Path dependency in aesthetic control management within Turkish planning history

Bibliography

• Ahmad Nia, Hourakhsh, and Resmiye Alpar Atun. “Aesthetic Design Thinking Model for Urban Environments: A Survey Based on a Review of the Literature.” Urban Design International 21, no. 3 (2016): 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataöv, Anıl, and Sevin Osmay. “Türkiye’de Kentsel Dönüş Üme Yöntemsel Bir Yaklaşım.” METU, JFA 24, no. 2 (2007): 57–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ayataç, Hatiçe. “Influence of International Planning Ideas on Istanbul’s Urban Fabric.” Paper presented at the Annual International Conference IPHS, Istanbul, Turkey, 13–15, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ayataç, Hatiçe. “The International Diffusion of Planning Ideas: The Case of Istanbul, Turkey.” Journal of Planning History 6 (2007): 114–136.
   Google Scholar
• Arıkboğa, Erbay. “Büyükşehir Belediye Modeli ve Reform.” Marmara Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2 (2014): 32.
   Google Scholar
• Ayrancı, İrem. “Metropoliten alanlarda planlama-kentsel gelişimin yöntemini ilişkisi ve bir izleme değerlendirme model önerisi.” 10–30. PhD thesis, Istanbul Technical University, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Balaban, Osman. “The Negative Effects of Construction Boom on Urban Planning and Environment in Turkey: Unraveling the Role of the Public Sector.” Habitat İnternational 36 (2012): 26–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boratav, Korkut, A. Erinc Yeldan, and Ahmet Kose. “Globalization, Distribution and Social Policy: Turkey, 1980–1998.” 3. Center of Economy Analysis, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Yılmaz Bakır, Neşe. “Delineation of Path Dependence in Development of Central Business Districts (CBD) in Turkey’s Kayseri.” Periodica Polytechnica Architecture 51 (2020): 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, Chris. “The Contingent Public Value of ‘Good Design’: Regulating the Aesthetics of the Australian Urban Built Environment.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 73, no. 2 (2014): 282–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilsel, Cana, and Haluk Zelef. “Mega Events in Istanbul from Henri Prost’s Master Plan of 1937 to the Twenty-First-Century Olympic Bids.” Planning Perspectives 26, no. 4 (2011): 621–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burat, Sinan. “The Changing Morphology of Urban Greenways, Ankara, 1923–1960.” PhD Thesisi, METU, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Cantemir, Bekir. “Çok PartiLi Hayata Geçiş Sürecinde Istanbul’un Mekân ve Sosyal Yapi Dönüşümü (1946–1960).” PhD thesis, Marmara Üniversitesi, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Zeynep. “The Remarking of İstanbul: The Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century.” University of California Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Zeynep. “19.: yüzyılda Osmanlı Başkenti, Değişen İstanbul.” Türkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Çelebi, Çiğdem, and Belinda Torus. “The Investigation of City Hospitals Within the Scope of Urban Planning in Turkey.” Intercultural Understanding 10 (2020): 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Çavdar, Ayşe. “Kutsal Hırsın Beton Gölgesi: Çamlıca Camii Neyin Anıtı? Otoriter Neoliberalizmin Gölgesinde’Kent Mekan İnsan.” Nika Yayınevi, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Conteh, Charles, and Diana Panter. “Path-Dependence and the Challenges of Institutional Adaptability: The Case of the Niagara Region in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50, no. 4 (2017): 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinçer, İclal. “The Impact of Neoliberal Policies on Historic Urban Space: Areas of Urban Renewal in Istanbul.” International Planning Studies 16, no. 1 (2011): 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Duyguluer, Fridun. “Imar ve Şehir Planlama Mevzuatının Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Mimarlığına Etkileri.” T.B.M.M. Kültür Sanat ve Yayın Kurulu Yayınları, 38, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Durhan, Sıla. “Özlem Erken Cumhuriyet Istanbul’unda Kentsel Değişim (1928–1950).” [Urban Change in the Early Republic of Istanbul (1928–1950).] PhD thesis, Yildiz Teknik Üniversitesi, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Egli, Ernst. “Genç Türkiye İnşa Edilirken – Atatürk'ün Mimarının Anıları.” Kültür Yayınları, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan, Nihal E. “Ebniye Nizamnamelerinden Şehir Planlama Teorisine Uzanan Yol: Istanbul’da Şehir Planlama.” Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 21, no. 4 (2012): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan, Nihal. “Urban Planning in Turkey as a Process of Translation.” Translation Studies 3, no. 2 (2010): 188–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, Melih. “Relations Between Central and Local Governments in Turkey: A Historical Perspective.” Public Administration And Development 12 (1992): 325–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, Melih. “kentsel planlama kuramları.” İmge Kitabevi, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Garvin, Elizabeth A., and Glen Leroy. “Design Guidelines: The Law of Aesthetic Controls.” Land Use Law and Zoning Digest 5, no. 4 (2003): 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gedikli, Bahar. “Examination of the Interpretation of Strategic Spatial Planning in Three Cases from Turkey.” European Planning Studies 18, no. 2 (2010): 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gül, Mehmet M., and Richard Lamb. “Urban Planning in Istanbul in the Early Republican Period.” Architectural Theory Review 9, no. 1 (2004): 59–81.
   Google Scholar
• Günay, Zeynep. “Yeni Liberal Kentleşme Kavramı ve Politikaları’ Kentsel Planlama Ansiklopedik Sözlük.” Ninova Yayınları, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Güzey, Özlem. “The Last Round in Restructuring the City: Urban Regeneration Becomes a State Policy of Disaster Prevention in Turkey.” Cities 50 (2016): 40–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastaoglou Martinidis, Vilma. “Urban Aesthetics and National Identity: The Refashioning of Eastern Mediterranean Cities Between 1900 and 1940.” Planning Perspectives 26, no. 2 (2011): 153–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Patsy. “European Urban Planning Systems: Diversity and Convergence.” Urban Studies 30, no. 4(5) (1993): 701–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İbidan, Zuhal. “The Urban Development of Istanbul in the Nineteenth Century: The Role of Expropriations.” Master thesis, Boğaziçi University, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Karakaya, Emel. “Construction of the Republic in City Space: From Political Ideal to Urban Planning Principles.” Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kastas Uzun, Ipek, and Fatma Senol. “Recent ‘Nation Gardens’ and Historical Development of Public Green Spaces in Turkey.” Art-Sanat 14 (2020): 211–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keleş, Ruşen. “Kent ve Çevre Değerleri Bağlamında Kamu Yararı Kavramı.” In Mekan Planlama ve Yargı, Denetimi içinde, Der. by Melih Ersoy and H. Çağatay Keskinok. Yargı Yayınevi, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Keleş, Uğur. “İmar Kanunu ve Yönetmeliklerinin Mimari Tasarım Oluşumuna ve Uyguamasına Etkileri Üzerine bir İnceleme.” Master thesis, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kilinç, Gökçe, Hüseyin Özgür, and Genç Neval. “The Possible Sources of Ethical Issues in Urban/Physical Planning in Turkey.” Turkish Studies 13, no. 1 (2012): 45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köktürk, Erdal. “Türkiye’de ‘Gecekondu ve İmar Affı’ Üzerine Bir İnceleme.” HKM Jeodezi Jeoinformasyon Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi 89 (2003): 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyucu, Tuna. “Türkiye'de Kentsel Dönüşümün Dönüşümü: Kuramsal Bir Açıklama Denemesi.” IdealKent 9, no. 24 (2018): 364–386.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Taek Ku. “Rethinking Path Dependency and Regional Innovation – Policy Induced ‘Government Dependency’: The Case of Daedeok, South Korea.” World Technopolis Review 1, no. 2 (2012): 92–106.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, James. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29, no. 4 (2000): 507–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mary Gregor, J. “Baumgarten’s ‘Aesthetica’.” The Review of Metaphysics 37 (1983): 357–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelissen, Nico J. M., and Cees L. F. M Vocht. “Aesthetic Control in Europe.” Journal of Housing and Built Environment 6, no. 4 (1991): 347.
   Google Scholar
• Özalp, Seçil, and Gülden Erkut. “Kamu Yararı Perspektifinden İstanbul’da Kentsel Müdahaleler.” Planlama 26, no. 3 (2016): 242.
