Validation of hybrid angular spectrum acoustic and thermal modelling in phantoms

References

• Al-Bataineh O, Jenne J, Huber P. Clinical and future applications of high intensity focused ultrasound in cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:346–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodrum DA, Kawashima A, Gorny KR, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided thermal therapy for localized and recurrent prostate cancer Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015;23:607–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx M, Ghanouni P, Butts Pauly K. Specialized volumetric thermometry for improved guidance of MRgFUS in brain. Magn Reson Med. 2017;78:508–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsi F, Arnone P, Chen W, et al. High intensity focused ultrasound ablation: a new therapeutic option for solid tumors. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010;6:414–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapareto SA, Dewey WC. Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984;10:787–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydari M, Jahed M. Prediction of temperature distribution and volume of lesion during HIFU therapy. ITNG 2009-6th Int Conf Inf Technol New Gener. 2009;1468–1473.
   Google Scholar
• Meaney PM, Clarke RL, ter Haar GR, et al. A 3-D finite-element model for computation of temperature profiles and regions of thermal damage during focused ultrasound surgery exposures. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1998;24:1489–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas U, Webb T, Bitton R, et al. Acoustic and thermal simulations of tcMRgFUS in patient specific models: validation with experiments. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;3:(Suppl 1)P35.
   Google Scholar
• Ellens N, Hynynen K. Simulation study of the effects of near- and far-field heating during focused ultrasound uterine fibroid ablation using an electronically focused phased array: a theoretical analysis of patient safety. Med Phys. 2014;41:072902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash P, Diederich CJ. Considerations for theoretical modelling of thermal ablation with catheter-based ultrasonic sources: implications for treatment planning, monitoring and control. Int J Hyperthermia. 2012;28:69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey MR, Khokhlova VA, Sapozhnikov OA, et al. Physical mechanisms of the therapeutic effect of ultrasound (a review). Acoust Phys. 2003;49:369–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntur SR, Choi MJ. Influence of temperature-dependent thermal parameters on temperature elevation of tissue exposed to high-intensity focused ultrasound: numerical simulation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:806–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreider W, Yuldashev P, Sapozhnikov OA, et al. Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr. 2013;60:1683–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gélat P, Ter Haar G, Saffari N. Towards the optimisation of acoustic fields for ablative therapies of tumours in the upper abdomen. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2013;457:012002.
   Google Scholar
• Huttunen T, Malinen M, Kaipio JP, et al. A full-wave Helmholtz model for continuous-wave ultrasound transmission. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr. 2005;52:397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin E, Ling YT, Treeby BE. Simulating focused ultrasound transducers using discrete sources on regular cartesian grids. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr. 2016;63:1535–1542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van 't Wout E, Gélat P, Betcke T, et al. A fast boundary element method for the scattering analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;138:2726–2737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gélat P, Ter Haar G, Saffari N. A comparison of methods for focusing the field of a HIFU array transducer through human ribs. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:3139–3171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaros J, Rendell AP, Treeby BE. Full-wave nonlinear ultrasound simulation on distributed clusters with applications in high-intensity focused ultrasound. Int J High Perform Comput Appl. 2016;30:137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treeby BE, Cox BT. K-wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. J Biomed Opt. 2010;15:021314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solovchuk MA, Hwang SC, Chang H, et al. Temperature elevation by HIFU in ex vivo porcine muscle: MRI measurement and simulation study. Med Phys. 2014;41:052903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treeby BE, Tumen M, Cox BT. Time domain simulation of harmonic ultrasound images and beam patterns in 3D using the k -space pseudospectral method. In. : Fichtinger G, Martel A, Peters T, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 363–370.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas U, Christensen D. Ultrasound beam simulations in inhomogeneous tissue geometries using the hybrid angular spectrum method. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Contr. 2012;59:1093–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennes H. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol Vol 1. 1948;1:93–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd N, Payne A, Parker DL. Model predictive filtering for improved temporal resolution in MRI temperature imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63:1269–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd N, Prakash J, Odéen H, et al. Toward real-time availability of 3D temperature maps created with temporally constrained reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71:1394–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Holt RG, Cleveland RO, et al. Experimental validation of a tractable numerical model for focused ultrasound heating in flow-through tissue phantoms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116:2451–2458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khokhlova TD, Canney MS, Lee D, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of boiling induced by high intensity focused ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125:2420–2431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruvada S, Liu Y, Soneson JE, et al. Comparison between experimental and computational methods for the acoustic and thermal characterization of therapeutic ultrasound fields. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015;137:1704–1713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisey A, Heidmann M, Letort V, et al. Influence of skin and subcutaneous tissue on high-intensity focused ultrasound beam: experimental quantification and numerical modeling. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:2457–2465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd N, Vyas U, de Bever J, et al. The effects of spatial sampling choices on MR temperature measurements. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:515–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrer AI, Odéen H, de Bever J, et al. Characterization and evaluation of tissue-mimicking gelatin phantoms for use with MRgFUS. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;3:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guntur SR, Il Lee K, Paeng D-G, et al. Temperature-dependent thermal properties of ex vivo liver undergoing thermal ablation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1771–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen EL, Frank GR, Carson PL, et al. Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic attenuation and speed measurements. J Ult Med. 1986;5:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar G. Standardisation and metrology for high intensity focused ultrasound: a clinical perspective. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123:3004.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen DA, Almquist S. Incorporating tissue absorption and scattering in rapid ultrasound beam modeling. SPIE Proceesdings. 2013;8584:85840X-1-85840X-7.
   Google Scholar
• Shou W, Huang X, Duan S, et al. Acoustic power measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound in medicine based on radiation force. Ultrasonics. 2006;44:e17–e20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia R, Thittai AK. Real-time monitoring of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment using axial strain and axial-shear strain elastograms. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:485–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, Freund WR, Cline HE, et al. A clinical, noninvasive, MR imaging monitored ultrasound surgery method. Radiographics. 1996;16:185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N. Quantitative MRI-based temperature mapping based on the proton resonant frequency shift: review of validation studies. Int J Hyperth. 2005;21:533–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP. Simulation and the monte carlo method. New York: Wiley; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Rieke V, Ghanouni P, et al. Thermal diffusivity and perfusion constants from in vivo MR-guided focussed ultrasound treatments: a feasibility study. Int J Hyperth. 2017;61:923–936.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli A, Ebrary I. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Yuldashev PV, Khokhlova VA. Simulation of three-dimensional nonlinear fields of ultrasound therapeutic arrays. Acoust Phys. 2011;57:334–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddadi S, Ahmadian MT. Numerical and experimental evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound-induced lesions in liver tissue ex vivo. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37:1481–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapozhnikov OA, Ponomarev AE, Smagin MA. Transient acoustic holography for reconstructing the particle velocity of the surface of an acoustic transducer. Acoust Phys. 2006;52:324–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker NG, Povey MJW. Ultrasonic study of the gelation of gelatin: phase diagram, hysteresis and kinetics. Food Hydrocoll. 2012;26:99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moraes ICF, Carvalho RA, Bittante AMQB, et al. Film forming solutions based on gelatin and poly(vinyl alcohol) blends: thermal and rheological characterizations. J Food Eng. 2009;95:588–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damianou C. a, Sanghvi NT, Fry FJ, et al. Dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and absorption in dog soft tissues on temperature and thermal dose. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997;102:628–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MJ, Guntur SR, Lee JM, et al. Changes in ultrasonic properties of liver tissue in vitro during heating-cooling cycle concomitant with thermal coagulation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:2000–2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollberger R, Ascher PW, Huber D, et al. Temperature monitoring of interstitial thermal tissue coagulation using MR phase images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998;8:188–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Kendell KR, Felmlee JP, et al. Reliability of water proton chemical shift temperature calibration for focused ultrasound ablation therapy. Med Phys. 2000;27:221–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P. Evaluation of MR thermometry with proton resonance frequency method at 7T. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2017;7:259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarasek MR, Pellicer R, Hofstetter LW, et al. Validation of MR thermometry: method for temperature probe sensor registration accuracy in head and neck phantoms. Int J Hyperth. 2014;30:142–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Farrer A, McLean H, et al. Experimental assessment of phase aberration correction for breast MRgFUS therapy. Int J Hyperth. 2018;34:731–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almquist S, Parker DL, Christensen DA. Rapid full-wave phase aberration correction method for transcranial high-intensity focused ultrasound therapies. J Ther Ultrasound. 2016;4:30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duck FA. Physical properties of tissue: a comprehensive reference book. London: Academic Press Limited; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Zeqiri B, Jones DR. A radiation force technique for determining ultrasonic attenuation a radiation force technique for determining ultrasonic attenuation. Phys Med Biol. 1989;34:1653–1666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal S, Sadhoo N, Zeqiri B. Reference characterisation of sound speed and attenuation of the IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material up to a frequency of 60MHz. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:317–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasgall PA, Di Gennaro F, Baumgartner C, et al. IT’IS Database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues,” Version 3.0, 2015. [Online]. Available: www.itis.ethz.ch/database. [Accessed: 09-Jan-2017].
   Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wan M, Zhong H, et al. Dynamic changes of integrated backscatter, attenuation coefficient and bubble activities during high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1828–1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SL, Dillon C, Parker D, et al. Development and validation of a MRgHIFU non-invasive tissue acoustic property estimation technique. Int J Hyperth. 2016;32:723–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civale J, Bamber J, Miller N, et al. Attenuation estimation and temperature imaging using backscatter for extracorporeal HIFU treatment planning. In: Coussios CC, ter Haar G, editors. Oxford (UK): AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Conference Proceedings; 2007. p. 314–320.
   Google Scholar
• Sumi C, Yanagimura H. Reconstruction of thermal property distributions of tissue phantoms from temperature measurements–thermal conductivity, thermal capacity and thermal diffusivity. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:2845–2863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragonu I, de Oliveira PL, Laurent C, et al. Non-invasive determination of tissue thermal parameters from high intensity focused ultrasound treatment monitored by volumetric MRI thermometry. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:843–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon CR, Borasi G, Payne A. Analytical estimation of ultrasound properties, thermal diffusivity, and perfusion using magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound temperature data. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:923–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil HT. Theory of focusing radiators. J Acoust Soc Am. 1949;21:516–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulouvrat F. Continuous field radiated by a geometrically focused transducer: numerical investigation and comparison with an approximate model. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993;94:1663–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar