A three-dimensional transient computational study of 532-nm laser thermal ablation in a geometrical model representing prostate tissue

References

• Te AE. The Next Generation in Laser Treatments and the Role of the GreenLight High-Performance System Laser. Rev Urol. 2006;8:S24–S30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Te A, Malloy T, Stein B, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial. J Urol. 2004;172:1404–1408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu J, Ng C, Gonzalez R, et al. Photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in men receiving anticoagulants. J Endourol. 2005;19:1196–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchier-Hayes D, Anderson P, Appledorn S, et al. KTP laser versus transurethral resection: early results of a randomized trial. J Endourol. 2006;20:580–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang HW. Effect of the pulse repetition rate on fiber-assisted tissue ablation. J Korean Phys Soc. 2016;69:152–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Gonzalez R, Te A. The evolution of photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP): advancing the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. 2006;24:405–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang H, Jebens D, Malek R, et al. Laser vaporization of bovine prostate: A quantitative comparison of potassium-titanyl-phosphate and lithium triborate lasers. J Urol. 2008;180:2675–2680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malek R, Kang H, Coad J, et al. Greenlight photoselective 120-Watt 532-nm lithium triborate laser vaporization prostatectomy in living canines. J Endourol. 2009;23:837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkhalil H, Akkin T, Pearce J, et al. Potassium titanyl phosphate laser tissue ablation: development and experimental validation of a new numerical model. J Biomech Eng. 2012;134:101002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkhalil HM. The role and optimization of high power visible KTP laser in BPH treatment: numerical and experimental study in native and engineered tissues [Doctoral thesis]. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn M, Hau NT, Van Phuc N, et al. Photoactive dye-enhanced tissue ablation for endoscopic laser prostatectomy. Lasers Surg Med. 2014;46:703–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel A, Venugopalan V. Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues (vol 103, pg 577, 2003). Chem Rev. 2003;103:577–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabby F, Paek UC. High-intensity laser-induced vaporization and explosion of solid material. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 1972;8:106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig AA. Thermo mechanical model for laser ablation. J Appl Phys. 1991;70:1684–1691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckenzie AL. Physics of thermal processes in laser-tissue interaction . Phys Med Biol. 1990;35:1175–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang X, editors. Dynamic Modeling of Tissue Ablation with Continuous Wave CO2 Laser 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Erkol H, Nouizi F, Luk A, et al. Comprehensive analytical model for CW laser induced heat in turbid media. Opt Express. 2015;23:31069–31084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie AA. A three-zone model of soft-tissue damage by a CO2 laser. Phys Med Biol. 1986;31:967–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partovi F, Izatt J, Cothren R, et al. A model for thermal ablation of biological tissue using laser radiation. Lasers Surg Med. 1987;7:141–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venugopalan V, Nishioka NS, Mikic BB. The effect of laser parameters on the zone of thermal-injury produced by laser-ablation of biological tissue. J Biomech Eng. 1994;116:62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majaron B, Plestenjak P, Lukac M. Thermo-mechanical laser ablation of soft biological tissue: modeling the micro-explosions. Appl Physics B Lasers Optics. 1999;69:71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham J, Sparrow E. A thermal-ablation bioheat model including liquid-to-vapor phase change, pressure-and necrosis-dependent perfusion, and moisture-dependent properties. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2007;50:2537–2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques SL. Monte Carlo modeling of light transport in tissue (steady state and time of flight). Optical-thermal response of laser-irradiated tissue. Vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010; p. 109–144.
   Google Scholar
• Patankar S. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. CRC press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson A, Berg R, Andersson-Engels S. Measurements of the optical properties of tissue in conjunction with photodynamic therapy. Appl Opt. 1995;34:4609–4619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incropera FP, De Witt DP. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques S. Laser-tissue interactions. Photochemical, photothermal, and photomechanical. Surg Clin North Am. 1992;72:531–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques SL. Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:R37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh JT, Flotte TJ, Anderson RR, et al. Pulsed CO2 laser tissue ablation: effect of tissue type and pulse duration on thermal damage. Lasers Surg Med. 1988;8:108–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig AD, Meierhofer B, Müller OM, et al. Lateral thermal damage along pulsed laser incisions. Lasers Surg Med. 1990;10:262–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu C-L, Barnes FS. The thermal-chemical damage in biological material under laser irradiation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1970; BME-17: 220–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RK, Chughtai B, Elterman DS, et al. Comparison of 80 W versus 120 W 532 nm Laser Prostatectomy for BPH. OJU. 2013;3:1.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Zvi T, Hueber P-A, Liberman D, et al. GreenLight XPS 180W vs HPS 120W laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective comparative analysis after 200 cases in a single-center study. Urology. 2013;81:853–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemes K, Diaci J, Ahcan U, et al. Dependence of skin ablation depths on Er: YAG laser fluence. J Laser Health Acad. 2014. 2014;1:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220:524–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadhurst MS, Akst LM, Burns JA, et al. Effects of 532 nm pulsed-KTP laser parameters on vessel ablation in the avian chorioallantoic membrane: implications for vocal fold mucosa. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:220–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross E, Domankevitz Y, Skrobal M, et al. Effects of CO2 laser pulse duration in ablation and residual thermal damage: implications for skin resurfacing. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;19:123–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackanos MA, Simanovskii DM, Schriver KE, et al. Pulse-duration-dependent mid-infrared laser ablation for biological applications. IEEE J Select Topics Quantum Electron. 2012;18:1514–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh JT, Flotte TJ, Deutsch TF. Er: YAG laser ablation of tissue: effect of pulse duration and tissue type on thermal damage. Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9:314–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorec B, Škrabelj D, Marinček M. The effect of pulse duration, power and energy of fractional Er: YAG laser for transdermal delivery of differently sized FITC dextrans. Int J Pharm. 2017;516:204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar