A Markov random field model with cumulative logistic functions for spatially dependent ordinal data

References

• A. Agresti, Categorical Data Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• A. Agresti, Analysis of Ordinal Categorical Data, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• A. Al-Humairi, R.H.L. Ip, K. Spuur, X. Zheng, and B. Huang, Visual grading experiments and optimization in CBCT dental implantology imaging: Preliminary application of integrated visual grading regression, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 61 (2022), pp. 133–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Besag, Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice system (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 36 (1974), pp. 192–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Besag, Statistical analysis of non-lattice data, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. D (The Statistician) 24 (1975), pp. 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• F. Bickenbach and E. Bode, Evaluating the Markov property in studies of economic convergence, Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 26 (2003), pp. 363–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Borovkova, H.P. Lopuhaä, and B.N. Ruchjana, Consistency and asymptotic normality of least estimators in generalized STAR models, Stat. Neerl. 62 (2008), pp. 482–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Braddley and R. Turner, Practical maximum pseudo likelihood for spatial point pattern, Aust. N. Z. J. Stat. 42 (2010), pp. 283–322.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Brewer, D.A. Elston, M.E. Hodgson, A.M. Stolte, A.J. Nolan, and D.J. Henderson, A spatial model with ordinal responses for grazing impact data, Stat. Modell. 4 (2004), pp. 127–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chilés and P. Delfiner, Geostatistics, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• R.H.B. Christensen, Ordinal – regression models for ordinal data (2019). Available at http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/.
   Google Scholar
• A.D. Cliff and J. Ord, Spatial Processes: Models and Applications, Pioneer, London, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• N. Cressie, Statistics for Spatial Data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• N. Cressie and S. Lele, New models for Markov random fields, J. Appl. Probab. 29 (1992), pp. 877–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.K. Dow and J.W. Endersby, Multinomial probit and multinomial logit: A comparison of choice models for voting research, Elect. Stud. 23 (2004), pp. 107–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Fokianos and B. Kedem, Regression theory for categorical time series, Statist. Sci. 18 (2013), pp. 357–376.
   Google Scholar
• S. Geman and C. Graffigne, Markov random field image models and their applications to computer vision, Proc. Int. Congr. Math. 1 (1986), pp. 1496–1517.
   Google Scholar
• Z.R. Ghahroodi, M. Ganjali, and D. Berridge, A transition model for ordinal response data with random dropout: An application to the fluvoxamine data, J. Biopharm. Stat. 19 (2009), pp. 658–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Gómez, L. Gonda-King, C.M. Orians, D.A. Orwig, R. Panko, L. Radville, N. Soltis, C.S. Thornber, and E.L. Preisser, Interactions between invasive herbivores and their long-term impact on New England hemlock forests, Biol. Invasions 17 (2015), pp. 661–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Guisan and F.E. Harrell, Ordinal response regression models in ecology, J. Veg. Sci. 11 (2000), pp. 617–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.L. Gumpertz, J.M. Graham, and J.B. Ristaino, Autologistic model of spatial pattern of phytophthora epidemic in bell pepper: Effects of soil variables on disease presence, J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2 (1997), pp. 131–156.
   Google Scholar
• X. Guyon, Random Fields on a Network: Modeling, Statistics, and Applications, Springer, New York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• M. Hebar, D. Gleich, and Ž. Čučej, Autobinomial model for SAR image despeckling and information extraction, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 47 (2009), pp. 2818–2835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.D. Higgs and J.A. Hoeting, A clipped latent variable model for spatially correlated ordered categorical data, Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 54 (2010), pp. 1999–2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Hooke and T.A. Jeeves, ‘Direct search’ solution of numerical and statistical problems, J. ACM 8 (1961), pp. 212–229.
   Google Scholar
• F. Huang and Y. Ogata, Generalized pseudo-likelihood estimates for Markov random fields on lattice, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. 54 (2002), pp. 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.H.L. Ip and K.Y.K. Wu, A note on discrete multivariate Markov random field models, Statist. Probab. Lett. 156 (2020), pp. 108588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.H.L. Ip, L. Ang, K.P. Seng, J.C. Broster, and J.E. Pratley, Big data and machine learning for crop protection, Comput. Electron. Agric. 151 (2018), pp. 376–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.H.L. Ip, D. Demskoi, A. Rahman, and L. Zheng, Evaluation of COVID-19 mitigation policies in Australia using generalised space–time autoregressive intervention models, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (2021), pp. 7474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kaiser and N. Cressie, Modeling Poisson variables with positive spatial dependence, Statist. Probab. Lett. 35 (1997), pp. 423–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kavousi, R.M. Meshkani, and M. Mohammadzadeh, Spatial analysis of relative risk of lip cancer in Iran: A Bayesian approach, Environmetrics 20 (2009), pp. 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Kavousi, M.R. Meshkani, and M. Mohammadzadeh, Spatial analysis of auto-multivariate lattice data, Statist. Papers 52 (2011), pp. 937–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Knorr-Held and H. Rue, On block updating in Markov random field models for disease mapping, Scand. J. Stat. 29 (2002), pp. 597–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Kutsyy, Modeling and inference for spatial processes with ordinal data, Ph.D. thesis., The University of Michigan, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• K. Lee and M.J. Daniels, Marginalized models for longitudinal ordinal data with application to quality of life studies, Stat. Med. 27 (2008), pp. 4359–4380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Lele, Jackknifing linear estimating equations: Asymptotic theory and applications in stochastic processes, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 53 (1991), pp. 253–267.
   Google Scholar
• S.Z. Li, Markov Random Field Modeling in Image Analysis, Springer-Verlag, London, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Li, C. Li, X. Li, K. Wang, M.M. Rahaman, C. Sun, H. Chen, X. Wu, H. Zhang, and Q. Wang, A comprehensive review of Markov random field and conditional random field approaches in pathology image analysis, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 29 (2021), pp. 609–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Liu and A. Agresti, The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent development, Test 14 (2005), pp. 1–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Liu and H. Zhu, Statistical disease mapping for heterogeneous neuroimaging studies, Canad. J. Statist. 49 (2021), pp. 10–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. McCullagh, Regression models for ordinal data, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Stat. Methodol.) 42 (1980), pp. 109–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.C. Nash, optimr: A replacement and extension of the ‘optim’ function (2016). Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=optimr/.
   Google Scholar
• E.C. Norton, H. Wang, and C. Ai, Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models, Stata J. 4 (2004), pp. 154–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Otranto, M. Mucciardi, and P. Bertuccelli, Spatial effects in dynamic conditional correlations, J. Appl. Stat. 43 (2016), pp. 604–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Padoan and M. Bevilacqua, Analysis of random fields using CompRandFld, J. Stat. Softw. 63 (2015), pp. 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Peraza-Garay, J.U. Márquez-Urbina, and G. González-Farías, Inference for the analysis of ordinal data with spatio-temporal models, Int. J. Biostat. 16 (2020), pp. 20190101.
   Google Scholar
• N. Privault, Understanding Markov Chains, Singapore, Springer, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2021). Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• E.M. Schliep, N.K. Lany, P.L. Zarnetske, R.N. Schaeffer, C.M. Orians, D.A. Orwig, and E.L. Preisser, Joint species distribution modelling for spatio-temporal occurrence and ordinal abundance data, Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27 (2018), pp. 142–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B.C. Sutradhar and R. Prabhakar Rao, Regression models for ordinal categorical time series data, in Advances in Time Series Methods and Applications, W.K. Li, D. Stanford, and H. Tu, eds., Fields Institute Communications Vol. 78, Springer, New York, 2016, pp. 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• T.R. Ten Have, M.E. Miller, B.A. Reboussin, and M.K. James, Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal ordinal functional response data with multiple-cause drop-out from the longitudinal study of aging, Biometrics 56 (2000), pp. 279–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.R. Tobler, A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Econ. Geogr. 46 (1970), pp. 234–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Xu, Y. Gao, Y. Wang, and J. Guan, Protein–protein interaction prediction based on ordinal regression and recurrent convolutional neural networks, BMC Bioinform. 22 (2021), pp. 485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhu, H. Huang, and J. Wu, Modeling spatial-temporal binary data using Markov random fields, J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 10 (2005), pp. 212–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar