Imagined interactions of social workers in social work with families: how and why the practitioners talk to themselves?

References

• Abelson, R. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision-making. In J. S. Carroll & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behavior (pp. 33–45). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Act No. 359/1999 Sb., on social and legal protection of children.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, M. (2015). Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Method Research, 10(3), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkos, K. M., Allen, T. H., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (2001). When norms are violated: Imagined interactions as processing and coping mechanisms. Communication Monographs, 68(3), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750128066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work. Social Work Education, 37(4), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1413083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, L., James, H., Cronin-Davis, J., Tizro, Z., Beetham, T., Hullock, A., & Raynar, A. (2017). Reflexive research with mothers and children victims of domestic violence. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 17(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, J. D., & Farber, B. A. (2015). Attachment style, representations of psychotherapy, and clinical interventions with insecurely attached clients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glumbíková, K. (2019). The self of social workers in practice of field social work with families in the Czech Republic. Journal of Social Work Practice, 34(2), 139–150. 10.1080/02650533.2019.1665000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glumbíková, K., Petrucijová, J., & Mikulec, M. (2020). Formation of practice wisdom in social work with vulnerable children and their families in the Czech Republic. Social Work Education, 40(7), 888–900. 10.1080/02615479.2020.1745173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, N., & Baldwin, M. (2004). Social work, critical reflection and the learning organization. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. 2004. Forgive but don’t forget: Correlates of rumination about conflict. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Conference, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., & Ford, G. S. (2001). Mental imagery and intrapersonal communication: A review of research on imagined interactions (IIs) and current developments. Annals of the International Communication Association, 25(1), 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11679007
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., & Mccann, R. M. (2008). Predicting intrapersonal communication satisfaction on the basis of imagined interactions in the pacific rim. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 37(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750802077362
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Vickery, A. J., & Hatcher, L. C. (2015). The daily use of imagined interaction features. Communication Monographs, 82(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2014.953965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Zagacki, K. S., & Edwards, R. (1989). Intrapersonal communication, social cognition, and imagined interactions. In C. V. Roberts & K. W. Watson (Eds.), Intrapersonal communication processes (pp. 166–184). Gorsuch Scarisbrick and Spectra.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. (1989). A functional analysis of imagined interaction activity in everyday life. In J. E. Shorr, P. Robin, J. A. Connella, & M. Wolpin (Eds.), Imagery: Current perspectives (pp. 13–25). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, C. R. (2004). Active ingredients in individual psychotherapy: searching for common factors. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21(4), 516–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.21.4.516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knott, C. H, & Scragg, T. (2016). Reflective Practice in Social Work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, G. J., & Simmons, J. L. (1966). Identities and interaction. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., Hilsenroth, M. J., & Rodolfa, E. (2012). Working through: In-session processes that promote between-session thoughts and activities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(1), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2011). Research methods for social work. Brooks/Cole Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Ruch, G., Turney, D., & Ward, A. (2018). Relationship-based social work. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sicora, A. (2017). Reflective practice and learning from mistakes in social work. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallenfelsz, K. P., & Hample, H. (2010). The role of taking conflict personally in imagined interactions about conflict. Southern Communication Journal, 75(5), 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940903006057
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. J. (2018). How do child-protection practitioners make decisions in real-life situations? Lessons from the psychology of decision making. British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 1967–1984. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeeck, A., Hartmann, A., & Orlinsky, D. (2006). Internalization of the therapeutic process: Differences between borderline and neurotic patients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2006.20.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar