Comparing Risk-Averse and Risk-Friendly Practitioners in Child Welfare Decision-Making: A Mixed Methods Study

References

• Alexander, C., & Becker, H. (1978). The use of vignettes in in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 42, 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arad-Davidzon, B., & Benbenishty, R. (2008). The role of workers’ attitudes and parent and child wishes in child protection workers’ assessments and recommendation regarding removal and reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(1), 107–121. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruabarrena, I., & De Paúl, J. (2012). Improving accuracy and consistency in child maltreatment severity assessment in child protection services in Spain: New set of criteria to help caseworkers in substantiation decisions. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 666–674. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelink, C., De Kwaadsteniet, L., Ten Berge, I. J., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2017). Is it safe? Reliability and validity of structured vs. unstructured child safety judgments. Child & Youth Care Forum, 1–24. doi:10.1007/s10566-017-9405-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update, 25, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, D. J., Dalgleish, L., Fluke, J., & Kern, H. (2011). The decision-making ecology. Washington, DC: American Humane Association.
   Google Scholar
• Beddoe, L., & Joy, E. (2017). Questioning the uncritical acceptance of neuroscience in child and family policy and practice: A review of challenges to the current doxa. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 29(1), 12–20. doi:10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss1id213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbenishty, R., Davidson-Arad, B., López, M., Devaney, J., Spratt, T., Koopmans, C., & Hayes, D. (2016). Decision making in child protection: An international comparative study on maltreatment substantiation, risk assessment and interventions recommendations, and the role of professionals’ child welfare attitudes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 63–75. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P. (2015). Inequalities in child welfare: Towards a new policy, research and action agenda. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 6–23. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Sparks, T., & Bos, E. (2016). Child welfare inequalities: New evidence, further questions. Child & Family Social Work, 21(3), 369–380. doi:10.1111/cfs.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleophas, T., & Zwinderman, A. (2012). Statistics Applied to Clinical Studies (3rd ed.). Various: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2863-9
   Google Scholar
• Cram, F., Gulliver, P., Ota, R., & Wilson, M. (2015). Understanding overrepresentation of indigenous children in child welfare data: An application of the drake risk and bias models. Child Maltreatment, 20(3), 170–182. doi:10.1177/1077559515580392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson-Arad, B. & Benbenishty, R. (2010). Contribution of child protection workers’ attitudes to their risk assessments and intervention recommendations: A study in Israel. Health Soc Care Community, 18(1), 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson-Arad, B., & Benbenishty, R. (2016). Child welfare attitudes, risk assessments and intervention recommendations: The role of professional expertise. British Journal of Social Work, 46(1), 186–203. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickens, J., Howell, D., Thoburn, J., & Schofield, G. (2007). Children starting to be looked after by local authorities in England: An analysis of inter-authority variation and case-centred decision making. British Journal of Social Work, 37, 597–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., Gillies, V., & Horsley, N. (2015). Brain science and early years policy: Hopeful ethos or ‘cruel optimism’? Critical Social Policy, 35(2), 167–187. doi:10.1177/0261018315574020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enosh, G., & Bayer-Topilsky, T. (2014). Reasoning and bias: Heuristics in safety assessment and placement decisions for children at risk. British Journal of Social Work, 45(6), 1771–1787. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Expert Panel. (2015). Expert panel final report: Investing in New Zealand’s children and their families. Wellington: Ministry of Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Fargion, S. (2014). Synergies and tensions in child protection and parent support: Policy lines and practitioners’ cultures. Child and Family Social Work, 19(1), 24–33.10.1111/cfs.2014.19.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(1), 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Fluke, J. D., Chabot, M., Fallon, B., MacLaurin, B., & Blackstock, C. (2010). Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: An application of the decision making ecology through multi-level analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(1), 57–69. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluke, J. D., Corwin, T. W., Hollinshead, D. M., & Maher, E. J. (2016). Family preservation or child safety? Associations between child welfare workers’ experience, position, and perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 69, 210–218. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., Parton, N., & Skivenes, M. (2011). Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199793358.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2009). The use of assessment tools in child protection: An ethnomethodological study (Phd). University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, S., & Taylor, A. (2014). Decision making in social work with children and families: The use of experiential and analytical cognitive processes. British Journal of Social Work, 44(8), 2182–2199. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2011). Judgements or assumptions? the role of analysis in assessing children and young people’s needs. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 894–911. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D., & Roesch-Marsh, A. (2016). The ecology of judgement: A model for understanding and improving social work judgements. British Journal of Social Work, 47(5), 1361–1376. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennum, N. (2011). Controlling children’s lives: Covert messages in child protection service reports. Child & Family Social Work, 16(3), 336–344. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00744.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drig injecting and HIV risk. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 381–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyslop, I. (2015). Elephant outing. Retrieved from http://www.reimaginingsocialwork.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking: Fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2011). Reasoning processes in child protection decision making: Negotiating moral minefields and risky relationships. British Journal of Social Work, 41(7), 1251–1270. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014a). Current debates on variability in child welfare decision-making: A selected literature review. Social Sciences, 3(4), 916–940. doi:10.3390/socsci3040916
   Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014b). Theorising the signs of safety approach to child protection social work: Positioning, codes and power. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(1), 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2014c). Weighing it up: Family maintenance and children’s best interests discourses in child protection decision-making. Child & Family Social Work, 21(4), 512–520. doi:10.1111/cfs.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2015). Constructing parental problems: The function of mental illness discourses in a child welfare context. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 2088–2103. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2016). Is decision consistency in child welfare achievable without reversion to technical – Rational approaches?. Visiting Academic, Child Welfare Inequalities Project. Coventry University, July 14th.
   Google Scholar
• Keddell, E. (2017). Interpreting children’s best interests: Needs, attachment and decision-making. Journal of Social Work, 17(3), 324–342. doi:10.1177/1468017316644694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keddell, E., & Hyslop, I. (2016). First findings from phase one of the child welfare decision-making variability project: Research briefing paper. Dunedin: University of Otago.
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H. (2010). Risk rationalities in contemporary social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1247–1262.10.1093/bjsw/bcp157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriẑ, K., & Skivenes, M. (2012). Child-centric or family focused? A study of child welfare workers’ perceptions of ethnic minority children in England and Norway. Child & Family Social Work, 17(4), 448–457. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00802.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Križ, K., & Skivenes, M. (2013). Systemic differences in views on risk: A comparative case vignette study of risk assessment in England, Norway and the United States (California). Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1862–1870. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Križ, K., & Skivenes, M. (2014). Street-level policy aims of child welfare workers in England, Norway and the United States: An exploratory study. Children and Youth Services Review, 40, 71–78. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2010). Conflating risks: Implications for accurate risk prediction in child welfare services. Health, Risk & Society, 12(2), 119–130. doi:10.1080/13698571003632411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The munro review of child protection: Final report, a child-centred system. London: The Stationary Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E., & Musholt, K. (2014). Neuroscience and the risks of maltreatment. Children and Youth Services Review, 47(Part 1), 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E., Taylor, J., & Bradbury-Jones, C. (2014). Understanding the causal pathways to child maltreatment: Implications for health and social care policy and practice. Child Abuse Review, 23(1), 61–74. doi:10.1002/car.2266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28(1), 5–27.10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peabody, J. W., & Liu, A. (2007). A cross-national comparison of the quality of clinical care using vignettes. Health Policy and Planning, 22(5), 294–302. doi:10.1093/heapol/czm020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peabody, J. W., Luck, J., Glassman, P., Jain, S., Hansen, J., & Spell, M. (2004). Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: A prospective validation study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 141, 771–780. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-10-200411160-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodwell, M. K. (1998). Social work constructivist research. New York, NY: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Saleebey, D. (2010). The strengths perspective. Lawrence, KS: Strengths Institute, University of Kansas School of Social Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Samsonsen, V., & Turney, D. (2016). The role of professional judgement in social work assessment: A comparison between Norway and England. European Journal of Social Work, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13691457.2016.1185701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivenes, M., & Stenberg, H. (2013). Risk assessment and domestic violence – How do child welfare workers in three countries assess and substantiate the risk level of a 5-year-old girl? Child and Family Social Work, 20(4), 424–436. doi:10.1111/cfs.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, T. (2012). Why multiples matter: Reconceptualising the population referred to child and family social workers. British Journal of Social Work, 42(8), 1574–1591. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcr165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, J., & Schmidt, G. (2012). Child protection decision making: A factorial analysis using case vignettes. Social Work, 57(1), 83–90.10.1093/sw/swr007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2006). Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36(7), 1187–1207. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2016). Heuristics in professional judgement: A psycho-social rationality model. British Journal of Social Work, 47(4), 1043–1060. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J. (2017). Decision making, assessment and risk in social work (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. J., & Zeller, R. A. (2007). Getting robust and valid data on decision policies: The factorial survey. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 28(1–2), 27–41. doi:10.1080/03033910.2007.10446246
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). Signs of safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework. London: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., & White, S. (2012). Blinded by neuroscience: Social policy, the family and the infant brain. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(2), 397–414.10.1332/204674312X656301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildemuth, B. M. (1993). Post-positivist research: Two examples of methodological pluralism. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 63(4), 450–468.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, T. (2004). The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work, 3, 78–87.
   Google Scholar