Flexible uncertainty in mixture models for ordinal responses

References

• A. Agresti, Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, 3d ed., Wiley, New York, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• U. Bockenholt, Modeling multiple response processes in judgment and choice, Psychol. Meth. 17 (2012), pp. 665–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Bolt and T.R. Johnson, Addressing score bias and differential item functioning due to individual differences in response style, Appl. Psychol. Meas. 33 (2009), pp. 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Bolt and J.R. Newton, Multiscale measurement of extreme response style, Educ. Psychol. Meas. 71 (2011), pp. 814–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Capecchi and D. Piccolo, Investigating the determinants of job satisfaction of italian graduates: A model-based approach, J. Appl. Stat. 43 (2016), pp. 169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Clarke, Extreme response style in cross-cultural research: An empirical investigation, J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 15 (2000), pp. 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• P. De Boeck and I. Partchev, Irtrees: Tree-based item response models of the glmm family, J. Stat. Softw. 48 (2012), pp. 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. D'Elia and D. Piccolo, A mixture model for preference data analysis, Comput. Stat. Data. Anal. 49 (2005), pp. 917–934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird and D.B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39 (1977), pp. 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• M. Eid and M. Rauber, Detecting measurement invariance in organizational surveys, Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 16 (2000), pp. 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gottard, M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, Varying uncertainty in CUB, Adv. Data. Anal. Classif. 10 (2016), pp. 225–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario, On the identifiability of a mixture model for ordinal data, Metron 68 (2010), pp. 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• M. Iannario, Hierarchical CUB models for ordinal variables, Commun. Stat. Theory Meth. 41 (2012a), pp. 3110–3125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario, Modelling shelter choices in a class of mixture models for ordinal responses, Stat. Meth. Appl. 21 (2012b), pp. 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario, Modelling uncertainty and overdispersion in ordinal data, Commun. Stat. Theory Meth. 43 (2014), pp. 771–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario, M. Manisera, D. Piccolo and P. Zuccolotto, Sensory analysis in the food industry as a tool for marketing decisions, Adv. Data. Anal. Classif. 6 (2012), pp. 303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, Statistical modelling of subjective survival probabilities, Genus 66 (2010), pp. 17–42.
   Google Scholar
• M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, Investigating and modelling the perception of economic security in the survey of household income and wealth, in Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance, C. Perna and M. Sibillo, eds., Springer, Berlin, 2012, pp. 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, A comprehensive framework of regression models for ordinal data, Metron 74 (2016a), pp. 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, A generalized framework for modelling ordinal data, Stat. Meth. Appt. 25 (2016b), pp. 163–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Iannario, D. Piccolo and R. Simone, CUB: A Class of Mixture Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 1.1.2, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• M. Jeon and P. De Boeck, A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments, Behav. Res. Meth. 48 (2016), pp. 1070–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.R. Johnson, On the use of heterogeneous thresholds ordinal regression models to account for individual differences in response style, Psychometrika 68 (2003), pp. 563–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kankaraš and G. Moors, Measurement equivalence in solidarity attitudes in europe insights from a multiple-group latent-class factor approach, Int. Soc. 24 (2009), pp. 557–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Manisera and P. Zuccolotto, Modeling rating data with nonlinear CUB models, Comput. Stat. Data. Anal. 78 (2014), pp. 100–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Marin, R.J. Gamba and B.V. Marin, Extreme response style and acquiescence among hispanics the role of acculturation and education, J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 23 (1992), pp. 498–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Mauerer and M. Schneider, Perceived party placements and uncertainty on immigration in the 2017 german election, in Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie, M. Debus, J. Sauermann, and M. Tepe, eds., Springer, forthcoming, Vol. 11, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• P. McCullagh, Regression model for ordinal data (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc. B 42 (1980), pp. 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• G. Meisenberg and A. Williams, Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education? Pers. Individ. Dif. 44 (2008), pp. 1539–1550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Moors, Facts and artefacts in the comparison of attitudes among ethnic minorities. A multigroup latent class structure model with adjustment for response style behavior, Eur. Sociol. Rev. 20 (2004), pp. 303–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Moors, Ranking the ratings: A latent-class regression model to control for overall agreement in opinion research, Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 22 (2010), pp. 93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Piccolo, Inferential issues on CUBE models with covariates, Commun. Stat. Theory Meth. 44 (2015), pp. 5023–5036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Poessnecker, MRSP: multinomial response models with structured penalties. R package version 0.6.11, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• J.V. Rosmalen, H.V. Herk and P. Groenen, Identifying response styles: A latent-class bilinear multinomial logit model, J. Mark. Res. 47 (2010), pp. 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Rost, A logistic mixture distribution model for polychotomous item responses, British J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 44 (1991), pp. 75–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Simone and G. Tutz, Modelling uncertainty and response styles in ordinal data, Stat. Neerl. 2018. doi:10.1111/stan.12129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Tutz, Regression for Categorical Data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• G. Tutz and M. Schneider, Mixture models for ordinal responses with a flexible uncertainty component, Technical Report 203, Department of Statistics LMU Munich, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• G. Tutz, M. Schneider, M. Iannario and D. Piccolo, Mixture models for ordinal responses to account for uncertainty of choice, Adv. Data. Anal. Classif. 11 (2017), pp. 281–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Van Herk, Y.H. Poortinga and T.M. Verhallen, Response styles in rating scales evidence of method bias in data from six eu countries, J. Cross. Cult. Psychol. 35 (2004), pp. 346–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. von Davier and J. Rost, Polytomous mixed rasch models, in Rasch Models, Springer, Berlin, 1995, pp. 371–379.
   Google Scholar
• M. von Davier and K. Yamamoto, Mixture-distribution and HYBRID rasch models, in Multivariate and Mixture Distribution Rasch Models, M. von Davier and C.H. Carstensen eds., Springer, Berlin, 2007, pp. 99–115.
   Google Scholar
• T.W. Yee, VGAM: Vector Generalized Linear and Additive Models. R package version 1.0-3, 2016.
   Google Scholar