   Google Scholar
• Özalp, Seçil. “İstanbul’da Neoliberal Kentleşme Dinamikleri:Kamu Yararı ve Kentsel Rejim Analizi.” PhD thesis, Istanbul Technical University, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, Koray. “Tanzimat’ın Kent Reformları, Türk Imar Sisteminin Kuruluş Sürecinde Erken Planlama Deneyimleri (1839–1908).” Osmanlı Bilim Araştırmaları VII/2 (2006): 150–180.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, H. Aysun, and Ş. Şence Turk. “Emergence, Formation and Outcomes of Flexibility in Turkish Planning Practice.” International Development Planning Review 38 (2016): 31–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, F. Pelin, and Hale Çıracı. “The Planning History of Turkey: Policies, Practices, Breakdowns.” Paper presented at the Annual International Conference 14th IPHS, Istanbul, Turkey, 1–9, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, Hilal Erkuş, and Terhorst Pieter. “Variety of Urban Tourism Development Trajectories: Antalya, Amsterdam and Liverpool Compared.” European Planning Studies 20, no. 4 (2012): 665–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öktem, Binnur. “Küresel Kent Söyleminin Kentsel Mekanı Dönüştürmedeki Rolü: Büyükdere – Maslak Aksı, Ed. H. Kurtuluş, İstanbul'da Kentsel Ayrışma: Mekansal Dönüşümde Farklı Boyutlar.” Bağlam Yayıncılık, Istanbul, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, Pion. “The Urbanism of Henri Prost and Transformations of Istanbul, From the Imperial Capital to the Republican Modern City, Henri Prost’s Planning of Istanbul (1936–1951).” Istanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. “Interesting Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (2000): 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punter, John. “Aesthetic Control/Design Control in the United Kingdom.” Urban Design International 4 (1999): 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ploger, J. “Discoursive Planning and the Ethics of Closeness Trends in Urban Planning.” 1–20. Norwegian Institute for Urban & Regional Research/Danish Building & Urban Research, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rezafar, Azadeh, and S. Sence Turk. “Proposing a Checklist for Aesthetic Control and Management in a City Under Neoliberal Influences: Istanbul Case.” Open House International 47, no. 1 (2021): 68–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezafar, Azadeh. “Aesthetic Control Management, the Case of Istanbul.” PhD thesis, Istanbul Technical University, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rezafar, Azadeh, and S. Sence Turk. “The History of Aesthetic Control and Management in the Planning System, the Case of Turkey.” Paper presented at the annual international Conference IPHS, Delft, Netherlands, July 17–21, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rezafar, Azadeh, and Sevkiye Sence Turk. “Urban Design Factors Involved in the Aesthetic Assessment of Newly Built Environments and Their Incorporation into Legislation: The Case of Istanbul.” Urbani-izziv 29, no. 2 (2018): 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Salman, Yıldız, and Doğan Kuban. “Boğaziçi tarihi sit alanının yokoluş süreci.” İTU Dergisi/a 5, no. 1 (2010): 104–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sarı, Tüba, and Yurdanur Dülgeroğlu. “The Development of High-Rise Housing Image in Istanbul: Policies and Architecturalis(m)s.” Megaron 14 (2019): 133–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şengül, H. Tarık. “Planlama Paradigmalarının Dönüşümü Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme’, Melih Ersoy Kentsel Planlama Kuramları.” İmge Kitabevi, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, Cristian. “Aesthetic Control Management in the German Planning Process.” Urban Design International 4 (1999): 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Sınacı, Fulya. “Stratejik Mekansal Planlamanın Yasal Boyut Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, Türkiye-AB Karşılaştırılması.” Master thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Suher, H. “Kent Kimliğine Etkili Yasa Uygulamaları.” Paper presented at the Conference Mimari ve Kentsel Çevrede Kalite Arayışları İstanbul, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Şengül, Tarık. “Planlama Perspektifinden Büyükúehirlerde Hastanelerin Yer Seçimi Kararları. Şehir Hastaneleri Sempozyumu.” Paper presented at the Şehir Hastaneleri Conference TMMOB Mimarlar Odası, Ankara, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, Andre. “Taking Path Dependence Seriously: A Historical Institutional Research Agenda in Planning History.” Planning Perspective 30, no. 1 (2014): 17–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Rolf. “The Urban Aesthetic in Comparative Perspective.” Environmental, Urban and Geographic Studies 24 (1991): 70–79.
   Google Scholar
• Tankut, Gönül. “Ankara’nın başkent olma süreci.” ODTÜ MFD 8, no. 2 (1988): 93–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan Kok, Tuna. “Analysing Path Dependence to Understand Divergence: Investigating Hybrid Neoliberal Urban Transformation Processes in Turkey.” European Planning Studies 23, no. 11 (2015): 2184–2209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekeli, Ilhan. “Türkiye’de Kent Planlaması Düşüncesinin Gelişimi.” Yapı Dergisi 291 (2006): 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Tekeli, Ilhan. “Türkiye’nin Kent Planlama ve Kent Araştırmaları Tarihi Yazıları.” Tarih Vakıf Yurt Yayınları, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tekeli, Ilhan. “Lessons to Turkey’s Urbanization Experience.” 4th Merih Celasun Memorial Day, Tepav, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Torlak, S. Evinç. “Gecekondulaşmanın Gelişimi, İmar Afları ve Islah İmar Planları.” TODAİE, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler 12, no. 1 (2003): 64–73.
   Google Scholar
• Türk, S. Sence, and Esra Demircioğlu. “Use of Market-led Measures for Land Assembly in Turkey.” Habitat International 40 (2013): 201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türkün, Asuman. Mülk, Mahal, İnsan: İstanbul’da Kentsel Dönüşüm [Property, Location, People: Urban Transformation in Istanbul]. Istanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Türkün, Asuman. “Urban Regeneration and Hegemonic Power Relationships.” International Urban Studies 16, no. 1 (2011): 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Uzun, Nil. “Yeni Yasal Düzenlemeler ve Kentsel Dönüșüme Etkileri.” Planlama 2006, no. 2 (2006): 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Ünal, Yücel. “An Examination of Turkish Planning and Development Legal Sources by Focusing on the Urban Regeneration and Earthquake.” Yetkin Kitabevi, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ünal, Yücel. “Türk Şehir Planlama Hukukunun Dünü, Bugünü 1985–2015.” Legal Yayınları, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, David M., and Kiyoshi Abe. “The Aesthetics of Control: Mega-Event and Urban Governance in Japan.” Urban Studies 48, no. 15 (2011): 3241–3258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodlief, Anthony. “The Path Dependence City.” Urban Affairs Review 33, no. 3 (1998): 405–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weert, Carry Van. “Aesthetic Control Management in the Netherlands.” Urban Design International 4 (1999): 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yenice, M. Serhat. “Türkiye’nin Kentsel Dönüşüm Deneyiminin Tarihsel Analizi.” BAÜ Dergisi 16, no. 1 (2014): 76–88.
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, Sibel. “Critical Evaluation of ‘Adjacent Areas’ Concept from Urban Growth Perspective in Turkish Urban Planning: The Case of Ankara.” Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, E. H., Jr. “Aesthetic in Ohio Land Use Law: Preserving Beauty in the Parlor and Keeping Pigs in the Barnyard.” Akron Law Review 19, no. 1 (1985): 2–33.
   Google Scholar
• GYODER. “Gayrimenkul Sektörel ve Istanbul Konut piyasası Saha Araştırma Raporu” [Real Estate Sector and Istanbul Housing Market Field Survey Report], 2013. Accessed March 25, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• GYODER. “Reconstruction of Istanbul, Reconnection, Regeneration, Resettlement.” 2015. Accessed March 25, 2017. https://www.gyoder.org.tr/uploads/Restructuring.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Law No. 6306 on Restructuring of Areas under Risk of Natural Disasters. Accessed July 8, 2021. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/05/20120531-1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Urbanization [Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı]. “Riskli Bina Sayısı.” İstanbul Çevre ve Şehircilik Müdürlüğü, İstanbul, 2014. Accessed July 1, 2022). https://emlakkulisi.com/istanbulda-riskli-yapi-basvurusu-ve-yikilan-riskli-yapi-sayisi/226337 (https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/riskli-binayi-yikin-41452874).
   Google Scholar
• The Metropolitan Municipality Law No. 3030. Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.csb.gov.tr/turkce/index.php?Sayfa=sayfa&Tur=mevzuat&Id=98.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality Law No. 5216. Accessed June 1, 2020. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/Metin1.Aspx?MevzuatKod=1.5.5216&MevzuatIliski=0&sourceXmlSearch=&Tur=1&Tertip=5&No=526.
   Google Scholar
• The Municipal Law No. 5393. Accessed March 2, 2019. http://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.5393.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Special Provincial Administrations Law No. 5302. Accessed March 2, 2019. http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/03/20050304-1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• “Risky Buildings.” Accessed July 1, 2022. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/ekonomi/riskli-binayi-yikin-41452874.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Report. Accessed July 5, 2022. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/mpgm/icerikler/cdp_rev_rapor_2021-duzenlenm-s–20210323135631.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• “Toki.” Accessed July 30, 2019. https://www.toki.gov.tr/haber/tokiden-30-ile-41-millet-bahcesi.
   Google Scholar
• “Haber. Atatürk Havalimanı Millet bahçesi oluyor.” Accessed July 3, 2022. https://haber.aero/havacilik/ataturk-havalimani-millet-bahcesi-oluyor/.
   Google Scholar