Publication Cover
International Journal of Advertising
The Review of Marketing Communications
Volume 42, 2023 - Issue 6
3,206
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When brands get real: the role of authenticity and electronic word-of-mouth in shaping consumer response to brands taking a stand

, &
Pages 1037-1064 | Received 22 Nov 2021, Accepted 17 Oct 2022, Published online: 02 Nov 2022

References

  • Alhouti, S., C. M. Johnson, and B. B. Holloway. 2016. Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Research 69, no. 3: 1242–9.
  • Anderson, J. C, and D. W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103, no. 3: 411–23.
  • Ansary, A, and N. M. H. N. Hashim. 2018. Brand image and equity: The mediating role of brand equity drivers and moderating effects of product type and word of mouth. Review of Managerial Science 12, no. 4: 969–1002.
  • Ashley, C, and T. Tuten. 2015. Creative strategies in social media marketing: An exploratory study of branded social content and consumer engagement. Psychology & Marketing 32, no. 1: 15–27.
  • Aslin, T. M, and M. L. Rothschild. 1987. An introduction to a cognitive-behavioral perspective of consumer behavior. Advances in Consumer Research 14: 566.
  • Araujo, T., P. Neijens, and R. Vliegenthart. 2017. Getting the word out on twitter: The role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 3: 496–513.
  • Beard, A. 2021. Why Ben & Jerry’s speaks out. Harvard Business Review, January 13. https://hbr.org/2021/01/why-ben-jerrys-speaks-out (accessed September 6, 2021).
  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., B. A. Cudmore, and R. P. Hill. 2006. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research 59, no. 1: 46–53.
  • Becker, M., N. Wiegand, and W. J. Reinartz. 2019. Does it pay to be real? Understanding authenticity in TV advertising. Journal of Marketing 83, no. 1: 24–50.
  • Beverland, M. B, and F. J. Farrelly. 2010. The quest for authenticity in consumption: Consumers’ purposive choice of authentic cues to shape experienced outcomes. Journal of Consumer Research 36, no. 5: 838–56.
  • Beverland, M. B., A. Lindgreen, and M. W. Vink. 2008. Projecting authenticity through advertising: Consumer judgments of advertisers’ claims. Journal of Advertising 37, no. 1: 5–15.
  • Bhagwat, Y., N. L. Warren, J. T. Beck, and G. F. Watson. IV. 2020. Corporate sociopolitical activism and firm value. Journal of Marketing 84, no. 5: 1–21.
  • Bhattacharya, C. B, and S. Sen. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47, no. 1: 9–24.
  • Bigné-Alcañiz, E., R. Currás-Pérez, and I. Sánchez-García. 2009. Brand credibility in cause-related marketing: The moderating role of consumer values. Journal of Product & Brand Management 18, no. 6: 437–47.
  • Brown, S., R. V. Kozinets, and J. F. Sherry, Jr. 2003. Teaching old brands new tricks: Retro branding and the revival of brand meaning. Journal of Marketing 67, no. 3: 19–33.
  • Brown, T. J, and P. A. Dacin. 1997. The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of Marketing 61, no. 1: 68–84.
  • Buvár, A, and G. Orosz. 2020. “Branded, biased and it wants to sell a product”: Typical ad representations influence the effect of ad recognition: A mixed-method research. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 1: 32–50.
  • Carù, A., M. C. Ostillio, and G. Leone. 2017. Corporate museums to enhance brand authenticity in luxury goods companies: The case of Salvatore Ferragamo. International Journal of Arts Management 19, no. 2: 32–45.
  • Cassidy, P. 2017. Survey finds consumers crave authenticity - and user-generated content delivers. Social Media Today, November 21. https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/survey-finds-consumers-crave-authenticity-and-user-generated-content-deli/511360/ (accessed September 10, 2021).
  • Chaudhuri, A, and M. B. Holbrook. 2001. The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing 65, no. 2: 81–93.
  • Chéron, E., F. Kohlbacher, and K. Kusuma. 2012. The effects of brand-cause fit and campaign duration on consumer perception of cause-related marketing in Japan. Journal of Consumer Marketing 29, no. 5: 357–68.
  • Cho, S., J. Huh, and R. J. Faber. 2014. The influence of sender trust and advertiser trust on multistage effects of viral advertising. Journal of Advertising 43, no. 1: 100–14.
  • Chu, S. C, and H. T. Chen. 2019. Impact of consumers’ corporate social responsibility-related activities in social media on brand attitude, electronic word-of-mouth intention, and purchase intention: A study of chinese consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 18, no. 6: 453–62.
  • Chu, S. C, and Y. Kim. 2011. Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising 30, no. 1: 47–75.
  • Dabbous, A., K. Aoun Barakat, and B. de Quero Navarro. 2021. Fake news detection and social media trust: A cross-cultural perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology 1–20.
  • De Bruyn, A, and G. L. Lilien. 2008. A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 25, no. 3: 151–63.
  • De Veirman, M., V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2017. Marketing through instagram influencers: The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 5: 798–828.
  • Delgado-Ballester, E., J. L. Munuera-Aleman, and M. J. Yague-Guillen. 2003. Development and validation of a brand trust scale. International Journal of Market Research 45, no. 1: 35–54.
  • Doney, P. M, and J. P. Cannon. 1997. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing 61, no. 2: 35–51.
  • Edelman 2018. Trust barometer special report: Brands and social media. Edelman, June 18. https://www.edelman.com/research/trust-barometer-brands-social-media#top (accessed September 6, 2021).
  • Edelman 2020. A universal demand for change. Edelman, June 9. https://www.edelman.com/research/universal-demand-change (accessed September 6, 2021).
  • Ellen, P. S., D. J. Webb, and L. A. Mohr. 2006. Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34, no. 2: 147–57.
  • Elving, W. J. 2013. Skepticism and corporate social responsibility communications: The influence of fit and reputation. Journal of Marketing Communications 19, no. 4: 277–92.
  • Eyada, B. 2020. Brand activism, the relation and impact on consumer perception: A case study on Nike advertising. International Journal of Marketing Studies 12, no. 4: 30–42.
  • Ferguson, R. J., M. Paulin, and E. Leiriao. 2006. Loyalty and positive word-of-mouth: Patients and hospital personnel as advocates of a customer-centric health care organization. Health Marketing Quarterly 23, no. 3: 59–77.
  • Fernandes, J., S. Segev, and J.K. Leopold. 2020. When consumers learn to spot deception in advertising: Testing a literacy intervention to combat greenwashing. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 7: 1115–49.
  • Fisher, R. J, and K. Wakefield. 1998. Factors leading to group identification: A field study of winners and losers. Psychology and Marketing 15, no. 1: 23–40.
  • Folkes, V. S. 1988. Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research 14, no. 4: 548–65.
  • Fornell, C, and D. F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 1: 39–50.
  • Fujita, M., P. Harrigan, and G. N. Soutar. 2018. Capturing and co-creating student experiences in social media: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 26, no. 1–2: 55–71.
  • Gao, Y. L, and A. S. Mattila. 2014. Improving consumer satisfaction in green hotels: The roles of perceived warmth, perceived competence, and CSR motive. International Journal of Hospitality Management 42: 20–31.
  • Goldsmith, E. R, and Z. Yimin. 2014. The influences of brand-consumer and cause-congruence on consumer responses to cause related marketing. Journal of Applied Marketing Theory 5, no. 2: 74–95.
  • Gupta, S, and J. Pirsch. 2006. The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 23, no. 6: 314–26.
  • Hair, J.F., G.T.M. Hult, C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2021. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hart, E. 2021. How brand activism influences consumer decisions. Jungle Scout, October 26. https://www.junglescout.com/blog/brand-activism/ (accessed August 14, 2022).
  • Hayes, J. L., S. Holiday, and H. Park. 2022. Corporate social responsibility & the advertising strategic planning process: A literature review & research agenda. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 210–32.
  • Hennig-Thurau, T., K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, and D. D. Gremler. 2004. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18, no. 1: 38–52.
  • Hernandez-Fernandez, A, and M.C. Lewis. 2019. Brand authenticity leads to perceived value and brand trust. European Journal of Management and Business Economics 28, no. 3: 222–38.
  • Holt, D. B. 2002. Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research 29, no. 1: 70–90.
  • Hong, C, and C. Li. 2021. Will consumers silence themselves when brands speak up about sociopolitical issues? Applying the spiral of silence theory to consumer boycott and buycott behaviors. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 33, no. 2: 193–211.
  • Huang, L., J. Zhang, H. Liu, and L. Liang. 2014. The effect of online and offline word-of-mouth on new product diffusion. Journal of Strategic Marketing 22, no. 2: 177–89.
  • Hydock, C., N. Paharia, and S. Blair. 2020. Should your brand pick a side? How market share determines the impact of corporate political advocacy. Journal of Marketing Research 57, no. 6: 1135–51.
  • Jeon, M. A, and D. An. 2019. A study on the relationship between perceived CSR motives, authenticity and company attitudes: A comparative analysis of cause promotion and cause-related marketing. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility 4, no. 1: 1–14.
  • Joo, S., E. G. Miller, and J. S. Fink. 2019. Consumer evaluations of CSR authenticity: Development and validation of a multidimensional CSR authenticity scale. Journal of Business Research 98: 236–49.
  • Kees, J., C. Berry, S. Burton, and K. Sheehan. 2017. An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and amazon’s mechanical turk. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 1: 141–55.
  • Kelleher, S. 2019. Brand activism: Do consumers care? Comscore, August 29. https://www.comscore.com/por/Insights/Blog/Brand-activism-do-consumers-care (accessed September 10, 2021).
  • Keller, K.L. 1998. Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Kelley, H.H. 1967. Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 15: 192–238.
  • Kim, B.S, and M. Pittman. 2016. Amazon’s mechanical Turk for academics. Irvine, CA: Melvin & Leigh.
  • Kim, D. Y, and H.-Y. Kim. 2021. Trust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research 134: 223–32.
  • Kim, S, and H. Lee. 2020. The effect of CSR fit and CSR authenticity on the brand attitude. Sustainability 12, no. 1: 275. doi:10.3390/su12104159.
  • Kozinets, R. V., K. de Valck, A. C. Wojnicki, and S. J. S. Wilner. 2010. Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing 74, no. 2: 71–89.
  • Kuo, A, and D. H. Rice. 2015. The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Consumer Psychology 25, no. 1: 78–88.
  • Laffan, D. A. 2021. Positive psychosocial outcomes and fanship in K-pop fans: A social identity theory perspective. Psychological Reports 124, no. 5: 2272–85.
  • Lam, S. K., M. Ahearne, Y. Hu, and N. Schillewaert. 2010. Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing 74, no. 6: 128–46.
  • Lange, D, and N. T. Washburn. 2012. Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review 37, no. 2: 300–26.
  • Lee, M, and H. J. Yoon. 2020. When brand activism advertising campaign goes viral: An analysis of always #LIKEAGIRL video networks on YouTube. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology 8, no. 2: 146–58.
  • Li, J. Y., J. K. Kim, and K. Alharbi. 2022. Exploring the role of issue involvement and brand attachment in shaping consumer response toward corporate social advocacy (CSA) initiatives: The case of nike’s colin kaepernick campaign. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 233–57.
  • Lin, W. Y., X. Zhang, H. Song, and K. Omori. 2016. Health information seeking in the web 2.0 age: Trust in social media, uncertainty reduction, and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior 56: 289–94.
  • López, M, and M. Sicilia. 2014. eWOM as source of influence: The impact of participation in eWOM and perceived source trustworthiness on decision making. Journal of Interactive Advertising 14, no. 2: 86–97.
  • Luo, X, and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2009. The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing 73, no. 6: 198–213.
  • Mantovani, D., L. M. de Andrade, and A. Negrão. 2017. How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 36: 156–63.
  • Mar García-de los Salmones, M., A. Herrero, and P. Martínez. 2021. Determinants of electronic word-of-mouth on social networking sites about negative news on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics 171, no. 3: 583–97.
  • Martínez, P., Á. Herrero and, and M. D. Mar García-de los Salmones. 2020. Determinants of eWOM on hospitality CSR issues. In facebook we trust? Journal of Sustainable Tourism 28, no. 10: 1479–97.
  • Mason, W, and S. Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on amazon’s mechanical turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, no. 1: 1–23.
  • Mohr, L. A., D. Eroǧlu, and P. S. Ellen. 1998. The development and testing of a measure of skepticism toward environmental claims in marketers’ communications. Journal of Consumer Affairs 32, no. 1: 30–55.
  • Morgan, R. M, and S. D. Hunt. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing 58, no. 3: 20–38.
  • Morhart, F., L. Malär, A. Guèvremont, F. Girardin, and B. Grohmann. 2015. Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology 25, no. 2: 200–18.
  • Muehling, D. D. 1987. An investigation of factors underlying attitude-toward-advertising-in-general. Journal of Advertising 16, no. 1: 32–40.
  • Mukherjee, S, and N. Althuizen. 2020. Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand? International Journal of Research in Marketing 37, no. 4: 772–88.
  • Nan, X, and K. Heo. 2007. Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives: Examining the role of brand-cause fit in cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising 36, no. 2: 63–74.
  • Nunes, J. C., A. Ordanini, and G. Giambastiani. 2021. The concept of authenticity: What it means to consumers. Journal of Marketing 85, no. 4: 1–20.
  • Osgood, C. E, and P. H. Tannenbaum. 1955. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review 62, no. 1: 42–55.
  • Pronschinske, M., M. D. Groza, and M. Walker. 2012. Attracting facebook ‘fans’: The importance of authenticity and engagement as a social networking strategy for professional sport teams. Sport Marketing Quarterly 21: 221–31.
  • Rifon, N. J., S. M. Choi, C. S. Trimble, and H. Li. 2004. Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising 33, no. 1: 30–42.
  • Sarkar, C, and P. Kotler. 2018. Brand activism: From purpose to action. Houston, TX: Idea Bite Press.
  • Sarstedt, M., P. Bengart, A. M. Shaltoni, and S. Lehmann. 2018. The use of sampling methods in advertising research: A gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 4: 650–63.
  • Schaefer, S. D., R. Terlutter, and S. Diehl. 2020. Talking about CSR matters: Employees’ perception of and reaction to their company’s CSR communication in four different CSR domains. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 191–212.
  • Scheinbaum, A. C., R. Lacey, and M. Drumwright. 2019. Social responsibility and event-sponsor portfolio fit: Positive outcomes for events and brand sponsors. European Journal of Marketing 53, no. 2: 138–63.
  • Schmidt, S. H., M. B. Shreffler, M. E. Hambrick, and B. S. Gordon. 2018. An experimental examination of activist type and effort on brand image and purchase intentions. Sport Marketing Quarterly 27, no. 1: 31–43.
  • Schomer, A, and D.A. Williamson. 2021. Digital trust benchmark report 2021. eMarketer, October 25. https://www.emarketer.com/content/digital-trust-benchmark-report-2021. (accessed March 15, 2021).
  • Sheikh, S, and R. Beise-Zee. 2011. Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR. Journal of Consumer Marketing 28, no. 1: 27–39.
  • Shoenberger, H., E. A. Kim, and E. K. Johnson. 2020. # BeingReal about instagram ad models: The effects of perceived authenticity: How image modification of female body size alters advertising attitude and buying intention. Journal of Advertising Research 60, no. 2: 197–207.
  • Sibai, O., L. Mimoun, and A. Boukis. 2021. Authenticating brand activism: Negotiating the boundaries of free speech to make a change. Psychology & Marketing 38, no. 10: 1651–69.
  • Siddiqui, M. S., U. A. Siddiqui, M. A. Khan, I. G. Alkandi, A. K. Saxena, and J. H. Siddiqui. 2021. Creating electronic word of mouth credibility through social networking sites and determining its impact on brand image and online purchase intentions in India. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16, no. 4: 1008–24.
  • Siuki, H, and C. M. Webster. 2021. Social good or self-interest: Incentivizing consumer social media engagement behaviour for health messages. Psychology & Marketing 38, no. 8: 1293–313.
  • Skarmeas, D, and C. N. Leonidou. 2013. When consumers doubt, watch out! the role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 10: 1831–8.
  • Smith, N. C, and D. Korschun. 2018. Finding the Middle ground in a politically polarized world. MIT Sloan Management Review 60, no. 1: 1–5.
  • Sprout Social 2018. #Brandsgetreal: Championing change in the age of social media. SproutSocial. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/data/championing-change-in-the-age-of-social-media/ (accessed September 10, 2021).
