British colonial civic improvement in the early twentieth century: E. P. Richards in Madras, Calcutta, and Singapore

Bibliography

• Membership lists of ICE & IMunE. Richards’ obituary notice is in Proceedings of ICE 23 (1962): 540–541.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. A., and R. A. Bayliss. “William John Ritchie Simpson (1855–1931).” Medical History 31 (1987): 450–465. doi: 10.1017/S0025727300047293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, Bill. The Upper Derwent: 10,000 Years in a Peak District Valley, 147–156. Stroud: Tempus, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bissell, William. Urban Design, Chaos, and Colonial Power in Zanzibar: Modernity and Metropolis in East Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bompas, Cecil. Folklore of the Santal Parganas. Translated by C. H. [the Editor of Material Collected by the Rev. O. Bodding]. London; printed in Holland, 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Bompas, Cecil. “The Work of the Calcutta Improvement Trust.” Journal of the Royal Society of Arts 75 (1927): 200–213.
   Google Scholar
• Catanach, Ian. “Plague and the Tensions of Empire: India 1896–1918.” In Imperial Medicine and Indigenous Societies, edited by David Arnold, 144–172. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, Swati. Representing Calcutta: Modernity, Nationalism and the Colonial Uncanny. London: Routledge, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, S. Calcutta: The Living City, vol. 1. Calcutta: Oxford University Press, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, Ernest, and Edwin Lee. A History of Singapore. Singapore: OUP, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, Partho. “How Modern Planning Came to Calcutta.” Planning Perspectives 28, no. 1 (2013): 139–147. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2012.737247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echenberg, Myron. Plague Ports: The Global Urban Impact of Bubonic Plague, 1894–1901. New York City: New York University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, James. The Work of the Singapore Improvement Trust 1927–1947. Singapore: Kiat, 1948.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, James. “The Work of the Singapore Improvement Trust 1927–1947.” JTPI 26 (1957): 190–196.
   Google Scholar
• Furedy, Chris. “Lord Curzon and the Reform of the Calcutta Corporation, 1899. A Case Study in Imperial Decision-Making.” South Asia 1 (1978): 75–89. doi: 10.1080/00856407808722960
   Google Scholar
• Glover, William. Making Lahore Modern: Constructing and Imagining a Colonial City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, Ban Lee. “Import of Urban Planning into Malaysia.” Planning History 10, no. 1 (1988): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Home, Robert. “Global Systems Foundations of the Discipline: Colonial, Post-colonial and Other Power Structures.” In Routledge Handbook of Planning History, edited by C. Hein. London: Routledge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Home, Robert. Of Planting and Planning: The Making of British Colonial Cities. 2nd ed. London: Spon, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, David, and Alan Lester, eds. Colonial Lives Across the British Empire: Imperial Careering in the Long Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lanchester, Henry. “Calcutta Improvement Trust: Precis of Mr. E.P. Richards’ Report on the City of Calcutta.” Town Planning Review 5 (1914): 115–130, 214–224. doi: 10.3828/tpr.5.2.27067052483l63x9
   Google Scholar
• Moorhouse, Geoffrey. Calcutta. Weidenfeld & Nicholson: London, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, Michael. “Towards an Archaeology of Navvy Huts and Settlements on the Industrial Revolution.” Antiquity 68 (1994): 573–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckham, Robert, and David Pomfret, eds. Imperial Contagions. Medicine, Hygiene, and Cultures of Planning in Asia. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, Martin, Lily Kong, and Brenda Yeoh, eds. Singapore: A Developmental City State. Chichester: John Wiley, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Edwin. The Condition, Improvement and Town Planning of the City of Calcutta and Contiguous Areas ( Reprint 2015) London: Routledge (Ware: Jennings and Bewley) Introduction by Richard Harris and Robert Lewis, 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Edwin. “A Memoir on the Geology of Newbury District.” In A Popular History of Newbury, edited by W. Money, 197–122. Newbury: W.J. Blacket, 1905.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Brian. Memories of Tin Town: The Navvy Village of Birchinlee and its People. Sheffield: Northend, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Andre. “Taking Path Dependency Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 30, no. 1 (2015): 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutphen, Mary. “Not What, but Where: Bubonic Plague and the Reception of Germ Theories in Hong Kong and Calcutta, 1894–1897.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 52, no. 1 (1997): 81–113. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/52.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, Stephen. “Re-examining the International Diffusion of Planning.” In Critical Readings in Planning Theory, edited by S. Fainstein and A. Scott, 479–498. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Withey, M. “ The Glasgow City Improvement Trust: An Analysis of Its Genesis, Impact and Legacy and an Inventory of Its Buildings, 1866–1910.” PhD, St. Andrews, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh, Brenda. Contesting Space: Power Relations and the Urban Built Environment in Colonial Singapore. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar