Discovering hidden statistical issues through individual-level models in ecological studies

References

• E.J. Beh, The aggregate association index, Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 54 (2010), pp. 1570–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.J. Brown and C.D. Payne, Aggregate data, ecological regression, and voting transitions, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 81 (1986), pp. 452–460. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.P. Carlin and T.A. Louis, Bayes and Empirical Bayes Methods for Data Analysis, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall, London, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P.J. Diggle and P. Elliott, Statistical issues in the analysis of disease risk near point sources using individual or spatially aggregated data, J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 49 (1995), pp. S20–S27. doi: 10.1136/jech.49.Suppl_2.S20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.A. Freedman, S.P. Klein, J. Sacks, C.A. Smyth, and C.G. Everett, Ecological regression and voting rights, Evaluation Rev. 15 (1991), pp. 673–711. doi: 10.1177/0193841X9101500602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Gelman, D.K. Park, S. Ansolabeher, P.N. Price, and L.C. Minnite, Models, assumptions and model checking in ecological regressions, J. R. Statist. Soc. A 164 (2001), pp. 101–118. doi: 10.1111/1467-985X.00190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Goodman, Ecological regression and the behavior of individuals, Am. Sociol. Rev. 18 (1953), pp. 663–664. doi: 10.2307/2088121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Greenland and H. Mogrgenstern, Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification, Int. J. Epidemiol. 18 (1989), pp. 269–274. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.1.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Greiner and K.M. Quinn, R×C ecological inference: Bounds, correlations, flexibility and transparency of assumptions, J. R. Statist. Soc. A 172 (2009), pp. 67–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00551.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.A. Guthrie and L. Sheppard, Overcoming biases and misconceptions in ecological studies, J. R. Statist. Soc. A 164 (2001), pp. 141–154. doi: 10.1111/1467-985X.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I.L. Hudson, L. Moore, E.J. Beh, and D.G. Steel, Ecological inference techniques: An empirical evaluation using data describing gender and voter turnout at New Zealand elections, 1893–1919, J. R. Statist. Soc. A 173 (2010), pp. 185–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00609.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. King, A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• J. Loewen and B. Grofman, Recent developments in methods used in vote dilution litigation, Urban Lawyer 21 (1989), pp. 589–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Nolan and T. Speed, Stat Labs: Mathematical Statistics Through Applications, Springer, New York, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Pawitan, In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• W.S. Robinson, Ecological correlations and behavior of individuals, Am. Sociol. Rev. 15 (1950), pp. 351–357. doi: 10.2307/2087176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Rosen, W. Jiang, G. King, and M.A. Tanner, Bayesian and frequentist inference for ecological inference: The R×C case, Stat. Neerl. 55 (2001), pp. 134–156. doi: 10.1111/1467-9574.00162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Salway and J. Wakefield, Sources of bias in ecological studies of non-rare events, Environ. Ecol. Stat. 12 (2005), pp. 321–347. doi: 10.1007/s10651-005-1516-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wakefield, Sensitivity analysis for ecological regression, Biometrics 59 (2003), pp. 9–17. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Wakefield, A critique of statistical aspects of ecological studies in spatial epidemiology, Environ. Ecol. Stat. 11 (2004), pp. 31–54. doi: 10.1023/B:EEST.0000011363.12720.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. White, A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica 48 (1980), pp. 817–838. doi: 10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zeileis, Econometric computing with HC and HAC covariance matrix estimators, J. Stat. Softw. 11 (2004), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.18637/jss.v011.i10
   Google Scholar