Too hot to handle? Unthought anxiety and parallel process in social work supervision

References

• Beddoe, L. (2010). Surveillance or reflection: Professional supervision in ‘the risk society’. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, J., & Goodyear, R. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision: Pearson new international edition. Pearson Education UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. (1962). Learning from experience. Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cajvert, L. (2011). A model for dealing with parallel processes in supervision. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 20(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.18352/jsi.248
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J., Webb, C., & Bostock, L. (2013). The surprisingly weak evidence base for supervision: Findings from a systematic review of research in child welfare practice (2000–2012). Children & Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1843–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (2014a). Analysing data 1: From raw data to theorisation: A working paper [ Unpublished].
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. (2014b). A short psychosocial history of British child abuse and protection: Case studies in problems of mourning in the public sphere. Journal of Social Work Practice, 28(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.927842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., & Lees, A. (2014). Spotlight: Defences against anxiety in contemporary human services. In D. Armstrong & M. Rustin (Eds.), Social defences against anxiety: Explorations in a paradigm (pp. 239–255). Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, E. (2012). Supervision in action: A relational approach to coaching and consulting supervision. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delucia, J., Bowman, V., & Bowman, R. (1989). The use of parallel process in supervision and group counseling to facilitate counselor and client growth. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 14(4), 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01933928908412055
   Google Scholar
• Doehrman, M. J. G. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40, 9–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekstein, R., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1958). The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S., & Trowler, I. (Eds.). (2012). Social work reclaimed: Innovative frameworks for child and family social practice. Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Harlow, E. (2015). The management of children and family social workers in England: Reflecting upon the meaning and provision of support. Journal of Social Work, 16(6), 674–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017315607092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2012). Supervision in the helping professions. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, R., & Skogstad, W. (2000). Methods of researching into the unconscious. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, I. (1997). Supervision amidst abuse: A supervisor’s perspective. In M. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision: Perspectives of the supervisor and supervisee (pp. 337–357). Jason Aronson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L., & Pengelly, P. (1997). Staff supervision in a turbulent environment: Managing process and task in front-line services. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C. (2007). A qualitative single case study of parallel processes. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140601140410
   Google Scholar
• Jarmon, H. (1990). The supervisory experience: An object relations perspective. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 2, 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.27.2.195
   Google Scholar
• Kadushin, A., & Harkness, D. (2002). Supervision in social work (4th ed.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27(Pt 3–4), 99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltz, R., Odegard, M., Feit, S., Provost, K., & Smith, T. (2012). Parallel process and isomorphism: A model for decision making in the supervisory triad. The Family Journal: Counselling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 20(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712448788
   Google Scholar
• Lamming, L. (2009). The protection of children in England: A progress report. The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• MacAlister, J. (2021). The case for change, the independent review of children’s social care ( Online). Retrieved February 18, 2021, from https://childrenssocialcare.independentreview.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/case-for-change.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Manthorpe, J., Moriarty, J., Hussein, S., Stevens, M., & Sharpe, E. (2015). Content and purpose of supervision in social work practice in England: Views of newly qualified social workers, managers and directors. British Journal of Social Work, 45(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bct102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattinson, J. (1975). The reflection process in casework supervision. Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies, I. (1959). Containing anxiety in institutions: Selected essays volume 1. Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L., & Twomey, J. E. (1999). A parallel without a process: A relational view of a supervisory experience. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 35(4), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1999.10746402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrissey, J., & Tribe, R. (2001). Parallel process in supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070126329
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report. DfE.
   Google Scholar
• Raichelson, S., Herron, W., Primavera, L., & Ramirez, S. (1997). Incidence and effects of parallel process in psychotherapy supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 15(2), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v15n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Ravalier, M., Wegrzynek, P., Mitchell, P., McGowan, J., Mcfadden, P., & Bald, C. (2023). A rapid review of reflective supervision in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 53(4), 1945–1962. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcac223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruch, G. (2011). Where have all the feelings gone? Developing reflective and relationship-based management in child-care social work. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarnat, J. (2019). What’s new in parallel process? The evolution of supervisions signature phenomenon. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79(3), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-019-09202-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Searles, H. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experiences. Psychiatry, 18(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, K. (2018). Social work supervision of staff: A primer and scoping review (2013–2017). Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0679-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. (2022). Learning from experience – Anxiety, defence and leadership in group supervision: The implications for supervision and reflective practice. Journal of Social Work Practice, 36(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2057939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., Parish-Mackin, L., & Wise, R. (2023). Towards a psychosocial formulation of newly qualified social worker supervision: Bringing the self into supervision. Journal of Social Work Practice, 38(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2023.2257874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, T., Bludworth, J., & Glidden Tracey, C. (2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision? An empirical examination. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 49(3), 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Daly, B., & Jack, G. (2017). Rhetoric vs. reality in social work supervision: The experiences of a group of child care social workers in England. Child & Family Social Work, 22(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A., & Havard, T. (2016). Defensive practice as “fear-based” practice: Social work’s open secret?. British Journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1158–1174. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D. (2017). Does reflective supervision have a future in English local authority child and family social work? Journal of Children’s Services, 12(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-06-2017-0024
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D., Forrester, D., & Grant, L. (2017). What happens in child and family social work supervision?. Children and Families Social Work, 22(2), 942–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J., Ruch, G., & Jennings, S. (2022). Creating the conditions for collective curiosity and containment: Insights from developing and delivering reflective groups with social work supervisors. Journal of Social Work Practice, 36(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2022.2058922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar