info 16, no. 3: 22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. R., M. B. Stafford, D. A. Sheinin, and K. Pounders. 2021. The dance between darkness and light: A systematic review of advertising’s role in consumer well-being (1980-2020). International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 4: 491–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hailey, G. D. 1989. The federal trade commission, the Supreme Court and restrictions on professional advertising. International Journal of Advertising 8, no. 1: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hegelich, S. 2020. Facebook needs to share more with researchers. Nature 579, no. 7800: 473–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helberger, N, and N. Diakopoulos. 2022. The European AI act and how it matters for research into AI in media and journalism. Digital Journalism. Online First. 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helberger, N., J. Huh, G. Milne, J. Strycharz, and H. Sundaram. 2020. Macro and exogenous factors in computational advertising: Key issues and new research directions. Journal of Advertising 49, no. 4: 377–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helberger, N., O. Lynskey, H.-W. Micklitz, P. Rott, M. Sax, and J. Strycharz. 2021. EU Consumer Protection 2.0. Structural asymmetries in digital consumer markets. A joint report from research conducted under the EUCP2.0 project. Retrieved from https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2021-018_eu_consumer_protection.0_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, M. R., R. Tansey, and J. W. Clark. 1994. Research on advertising ethics: Past, present, and future. Journal of Advertising 23, no. 3: 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., L. Yu, and W. He. 2019. The impact of GDPR on global technology development. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 22, no. 1: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. 2002. Surveillance as social sorting: Computer codes and mobile bodies. In Surveillance as social sorting, ed. David Lyon: 27–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manokha, I. 2018. Surveillance, panopticism, and self-discipline in the digital age. Surveillance & Society 16, no. 2: 219–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. 2012. The public domain: Social surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society 9, no. 4: 378–93.
   Google Scholar
• Nevett, T. 1985. The ethos of advertising. F.P. Bishop reconsidered. International Journal of Advertising 4, no. 4: 297–304.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. 1975. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology 91, no. 1: 93–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C. M., J. Strycharz, A. Riegelman, and C. Hennesy. 2021. A literature review of personalization transparency and control: Introducing the transparency-awareness-control framework. Media and Communication 9, no. 4: 120–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, E. G., G. Van Noort, and H. A. Voorveld. 2014. Understanding online behavioural advertising: User knowledge, privacy concerns and online coping behaviour in Europe. Computers in Human Behavior 32: 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strycharz, J., G. Van Noort, N. Helberger, and E. Smit. 2019. Contrasting perspectives – practitioner’s viewpoint on personalised marketing communication. European Journal of Marketing 53no.4: 635–60. doi:10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strycharz, J, and B. B. Duivenvoorde. 2021. The exploitation of vulnerability through personalised marketing communication: Are consumers protected? Internet Policy Review 10, no. 4: 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, J. 2012. The daily you. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Gogh, R., M. Walrave, and K. Poels. 2021. Personalization and digital marketing: Implementation strategies and the corresponding ethical issues. In The SAGE handbook of marketing ethics, eds. Lynne Eagle, Stephan Dahl, Patrick De Pelsmacker & Charles R. Taylor. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ooijen, I, and H. U. Vrabec. 2019. Does the GDPR enhance consumers’ control over personal data? An analysis from a behavioural perspective. Journal of Consumer Policy 42, no. 1: 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, J. T., U. Pamuksuz, and B. R. Duff. 2019. Are we who we follow? Computationally analyzing human personality and brand following on twitter. International Journal of Advertising, 38, no. 5: 776–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, J. T., C. M. Segijn, S. Pearson, E. C. Malthouse, J. A. Konstan, and V. Shankar. 2020. Challenges and future direction of computational advertising measurement systems. Journal of Advertising 49, no. 4: 446–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar