Message assertiveness and price discounts: differences between hedonic and utilitarian consumption

References

• Ahn, R.J., and C. Ham. 2022. Exploring the effect of ad choice in online Video-Streaming platforms: Moderated by ad involvement and mediated by psychological reactance. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 4: 360–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcañiz, E.B., Cáceres, R.C. Pérez, and R. C. 2010. Alliances between brands and social causes: The influence of company credibility on social responsibility image. Journal of Business Ethics 96, no. 2: 169–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreu, L., A.B. Casado-Díaz, and A. S. Mattila. 2015. Effects of message appeal and service type in CSR communication strategies. Journal of Business Research 68, no. 7: 1488–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., X. Luo, Z. Fang, and J. Aspara. 2014. Cause marketing effectiveness and the moderating role of price discounts. Journal of Marketing 78, no. 6: 120–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, N., and T. Henderson. 2007. Embedded premium promotion: Why it works and how to make it more effective. Marketing Science 26, no. 4: 514–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, J., H. Oh, and S. Kim. 2022. Advertising role of CSR and strategic investment in R&D: Evidence from the biohealth industry. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, in Press 44, no. 1: 105–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H, and S. Yoon. 2017. Guilt and shame: Environmental message framing effects. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 3: 440–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H, and S. Yoon. 2022. Pride and gratitude: Egoistic versus altruistic appeals in social media advertising. Journal of Business Research 142: 499–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., S. Yoon, and S. Kim. 2015. When environmental messages should be assertive: Examining the moderating role of effort investment. International Journal of Advertising 34, no. 1: 135–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., S. Yoon, S. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2019. Social exclusion influences on the effectiveness of altruistic versus egoistic appeals in charitable advertising. Marketing Letters 30, no. 1: 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghi, I., and P. Antonetti. 2017. High-fit charitable initiatives increase hedonic consumption through guilt reduction. European Journal of Marketing 51, no. 11/12: 2030–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H., D. Choi, S. Yoon, T.H. Baek, and Y. Kim. 2021. Message assertiveness and price discount in prosocial advertising: Differences between Americans and Koreans. European Journal of Marketing 55, no. 6: 1780–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., and O.T. Ahtola. 1991. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters 2, no. 2: 159–70.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, L.C. 1986. Reciprocity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, N., and J. McKay-Nesbitt. 2016. Pro-environmental advertising messages: The role of regulatory focus. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 1: 4–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchers, N.S. 2022. Between skepticism and identification: A systematic mapping of adolescents’ persuasion knowledge of influencer marketing. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 3: 274–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, A.S. 2023. To share or not to share: A framing analysis of paid vaccine advertisements on facebook during COVID-19 and Pro-Vaccine mothers’ willingness to promote vaccines within their peer networks. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 44, no. 2: 142–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J.W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S.S, and J.W. Brehm. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buller, D.B., R. Borland, and M. Burgoon. 1998. Impact of behavioral intention on effectiveness of message features evidence from the family sun safety project. Human Communication Research 24, no. 3: 433–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyükdağ, N., A.N. Soysal, and O. Ki̇tapci. 2020. The effect of specific discount pattern in terms of price promotions on perceived price attractiveness and purchase intention: An experimental research. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 55: 102112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J.R., and M. Kukar-Kinney. 2018. Investigating discounting of discounts in an online context: The mediating effect of discount credibility and moderating effect of online daily deal promotions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 41: 153–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J.M., and M. Moore. 2009. Utilitarian and hedonic shopping value in the US discount sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 16, no. 1: 68–74.
   Google Scholar
• Castonguay, J. 2022. Influencers’ disclosures of advertising and responses from youth with varying levels of theory of mind. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 3: 237–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. 2016. Impact of fear appeals on pro-environmental behavior and crucial determinants. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 1: 74–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitturi, R., R. Raghunathan, and V. Mahajan. 2007. Form versus function: How the intensities of specific emotions evoked in functional versus hedonic trade-offs mediate product preferences. Journal of Marketing Research 44, no. 4: 702–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., S.R. Madhavaram, and H.Y. Park. 2020. The role of hedonic and utilitarian motives on the effectiveness of partitioned pricing. Journal of Retailing 96, no. 2: 251–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Y.J. Li, P. Rangan, P. Chatterjee, and S.N. Singh. 2014. The odd-ending price justification effect: The influence of price-endings on hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 42, no. 5: 545–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., S. Yoon, K. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2019. Text versus pictures in advertising: Effects of psychological distance and product type reference. International Journal of Advertising 38, no. 4: 528–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, T.G, and A. Khare. 2011. Matching a cause with self-schema: The moderating effect on brand preferences. Psychology and Marketing 28, no. 8: 825–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.J., S.S. Lee, and E. Kim. 2023. The effects of influencer types and sponsorship disclosure in instagram sponsored posts. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 44, no. 2: 193–211. in press,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, D.W., H. Honea, and R.V. Manchanda. 2005. Three Rs of interpersonal consumer guilt: Relationship, reciprocity, reparation. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15, no. 4: 307–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewani, P.P., P.K. Sinha, and S. Mathur. 2016. Role of gratitude and obligation in long term customer relationships. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 31: 143–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, R., and K. Wertenbroch. 2000. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 37, no. 1: 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J.P, and L. Shen. 2005. On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs 72, no. 2: 144–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J.P., L. Shen, and R.G. Vail. 2007. Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research 33, no. 4: 467–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsch, M.J., and S.W. Kelley. 1994. An investigation into the intentions of purchasing executives to reciprocate vendor gifts. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22, no. 4: 315–27.
   Google Scholar
• Folse, J., A. Garretson, R.W. Niedrich, and S.L. Grau. 2010. Cause-relating marketing: The effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions. Journal of Retailing 86, no. 4: 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J., and F. Dardis. 2022. Kidfluencing: The role of calls to action, logo presence, and disclosure modality on parental appraisal. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 3: 256–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamliel, E., and R. Herstein. 2011. To save or to lose: Does framing price promotion affect consumers’ purchase intentions? Journal of Consumer Marketing 28, no. 2: 152–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gorton, M., R. Angell, J. White, and Y. Tseng. 2013. Understanding consumer responses to retailers’ cause related voucher schemes: Evidence from the UK grocery sector. European Journal of Marketing 47, no. 11–12: 1931–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandpre, J., E.M. Alvaro, M. Burgoon, C.H. Miller, and J.R. Hall. 2003. Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Health Communication 15, no. 3: 349–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, H.H., J.S. Hyun, and J.H. Pae. 2006. Consumers’ “mental accounting” in response to unexpected price savings at the point of sale. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 24, no. 4: 406–16.
   Google Scholar
• Haesevoets, T., A. Van Hiel, E. Onraet, A. Joosten, and D. De Cremer. 2017. Low-price guarantees as advertisement strategy and compensation policy: The more, the better? Journal of Consumer Behaviour 16, no. 5: 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C., S. Ryu, J. Lee, U. Chaung, E. Buteau, and S. Sar. 2022. Intrusive or relevant? Exploring how consumers avoid native Facebook ads through decomposed persuasion knowledge. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 1: 68–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, S.F., I. Lings, L. Neale, and G. Mortimer. 2014. The role of customer gratitude in making relationship marketing investments successful. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21, no. 5: 788–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Heilman, C.M., K. Nakamoto, and A.G. Rao. 2002. Pleasant surprises: Consumer response to unexpected in-store coupons. Journal of Marketing Research 39, no. 2: 242–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L.D. 2013. The customer engagement/value interface: An exploratory investigation. Australasian Marketing Journal 21, no. 1: 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Janakiraman, N., R.J. Meyer, and A.C. Morales. 2006. Spillover effects: How consumers respond to unexpected changes in price and quality. Journal of Consumer Research 33, no. 3: 361–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., A. Kronrod, A. Grinstein, and U. Nisan. 2018. Still waters run deep: Comparing assertive and suggestive language in water conservation campaigns. Water 10, no. 3: 275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, D. 2023. Empathy or escape? Examining alternative mechanisms underlying responses to Disgust-Evoking charity appeals over time. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 44, no. 1: 88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, U., and R. Dhar. 2006. Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research 43, no. 2: 259–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, U., and R. Dhar. 2010. Price-framing effects on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. Journal of Marketing Research 47, no. 6: 1090–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., S. Kim, G. Corner, and S. Yoon. 2019. Dollar-Off or Percent-Off? Discount framing, construal levels, and advertising appeals. Journal of Promotion Management 25, no. 3: 314–27.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, W., Y. Ryoo, S. Yoon, and K. Kim. 2021. Ethical dissonance in environmental advertising: Moderating effects of self-benefit versus other-benefit appeals. International Journal of Advertising 40, no. 8: 1320–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., T.H. Baek, S. Yoon, S. Oh, and Y.K. Choi. 2017. Assertive environmental advertising and reactance: Differences between South Koreans and Americans. Journal of Advertising 46, no. 4: 550–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivetz, R., and I. Simonson. 2002. Earning the right to indulge: Effort as a determinant of customer preferences toward frequency program rewards. Journal of Marketing Research 39, no. 2: 155–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivetz, R., and Y. Zheng. 2006. Determinants of justification and self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 135, no. 4: 572–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivetz, R., and Y. Zheng. 2017. The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. Journal of Consumer Psychology 27, no. 1: 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronrod, A., A. Grinstein, and L. Wathieu. 2012a. Enjoy! hedonic consumption and compliance with assertive messages. Journal of Consumer Research 39, no. 1: 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronrod, A., A. Grinstein, and L. Wathieu. 2012b. Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing 76, no. 1: 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattin, J.M., and R.E. Bucklin. 1989. Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 26, no. 3: 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVoi, S., and E. Haley. 2021. How pro-social purpose agencies define themselves and their value: An emerging business model in the advertising-agency world. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no. 4: 372–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVoie, N.R., B.L. Quick, J.M. Riles, and N.J. Lambert. 2017. Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communication Research 44, no. 3: 416–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L., and C.I. Tsai. 2014. How price promotions influence postpurchase consumption experience over time. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 5: 943–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, R.E., and J.M. Hong. 2022. Don’t make me feel guilty! Examining the effect of a past moral deed on perceived irritation with guilt appeals in environmental advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 4: 421–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, R.E., Y.H. Sung, and W.N. Lee. 2018. Connecting with global consumers through corporate social responsibility initiatives: A cross-cultural investigation of congruence effects of attribution and communication styles. Journal of Business Research 88: 11–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Z. Liu, and Z. Fang. 2016. Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me. Judgment and Decision Making 11, no. 4: 332–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay-Nesbitt, J., and S. Yoon. 2015. Social marketing communication messages: How congruence between source and content influences physical activity attitudes. Journal of Social Marketing 5, no. 1: 40–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay-Nesbitt, J., C. Ryan, and S. Yoon. 2018. College students’ online purchase attitudes and intentions: Gender, product type, and risk. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing 9, no. 3: 207–29.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C.H., L.T. Lane, L.M. Deatrick, A.M. Young, and K.A. Potts. 2007. Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research 33, no. 2: 219–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, A.C. 2005. Giving firms an “E” for effort: Consumer responses to high-effort firms. Journal of Consumer Research 31, no. 4: 806–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., S. Diehl, C.R. Taylor, R. Terlutter, and B. Mueller. 2022. Do CSR ads with public health messages pertaining to COVID-19 actually help consumers, advertisers, and society? Insights from the United States and Germany. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 4: 337–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M.R., C.D. Ham, and E. Haley. 2021. What do we know about political advertising? Not much! political persuasion knowledge and advertising skepticism in the United States. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no. 4: 329–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noland, C., and T.J. Wen. 2022. Listicles vs. narratives: The interplay between mood, message type, and disclosure on native-advertising effectiveness. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 4: 377–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, R., and B. Warnick. 1976. Assertiveness as a communication construct. Human Communication Research 3, no. 1: 62–6.
   Google Scholar
• Okada, E.M. 2005. Justification effects on consumer choice of hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 42, no. 1: 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkara, B.Y., M. Ozmen, and J.W. Kim. 2017. Examining the effect of flow experience on online purchase: A novel approach to the flow theory based on hedonic and utilitarian value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 37: 119–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, X., and S. Yoon. 2022. Gym membership programs: Image motivation and conditional discount framing. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 3: 301–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Lalwani, A.K. Silvera, and D. H. 2020. The impact of resource scarcity on Price-Quality judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 46, no. 6: 1110–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeuffer, A., X. Lu, Y. Zhang, and J. Huh. 2021. The effect of sponsorship disclosure in YouTube product reviews. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no. 4: 391–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, M., A. Oeldorf-Hirsch, and A. Brannan. 2022. Green advertising on social media: Brand authenticity mediates the effect of different appeals on purchase intent and digital engagement. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 1: 106–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratihari, S.K, and S.H. Uzma. 2018. CSR and corporate branding effect on brand loyalty: A study on indian banking industry. Journal of Product & Brand Management 27, no. 1: 57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiang, Y., and M.R. Hyman. 2022. How can we minimize visual stereotypes in ads? Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 2: 185–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B.L, and J.R. Considine. 2008. Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive messages for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication 23, no. 5: 483–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B.L, and M.T. Stephenson. 2007. Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research 34, no. 3: 255–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B.L, and M.T. Stephenson. 2008. Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research 34, no. 3: 448–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B.L., Shen, L. Dillard, and J. P. 2013. Reactance theory and persuasion. In The sage handbook of persuasion: Advances in theory and research. 2nd ed., ed. J.P. Dillard and L. Shen, 167–183. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rains, S.A. 2013. The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research 39, no. 1: 47–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, D.T. 1971. Effects of a favor and liking on compliance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7, no. 6: 627–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savas, S. 2016. Factors affecting donations in US retail stores: A conceptual framework. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 33: 178–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, J., S. Yoon, and M. Vangelova. 2016. Shopping plans, buying motivations, and return policies: Mpacts on product returns and purchase likelihood. Marketing Letters 27, no. 4: 645–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, Y., X. Li, Y. Choi, and S. Yoon. 2018. Narrative transportation and paratextual features of social media in viral advertising. Journal of Advertising 47, no. 1: 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, H., and B. Dai. 2022. The efficacy of customer’s voluntary use of self-service technology (SST): A dual-study approach. Journal of Strategic Marketing 30, no. 8: 723–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhal, A., and M. Nagao. 1993. Assertiveness as communication competence a comparison of the communication styles of American and Japanese students. Asian Journal of Communication 3, no. 1: 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Steindl, C., and E. Jonas. 2012. What reasons might the other one have?—perspective taking to reduce psychological reactance in individualists and collectivists. Psychology (Irvine, Calif.) 3, no. 12A: 1153–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strahilevitz, M., and J.G. Myers. 1998. Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research 24, no. 4: 434–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y.H., and W.N. Lee. 2020. Doing good while playing: The impact of prosocial advergames on consumer response. Computers in Human Behavior 106: 106244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y.H., R.E. Lim, and W.N. Lee. 2022. Does company size matter in corporate social responsibility? An examination of the impact of company size and cause proximity fit on consumer response. International Journal of Advertising 41, no. 2: 284–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tackett, T. 2023. A textual analysis of gender diversity and creativity in award-winning agencies’ self-representations. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, in Press 44, no. 2: 212–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, S., and J. Li. 2021. The role of guilt, shame, and social distance in Bystander-Focused prevention of campus sexual violence. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 42, no. 2: 138–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C.H. 2016. The effect of price discounts on green consumerism behavioral intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 15, no. 4: 325–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, K.E., E.R. Spangenberg, and B. Grohmann. 2003. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research 40, no. 3: 310–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, T.J., C. Chuan, J. Yang, and W.S. Tsai. 2022a. Predicting advertising persuasiveness: A decision tree method for understanding emotional (in)congruence of ad placement on YouTube. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 2: 200–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, T.J., C.W. Choi, L. Wu, and J.D. Morris. 2022b. Empowering emotion: The driving force of share and purchase intentions in viral advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 1: 47–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiid, R., T. Müllern, and A. Berndt. 2023. The face of nonbinary beauty communication on instagram: A content analysis. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, in Press 44, no. 1: 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S.R, and A.W. Kunkel. 2000. Identity implications of influence goals: Similarities in perceived face threats and Facework across sex and close relationships. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19, no. 2: 195–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., N. Krey, and R.E. Cruz. 2022. Improving representation over time? Assessing intersectional (in)visibility of masculinity and race/ethnicity in print ads. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 43, no. 4: 400–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, L., and N.N. Bechwati. 2017. The impact of price promotions on checkout donations. Journal of Product & Brand Management 26, no. 7: 734–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., S. Sun, A.K. Lalwani, and N. Janakiraman. 2019. How does consumers’ local or global identity influence price–perceived quality associations? The role of perceived quality variance. Journal of Marketing 83, no. 3: 145–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., S. Oh, S. Song, K.K. Kim, and Y. Kim. 2014. Higher quality or lower price? How value-increasing promotions affect retailer reputation via perceived value. Journal of Business Research 67, no. 10: 2088–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemack-Rugar, Y., R. Rabino, L.A. Cavanaugh, and G.J. Fitzsimons. 2016. When donating is liberating: The role of product and consumer characteristics in the appeal of cause-related products. Journal of Consumer Psychology 26, no. 2: 213–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemack-Rugar, Y., S.G. Moore, and G.J. Fitzsimons. 2017. Just do it! why committed consumers react negatively to assertive ads. Journal of Consumer Psychology 27, no. 3: 287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., and R. Kivetz. 2009. The differential promotion effectiveness on hedonic versus utilitarian products. Advances in Consumer Research 36: 565.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, D.H., Z.J. Zhang, Y.P. Chang, and S. Liang. 2019. Good discounts earn good reviews in return? Effects of price promotion on online restaurant reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management 77: 178–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollo, L., S. Yoon, R. Rialti, and C. Ciappei. 2018. Ethical consumption and consumers’ decision making: The role of moral intuition. Management Decision 56, no. 3: 692–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żyminkowska, K. 2018. Hedonic and utilitarian drivers of customer engagement. Central European Business Review 7, no. 4: 15–33.
   Google Scholar