Probabilistic frontier regression models for binary type output data

References

• D.J. Aigner, C.A.K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt, Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models, J. Econom. 6 (1977), pp. 21–37. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
   Google Scholar
• G. Battese and T. Coelli, Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data, J. Econom. 38 (1988), pp. 387–399. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(88)90053-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Battese and T. Coelli, Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: With application to paddy farmer in India, J. Prod. Anal. 3 (1992), pp. 153–169. doi: 10.1007/BF00158774
   Google Scholar
• P.W. Bauer, Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers, J. Econom. 46 (1990), pp. 39–56. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(90)90046-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Cengiz, E. Dünder, and T. Şenel, Energy performance evaluation of OECD countries using Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis and Bayesian network classifiers, J. Appl. Stat. 45 (2018), pp. 17–25. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1257586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.J. Coelli, P. Rao, and G.E. Battese, An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer, New York, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• R.S. Ehlers, Comparison of Bayesian models for production efficiency, J. Appl. Stat. 38 (2011), pp. 2433–2443. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2011.559203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Geweke, Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments, in Bayesian Statistics, J. Bernardo, J. Berger, A.P. Dawid, and A.F.M. Smith, eds., 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 169–193.
   Google Scholar
• W. Greene, A gamma-distributed stochastic frontier model, J. Econom. 46 (1990), pp. 141–163. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(90)90052-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Griffiths, X. Zhang, and X. Zhao, Estimation and efficiency measurement in stochastic production frontiers with ordinal outcomes, J. Prod. Anal. 42 (2014), pp. 67–84. doi: 10.1007/s11123-013-0365-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Jaldell, Measuring productive performance using binary and ordinal output variables: The case of the Swedish fire and rescue services, Int. J. Prod. Res. 57 (2019), pp. 907–917. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2018.1489159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Kalirajan and S. Bhide, Bias free measurement of technical efficiency, J. Appl. Stat. 33 (2006), pp. 523–533. doi: 10.1080/02664760600585592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.C. Koopmans, An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities, in Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, T.C. Koopmans, ed., Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph No. 13, Wiley, New York, 1951, pp. 33–97.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kumar and R. Gulati, Evaluation of technical efficiency and ranking of public sector banks in India: An analysis from cross-sectional perspective, Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 57 (2008), pp. 540–568. doi: 10.1108/17410400810904029
   Google Scholar
• S.C. Kumbhakar and C.A.K. Lovell, Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge University, London, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Y.H. Lee and P. Schmidt, A production frontier model with flexible temporal variation in technical inefficiency, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell, and S.S. Schmidt, eds., Oxford University Press, New York, 1993, pp. 237–255.
   Google Scholar
• W. Meeusen and J. vandenBroeck, Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error, Int. Econ. Rev. 18 (1977), pp. 435–444. doi: 10.2307/2525757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.B. Miller, Bayesian analysis of the two-parameter gamma distribution, Technometrics 22 (1980), pp. 65–69. doi: 10.2307/1268384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.C. Pérez-Cárceles, J.C. Gómez-Gallego, and J. Gómez-García, Distribution of cost efficiency in stochastic frontier approach: Evidence from Spanish banking, J. Appl. Stat. 43 (2016), pp. 3030–3041. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1161737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reserve Bank of India, Report on Trend and Progress of Banking in India, RBI, Mumbai, 2000–2013.
   Google Scholar
• Reserve Bank of India, Statistical Tables Relating to Banks in India, RBI, Mumbai, 2000–2013.
   Google Scholar
• R. Sangeetha and Jain Mathew, A study on technical efficiency of public sector banks in India, Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2 (2013), pp. 15–21. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20130202.11
   Google Scholar
• S. Scippacercola and E. Sepe, Ordinal principal component analysis for a common ranking of stochastic frontiers, J. Appl. Stat. 43 (2016), pp. 2442–2451. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1163530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.R. Shanmugam and A. Das, Efficiency of Indian commercial banks during the reform period, Appl. Financial Econ. 14 (2004), pp. 681–686. doi: 10.1080/0960310042000233458
   Google Scholar
• P. Shi and W. Zhang, A copula regression model for estimating firm efficiency in the insurance industry, J. Appl. Stat. 38 (2011), pp. 2271–2287. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2010.545376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Stevenson, Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation, J. Econom. 13 (1980), pp. 58–66. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(80)90042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Suresh Chandra, G. Gopal, and M. Ramadurai, A stochastic frontier approach to survival analysis, J. Appl. Stat. 40 (2013), pp. 1362–1371. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.785498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.G. Tsionas, Efficiency measurement with the Weibull stochastic frontier, Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 69 (2007), pp. 693–706. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar