An improved agricultural household margin insurance scheme with insured–insurer risk protection: a time-varying copula approach

References

• A. Ahdika, D. Rosadi, A.R. Effendie, and Gunardi, Household margin insurance of agricultural sector in Indonesia using a farmer exchange rate index, Agric. Finance Rev. 81 (2020), pp. 169–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ahdika, D. Rosadi, and A.R. Effendie, Measuring dynamic dependency using time-Varying copulas with extended parameters: Evidence from exchange rates data, MethodsX 8 (2021), pp. 101322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ang and G. Bekaert, International asset allocation with time-varying correlations, Rev. Financial Stud. 15 (2002), pp. 1137–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Aubert and G. Enjolras, The determinants of chemical input use in agriculture: A dynamic analysis of the wine grape–growing sector in France, J. Wine Econ. 9 (2014), pp. 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• R. H. Blosser, Corn-hog ratio is poor indicator of hog profits, J. Farm Econ. 47 (1965), pp. 467–468.
   Google Scholar
• H. Buhlmann, An economic premium principle, Astin Bull. 11 (1980), pp. 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• I.N. Bunyasiri and P. Sirisupluxana, The possibility of implementing the area yield index rice insurance product in thailand 2018.
   Google Scholar
• R. Chakir and J. Hardelin, Crop insurance and pesticide use in French agriculture: An empirical analysis, Rev. Agric. Environ. Stud. 95 (2014), pp. 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• L. Chalise, K.H. Coble, B.J. Barnett, and J.C. Miller, Developing area-triggered whole-Farm revenue insurance, J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 42 (2017), pp. 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Chantarat, A.G. Mude, C.B. Barrett, and M.R. Carter, Designing index-based livestock insurance for managing asset risk in northern Kenya, J. Risk. Insur. 00 (2012), pp. 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• L. Chollete, A. Heinen, and A. Valdesogo, Modeling international financial returns with a multivariate regime-switching copula, J. Financial Econ. 7 (2009), pp. 437–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.B. Cole and R. Gibson, Analysis and feasibility of crop revenue insurance in China, Agric. Agric. Sci. Proc. 1 (2010), pp. 136–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.016
   Google Scholar
• A. Dias and P. Embrechts, Modeling exchange rate dependence dynamics at different time horizons, J. Int. Money Finance. 29 (2010), pp. 1687–1705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.V. Duarte and V.A. Ozaki, Pricing crop revenue insurance using parametric copulas, Rev. Brasileira De Econ. 73 (2019), pp. 325–343.
   Google Scholar
• P. Embrechts, F. Lindskog, and A. McNeil, Modeling dependence with copulas, Rapport technique, Département de mathématiques, Institut Fédéral de Technologie de Zurich, Zurich 14 (2001): pp. 1–50.
   Google Scholar
• B.K. Goodwin, M.C. Roberts, and K.H. Coble, Measurement of price risk in revenue insurance : implications of distributional assumptions, J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 25 (2000), pp. 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.M. Hafner and H. Manner, Dynamic stochastic copula models: Estimation, inference, and applications, J. Appl. Econ. 27 (2012), pp. 269–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. BPS-Statistics, Statistik Nilai Tukar Petani 2019, Tech. Rep. Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• A. Jasindo, Jasindo Agri, 2020, http://www.jasindo.co.id/product/ritel/agri.
   Google Scholar
• E. Jondeau and M. Rockinger, The copula-GARCH model of conditional dependencies: An international stock market application, J. Int. Money. Finance. 25 (2006), pp. 827–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Kahane, The theory of insurance risk premiums – A re-examination in the light of recent development in capital market theory, Astin Bull. 10 (1979), pp. 223–239.
   Google Scholar
• M.G. Kang, Innovative agricultural insurance products and schemes, Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia. Asuransi Usaha Tani Padi, Solusi Kegagalan Panen, 2015, http://www.pertanian.go.id/home/?show=news&act=view&id=1609.
   Google Scholar
• O. Mahul and B.D. Wright, Designing optimal crop revenue insurance, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85 (2003), pp. 580–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mane and B. Watkins, Stochastic analysis of margin protection (mp) crop insurance in arkansas rice production, AgEcon search: Research in agricultural and applied economics, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• H. Manner, F. Alavi Fard, A. Pourkhanali, and L. Tafakori, Forecasting the joint distribution of Australian electricity prices using dynamic vine copulae, Energy Econ. 78 (2019), pp. 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Manner and O. Reznikova, A survey on time-varying copulas: specification, simulations, and application, Econom. Rev. 31 (2012), pp. 654–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.D. Meilke, Another look at the Hog-Corn ratio, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 59 (1977), pp. 216–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.G. Merritt, A.P. Griffith, C.N. Boyer, and K.E. Lewis, Probability of receiving an indemnity payment from feeder cattle livestock risk protection insurance, J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 49 (2017), pp. 363–381.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Miranda, Area-Yield crop insurance reconsidered, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73 (1991), pp. 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Mishra and B.K. Goodwin, Revenue insurance purchase decisions of farmers, Appl. Econ. 38 (2006), pp. 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Möhring, T. Dalhaus, G. Enjolras, and R. Finger, Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture, Agric. Syst. 184 (2020), pp. 102902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Mude, S. Chantarat, C.B. Barrett, M. Carter, M. Ikegami, and J. Mcpeak, Insuring against drought-related livestock mortality: Piloting index based livestock insurance in northern Kenya. Available at SRRN 1844745, 2010, pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• J. Pai and N. Ravishanker, Livestock mortality catastrophe insurance using fatal shock process, Insur: Math. Econ. 90 (2020), pp. 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.J. Patton, Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence, Int. Econ. Rev. 47 (2006), pp. 527–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Pelletier, Regime switching for dynamic correlations, J. Econom. 131 (2006), pp. 445–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Ramchand and R. Susmel, Volatility and cross correlation across major stock markets, J. Empir. Finance 5 (1998), pp. 397–416.
   Google Scholar
• J.C. Rodriguez, Measuring financial contagion: A copula approach, J. Empir. Finance 14 (2007), pp. 401–423.
   Google Scholar
• J.R. Skees, J.R. Black, and B.J. Barnett, Designing and rating an area yield crop insurance contract, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 79 (1997), pp. 430–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sklar, Distribution functions of n dimensions and margins, Public. Inst. Stat. Univ. Paris 8 (1959), pp. 229–231.
   Google Scholar
•   Sumarno, Periodisasi Musim Tanam Padi Sebagai Landasan Manajemen Produksi Beras Nasional, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• S. Tiwari, Hedging the Price Risk of Crop Revenue Insurance Through the Options Market, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• C.G. Turvey, J. Woodard, and E. Liu, Financial engineering for the farm problem, Agric. Finance Rev. 74 (2014), pp. 271–286.
   Google Scholar
• T. Url, F. Sinabell, and K. Heinschink, Addressing basis risk in agricultural margin insurances the case of wheat production in Austria, Agric. Finance Rev. 78 (2018), pp. 233–245.
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Wolf, Understanding the milk-to-feed price ratio as a proxy for dairy farm profitability, J. Dairy. Sci. 93 (2010), pp. 4942–4948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Xu, J. Yuan and M. Xing, A Time-Varying Vine Copula Model for Dependence Analysis of Failure System, 2018 International Conference on Sensing, Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC), Xi'an, China, 2018, pp. 437–442.
   Google Scholar
• T. Ye, W. Hu, B.J. Barnett, J. Wang, and Y. Gao, Area yield index insurance or farm yield crop insurance? Chinese perspectives on farmers' welfare and government subsidy effectiveness, J. Agri. Econ. 71 (2020), pp. 144–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.R. Young, Premium principles, Wiley StatsRef, 2014, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar