Sustainability advertising: literature review and framework for future research

References

• Ahmad, A., and S. Thyagaraj. 2015. Consumer’s intention to purchase green brands: The roles of environmental concern, environmental knowledge and self expressive benefits. Current World Environment 10, no. 3: 879–89.
   Google Scholar
• Antea Group. 2021. ESG vs. CSR: Key distinctions and what businesses need to know. https://us.anteagroup.com/news-events/blog/esg-csr-definitions-differences-sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, no. 2: 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., and F. Martin. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Aouadi, A., and S. Marsat. 2018. Do ESG controversies matter for firm value? Evidence from international data. Journal of Business Ethics 151, no. 4: 1027–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong Soule, C. A., and B. J. Reich. 2015. Less is more: Is a green demarketing strategy sustainable? Journal of Marketing Management 31, no. 13–14: 1403–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballestar, M. T., M. Cuerdo-Mir, and M. T. Freire-Rubio. 2020. The concept of sustainability on social media: A social listening approach. Sustainability 12, no. 5: 2122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, T. 2015. Don’t confuse sustainability with CSR. https://iveybusinessjournal.com/dont-confuse-sustainability-with-csr/.
   Google Scholar
• Barbarossa, C., and P. De Pelsmacker. 2016. Positive and negative antecedents of purchasing eco-friendly products: A comparison between green and non-green consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 134, no. 2: 229–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbarossa, C., and A. Pastore. 2015. Why environmentally conscious consumers do not purchase green products: A cognitive mapping approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 18, no. 2: 188–209.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, J., M. J. Reinders, C. Broersen, and S. Hendriks. 2020. Communicating the fair trade message: The roles of reputation and fit. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 4: 523–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickart, B., and A. Julie. 2012. Green eco-seals and advertising persuasion. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 4: 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, J., N. Johns, and D. Kilburn. 2011. An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics 98, no. 4: 597–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechman, J. Marie, and S. C. Purvis. 2015. Narrative transportation and advertising. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 2: 366–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business Litigation Report. 2021. Greenwashing claims on the rise: Avoiding dirty laundry. https://www.quinnemanuel.com/the-firm/publications/lead-article-greenwashing-claims-on-the-rise-avoiding-dirty-laundry/.
   Google Scholar
• Business Wire. 2021. Recent study reveals that more than a third of consumers are willing to pay more for sustainability as demand grows for environmentally-friendly alternatives. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20211014005090/en/Recent-Study-Reveals-More-Than-a-Third-of-Global-Consumers-Are-Willing-to-Pay-More-for-Sustainability-as-Demand-Grows-for-Environmentally-Friendly-Alternatives.
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland, G.H. 1987. Our common future: The world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, L., S. J. Grove, and N. Kangun. 1993. A content analysis of environmental advertising claims: A matrix method approach. Journal of Advertising 22, no. 3: 27–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan, M., and A. Attalla. 2001. The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing 18, no. 7: 560–78.
   Google Scholar
• Catlin, J. R., M. G. Luchs, and M. Phipps. 2017. Consumer perceptions of the social vs. environmental dimensions of sustainability. Journal of Consumer Policy 40, no. 3: 245–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. 2011. Feeling ambivalent about going green. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 4: 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., L. Zhang, and G.-X. Xie. 2015. Message framing in green advertising: The effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 1: 158–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., H. Chen, J. Yang, R. Long, and Q. Li. 2018. Impact of information intervention on the recycling behavior of individuals with different value orientations—An experimental study on express delivery packaging waste. Sustainability 10, no. 10: 3617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., C.-L. Lin, and C.-H. Chang. 2014. The influence of greenwash on green word-of-mouth (green WOM): The mediation effects of green perceived quality and green satisfaction. Quality & Quantity 48, no. 5: 2411–25.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S, and C.-H. Chang. 2012. Enhance green purchase intentions: The roles of green perceived value, green perceived risk, and green trust. Management Decision 50, no. 3: 502–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., and C.-H. Ching. 2013. Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics 114: 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, D., J. Ketchen, and F. S. Stanley. 2011. Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39: 86–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E., S. Gupta, and Y.-K. Kim. 2015. Style consumption: Its drivers and role in sustainable apparel consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39, no. 6: 661–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y.-N., and C. R. Taylor. 2020. The role of ambiguity and skepticism in the effectiveness of sustainability labeling. Journal of Business Research 120: 379–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. M., and N. J. Rifon. 2012. “It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 29, no. 9: 639–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T. 2007. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10, no. 3: 163–76.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, K., and F. Guzman. 2020. How CSR reputation, sustainability signals, and country-of-origin sustainability reputation contribute to corporate brand performance: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Research 117: 683–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, E. 2020. Sustainably-marketed products drove more than half of all growth across CPGs in past five years. https://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Article/2020/07/23/Sustainably-marketed-products-drove-more-than-half-of-all-growth-across-CPGs-in-past-five-years
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, S., T. M. Reilly, L. Carlson, S. J. Grove, and M. J. Dorsch. 2014. Investigating the portrayal and influence of sustainability claims in an environmental advertising context. Journal of Macromarketing 34, no. 3: 332–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pelsmacker, P., M. Geuens, and P. Anckaert. 2002. Media context and advertising effectiveness: The role of context appreciation and context/ad similarity. Journal of Advertising 31, no. 2: 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del, G. A., and R. Silvia. 2020. Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct. Sustainability 12, no. 14: 5670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, S., R. Terlutter, and B. Mueller. 2015. Doing good matters to consumers: The effectiveness of humane-oriented CSR appeals in cross-cultural standardized advertising campaigns. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 4: 730–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dono, J., J. Webb, and B. Richardson. 2010. The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behavior, and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, no. 2: 178–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., and L. E. Preston. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review 20, no. 1: 65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza, C., M. Taghian, and P. Lamb. 2006. An empirical study on the influence of environmental labels on consumers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 11, no. 2: 162–73.
   Google Scholar
• Du, S., C. B. Bhattacharya, and S. Sen. 2010. Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews 12, no. 1: 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, X. 2015. How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics 128, no. 3: 547–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyllick, T., and K. Hockerts. 2002. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment 11, no. 2: 130–41.
   Google Scholar
• Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen, P. S., D. J. Webb, and L. A. Mohr. 2006. Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34, no. 2: 147–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmert, A. 2021. The rise of the eco-friendly consumer. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/The-rise-of-the-eco-friendly-consumer.
   Google Scholar
• ESG Report. 2021. What is social washing? https://www.esgthereport.com/what-is-social-washing/
   Google Scholar
• Essoussi, L. H., and J. D. Linton. 2010. New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay? Journal of Consumer Marketing 27, no. 5: 458–68.
   Google Scholar
• Erdem, T., S. Joffre, and V. Ana. 2006. Brands as signals: A cross-country validation study. Journal of Marketing 70, no. 1: 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finisterra, A. D. M., and R. Reis. 2012. Factors affecting skepticism toward green advertising. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 4: 147–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follows, S. B., and D. Jobber. 2000. Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing 34: 723–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, M. L., P. W. Verlegh, A. Kirmani, and E. G. Smit. 2015. A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 1: 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frooman, J. 1997. Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society 36, no. 3: 221–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gangadharbatla, H. 2021. Covid-19 and advertising: The case for a paradigm shift. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no. 1: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilg, A., S. Barr, and N. Ford. 2005. Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures 37, no. 6: 481–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleim, M., J. S. Smith, D. Andrews, and J. J. Cronin, Jr. 2013. Against the green: A multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing 89, no. 1: 44–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, M., and B. Timothy. 2013. Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research 66, no. 10: 1945–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., and D. T. Ogden. 2009. To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26, no. 6: 378–93.
   Google Scholar
• Haaland, M. 2021. Americans believe these sustainability terms are overused by many of today’s companies. https://swnsdigital.com/us/2021/06/americans-believe-these-sustainability-terms-are-overused-by-many-of-todays-companies/
   Google Scholar
• Haley, E. 1996. Exploring the construct of organization as source: Consumers’ understandings of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising. Journal of Advertising 25, no. 2: 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, E., and M. Pittman. 2022. Remembering the FCB grid: Thinking, feeling, and involvement in the age of social media. Journal of Advertising 51, no. 2: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Han, N. R., T. H. Baek, S. Yoon, and Y. Kim. 2019. Is that coffee mug smiling at me? How anthropomorphism impacts the effectiveness of desirability vs. feasibility appeals in sustainability advertising. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 51: 352–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P., and V. Apaolaza-Ibáñez. 2009. Green advertising revisited: Conditioning virtual nature experiences. International Journal of Advertising 28, no. 4: 715–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, P., V. Apaolaza, C. D’souza, J. M. Barrutia, and C. Echebarria. 2014. Environmental threat appeals in green advertising: The role of fear arousal and coping efficacy. International Journal of Advertising 33, no. 4: 741–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holger, D. 2023. Many Companies Boost Sustainability Budgets Despite Economic Uncertainty, The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/articles/many-companies-boost-sustainability-budgets-despite-economic-uncertainty-11675176684.
   Google Scholar
• Hur, S., J. E. Lee, and L. Stoel. 2020. Fair trade advertising: Influences of information type and emotional appeal congruency. Journal of Marketing Communications 26, no. 2: 186–206.
   Google Scholar
• Ishaswini, N., and S. K. Datta. 2011. Pro-environmental concern influencing green buying: A study on Indian consumers. International Journal of Business and Management 6, no. 6: 124–33.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, C., and J. Vanhamme. 2015. Theoretical lenses for understanding the CSR–consumer paradox. Journal of Business Ethics 130, no. 4: 775–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangun, N., L. Carlson, and S. J. Grove. 1991. Environmental advertising claims—A preliminary investigation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 10, no. 2: 47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare, A., S. Mukerjee, and T. Goyal. 2013. Social influence and green marketing: An exploratory study on Indian consumers. Journal of Customer Behaviour 12, no. 4: 361–81.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, E. A., H. Shoenberger, E. P. Kwon, and S. Ratneshwar. 2022. A narrative approach for overcoming the message credibility problem in green advertising. Journal of Business Research 147: 449–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-B, and D.-Y. Kim. 2014. The effects of message framing and source credibility on green messages in hotels. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly 55, no. 1: 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. K., M. Y.-C. Yim, E. A. Kim, and W. Reeves. 2020. Exploring the optimized social advertising strategy that can generate consumer engagement with green messages on social media. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 15, no. 1: 30–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W., R. Yuhosua, Y. Sukki, and K. Kacy. 2021. Ethical dissonance in environmental advertising: Moderating effects of self-benefit versus other-benefit appeals. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 8: 1320–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., H. B. Tae, Y. Sukki, O. Sangdo, and K. C. Yung. 2017. Assertive environmental advertising and reactance: Differences between South koreans and americans. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 4: 550–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koestner, R., N. Houlfort, S. Paquet, and C. Knight. 2001. On the risks of recycling because of guilt: An examination of the consequences of introjection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31, no. 12: 2545–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu, H., J. Rappleye, and I. Silova. 2019. Culture and the independent self: Obstacles to environmental sustainability? Anthropocene 26: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, H. M., A. Witmaier, and E. Ko. 2021. Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research 131: 640–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronrod, A., A. Grinstein, and L. Wathieu. 2012. Go green! should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing 76, no. 1: 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Z. Rahman, and A. A. Kazmi. 2013. Sustainability marketing strategy: An analysis of recent literature. Global Business Review 14, no. 4: 601–25.
   Google Scholar
• LaVoi, S., and E. Haley. 2021. How pro-social purpose agencies define themselves and their value: An emerging business model in the advertising-agency world. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no. 4: 372–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. M. J., N. Che-Ha, and S. F. S. Alwi. 2021. Service customer orientation and social sustainability: The case of small medium enterprises. Journal of Business Research 122: 751–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and M. Cho. 2020. The effects of consumers’ media exposure, attention, and credibility on pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Promotion Management 26, no. 3: 434–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., K. W. King, and L. N. Reid. 2015. Factors influencing consumers’ attitudinal and behavioral responses to direct-to-consumer and over-the-counter drug advertising. Journal of Health Communication 20, no. 4: 431–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-J, and E. Haley. 2020. How do generational differences drive response to social-issue ads?: The effect of value orientations across generations in the U.S. Journal of Advertising Research 60, no. 3: 271–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-K., C.-T. Chang, and P.-C. Chen. 2017. What sells better in green communications: Fear or hope?: It depends on whether the issue is global or local. Journal of Advertising Research 57, no. 4: 379–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and H. Eric. 2022. Green consumer segmentation: Consumer motivations for purchasing pro-environmental products. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 8: 1477–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgreen, A., M. Antioco, D. Harness, and R. Van der Sloot. 2009. Purchasing and marketing of social and environmental sustainability for high-tech medical equipment. Journal of Business Ethics 85, no. 2: 445–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., and X. Liu. 2020. Culture and green advertising preference: A comparative and critical discursive analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 11: 1944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loo, E., V. Caputo, R. M. Nayga, Jr., H.-S. Seo, B. Zhang, and W. Verbeke. 2015. Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecological Economics 118: 215–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, C., X. Zhou, X. Huang, C. Qiu, and M. Yuan. 2022. Fostering consumer engagement during an omnipresent victim crisis: Understanding the role of values in pandemic-themed advertising. International Journal of Advertising: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchs, M. G., J. Brower, and R. Chitturi. 2012. Product choice and the importance of aesthetic design given the emotion-laden trade-off between sustainability and functional performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29, no. 6: 903–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchs, M. G., and T. A. Mooradian. 2012. Sex, personality, and sustainable consumer behaviour: Elucidating the gender effect. Journal of Consumer Policy 35, no. 1: 127–44.
   Google Scholar
• Luchs, G. M., W. N. Rebecca, R. I. Julie, and R. Rajagopal. 2010. The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing 74, no. 5: 18–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K. 2022. ‘We have to clean up our act’: Industry leaders and critics discuss climate at Cannes Lions. https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/we-have-to-clean-up-our-act-industry-leaders-and-critics-discuss-climate-at-cannes-lions/
   Google Scholar
• Magnier, L., and J. Schoormans. 2015. Consumer reactions to sustainable packaging: The interplay of visual appearance, verbal claim and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology 44: 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mai, R., H. Stefan, L. Wassili, and B. Arne. 2019. Ethical products less strong: How explicit and implicit reliance on the lay theory affects consumption behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 158: 659–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. 2019. Uncharted territory in research on environmental advertising: Toward an organizing framework. Journal of Advertising 48, no. 1: 91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and A. Wonneberger. 