1,486
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Attractiveness or expertise? Which is more effective in beauty product endorsement? Moderating role of social distance

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 1201-1225 | Received 31 Jan 2022, Accepted 10 Mar 2023, Published online: 24 Mar 2023

References

  • Abidin, C., and M. Ots. 2016. Authenticity and credibility in brand scandal. In Blurring the lines: Market-driven and democracy-driven freedom of expression, ed. E. M. Kenyon and E. Svensson, 53–61. Göteborg: Nordicom.
  • Agrawal, J., and W. A. Kamakura. 1995. The economic worth of celebrity endorsers: an event study analysis. Journal of Marketing 59, no. 3: 56–62.
  • Austin, E.W., R.V.D. Vord, B.E. Pinkleton, and E. Epstein. 2008. Celebrity endorsements and their potential to motivate young voters. Mass Communication and Society 11, no. 4: 420–36.
  • Balaji, M., Y. Jiang, and S. Jha. 2021. Nanoinfluencer marketing: How message features affect credibility and behavioural intentions. Journal of Business Research 136, 293–304.
  • Bhatt, S., P. W. Gething, J. Oliver, J. J. P. Messina, A. W. Farlow, C. L. Moyes, J. M. Drake., et al. 2013. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496, no. 7446: 504–7.
  • Biswas, D., A. Biswas, and N. Das. 2006. The differential effects of celebrity and expert endorsements on consumer risk perceptions. The role of consumer knowledge, perceived congruency, and product technology orientation. Journal of Advertising 35, no. 2: 17–31.
  • Bond, B. 2018. Parasocial relationships with media personae: Why they matter and how they differ among heterosexual, lesbian, gay, and bisexual adolescents. Media Psychology 21, no. 3: 457–85.
  • Bornemann, T., and C. Homburg. 2011. Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research 38, no. 3: 490–504.
  • Brehm, S.S., S.M. Kassin, and S. Fein. 2005. Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  • Breves, P., J. Amrehn, A. Heidenreich, N. Liebers, and H. Schramm. 2021. Blind trust? The importance and interplay of parasocial relationships and advertising disclosures in explaining influencers’ persuasive effects on their followers. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 7: 1209–29.
  • Britt, R. K., J. L. Hayes, B. Britt, and H. Park. 2020. Too big to sell? A computational analysis of network and content characteristics among mega and micro beauty and fashion social media influencers. Journal of Interactive Advertising 20, no. 2: 111–8.
  • Campbell, C., and J.R. Farrell. 2020. More than meets the eye: the functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons 63, no. 4: 469–79.
  • Chaiken, S. 1979. Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, no. 8: 1387–97.
  • Chapple, C., and F. Cownie. 2017. An investigation into viewers’ trust in and response towards disclosed paid-for-endorsements by YouTube lifestyle vloggers. Journal of Promotional Communications 5, no. 2: 110–36.
  • Cheema, A., and A. M. Kaikati. 2010. The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research 47, no. 3: 553–563.
  • Choi, S.M, and N.J. Rifon. 2012. It is a match: the impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 29, no. 9: 639–50.
  • Choi, Y. K., Y. Seo, and S. Yoon. 2017. E-WOM messaging on social media: Social ties, temporal distance, and message concreteness. Internet Research 27, no. 3: 495–505.
  • Choi, W. J., and K. Winterich. 2013. Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitude. Journal of Marketing 77, no. 2: 96–111.
  • Choi, Y. K., S. Yoon, K. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2019. Text versus pictures in advertising: effects of psychological distance and product type. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 4: 528–43.
  • Chou, H.Y. 2015. Celebrity political endorsement effects: a perspective on the social distance of political parties. International Journal of Communication 9, 523–46.
  • Cohen, J. 2009. Mediated relationships and media effects: parasocial interaction and identification. In The sage handbook of media processes and effects, ed. R. Nabi and M. B. Oliver, 223–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • De Cicco, R., S. Iacobucci, and S. Pagliaro. 2021. The effect of influencer–product fit on advertising recognition and the role of an enhanced disclosure in increasing sponsorship transparency. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 5: 733–59.
  • De Veirman, M., V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2017. Marketing through instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 5: 798–828.
  • De Veirman, M., and L. Hudders. 2020. Disclosing sponsored instagram posts: the role of material connection with the brand and message-sidedness when disclosing covert advertising. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 1: 94–130.
  • Dibble, J. L., T. Hartmann, and S. F. Rosaen. 2016. Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research 42, no. 1: 21–44.
  • Eisend, M., and T. Langner. 2010. Immediate and delayed advertising effects of celebrity endorsers’ attractiveness and expertise. International Journal of Advertising 29, no. 4: 527–46.
  • Engel, J.F., R.J. Kegerreis, and R.D. Blackwell. 1969. Word-of-mouth communication by the innovator. Journal of Marketing 33, no. 3: 15–9.
  • Erdogan, B.Z. 1999. Celebrity endorsement: a literature review. Journal of Marketing Management 15, no. 4: 291–314.
  • Escalas, J. E., and J. R. Bettman. 2005. Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research 32, no. 3: 378–89.
  • Escalas, J. E., and J. R. Bettman. 2017. Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 2: 297–308.
  • Feng, Y., H. Chen, and Q. Kong. 2021. An expert with whom I can identify: the role of narratives in influencer marketing. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 7: 972–93.
  • Fiedler, K., J. Jung, M. Wänke, and T. Alexopoulos. 2012. On the relations between distinct aspects of psychological distance: an ecological basis of construal-level theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48, no. 5: 1014–21.
  • Goethals, G. 1986. Social comparison theory. Psychology from the lost and found. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 12, no. 3: 261–78.
  • Gong, W., and X. Li. 2017. Engaging fans on microblog: the synthetic influence of parasocial interaction and source characteristics on celebrity endorsement. Psychology & Marketing 34, no. 7: 720–32.
  • Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, no. 6: 1360–80.
  • Hayes, A.F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Hernandez, J., S. Wright, and F. Rodrigues. 2015. Attributes versus benefits: the role of construal levels and appeal type on the persuasiveness of marketing messages. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 243–53.
  • Hoffner, C., and M. Buchanan. 2005. Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: the role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology 7, no. 4: 325–51.
  • Holbrook, M.B, and R. Batra. 1987. Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research 14, no. 3: 404–20.
  • Horton, D., and R. Wohl. 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19, no. 3: 215–29.
  • Hosie, R. 2019. Why brands are turning away from big instagram influencers to work with people who have small followings instead. Business Insider, April 9. https://www.businessinsider.com/brands-turningto-micro-influencers-instead-of-instagram-stars-2019-4.
  • Hovland, C.I., I.L. Janis, and H.H. Kelley. 1953. Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Hudders, L., C. Lou, and M. de Brabandere. 2022. Understanding the impact of influencers’ responses to negative follower comments on the persuasiveness of sponsored instagram posts. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 1: 178–204.
  • Janssen, L., A. P. Schouten, and E. A. Croes. 2022. Influencer advertising on instagram: product-influencer fit and number of followers affect advertising outcomes and influencer evaluations via credibility and identification. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 1: 101–27.
  • Jin, L., and Y. He. 2013. Designing service guarantees with construal fit: effects of temporal distance on consumer responses to service guarantees. Journal of Service Research 16, no. 2: 202–15.
  • Jin, S.V., A. Muqaddam, and E. Ryu. 2019. Instafamous and social media influencer marketing. Marketing Intelligence and Planning 37, no. 5: 567–79.
  • Johar, G.V. 2005. The price of friendship: When, why, and how relational norms guide social exchange behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15, no. 1: 22–7.
  • Kamins, M.A. 1990. An investigation into the “match-up” hypothesis in celebrity advertising: When beauty may be only skin deep. Journal of Advertising 19, no. 1: 4–13.
  • Karakayali, N. 2009. Social distance and affective orientations. Sociological Forum 24, no. 3: 538–62.
  • Kardes, F. R., M.L. Cronley, and J. Kim. 2006. Construal-level effects on preference stability, preference-behavior correspondence, and the suppression of competing brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16, no. 2: 135–44.
  • Khamis, S., L. Ang, and R. Welling. 2017. Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’and the rise of social media influencers. Celebrity Studies 8, no. 2: 191–208.
  • Ki, C., and Y. Kim. 2019. The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: the role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing 36, no. 10: 905–22.
  • Kim, D., and H. Kim. 2021. Trust me, trust me now: a nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media. Journal of Business Research 134, 223–32.
  • Kim, M., and D. Song. 2018. When brand-related UGC induces effectiveness on social media: the role of content sponsorship and content type. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 1: 105–24.
  • Kim, M., D. Song, and A. Jang. 2021. Consumer response toward native advertising on social media: the roles of source type and content type. Internet Research 31, no. 5: 1656–76.
  • Kim, K., M. Zhang, and X. Li. 2008. Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 35, no. 4: 706–13.
  • Knoll, J., H. Schramm, C. Schallhorn, and S. Wynistorf. 2015. Good guy vs. bad guy: the influence of parasocial interactions with media characters on brand placement effects. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 5: 720–43.
  • Kujath, C. L. 2011. Facebook and MySpace: Complement or substitute for face-to-face interaction? Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14, no. 1–2: 75–8.
  • Le, T., L. Robinson, and A. Dobele. 2022. Ewom processing from receiver perspective: Conceptualising the relationships. International Journal of Consumer Studies 47, no. 1: 434–50.
  • Liberman, N., Y. Trope, and C. Wakslak. 2007. Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17, no. 2: 113–7.
  • Lim, C., and Y. Kim. 2011. Older consumers’ TV home shopping: Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and perceived convenience. Psychology & Marketing 28, no. 8: 763–80.
  • Liviatan, I., Y. Trope, and N. Liberman. 2008. Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44, no. 5: 1256–69.
  • Lou, C., and H. Kim. 2019. Fancying the new rich and famous? Explicating the roles of influencer content, credibility, and parental mediation in adolescents’ parasocial relationship, materialism, and purchase intentions. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 2567.
  • MacKenzie, S.B, and R.J. Lutz. 1989. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing 53, no. 2: 48–65.
  • MacKenzie, S.B., R.J. Lutz, and G.E. Belch. 1986. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 23, no. 2: 130–43.
  • Martin, B., J. Gnoth, and C. Strong. 2009. Temporal construal in advertising: the moderating role of temporal orientation and attribute importance in consumer evaluations. Journal of Advertising 38, no. 3: 5–20.
  • Mathys, J., A. Burmester, and M. Clement. 2016. What drives the market popularity of celebrities? A longitudinal analysis of consumer interest in film stars. International Journal of Research in Marketing 33, no. 2: 428–48.
  • McCracken, G. 1989. Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16, no. 3: 310–21.
  • McGuire, W. J. 1985. Attitudes and attitude change. In Lindzey, G., and E. Aronson (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology, (3rd ed.) 2: 233–346. New York: Random House.
  • McQuarrie, E. F., J. Miller, and B. J. Phillips. 2013. The megaphone effect: Taste and audience in fashion blogging. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 1: 136–58.
  • Mudambi, S.M, and D. Schuff. 2010. What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on amazon. MIS Quarterly 34, no. 1: 185–200.
  • Naderer, B., J. Matthes, and S. Schäfer. 2021. Effects of disclosing ads on instagram: the moderating impact of similarity to the influencer. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 5: 686–707.
  • Ohanian, R. 1990. Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising 19, no. 3: 39–62.
  • Ohanian, R. 1991. The impact of celebrity spokespersons’ perceived image on consumers’ intention to purchase. Journal of Advertising Research 31, no. 1: 46–54.
  • Onkvisit, S., and J. Shaw. 1987. Self-concept and image congruence: some research and managerial implications. Journal of Consumer Marketing 4, no. 1: 13–23.
  • Park, J., J. Lee, V. Xiong, F. Septianto, and Y. Seo. 2021. David and goliath: When and why micro-influencers are more persuasive than mega-influencers. Journal of Advertising 50, no. 5: 584–602.
  • Phua, J., S. Jin, and J. Kim. 2017. Gratifications of using facebook, twitter, instagram, or snapchat to follow brands: the moderating effect of social comparison, trust, tie strength, and network homophily on brand identification, brand engagement, brand commitment, and membership intention. Telematics and Informatics 34, no. 1: 412–24.
  • Schouten, A. P., L. Janssen, and M. Verspaget. 2020. Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: the role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising 39, no. 2: 258–81.
  • Seo, Y., X. Li, Y.K. Choi, and S. Yoon. 2018. Narrative transportation and paratextual features of social media in viral advertising. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 83–95.
  • Sirgy, M.J. 1982. Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review. Journal of Consumer Research 9, no. 3: 287–300.
  • Stephan, E., N. Liberman, and Y. Trope. 2011. The effects of time perspective and level of construal on social distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, no. 2: 397–402.
  • Sternthal, B., R. Dholakia, and C. Leavitt. 1978. The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research 4, no. 4: 252–60.
  • Till, B.D, and M. Busier. 1998. Matching products with endorsers: attractiveness versus expertise. Journal of Consumer Marketing 15, no. 6: 576–86.
  • Till, B.D, and M. Busier. 2000. The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising 29, no. 3: 1–13.
  • Trivedi, J.P. 2018. Measuring the comparative efficacy of an attractive celebrity influencer vis-à-vis an expert influencer-a fashion industry perspective. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management 11, no. 3: 256–71.
  • Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2003. Temporal construal. Psychological Review 110, no. 3: 403–21.
  • Trope, Y., and N. Liberman. 2010. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117, no. 2: 440–63.
  • Trope, Y., N. Liberman, and C. Wakslak. 2007. Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17, no. 2: 83–95.
  • Tukachinsky, R. H. 2011. Para-romantic love and Para-friendships: Development and assessment of a multiple-parasocial relationships scale. American Journal of Media Psychology 3, no. 1/2: 73–94.
  • Widaman, K., J. Helm, L. Castro-Schilo, M. Pluess, M. Stallings, and J. Belsky. 2012. Distinguishing ordinal and disordinal interactions. Psychological Methods 17, no. 4: 615–22.
  • Wood, J. 1986. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin 106, no. 2: 231–48.
  • Yau, C. 2019. What the $532bn Beauty Industry Looks Like in 2019. Edited, July 2. https://edited.com/ blog/2019/07/what-the-beauty-industry-looks-like-in-the-future.
  • Yuan, C., J. Kim, and S. Kim. 2016. Parasocial relationship effects on customer equity in the social media context. Journal of Business Research 69, 3795–803.
  • Yuan, S., and C. Lou. 2020. How social media influencers foster relationships with followers: the roles of source credibility and fairness in parasocial relationship and product interest. Journal of Interactive Advertising 20, no. 2: 133–47.
  • Zhang, M., and J. Wang. 2009. Psychological distance asymmetry: the spatial dimension vs. other dimensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology 19, no. 3: 497–507.
  • Zhou, F., L. Chen, and Q. Su. 2019. Understanding the impact of social distance on users’ broadcasting intention on live streaming platforms: a lens of the challenge-hindrance stress perspective. Telematics and Informatics 41, 46–54.
  • Zhu, H., M. Kim, and Y.K. Choi. 2022. Social media advertising endorsement: the role of endorser type, message appeal and brand familiarity. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 5: 948–69.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.