The impact of organisational change on professionals working within a Community Mental Health Team (CMHT): a psychodynamic perspective

References

• Anderson, J. (2006). Well-suited partners: Psychoanalytic research and grounded theory. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 32, 329–348.10.1080/00754170600997026
   Google Scholar
• Ballatt, J., & Campling, P. (2014). Intelligent kindness: Reforming the culture of healthcare. London: RCPsych publications.
   Google Scholar
• Berwick, D. (2013). A promise to learn, a commitment to act: The Berwick Review into Patient Safety. National Advisory Group on the Safety of Patients in England. London: Department of Health. Retrieved from http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/226703/Berwick_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84, 517–538.10.1111/padm.2006.84.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81–110). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012214640-4/50011-5
   Google Scholar
• Durdy, H., & Bradshaw, T. (2014). The impact of organisational change in the NHS on staff and patients: A literature review with a focus on mental health. Mental Health Nursing, 34, 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, R. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry. Executive summary. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hashmat, H., Upthegrove, R., & Marzanski, M. (2015). Impact of functionalisation on staff morale in CMHTs. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, 19, 24–27.10.1002/pnp.2015.19.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, R. D. (1989). A dictionary of Kleinian thought. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, R. D., & Skogstad, W. (2000). Observing organisations: Anxiety, defence, and culture in health care. London: Bruner Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinshelwood, R. D., & Skogstad, W. (2002). Irradiated by distress: Observing psychic pain in health-care organizations. Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, 16, 110–124.10.1080/14749730210129361
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P. (2010). Government and the perverse social defence. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 26, 202–212.10.1111/bjp.2010.26.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Jaques, E. (1953). On the dynamics of social structure a contribution to the psycho-analytical study of social phenomena. Human Relations, 6, 3–24.10.1177/001872675300600101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. (2013). A compassionate formulation of task drift in mental health staff. Mental Health Review Journal, 18, 73–82.10.1108/MHRJ-01-2013-0001
   Google Scholar
• King, N., & Anderson, N. (1995). Innovation and change in organisations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, A. (2001). A psychodynamic view of two forensic mental health services. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, S68–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, A., & Jeffcote, N. (2011). Everything contradicts in your mind’: A qualitative study of experiences of forensic mental health staff in two contrasting services. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 21, 245–258.10.1002/cbm.v21.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, S. (2008). The perverse organisation and its deadly sins. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• McGivern, G., & Ferlie, E. (2007). Playing tick-box games: Interrelating defences in professional appraisal. Human Relations, 60, 1361–1385.10.1177/0018726707082851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies Lyth, I. (1959). The functioning of social systems as a defence against anxiety. Human Relations, 13, 95–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (2005). What is best ‘value’? Bureaucracy, virtualism and local governance. In P. Du Gay (Ed.), The values of bureaucracy (pp. 233–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morante, F. (2005). Applying psychodynamic thinking in a staff support group to reflect on service change and clinical practice in a specialist psychiatric service. Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, 19, 103–120.10.1080/02668730500114948
   Google Scholar
• Obholzer, A. (1994). Managing social anxieties in the public sector. In A. Obholzer & V. Z. Roberts (Eds.), The unconscious at work: Individual and organisational stress in the human services (pp. 169–178). London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203359860
   Google Scholar
• Powell, S., & Morris, A. (2001). Loss and change in primary care: Working with organisational anxiety. Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, 15, 207–223.10.1080/02668730100700151
   Google Scholar
• Rizq, R. (2011). IAPT, anxiety, and envy: A psychodynamic view of NHS primary care mental health services today. Public Sector Practice, 27, 37–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rizq, R. (2012a). The ghost in the machine: IAPT and organizational Melancholia. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 28, 319–335.10.1111/j.1752-0118.2012.01281.x
   Google Scholar
• Rizq, R. (2012b). The perversion of care: Psychological therapies in a time of IAPT. Psychodynamic Practice, 18, 7–24.10.1080/14753634.2012.640161
   Google Scholar
• Rizq, R. (2013). States of abjection. Organization Studies, 34, 1277–1297.10.1177/0170840613477640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Turpin, G., Barley, V., Beail, N., Seaire, J., Slade, P., Smith, J. A., & Walsh, S. (1997). Standards for research projects and theses involving qualitative methods: Suggested guidelines for trainees and courses. Clinical Psychology Forum, 108, 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Tweed, A., & Charmaz, K. (2012). Grounded theory methods for mental health practitioners. In A. R. Harper & D. Thompson (Eds.), Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners (pp. 131–146). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby, P., & Gracias, S. (2013). Reflecting on the Francis report: This has happened before. Clinical Psychology Forum, 249, 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2011). Challenges for the Munro review? Journal of Social Work Practice, 25, 481–495.10.1080/02650533.2011.626654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, B. (2014). Managing staff experience to improve organisational culture. Implementing culture change within the NHS: Contributions from organisational psychology. Occupational psychology in public policy (OPIPP) Group Report. Retrieved from https://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/userfiles/Division%20of%20Occupational%20Psychology/public/17689_cat-1658.pdf
   Google Scholar