1,584
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The impact of gestational sac size on the effectiveness and safety of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with ultrasound-guided suction curettage treatment for caesarean scar pregnancy

, , , &
Pages 291-297 | Received 11 May 2018, Accepted 01 Jul 2018, Published online: 10 Sep 2018

References

  • Larsen JV, Solomon MH. Pregnancy in a uterine scar sacculus-an unusual cause of postabortal haemorrhage. A case report. S Afr Med J. 1978;53:142–143.
  • Zhai JF, Xu M, Zhang B, et al. Treatments of caesarean scar pregnancy and the corresponding results in ten years. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19:2523–2527.
  • Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG. 2007;114:253–263.
  • Litwicka K, Greco E. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a review of management options. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25:456–461.
  • Yin XH, Yang SZ, Wang ZQ, et al. Injection of MTX for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: comparison between different methods. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:1867–1872.
  • Shu SR, Luo X, Wang ZX, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy treated by curettage and aspiration guided by laparoscopy. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:1139–1141.
  • Uysal F, Uysal A, Adam G. Cesarean scar pregnancy: diagnosis, management, and follow-up. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:1295–1300.
  • Hois EL, Hibbeln JF, Alonzo MJ, et al. Ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean section scar treated with intramuscular methotrexate and bilateral uterine artery embolization. J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;36:123–127.
  • Orsi F, Arnone P, Chen W, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a new therapeutic option for solid tumors. J Can Res Ther. 2010;6:414–420.
  • Xie B, Zhang C, Xiong C, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation for submucosal fibroids: A comparison between type I and type II. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31:593–599.
  • Zhang X, Li K, Xie B, et al. Effective ablation therapy of adenomyosis with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124:207–211.
  • Huang L, Du Y, Zhao C. High-intensity focused ultrasound combined with dilatation and curettage for Cesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:98–101.
  • Xiao J, Zhang S, Wang F, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: noninvasive and effective treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:356.e1–357.
  • Zhu X, Deng X, Xiao S, et al. A comparison of high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolisation for the management of caesarean scar pregnancy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016;32:144–150.
  • Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:398–400.
  • Copelan A, Hartman J, Chehab M, et al. High-Intensity focused ultrasound: current status for image-guided therapy. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015;32:398–415.
  • Wu F, Chen WZ, Bai J, et al. Tumor vessel destruction resulting from high-intensity focused ultrasound in patients with solid malignancies. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28:535–542.
  • Ma Y, Shao M, Shao X. Analysis of risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage of cesarean scar pregnancy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e7327.
  • Xiao J, Shi Z, Zhou J, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: comparing the efficacy and tolerability of treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43:640–647.
  • Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:14–29.