The development of strategic spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe: between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics

Bibliography

• Adams, Neil, Giancarlo Cotella, and Richard Nunes. Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Building on EU Enlargement. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bache, Ian. Europeanization and Multi-Level Governance: Cohesion Policy in the European Union and Britain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, John, and Irene McMaster. “EU Cohesion Policy and the Role of the Regions: Investigating the Influence of Structural Funds in the New Member States.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26, no. 2 (2008): 398–427. doi: 10.1068/c0662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, John, Carlos Mendez, and Hildegard Oraže. “From Conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative Performance and Capacity in Cohesion Policy.” European Planning Studies 22 (2014): 735–757. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.772744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bafoil, François, Fabienne Beaumelou, Rachel Guyet, Gilles Lepesant, Lhomel Édith, and Catherine Perron. “Jumelages Institutionnels : Les Limites D’un Apprentissage Collectif.” Critique Internationale 4, no. 25 (2004):157–167. doi: 10.3917/crii.025.0157
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, Kai, and Bas Waterhout. “The Europeanization of Planning.” In European Spatial Research and Planning, edited by Andreas Faludi, 225–248. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Brusis, Martin. “Between EU Requirements, Competitive Politics, and National Traditions: Re-Creating Regions in the Accession Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Governance 15, no. 4 (2002): 531–559. doi: 10.1111/1468-0491.00200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, Aron, and Umut Korkut. “Administrative Reform and Regional Development Discourses in Hungary. Europeanisation Going NUTS?” Europe – Asia Studies 65, no. 8 (2013):1555–1577. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.833015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Spatial Development. ESDP European Spatial Development Perspective Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, Giancarlo. “Spatial Planning in Poland Between European Influence and Dominant Market Forces.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, edited by Mario Reimer, Panagotis Getimis, and Hans Heinrich Blotevogel, 255–277. London: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, Giancarlo, and Umberto Janin Rivolin. A Conceptual Device for Spreading (Good) Territorial Governance in Europe. ESPON Scientific Report. Luxembourg: ESPON, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, Marcin. “Europeanizing Sub-National Governance: Partnership in the Implementation of European Union Structural Funds in Poland.” Regional Studies 47, no. 8 (2011): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, Marcin.“Shallow or Deep Europeanisation? The Uneven Impact of EU Cohesion Policy on the Regional and Local Authorities in Poland.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30, no. 4 (2012): 730–745. doi: 10.1068/c1164r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, Marcin.“EU Cohesion Policy, Horizontal Partnership and the Patterns of Sub-National Governance: Insights From Central and Eastern Europe.” European Urban and Regional Studies 21, no. 3 (2014): 364–383. doi: 10.1177/0969776413481983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, Marcin, John Bachtler, and François Bafoil. “Challenges of Multi-Level Governance and Partnership: Drawing Lessons From European Union Cohesion Policy.” European Urban and Regional Studies 21, no. 4 (2014): 355–363. doi: 10.1177/0969776414533020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dühr, Stefanie, Claire Colomb, and Vincent Nadin. European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation. London: Routledge, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “From European Spatial Development to Territorial Cohesion Policy.” Regional Studies 40 , no. 6 (2006): 667–678. doi: 10.1080/00343400600868937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “Territorial Cohesion Policy and the European Model of Society.” European Planning Studies 15, no. 4 (2007): 567–583. doi: 10.1080/09654310701232079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas. “Centenary Paper: European Spatial Planning: Past, Present and Future.” Town Planning Review 81, no. 1 (2010): 1–22. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2009.21
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, Andreas, and Bas Waterhout. The Making of the European Spatial Development Perspective: No Masterplan. London: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, Martin, and Irene Mcmaster. “Implementing Structural Funds in Polish and Czech Regions: Convergence, Variation, Empowerment?” Regional & Federal Studies 15, no. 1 (2005): 19–39. doi: 10.1080/13597560500084046
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, Martin, and Irene McMaster. “Cohesion Policy and the Evolution of Regional Policy in Central and Eastern Europe.” Europe-Asia Studies 65, no. 8 (2013): 1502–1528. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.832969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finka, Maroš. “5 Evolving Frameworks for Regional Development and Spatial Planning in the New Regions of the EU.” In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Building on EU Enlargement, edited by Neil Adams, Giancarlo Cotella, and Richard Nunes, 103–122. London: Routledge, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44, no. 5 (1996): 936–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hladík, Jan and Václav Kopecký. “Public administration reform in the Czech Republic.” Research Paper, Association for International Affairs, 1–34, March, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Lisbet. “Building a Europe with the Regions: The Changing Role of the European Commission.” In Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multi-Level Governance, edited by Lisbet Hooghe, 89–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, James, Gwendolyn Sasse, and Claire Gordon. “Conditionality and Compliance in the EU’s Eastward Enlargement: Regional Policy and the Reform of Sub-National Government.” Journal of Common Market Studies 42, no. 3 (2004): 523–551. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00517.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács, Ilona Pálné. “Regionalization in Hungary: Options and Scenarios on the ‘Road to Europe.’” In De-Coding New Regionalism. Shifting Socio-Political Contexts in Central Europe and Latin America, edited by James W. Scott, 199–214. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, Ilona Pálné. “Local Governance in Hungary – The Balance of the Last 20 Years.” Discussion Papers Cenre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences 83 (2011). Pecs: RKK, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, Ilona Pálné, Christos Paraskevopoulos, and Gyula Horváth. “Institutional ‘Legacies’ and the Shaping of Regional Governance in Hungary.” Regional & Federal Studies 14, no. 3 (2004): 430–460. doi: 10.1080/1359756042000261388
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–548. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, Karel. “11 The Pursuit of Balanced Territorial Development.” In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, edited by Neil Adams, Giancarlo Cotella, and Richard Nunes, 266–290. London: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, Karel. “Changing Planning in the Czech Republic.” In Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe. A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, edited by Mario Reimer, Panagiotis Getimis, and Hans Blotevogel, 215–235. New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Malý, Jiří, and Mulíček Ondřej. “European Territorial Cohesion Policies: Parallels to Socialist Central Planning?” Moravian Geographical Reports 24, no. 1 (2016): 14–26. doi: 10.1515/mgr-2016-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzella, Gian Paolo, and Carlos Mendez. The Turning Points of EU Cohesion Policy. Brussels: European Commission, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Milio, Simona. “Can Administrative Capacity Explain Differences in Regional Performances? Evidence From Structural Funds Implementation in Southern Italy.” Regional Studies 41, no. 4 (2007): 429–442. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milio, Simona. “The Conflicting Effects of Multi-Level Governance and the Partnership Principle: Evidence From the Italian Experience.” European Urban & Regional Studies 2, no. 4 (2014): 384–397. doi: 10.1177/0969776413493631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedović-Budić, Zorica. “Adjustment of Planning Practice to the New Eastern and Central European Context.” Journal of the American Planning Association 67, no. 1 (2001): 38–52. doi: 10.1080/01944360108976354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Territorial Reviews: Poland 2008. OECD, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. How Regions Grow: Trends and Analysis. OECD, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pallagst, Karina M., and Georges Mercier. “Urban and Regional Planning in Central and Eastern European Countries – From EU Requirements to Innovative Practices.” In The Post-Socialist City, edited by Kiril Stanilov, 473–490. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul, and Theda Skocpol. “Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, 693–721. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Polverari, Laura, and John Bachtler. “The Contribution of European Structural Funds to Territorial Cohesion.” Town Planning Review 76, no. 1 (2005): 29–42. doi: 10.3828/tpr.76.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Polverari, Laura, Irene McMaster, Frederika Gross, John Bachtler, Martin Ferry, and Douglas Yuill. Strategic Planning for Structural Funds in 2007–2013. A Review of Strategies and Programmes. 20th IQ-Net Conference 2006-06-27. Glasgow: EPRC, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Regulski, Jerzy. Local Government Reform in Poland: An Insider’s Story. Budapest: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, Mario, Panagiotis Getimis, and Hans Blotevogel. Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes. New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Scherpereel, John A. “EU Cohesion Policy and the Europeanization of Central and East European Regions.” Regional & Federal Studies 20, no. 1 (2010): 45–62. doi: 10.1080/13597560903174899
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Ulrich Sedelmeier. “Governance by Conditionality: EU Rule Transfer to the Candidate Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 11, no. 4 (2004): 661–679. doi: 10.1080/1350176042000248089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, Ulrich. “Is Europeanisation Through Conditionality Sustainable? Lock-in of Institutional Change After EU Accession.” West European Politics 35, no. 1 (2011): 20–38. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, André. “Taking Path Dependence Seriously: An Historical Institutionalist Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspectives 30, no. 1 (2015): 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, Dominic, and Giancarlo Cotella. “Differential Europe: Domestic Actors and Their Role in Shaping Spatial Planning Systems.” disP – The Planning Review 47, no. 186 (2011): 13–21. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2011.10557140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, Dominic, and Vincent Nadin. 2011. “Shifts in Territorial Governance and the Europeanization of Spatial Planning in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU, edited by N Adams, G Cotella, and R Nunes, 154–177. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, Paweł. “Size of Local Government, Local Democracy and Efficiency in Delivery of Local Services —International Context and Theoretical Framework.” In Consolidation or Fragmentation? The Size of Local Government in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Paweł Swianiewicz, 5–29. Budapest: Open Society Institute, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Varró, Krisztina, and László Faragó. “The Politics of Spatial Policy and Governance in Post-1990 Hungary: The Interplay Between European and National Discourses of Space.” European Planning Studies 24, no. 1 (2016): 39–60. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1066760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBU. Studium Zagospodarowania Przestrzennego Pogranicza Polsko–Czeskiego. Warsaw: Ministry of Infrastructure and Construction of Poland/Ministry of Development of the Czech Republic, 2004.
   Google Scholar