Penalized robust learning for optimal treatment regimes with heterogeneous individualized treatment effects

References

• O. Bahcall, Precision medicine, Nature 526 (2015), pp. 335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Blatt, S.A. Murphy, and J. Zhu, A-learning for approximate planning, Ann. Arbor. 1001 (2004), pp. 48109–2122.
   Google Scholar
• I.S. Chan and G.S. Ginsburg, Personalized medicine: progress and promise, Annu. Rev. Genomics. Hum. Genet. 12 (2011), pp. 217–244. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082410-101446.PMID: 21721939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Chen and C. Guestrin, XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, KDD '16, 2016, pp. 785–794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785.
   Google Scholar
• V. Chernozhukov, D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. Duflo, C. Hansen, W. Newey, and J. Robins, Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters, Econom. J. 21 (2018), pp. C1–C68. doi: 10.1111/ectj.12097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.W. Elston and I.O. Ellis, Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. i. the value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology 19 (1991), pp. 403–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ertefaie, J.R. McKay, D. Oslin, and R.L. Strawderman, Robust q-learning, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 116 (2021), pp. 368–381. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1753522. PMID: 34121784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Fan and J. Lv, Nonconcave penalized likelihood with np-dimensionality, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 57 (2011), pp. 5467–5484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.A. Hamburg and F.S. Collins, The path to personalized medicine, N. Engl. J. Med. 363 (2010), pp. 301–304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006304.PMID: 20551152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M. Hammer, D.A. Katzenstein, M.D. Hughes, H. Gundacker, R.T. Schooley, R.H. Haubrich, W.K. Henry, M.M. Lederman, J.P. Phair, M. Niu, M.S. Hirsch, and T.C. Merigan, A trial comparing nucleoside monotherapy with combination therapy in hiv-infected adults with cd4 cell counts from 200 to 500 per cubic millimeter, N. Engl. J. Med. 335 (1996), pp. 1081–1090. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199610103351501.PMID: 8813038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Henderson, P. Ansell, and D. Alshibani, Regret-regression for optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Biometrics 66 (2010), pp. 1192–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Laber and Y. Zhao, Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes, Biometrika 102 (2015), pp. 501–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Loi, B. Haibe-Kains, C. Desmedt, F. Lallemand, A.M. Tutt, C. Gillet, P. Ellis, A. Harris, J. Bergh, and J.A. Foekens, et al. Definition of clinically distinct molecular subtypes in estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinomas through genomic grade, J. Clin. Oncol. 25 (2007), pp. 1239–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Ma and J. Huang, A concave pairwise fusion approach to subgroup analysis, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 112 (2017), pp. 410–423.doi: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1148039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Mosca, R. Alfieri, I. Merelli, F. Viti, A. Calabria, and L. Milanesi, A multilevel data integration resource for breast cancer study, BMC. Syst. Biol. 4 (2010), pp. 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Murphy, Optimal dynamic treatment regimes, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B. Stat. Methodol. 65 (2003), pp. 331–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Murphy, A generalization error for q-learning, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 6 (2005), pp. 1073–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.K. Pidugu, H.B. Pidugu, M.M. Wu, C.J. Liu, and T.C. Lee, Emerging functions of human ifit proteins in cancer, Front. Mol. Biosci. 6 (2019), pp. 148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Qi and Y. Liu, D-learning to estimate optimal individual treatment rules, Electron. J. Stat. 12 (2018), pp. 3601–3638.doi: 10.1214/18-EJS1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Qi, D. Liu, H. Fu, and Y. Liu, Multi-armed angle-based direct learning for estimating optimal individualized treatment rules with various outcomes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 115 (2020), pp. 678–691. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1529597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Qian and S.A. Murphy, Performance guarantees for individualized treatment rules, Ann. Stat. 39 (2011), pp. 1180–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.M. Rand, Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66 (1971), pp. 846–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.M. Robins, The analysis of randomized and non-randomized AIDS treatment trials using a new approach to causal inference in longitudinal studies, in Health Services Research Methodology: A Focus on AIDS, L. Sechrest, H. Freeman H, and A. Mulley A, eds., US Public Health Service National Center for Health Services Research, Washington, DC, 1989, pp. 113–159.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Robins, Causal inference from complex longitudinal data, in Latent variable modeling and applications to causality, Springer, 1997, pp. 69–117.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Robins, Optimal structural nested models for optimal sequential decisions, in Proceedings of the second seattle Symposium in Biostatistics, Springer, 2004, pp. 189–326.
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Robins, A. Rotnitzky, and L.P. Zhao, Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89 (1994), pp. 846–866. doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.M. Robinson, Root-n-consistent semiparametric regression, Econometrica 56 (1988), pp. 931–954. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1912705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Schick, On asymptotically efficient estimation in semiparametric models, Ann. Stat. 14 (1986), pp. 1139–1151. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3035563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.J. Schork, Personalized medicine: time for one-person trials, Nature 520 (2015), pp. 609–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Shi, R. Song, W. Lu, and B. Fu, Maximin projection learning for optimal treatment decision with heterogeneous individualized treatment effects, J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B. Stat. Methodol. 80 (2018), pp. 681–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Song, M. Kosorok, D. Zeng, Y. Zhao, E. Laber, and M. Yuan, On sparse representation for optimal individualized treatment selection with penalized outcome weighted learning, Stat 4 (2015), pp. 59–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Y. Tao, L. Wang, and D. Almirall, Tree-based reinforcement learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Ann. Appl. Stat. 12 (2018), pp. 1914–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.J.C.H. Watkins and P. Dayan, Q-learning, Mach. Learn. 8 (1992), pp. 279–292. doi: 10.1007/BF00992698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yang, X. Yan, and J. Huang, High-dimensional integrative analysis with homogeneity and sparsity recovery, J. Multivar. Anal. 174 (2019), pp. 104529. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047259X18305165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Zhang, A.A. Tsiatis, E.B. Laber, and M. Davidian, A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes, Biometrics 68 (2012), pp. 1010–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Zhao, D. Zeng, A.J. Rush, and M.R. Kosorok, Estimating individualized treatment rules using outcome weighted learning, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 107 (2012), pp. 1106–1118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Zhou, N. Mayer-Hamblett, U. Khan, and M.R. Kosorok, Residual weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 112 (2017), pp. 169–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar