Penalized multidimensional fitting for protein movement detection

References

• S.A. Adcock and J.A. McCammon, Molecular dynamics: Survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins, Chem. Rev. 106 (2006), pp. 1589–1615. doi: 10.1021/cr040426m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R.B. Batista and L. Martinez, Dynamics of nuclear receptor Helix-12 switch of transcription activation by modeling time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy decays, Biophys. J. 105 (2013), pp. 1670–1680. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Berge, N. Froloff, R.K. Kalathur, M. Maumy, O. Poch, W. Raffelsberger, and N. Wicker, Multidimensional fitting for multivariate data analysis, J. Comput. Biol. 17 (2010), pp. 723–732. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2009.0126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.L. De Groot, S. Hayward, D. van Aalten, A. Amadei, and H.J.C. Berendsen, Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: A comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data, Proteins 31 (1998), pp. 116–127. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980501)31:2<116::AID-PROT2>3.0.CO;2-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.D. Faraldo-Gomez, G.R. Smith, and M.S. Sansom, Molecular dynamics simulations of the bacterial outer membrane protein FhuA: A comparative study of the ferrichrome-free and bound states, Biophys. J. 85 (2003), pp. 1406–1420. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74573-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Gablonsky and C.T. Kelley, A locally-biased form of the DIRECT algorithm, Global Optim. 21 (2001), pp. 27–37. doi: 10.1023/A:1017930332101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Gower, Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data, in Mathematics in the Archaeological and Historical Sciences, F.R. Hodson, D.G. Kendall, and P. Tautu, eds., Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1971, pp. 138–149.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Gower and G B. Dijksterhuis, Procrustes Problems, Oxford Statistical Science Series Vol. 30, 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• B.F. Green, The orthogonal approximation of an oblique structure in factor analysis, Psychometrika 17 (1952), pp. 429–440. doi: 10.1007/BF02288918
   Google Scholar
• S. Hammes-Schiffer and S.J. Benkovic, Relating protein motion to catalysis, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75 (2006), pp. 519–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Hayward and H.J.C. Berendsen, Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme, Proteins 30 (1998), pp. 144–154. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19980201)30:2<144::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Hayward, A. Kitao, and H.J.C. Berendsen, Model-free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulations: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation, Proteins 27 (1997), pp. 425–437. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199703)27:3<425::AID-PROT10>3.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.G. Johnson, The NLopt nonlinear-optimization package, 2008. Available at http://ab-initio.mit.edu/nlopt.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Jones, C.D. Perttunen, and B.E. Stuckmann, Lipschitzian optimization without the lipschitz constant, Optim. Theory Appl. 79 (1993), pp. 157–181. doi: 10.1007/BF00941892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Kumar, M.N. Zakharov, S.H. Khan, R. Miki, H. Jang, G. Toraldo, R. Singh, S. Bhasin, and R. Jasuja, The dynamic structure of the estrogen receptor, J. Amino Acids (2011). DOI: 10.4061/2011/812540. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22312471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• K.P Locher, B. Rees, R. Koebnik, A. Mitschler, L. Moulinier, J.P. Rosenbusch, and D. Moras, Transmembrane signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA receptor: Crystal structures of free and Ferrichrome-bound states reveal allosteric changes, Cell Press 95 (1998), pp. 771–778.
   Google Scholar
• D.G. Luenberger, Optimization by Vector Space Methods, 1st ed., Wiley, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 1969. ISBN 978–0471181170.
   Google Scholar
• K.V. Mardia, J.T. Kent, and J.M. Bibby, Multivariate Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• J. Matousek, Lectures on Discrete Geometry, Springer, New York, 212, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• L. Moulinier, S. Eiler, G. Eriani, J. Gangloff, J.C. Thierry, K. Gabriel, W.H. McClain, and D. Moras, The structure of an AspRS-tRNA(Asp) complex reveals a tRNA-dependent control mechanism, EMBO J. 20 (2001), pp. 5290–5301. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.18.5290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mueller-Fahrnow and U. Egner, Ligand-binding domain of estrogen receptors, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10 (1999), pp. 550–556. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)00034-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.L. Nichols, G.D. Rose, L.F. Ten Eyck, and B.H. Zimm, Rigid domains in proteins: An algorithmic approach to their identification, Proteins 23 (1995), pp. 38–48. doi: 10.1002/prot.340230106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.A. Petsko and D. Ringe, Protein Structure and Function, London: New Science Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• G.P. Poornam, A. Matsumoto, H. Ishida, and S. Hayward, A method for the analysis of domain movements in large biomolecular complexes, Proteins 76 (2009), pp. 201–212. doi: 10.1002/prot.22339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Rhodes, Judging the quality of macromolecular models: A glossary of terms from crystallography NMR and Homology modeling, 2000. Available at http://spdbv.vital-it.ch/TheMolecularLevel/ModQual/.
   Google Scholar
• T. Rowan, Functional stability analysis of numerical algorithms, published Ph.D. diss., University of Texas at Austin, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• L. Skjaervena, S.M. Hollupc, and N. Reutera, Normal mode analysis for proteins, J. Mol. Struct. Theochem 898 (2009), pp. 42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.theochem.2008.09.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.V. Sumbayev, E.C. Bonefeld-Jorgensen, T. Wind, and P.A. Andreasen, A novel pesticide-induced conformational state of the oestrogen receptor ligand-binding domain, detected by conformation-specific peptide binding, FEBS Lett. 579 (2005), pp. 541–548. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.H. Swann, A survey of non-linear optimization techniques, FEBS Lett. 2 (1969), pp. 39–55. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(69)80075-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Teilum, J.G. Olsen, and B.B. Kragelund, Functional aspects of protein flexibility, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66 (2009), pp. 2231–2247. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0014-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Wriggers and K. Schulten, Protein domain movements: Detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates, Proteins 29 (1997), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199709)29:1<1::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Zou and T. Hastie, Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 67 (2005), pp. 301–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x
   Google Scholar