Family experiences of children’s social care involvement following a social work change programme

References

• Cross, S., Hubbard, A., & Munro, E. (2010a). Reclaiming social work – London borough of Hackney children and young people’s services, part 1: Independent evaluation. London: Human Reliability/The London School of Economics & Political Science. Retrieved August 4, 2016, from https://secure.toolkitfiles.co.uk/clients/28663/sitedata/files/Eileen-Munro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cross, S., Hubbard, A., & Munro, E. (2010b). Reclaiming social work – London borough of Hackney children and young people’s services, part 2: Unpacking the complexity of frontline practice – An ethnographic approach. London: Human Reliability/The London School of Economics & Political Science. Retrieved August 4, 2016, from https://secure.toolkitfiles.co.uk/clients/28663/sitedata/files/Eileen-Munro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dale, P. (2004). ‘Like a fish in a bowl’: parents’ perceptions of child protection services. Child Abuse Review, 13, 137–157.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0852
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2016). Children’s social care innovation programme. Retrieved November 11, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/childrens-social-care-innovation-programme
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2000). Framework for the assessment of children in need and their families. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, S., White, S., & Morris, K. (2015). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., & Warner, J. (2016). Let’s stop feeding the risk monster: towards a social model of child protection. Families, Relationships & Societies. doi:10.1332/204674316X14552878034622. Retrieved February 9, 2017, from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/frs/pre-prints/content-pp_frs-d-15-00034r2
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, D., McCambridge, J., Waissbein, C., & Rollnick, S. (2008). How do child and family social workers talk to parents about child welfare concerns? Child Abuse Review, 17, 23–35.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, D., Westlake, D., McCann, M., Thurnham, A., Shefer, G., Glynn, G., & Killian, M. (2013). Reclaiming social work? An evaluation of systemic units as an approach to delivering children’s services: Final report of a comparative study of practice and the factors shaping it in three local authorities. Bedford: University of Bedfordshire. Retrieved August 4, 2016, from https://www.beds.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/258491/finalreport-RSWv3-19072013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gale, N. K., Heath, G., & Cameron, E., et al. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13. Retrieved January 20, 2017, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/13/117
   Google Scholar
• Ghaffar, W., Manby, M., & Race, T. (2012). Exploring the experiences of parents and carers whose children have been subject to child protection plans. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 887–905.10.1093/bjsw/bcr132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingley-Jones, H. (2016). Using observation to research the experiences of teenagers with severe learning disabilities: Observing the ‘ordinary’. In G. Ruch & I. Julkunen (Eds.), Relationship-based research in social work: Understanding practice research (pp. 107–125). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Hingley-Jones, H., & Ruch, G. (2016). ‘Stumbling through’? Relationship-based social work practice in austere times. Journal of Social Work Practice, 30, 235–248.10.1080/02650533.2016.1215975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D. (2010). The safety of children and the parent-worker relationship in cases of child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Review, 19, 330–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, S. E., Morris, K., Archard, P., & Clawson, R. (2017a). Changing practice: The possibilities and limits for reshaping social work practice. Qualitative Social Work. doi:10.1177/1473325016688371. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1473325016688371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, S. E., Morris, K., Archard, P., & Clawson, R. (2017b). Working with the whole family: What case files tell us about social work practices. Child & Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12349. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cfs.12349/abstract
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevre, M. (2008). Assessment and decision-making in child protection: Relationship-based considerations. In M. C. Calder (Ed.), The carrot or the stick? Towards effective practice with involuntary clients in safeguarding children work (pp. 78–92). Lyme Regis: Russell House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. (2012). Liberated thinking within a social work unit. In S. Goodman & I. Trowler (Eds.), Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice (pp. 111–124). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P., & Barnes, M. (2007). Constructing theories of change: methods and sources. Evaluation, 13, 151–170.10.1177/1356389007075221
   Google Scholar
• Millar, M., & Corby, B. (2006). The framework for the assessment of children in need and their families – A basis for a ‘therapeutic’ encounter? British Journal of Social Work, 36, 887–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirick, R. G. (2016). Challenges in recruiting parents to participate in child welfare research: Implications for study design and research practice. Child & Family Social Work, 21, 484–491.10.1111/cfs.v21.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, K. (2012). Thinking family? The complexities for family engagement in care and protection. British Journal of Social Work, 42, 906–920.10.1093/bjsw/bcr116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. London: Department of Education. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/munro-review-of-child-protection-final-report-a-child-centred-system
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. R., Holmes, L., & Ward, H. (2005). Researching vulnerable groups: Ethical issues and the effective conduct of research in local authorities. British Journal of Social Work, 35, 1023–1038.10.1093/bjsw/bch220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2016). The report of her majesty’s chief inspector of education, children’s services and skills 2016: Social care. Retrieved August 12, 2016, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/534008/Ofsted_social_care_annual_report_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2014). The politics of child protection. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-26930-0
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pendry, N. (2012). Systemic practice in a risk management context. In S. Goodman & I. Trowler (Eds.), Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice (pp. 26–33). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, D. (2008). Care or control? The effects of investigations and initial assessments on the social worker–parent relationship. Journal of Social Work Practice, 22, 301–315.10.1080/02650530802396643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413081
   Google Scholar
• Roesch-Marsh, A., Gadda, A., & Smith, D. (2011). ‘It’s a tricky business’: The impact of identity work in negotiating research access. Qualitative Social Work, 11, 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiltroth, K. (2012). Preconditions: Structure, continuity and momentum. In S. Goodman & I. Trowler (Eds.), Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice (pp. 69–79). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Smithson, R., & Gibson, R. (2016). Less than human: A qualitative study into the experience of parents involved in the child protection system. Child & Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12270. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/cfs.12270/abstract
   Google Scholar
• Spratt, T., & Callan, J. (2004). Parents’ views on social work interventions in child welfare cases. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 199–224.10.1093/bjsw/bch022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trowler, I., & Goodman, S. (2012). A systems methodology for child and family social work. In S. Goodman & I. Trowler (Eds.), Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social work practice (pp. 14–25). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, K., & Harwood, L. (1999). Good enough partnership? Parents’ experience of child protection investigations. Practice: Social Work in Action, 11, 49–58.10.1080/09503159908412562
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J., Whittaker, A., Rickard, W., & Felix, C. (2016). Troubled, troubling or in trouble: The stories of ‘troubled families’. British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw061. Retrieved February 10, 2017, from https://academic.oup.com/bjsw/article/doi/10.1093/bjsw/bcw061/2622502/Troubled-Troubling-or-in-Trouble-The-Stories-of
   Google Scholar