Penalized likelihood methods for modeling count data

References

• A. Agresti and D.B. Hitchcock, Bayesian inference for categorical data analysis, Stat. Methods Appl. 14 (2005), pp. 297–330.
   Google Scholar
• R.L. Allington, Fluency: The neglected reading goal, Read. Teach. 36 (1983), pp. 556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Arlot and A. Celisse, A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection, Stat. Surv. 4 (2010), pp. 40–79.
   Google Scholar
• A. Baklizi and W. Abu Dayyeh, Shrinkage estimation of p(y<x) in the exponential case, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput. 32 (2003), pp. 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chernoff and E. Lehmann, The use of maximum likelihood estimates in χ2 tests for goodness of fit, Ann. Math. Statist. 25 (1954), pp. 579–586.
   Google Scholar
• J. Datta and D.B. Dunson, Bayesian inference on quasi-sparse count data, Biometrika 103 (2016), pp. 971–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. DiSalle and T. Rasinski, Impact of short-term intense fluency instruction on students' reading achievement: A classroom-based, teacher-initiated research study, J. Teacher Action Res. 3 (2017), pp. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• B. Efron and C. Morris, Stein's estimation rule and its competitors–an empirical bayes approach, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 68 (1973), pp. 117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.S. Fuchs, D. Fuchs, M.K. Hosp, and J.R. Jenkins, Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis, Sci. Stud. Read. 5 (2001), pp. 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• S. Geisser, The predictive sample reuse method with applications, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70 (1975), pp. 320–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.H. Gruber, Improving Efficiency by Shrinkage: The James-Stein and Ridge Regression Estimators, Routledge, New York, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• B.E. Hansen, Efficient shrinkage in parametric models, J. Econom. 190 (2016), pp. 115–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hasbrouck and G.A. Tindal, Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers, Read. Teach. 59 (2006), pp. 636–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright, Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• A.E. Hoerl and R.W. Kennard, Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems, Technometrics 12 (1970), pp. 55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Jani, A class of shrinkage estimators for the scale parameter of the exponential distribution, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40 (1991), pp. 68–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Johns and M.K. Lunn, The informal reading inventory: 1910–1980, Lit. Res. Instr. 23 (1983), pp. 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• H. Lemmer, From ordinary to bayesian shrinkage estimators, S. Afr. Stat. J. 15 (1981), pp. 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Lemmer, Note on shrinkage estimators for the binomial distribution, Comm. Statist. Theory Methods 10 (1981), pp. 1017–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Månsson, Developing a liu estimator for the negative binomial regression model: Method and application, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 83 (2013), pp. 1773–1780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Miura Wayman, T. Wallace, H.I. Wiley, R. Tichá, and C.A. Espin, Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading, J. Spec. Educ. 41 (2007), pp. 85–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Pandey and S. Upadhyay, Bayes shrinkage estimators of weibull parameters, IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34 (1985), pp. 491–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Park and G. Casella, The bayesian lasso, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103 (2008), pp. 681–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.G. Polson and V. Sokolov, Bayesian regularization: From tikhonov to horseshoe, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 11 (2019), e1463.
   Google Scholar
• M. Qasim, B. Kibria, K. Månsson, and P. Sjölander, A new Poisson liu regression estimator: Method and application, J. Appl. Stat. 47 (2020), pp. 2258–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.J. Samuels, Decoding and automaticity: Helping poor readers become automatic at word recognition, Read. Teach. 41 (1988), pp. 756–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Schreiber, Understanding prosody's role in reading acquisition, Theory Pract. 30 (1991), pp. 158–164.
   Google Scholar
• M.R. Shinn, N. Knutson, R.H. Good III, W.D. Tilly III, and V.L. Collins, Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading, School Psych. Rev. 21 (1992), pp. 459–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Stein, Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate normal distribution, in Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics, The Regents of the University of California, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 58 (1996), pp. 267–288.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Zandi, H. Bevrani, and R. Arabi Belaghi, Using shrinkage strategies to estimate fixed effects in zero-inflated negative binomial mixed model, Comm. Statist. Simulation Comput (2021). doi:10.1080/03610918.2021.1928704
   Google Scholar