178
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Application Notes

Income and democracy: a bivariate copula approach

Pages 1635-1649 | Received 03 Sep 2020, Accepted 15 Mar 2022, Published online: 04 Apr 2022

References

  • D. Acemoglu, S. Naidu, P. Restrepo, and J.A. Robinson, Democracy does cause growth. J. Polit. Econ. 127 (2019), pp. 47–100.
  • D. Acemoglu, J. Simon, J.A. Robinson, and P. Yared, Income and democracy. Am. Econ. Rev. 98 (2008), pp. 267–293.
  • D. Acemoglu, J. Simon, J.A. Robinson, and P. Yared, Re-evaluating the modernization hypothesis. J. Monet. Econ. 56 (2009), pp. 1043–1058.
  • R. Adcock, and D. Collier, Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 95 (2001), pp. 529–546.
  • D.W.K. Andrews, Chi-square diagnostic tests for econometric models: Introduction and applications. J. Econom. 37 (1988), pp. 135–156.
  • Z.F. Arat, Democracy and economic development: Modernization theory revisited. Comp. Polit. 21 (1988), pp. 21–36.
  • R.J. Barro, Determinants of democracy. J. Polit. Econ. 107 (1999), pp. S158–S183.
  • R.J. Barro, and J.W. Lee. A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010, J. Dev. Econ. 104 (2003), pp. 184–198.
  • J. Benhabib, A. Corvalan, and M.M. Spiegel, Income and democracy: Evidence from nonlinear estimations. Econ. Lett. 118 (2013), pp. 489–492.
  • C.L. Britt, M. Rocque, and G.M. Zimmerman, The analysis of bounded count data in criminology. J. Quant. Criminol. 34 (2018), pp. 591–607.
  • C.A. Cameron, T. Li, P.K. Trivedi, and D.M. Zimmer, Modelling the differences in counted outcomes using bivariate copula models with application to mismeasured counts. Econom. J. 7 (2004), pp. 566–584.
  • C.A. Cameron, and P.K. Trivedi, Regression Analysis of Count Data, Econometric Society Monograph No. 53, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  • G. Casper, and C. Tufis, Correlation versus interchangeability: The limited robustness of empirical findings on democracy using highly correlated datasets. Polit. Anal. 11 (2002), pp. 1–11.
  • M. Cervellati, F. Jung, U. Sunde, and T. Vischer, Income and democracy: comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 104 (2014), pp. 707–719.
  • U. Cherubini, E. Luciano, and W. Vecchiato, Copula Methods in Finance, Wiley, Chichester, 2004.
  • S. Chib, and R. Winkelmann, Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of correlated count data. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 19 (2001), pp. 428–435.
  • D.G. Clayton, A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65 (1978), pp. 141–151.
  • M. Coppedge, J. Gerring, S.I. Lindberg, S.E. Skaaning, and J. Teorell, V-Dem Comparisons and Contrasts with Other Measurement Projects, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, 2016.
  • S. Demarta, and A.J. McNeil, The t copula and related copulas. Int. Stat. Rev. 73 (2005), pp. 111–129.
  • Z. Elkins, Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 44 (2000), pp. 287–294.
  • P. Embrechts, and A. McNeil, Modelling Dependence with Copulas and Applications to Risk Management, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
  • P. Embrechts, A. McNeil, and D. Straumann, Correlaion and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999.
  • M.J. Frank, On the simultaneous associativity of F(x,y) and x+y − F(x,y). Aequ. Math. 19 (1979), pp. 194–226.
  • E.W. Frees, J.F. Carriere, and E.A. Valdez, Annuity valuation with dependent mortality. J. Risk. Insur. 63 (1996), pp. 229–261.
  • E.W. Frees, and E.A. Valdez, Understanding relationships using copulas. N. Am. Actuar. J. 2 (1998), pp. 1–25.
  • C. Genest, and J. Nešlehová, A primer on copulas for count data. ASTIN Bull. 37 (2007), pp. 475–515.
  • C. Genest, B. Remillard, and D. Beaudoin, Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study. Insur. Math. Econ. 44 (2009), pp. 199–213.
  • C. Genest, and L.P. Rivest, Statistical inference procedures for bivariate archimedean copulas. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88 (1993), pp. 1034–1043.
  • E. Glaeser, G. Ponzetto, and A. Shleifer, Why does democracy need education? J. Econ. Growth 12 (2007), pp. 77–99.
  • S. Grønneberg, and N.L. Hjort, The copula information criteria. Scand. J. Stat. 41 (2014), pp. 436–459.
  • E.J. Gumbel, Distributions des valeurs extremes en plusieurs dimensions. Publ. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris 9 (1960), pp. 171–173.
  • J. Hausman, B.H. Hall, and Z. Griliches, Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52 (1984), pp. 909–938.
  • B. Heid, J. Langer, and M. Larch, Income and democracy: Evidence from system GMM estimates. Econ. Lett. 116 (2012), pp. 166–169.
  • M. Hernández-Alava, and S. Pudney, bicop: A command for fitting bivariate ordinal regressions with residual dependence characterized by a copula function and normal mixture marginals. Stata J. 16 (2016), pp. 159–184.
  • J. Högström, Does the choice of democracy measure matter? Comparisons between the two leading democracy indexes, freedom house and polity IV. Gov. Oppos. 48 (2013), pp. 201–221.
  • D. Huard, G. Evin, and A.C. Favre, Bayesian copula selection. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51 (2006), pp. 809–822.
  • R.W. Jackman, On the relation of economic development to democratic performance. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 17 (1973), pp. 611–621.
  • H. Joe, Families of m-variate distributions with given margins and m(m-1)/2 bivariate dependence parameters, in Distributions with Fixed Marginals and Related Topics, Vol. 28, L. Rüschendorf, B. Schweizer and MD. Taylor, eds., Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, 1996. pp. 120–141.
  • H. Joe, Dependence modeling with copulas, in Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 134, A.J Mcneil, ed., CRC Press, 2015.
  • S.A. Klugman, and R. Parsa, Fitting bivariate loss distributions with copulas. Insur: Math. Econ. 24 (1999), pp. 139–148.
  • E.H. Lee, Copula analysis of correlated counts. Advances in Econometrics, 34, in Bayesian Model Comparison, Jeliazkov I., Poirier, D.J., eds., Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 325–348.
  • S.M. Lipset, Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 53 (1959), pp. 69–105.
  • A.W. Marshall. Copulas, marginals, and joint distributions. Lecture Notes-Monograph Series. 28 (1996), pp. 213–222.
  • A.W. Marshall, and I. Olkin, Multivariate distributions generated from mixtures of convolution and product families, in Topics in Statistical Dependence, IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, 16, Block H.W., Sampson A.R., Savits T.H., eds., Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA, 1990. pp. 371–393.
  • M.G. Marshall, and K. Jaggers, Polity iv project: Dataset users’ manual – political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2006, Available at https://home.bi.no/a0110709/PolityIV_manual.pdf, 2006.
  • P. McCullagh, and J.A. Nelder, Generalized Linear Models, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1989.
  • D.E. Neubauer, Some conditions of democracy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 61 (1967), pp. 1002–1009.
  • S.M. Paleologou, Income and democracy: The modernization hypothesis re-visited via alternative non-linear models. Empir. Econ. 48 (2015), pp. 909–921.
  • E. Papaioannou, and G. Siourounis, Economic and social factors driving the third wave of democratization. J. Comp. Econ. 36 (2008), pp. 365–387.
  • D. Pemstein, S.A. Meserve, and J. Melton, Democratic compromise: A latent variable analysis of ten measures of regime type. Polit. Anal. 18 (2010), pp. 426–449.
  • J. Prieger, A flexible parametric selection model for non-normal data with application to health care usage. J. Appl. Econom. 17 (2002), pp. 367–392.
  • A. Przeworski, M. Alvarez, J.A. Cheibub, and F. Limongi, Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Material Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
  • A. Sklar, Fonctions de Répartition a n Dimensions et Leurs Marges. Publ. Inst. Stat.Univ. Paris 8 (1959), pp. 229–231.
  • A. Sklar, Random variables, joint distributions, and copulas. Kybernetica 9 (1973), pp. 449–460.
  • A. Skrondal, and S. Rabe-Hesketh, Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2004.
  • M. Smith, Modelling selectivity using archimedean copulas. Econom. J. 6 (2003), pp. 99–123.
  • S. Treier, and S. Jackman, Democracy as a latent variable. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 52 (2008), pp. 201–217.
  • P.K. Trivedi, and D.M. Zimmer, Copula modeling: An introduction for practitioners. Found. Trends Econom. 1 (2007), pp. 1–111.
  • P.K. Trivedi, and D.M. Zimmer, A note on identification of bivariate copulas for discrete count data. Econometrics 5 (2017), pp. 1–11.
  • S. Vandenberghe, N.E.C. Verhoest, and B. De Baets, Fitting bivariate copulas to the dependence structure between storm characteristics: A detailed analysis based on 105 year 10 Min rainfall. Water Resour. J. 46 (2010), pp. 1–17.
  • World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2017. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
  • R. Winkelmann, Econometric Analysis of Count Data, 5th ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
  • D.M. Zimmer, and P.K. Trivedi, Using trivariate copulas to model sample selection and treatment effects: Application to family health care demand. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 24 (2006), pp. 63–76.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.