Inference of progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Chen distribution with an application

References

• K. Ahmadi, F. Yousefzadeh, and M. Rezaei, Analysis of progressively type-I interval censored competing risks data for a class of an exponential distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 86 (2016), pp. 3629–3652. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1178747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.A. Ahmed, Bayesian estimation based on progressive type-II censoring from two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime model: An Markov chain Monte Carlo approach, J. Appl. Stat. 41 (2014), pp. 752–768. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2013.847907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.K. Ashour and M.M.A. Nassar, Inference for Weibull distribution under adaptive type-I progressive hybrid censored competing risks data, Comm. Statist.-Theory Methods 46 (2017), pp. 4756–4773. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2015.1083111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Azizi, F. Haghighi, and N. Tabibi Gilani, Statistical inference for competing risks model under progressive interval censored Weibull data, Comm. Statist.-Simul. Comput. 7 (2018), pp. 1-–14.
   Google Scholar
• S.K. Azizi and M.M.A. Nassar, Analysis of generalized exponential distribution under adaptive type-II progressive hybrid censored competing risks data, Int. J. Adv. Stat. Probab. 2 (2014), pp. 108–113. doi: 10.14419/ijasp.v2i2.3423
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Baghestani and F.S. Hosseini-Baharanchi, An improper form of Weibull distribution for competing risks analysis with Bayesian approach, J. Appl. Stat. 46 (2019), pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1597027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan, Progressive censoring methodology: An appraisal (with discussions), Test 16 (2007), pp. 211–289. doi: 10.1007/s11749-007-0061-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan and R. Aggarwala, Progressive Censoring: Theory, Methods and Applications, Birkhauser, Boston, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan, E. Cramer, and The art of progressive censoring, Applications to Reliability and Quality, Birkhä user, Boston, MA, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan and M. Kateri, On the maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of Weibull distribution based on complete and censored data, Statist. Probab. Lett. 78 (2008), pp. 2971–2975. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2008.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Balakrishnan and R.A. Sandhu, A simple algorithm for generating progressively type-II generated samples, Am. Statist. 49 (1995), pp. 229–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Calabria and G. Pulcini, An engineering approach to Bayes estimation for the Weibull distribution, Micro-electron. Reliab. 34 (1994), pp. 789–802. doi: 10.1016/0026-2714(94)90004-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Chacko and R. Mohan, Bayesian analysis of Weibull distribution based on progressive type-II censored competing risks data with binomial removals, Comput. Statist. 34 (2019), pp. 233–252. Springer. doi: 10.1007/s00180-018-0847-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, A new two-parameter distribution with bathtub shape or increasing failure rate function, Statist. Probab. Lett. 49 (2000), pp. 155–161. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7152(00)00044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Cramer and A.B. Schmiedt, Progressively type-II censored competing risks data from Lomax distributions, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 55 (2011), pp. 1285–1303. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. Crowder, Classical Competing Risks, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 39 (1977), pp. 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• A.K. Dey, A. Jha, and S. Dey, Bayesian analysis of modified Weibull distribution under progressively censored competing risk model, preprint (2016), pp. 1–17. Available at arXiv1605.06585.
   Google Scholar
• N. Doganaksoy, W.Q. Meeker, and G.J. Hahn, Reliability Analysis by Failure Mode, Qual. Prog. (2002), pp. 47–52.
   Google Scholar
• B. Efron and R. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• A.E. Gelfand and A.F.M. Smith, Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85 (1990), pp. 398–409. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Geman and D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. PAMI-6 (1984), pp. 721–741. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.H. Greene, Econometric Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• R.D. Gupta, and D. Kundu, Generalized exponential distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Sim. 69 (2001), pp. 315–338. doi: 10.1080/00949650108812098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Hald, On the history of maximum likelihood in relation to inverse probability and least squares, Statist. Sci. 14 (1999), pp. 214–222. doi: 10.1214/ss/1009212248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.K. Hastings, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika 57 (1970), pp. 97–109. doi: 10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Hemmati and E. Khorram, On adaptive progressively type-II censored competing risks data, Comm. Statist.-Simul. Comput. 46 (2017), pp. 4671–4693. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2015.1129408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kayal, Y.M. Tripathi, S. Dey, and S.J. Wu, On estimating the reliability in a multicomponent stress-strength model based on Chen distribution, Comm. Statist.-Theory Methods (2019). doi:10.1080/03610926.2019.1576886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Kayal, Y.M. Tripathi, D.P. Singh, and M.K. Rastogi, Estimation and prediction for Chen distribution with bathtub shape under progressive censoring, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 87 (2017), pp. 348–366. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1209199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Kundu, N. Kannan, and N. Balakrishnan, Analysis of progressively censored competing risks data, in Handbook of Statistics on Survival Analysis, C.R. Rao and N. Balakrishnan, eds., Vol. 23, Elsevier Publications, New York, 2003, pp. 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• D. Kundu and B. Pradhan, Bayesian analysis of progressively censored competing risks data, Sankhya B 73 (2011), pp. 276–296. doi: 10.1007/s13571-011-0024-x
   Google Scholar
• C.T. Lin and N. Balakrishnan, Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators based on progressively type-II censoring, Metrika 74 (2011), pp. 349–360. doi: 10.1007/s00184-010-0306-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Louis, Finding the observed matrix using the EM algorithm, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 44 (1982), pp. 226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mao, Y.M. Shi, and Y.D. Sun, Exact inference for competing risks model with generalized type I hybrid censored exponential data, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 84 (2014), pp. 2506–2521. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2013.851681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Mao, J. Wang, and X. Pu, Advanced Mathematical Statistics, Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• W.Q. Meeker and L.A. Escobar, Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, Wiley, New York, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• W.B. Nelson, Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• B. Pareek, D. Kundu, and S. Kumar, On progressive censored competing risks data for Weibull distributions, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 53 (2009), pp. 4083–4094. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2009.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.S. Pundir and P.K. Gupta, Stressstrength reliability of two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime model based on hybrid censored samples, J. Stat. Manage. Syst. 21 (2018), pp. 1229–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.K. Rastogi and Y.M. Tripathi, Estimation using hybrid censored data from a two parameter distribution with bathtub shape, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 67 (2013), pp. 268–281. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Sarhan, D.C. Hamilton, and B. Smith, Parameter estimations for a two parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution, Appl. Math. Model. 36 (2012), pp. 5380–5392. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Tarvirdizade and M. Ahmadpour, Estimation of the stress–strength reliability for the two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution based on upper record values, Stat. Methodol. 31 (2016), pp. 58–72. doi: 10.1016/j.stamet.2016.01.005
   Google Scholar
• H.R. Varian, A Bayesian Approach to Real Estate Assessment, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975, pp. 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• J.W. Wu, H.L. Lu, C.H. Chen, and C.H. Wu, Statistical inference about the shape parameter of the new two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 20 (2004), pp. 607–616. doi: 10.1002/qre.572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wu and Y. Shi, Bayes estimation and expected termination time for the competing risks model from Gompertz distribution under progressively hybrid censoring with binomial removals, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 300 (2016), pp. 420–431. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2016.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.F. Wu, Estimation of the two-parameter bathtub-shaped lifetime distribution with progressive censoring, J. Appl. Stat. 35 (2008), pp. 1139–1150. doi: 10.1080/02664760802264996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.F. Wu, The performance assessment on the lifetime performance index of products following Chen lifetime distribution based on the progressive type I interval censored sample, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 334 (2018), pp. 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2017.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Zellner, Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81 (1986), pp. 446–451. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1986.10478289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar