Letters from the future: an exercise with child welfare predictions

References

• Adams, R., Dominelli, L., & Payne, M. (Eds.). (2005). Social work futures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Askeland, G. (2003). Reality-play – experiential learning in social work training. Social Work Education, 22, 351–362.10.1080/02615470309145
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S. (2016). Everyday ethics in professional life: Social work as ethics work. Ethics and Social Welfare, 10, 35–52.10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfoed, E., & Jacobsson, K. (2012). Moving from ‘gut feeling’ to ‘pure facts’: Launching the ASI interview as part of in-service training for social workers. Nordic Social Work Research, 2, 5–20.10.1080/2156857X.2012.667245
   Google Scholar
• Bradt, L., Roose, R., Bouverne-De Bie, M., & De Schryver, M. (2011). Data recording and social work: From the relational to the social. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 1372–1382.10.1093/bjsw/bcr131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. (Ed.). (2015). Critical and creative research methodologies in social work. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlayne, P., & Smith, M. (2007). Editorial. Journal of Social Work Practice, 21, 263–270.10.1080/02650530701590296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Act 417/2007, unofficial translation. Retrieved from https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2007/en20070417.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. (2006). Creativity within qualitative research on families: New ideas for old methods. In S. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Emergent methods in social research (pp. 95–108). London: Sage.10.4135/9781412984034
   Google Scholar
• Fahlgren, S. (2009). Discourse analysis of a childcare drama: Or the interfaces between paradoxical discourses of time in the context of social work. Time & Society, 18, 208–230.10.1177/0961463X09337856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., White, S., & Morris, K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection: Towards humane social work with families. Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447308027.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452234854
   Google Scholar
• Hall, C. (2012). Honoring client perspectives through collaborative practice: Shifting from assessment to collaborative exploration. In S. Witkin (Ed.), Social construction and social work practice (pp. 38–71). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardwick, L., Smith, R., & Worsley, A. (2016). Innovations in social work research. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, R., & Hadlow, J. (1997). Role-play in social work education: Process and framework for a constructive and focused approach. Social Work Education, 16, 61–73.10.1080/02615479711220241
   Google Scholar
• Healy, K., & Mulholland, J. (2010). Writing skills for social workers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. (2012). Writing as intimate friends … how does writing profeminist research become methodologically challenging? In M. Livholts (Ed.), Emergent writing methodologies in feminist studies (pp. 184–198). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helavirta, S. (2016). Lapsen asioista vastaaminen huostaanoton alkuvaiheessa [Being in charge of a child in the early stages of care]. In R. Enroos, T. Heino, & T. Pösö (Ed.), Huostaanotto [A care order]. (pp. 188–223). Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Hepworth, D., & Larsen, J. (1993). Direct social work practice. Pasific Grove: Brook, Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S., & Sjöblom, Y. (2010). Perspectives on narrative methods in social work research. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 272–280.10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00672.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livholts, M. (Ed.). (2012). Emergent writing methodologies in feminist studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2000). The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? The British Journal of Social Work, 38, 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2012). Thinking and acting constructively in child protection. In S. Witkin (Ed.), Social construction and social work practice (pp. 127–153). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., Helavirta, S., & Laakso, R. (2015). Time in care: the first months in care. Families. Relationships and Societies. doi:10.1332/204674315X145011229855334.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T. & Huhtanen, R. (2017). Removals of children in Finland: a mix of voluntary and involuntary decisions. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child welfare removals by the state: a cross-country analysis of decision-making systems (pp. 18–39). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., Pekkarinen, E., Helavirta, S., & Laakso, R. (2016). "Voluntary" and "involuntary" child welfare: challenging the distinction. Journal of Social Work,. doi:10.1177/14680173166532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. (2008). Narrative methods for human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saleeby, D. (1997). The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Samson, P. (2015). Practice wisdom: The art and science of social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 29, 119–131.10.1080/02650533.2014.922058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, C., & Adlam, J. (2013). Knowing your place and minding your own business: On perverse psychological solutions to the imagined problem of social exclusion. Ethics and Social Welfare, 7, 170–183.10.1080/17496535.2013.779006
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula, J., Arnkil, T., & Eriksson, E. (2003). Postmodern society and social networks: Open and anticipation dialogues in network meetings. Family Process, 42, 185–203.10.1111/famp.2003.42.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, A., & Benbenishty, R. (Eds.). (2014). From evidence to outcomes in child welfare. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2009). Doing social work research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swift, K., & Callahan, M. (2009). At risk: Social justice in child welfare and other human services. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2010). Professional decision making in social work. Exeter: Learning Matters Post Qualifying Social Work Series.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & White, S. (2006). Knowledge and reasoning in social work: Educating for humane judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 937–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevithick, P. (2014). Humanising managerialism: Reclaiming emotional reasoning, intuition, the relationship, and knowledge and skills in social work. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28, 287–311.10.1080/02650533.2014.926868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungar, M. (2004). Nurturing hidden resilience in troubled youth. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vehkalahti, K. (2009). Constructing reformatory identity: Girls’ Reform School Education in Finland, 1893–1923. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J. (2015). The emotional politics of social work and child protection. Bristol: Policy Press.10.1332/policypress/9781447318422.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Witkin, S., & Chambon, A. (2007). New voices in social work: Writing forms and knowledge production. Qualitative Social Work, 6, 387–395.10.1177/1473325007083352
   Google Scholar