2014. The skeptical green consumer revisited: Testing the relationship between green consumerism and skepticism toward advertising. Journal of Advertising 43, no. 2: 115–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., A. Wonneberger, and D. Schmuck. 2014. Consumers’ green involvement and the persuasive effects of emotional versus functional ads. Journal of Business Research 67, no. 9: 1885–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerding, S. G. H., and N. Merz. 2018. Consumer preferences for organic labels in Germany using the example of apples–combining choice-based conjoint analysis and eye-tracking measurements. Journal of Cleaner Production 181: 772–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, C., F. Chang, C. Lin, and Y. Chang. 2018. The theory of reasoned action to CSR behavioral intentions: The role of CSR expected benefit, CSR expected effort and stakeholders. Sustainability 10, no. 12: 4462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfeld, T., D. J. Flint, and A. R. Zablah. 2023. Riding the wave: How and when public issue salience impacts corporate social responsibility advertising. Journal of Advertising: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., and E. Markowitz. 2016. Sustainable consumer behavior: A multilevel perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology 10: 112–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintel. 2006. Attitudes towards ethical foods – UK. London: Mintel Reports. https://reports.mintel.com/display/173791/
   Google Scholar
• Minton, E., C. Lee, U. Orth, C.-H. Kim, and L. Kahle. 2012. Sustainable marketing and social media: A cross-country analysis of motives for sustainable behaviors. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 4: 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoro-Rios, F. J., T. Luque-Martínez, and M.-A. Rodriguez-Molina. 2008. How green should you be: Can environmental associations enhance brand performance? Journal of Advertising Research 48, no. 4: 547–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagar, K. 2015. Modeling the effects of green advertising on brand image: Investigating the moderating effects of product involvement using structural equation. Journal of Global Marketing 28, no. 3–5: 152–71.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, S. J., R. E. Goldsmith, and E. J. Banzhaf. 1998. The effect of misleading environmental claims on consumer perceptions of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 6, no. 2: 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, C. L., E. Howlett, S. Burton, J. C. Kozup, and A. H. Tangari. 2012. The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages. International Journal of Advertising 31, no. 3: 511–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyilasy, G., H. Gangadharbatla, and A. Paladino. 2014. Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of Business Ethics 125, no. 4: 693–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H., J. Bae, and S.-J. Kim. 2017. Can sinful firms benefit from advertising their CSR efforts? Adverse effect of advertising sinful firms’ CSR engagements on firm performance. Journal of Business Ethics 143, no. 4: 643–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OnePoll Report. 2021. Going green may start at an earlier age for America’s youth. https://www.onepoll.us/going-green-may-start-at-an-earlier-age-for-americas-youth/
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, M. C., R. J. Slotegraaf, and S. R. Chandukala. 2014. Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing 78, no. 5: 119–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormesher, E. 2022. 8 times brands fell afoul of ASA for ‘greenwashing’. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2022/03/23/8-times-brands-fell-foul-asa-greenwashing.
   Google Scholar
• Pancer, E., L. McShane, and T. J. Noseworthy. 2017. Isolated environmental cues and product efficacy penalties: The color green and eco-labels. Journal of Business Ethics 143, no. 1: 159–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parguel, B., F. Benoit-Moreau, and C. A. Russell. 2015. Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of executional greenwashing. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 1: 107–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., and S. Ha. 2012. Understanding pro-environmental behavior: A comparison of sustainable consumers and apathetic consumers. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 40, no. 5. 388–403.