  • Sprout Social 2020. Social media activism in 2020: New insights for brands. SproutSocial. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/data/social-media-activism-in-2020/ (accessed September 2021).
  • Statista 2021. Number of social network users worldwide from 2017 to 2025. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/278414/number-of-worldwide-social-network-users/ (accessed September 10, 2021).
  • Sung, Y. H., R. E. Lim, and W. N. Lee. 2022. Does company size matter in corporate social responsibility? An examination of the impact of company size and cause proximity fit on consumer response. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 284–308.
  • Swann, P. 2019. Cases in public relations management: The rise of social media and activism. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Swant, M. 2021. Silence is not an option: Research shows consumers expect CEOs to take a stand on political issues. Forbes, April 19. https://www.forbes.com/sites/martyswant/2021/04/19/silence-is-not-an-option-research-shows-consumers-expect-ceos-to-take-a-stand-on-political-issues/?sh=38307b3046c6 (accessed September 10, 2021).
  • Tajfel, H. 1982. Social identity and intergroup relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tajfel, H, and J.C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of inter-group relations, ed. W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33–47. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing.
  • Tarlton, A. 2020. 40 brands that are encouraging people to vote in the 2020 election. USATODAY, October 5. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/reviewedcom/2020/10/05/40-brands-encouraging-people-vote-2020-election-nordstrom-under-armour-target-and-more/3620750001/ (accessed September 10, 2021).
  • Thackeray, R., B. L. Neiger, C. L. Hanson, and J. F. McKenzie. 2008. Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: Use of web 2.0 social media. Health Promotion Practice 9, no. 4: 338–43.
  • Thomas, M. L., J. P. Fraedrich, and L. G. Mullen. 2011. Successful cause-related marketing partnering as a means to aligning corporate and philanthropic goals: An empirical study. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal 15, no. 2: 113–32.
  • Voorveld, H. A. 2019. Brand communication in social media: A research agenda. Journal of Advertising 48, no. 1: 14–26.
  • Vredenburg, J., S. Kapitan, A. Spry, and J. A. Kemper. 2020. Brands taking a stand: Authentic brand activism or woke washing? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 39, no. 4: 444–60.
  • Walker, M., B. Heere, M. M. Parent, and D. Drane. 2010. Social responsibility and the olympic games: The mediating role of consumer attributions. Journal of Business Ethics 95, no. 4: 659–80.
  • Warren, C., E. P. Carter, and A. P. McGraw. 2019. Being funny is not enough: The influence of perceived humor and negative emotional reactions on brand attitudes. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 7: 1025–45.
  • Wen, T. J., E. Kim, L. Wu, and N. A. Dodoo. 2020. Activating persuasion knowledge in native advertising: The influence of cognitive load and disclosure language. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 1: 74–93.
  • Wirtz, J, and P. Chew. 2002. The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word-of-mouth behaviour. International Journal of Service Industry Management 13, no. 2: 141–62.
  • Wojciszke, B., R. Bazinska, and M. Jaworski. 1998. On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24, no. 12: 1251–63.
  • Xu, Y., J. Du, F. Shahzad, and X. Li. 2021. Untying the influence of green brand authenticity on electronic word-of-mouth intention: A moderation-mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 724452.
  • Yoo, S. C., D. Piscarac, S. M. Kang, and T. A. Truong. 2021. Brand activism in the age of transmedia: Lessons learned from business practices. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology 9, no. 1: 64–9.
  • Yoon, Y., Z. Gürhan-Canli, and N. Schwarz. 2006. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16, no. 4: 377–90.
  • Yoon, Y., C. Polpanumas, and Y. J. Park. 2017. The impact of word of mouth via twitter on moviegoers’ decisions and film revenues: Revisiting prospect theory: How WOM about movies drives loss-aversion and reference-dependence behaviors. Journal of Advertising Research 57, no. 2: 144–58.
  • Zorrilla, M. 2020. Consumers want brands to take a moral stand on racial justice. ADWEEK, June 9. https://www.adweek.com/commerce/consumers-want-brands-to-take-a-moral-stand-on-racial-justice-edelman-study-shows/amp/ (accessed September 6, 2021).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.