   Google Scholar
• Pittman, M., and A. Abell. 2021. More trust in fewer followers: Diverging effects of popularity metrics and green orientation social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Marketing 56: 70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, B. J., and C. A. A. Soule. 2016. Green demarketing in advertisements: Comparing “buy green” and “buy less” appeals in product and institutional advertising contexts. Journal of Advertising 45, no. 4: 441–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., and W. Stacy. 2018. A good new brand—what happens when new brands try to stand out through corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Research 92: 231–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royne, M. B., M. Levy, and J. Martinez. 2011. The public health implications of consumers’ environmental concern and their willingness to pay for an eco-friendly product. Journal of Consumer Affairs 45, no. 2: 329–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryoo, Y., N. K. Hyun, and Y. Sung. 2017. The effect of descriptive norms and construal level on consumers’ sustainable behaviors. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 4: 536–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sailer, A., H. Wilfing, and E. Straus. 2022. Greenwashing and bluewashing in black Friday-related sustainable fashion marketing on instagram. Sustainability 14, no. 3: 1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar, H. A., L. Oerlmeans, and S. van Stroe-Biezen. 2013. Social influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioural experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies 37, no. 2: 172–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, F., U. Föhl, N. Walter, and V. Demmer. 2021. Green or social? An analysis of environmental and social sustainability advertising and its impact on brand personality, credibility and attitude. Journal of Brand Management 28, no. 4: 429–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, A. P., L. Janssen, and M. Verspaget. 2020. Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 258–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuck, D., J. Matthes, and B. Naderer. 2018. Misleading consumers with green advertising? An affect–reason–involvement account of greenwashing effects in environmental advertising. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 2: 127–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev, S., J. Fernandes, and C. Hong. 2016. Is your product really green? A content analysis to reassess green advertising. Journal of Advertising 45, no. 1: 85–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev, S., J. Fernandes, and W. Wang. 2015. The effects of gain versus loss message framing and point of reference on consumer responses to green advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 36, no. 1: 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, S., S. Du, and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2016. Corporate social responsibility: A consumer psychology perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology 10: 70–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S., E.-J. Ki, and W. G. Griffin. 2017. The effectiveness of fear appeals in ‘green’ advertising: An analysis of creative, consumer, and source variables. Journal of Marketing Communications 23, no. 5: 473–92.
   Google Scholar
• Silberstein, N. 2022. Harris Poll: 82% of consumers want a brand’s values to align with their own. Retail TouchPoints. https://www.retailtouchpoints.com/topics/consumer-trends/harris-poll-82-of-consumers-want-a-brands-values-to-align-with-their-ownarris.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, B. J., and S. K. Radford. 2012. Consumer perceptions of sustainability: A free elicitation study. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 24, no. 4: 272–91.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, and G. A. Guagnano. 1995. The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior 27, no. 6: 723–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L., Q. Lian, and Y. Huang. 2020. How do tourists’ attribution of destination social responsibility motives impact trust and intention to visit? The moderating role of destination reputation. Tourism Management 77: 103970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L., and S. R. Swanson. 2017. The effect of destination social responsibility on tourist environmentally responsible behavior: Compared analysis of first-time and repeat tourism. Tourism Management 60: 308–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, F., A. A. Silva, G. G. T. Ferreira, M. R. Tavares, and R. M. de Miranda. 2017. The “green consumption” and the rhizomatic capital strategy: Ads and reports in the Brazilian media. Advances in Applied Sociology 7, no. 2: 35.
   Google Scholar
• Teona, G., E. Ko, and S. J. Kim. 2020. Environmental claims in online video advertising: Effects for fast-fashion and luxury brands. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 6: 858–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thøgersen, J., and Ö. Folke. 2002. Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology 23, no. 5: 605–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tormala, Z. L., P. Briñol, and R. E. Petty. 2006. When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42, no. 5: 684–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117, no. 2: 440–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., D. J. Hardisty, and R. Habib. 2020. The elusive green consumer. Harvard Business Review 97, no. 4. https://hbr.org/2019/07/the-elusive-green-consumer
   Google Scholar
• White, K., R. MacDonnell, and D. W. Dahl. 2011. It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research 48, no. 3: 472–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S., S. Robinson, and M. Poor. 2018. The efficacy of green package cues for mainstream versus niche brands: How mainstream green brands can suffer at the shelf. Journal of Advertising Research 58, no. 2: 165–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, W., X. Jin, and R. Fu. 2021. The influence of scarcity and popularity appeals on sustainable products. Sustainable Production and Consumption 27: 1340–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Y. Lu, W. Zhu, and C. Su. 2015. Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior. Journal of Business Research 68, no. 12: 2663–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., Z. Gürhan-Canli, and N. Schwarz. 2006. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16, no. 4: 377–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, E. P-y., B. Van Luu, and C. H. Chen. 2020. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance 52: 101192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar