Twins and twin-related domains in a grain boundary-engineered 304 stainless steel

References

• Watanabe T. Grain boundary engineering: historical perspective and future prospects. J Mater Sci. 2011;46:4095–4115. doi: 10.1007/s10853-011-5393-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randle V. Twinning-related grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2004;52:4067–4081. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehockey EM, Limoges D, Palumbo G, et al. On improving the corrosion and growth resistance of positive Pb-acid battery grids by grain boundary engineering. J Power Sources. 1999;78:79–83. doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin P, Palumbo G, Erb U, et al. Influence of grain boundary character distribution on sensitization and intergranular corrosion of alloy 600. Scripta Metall Mater. 1995;33:1387–1392. doi: 10.1016/0956-716X(95)00420-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepak K, Mandal S, Athreya CN, et al. Implication of grain boundary engineering on high temperature hot corrosion of alloy 617. Corros Sci. 2016;106:293–297. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu CL, Xi S, Li H, et al. Improving the intergranular corrosion resistance of 304 stainless steel by grain boundary network control. Corros Sci. 2011;53:1880–1886. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West EA, Was GS. IGSCC of grain boundary engineered 316L and 690 in supercritical water. J Nucl Mater. 2009;392:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertsman VY, Bruemmer SM. Study of grain boundary character along intergranular stress corrosion crack paths in austenitic alloys. Acta Mater. 2001;49:1589–1598. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Xia S, Bai Q, Zhou B, et al. Three-dimensional study of grain boundary engineering effects on intergranular stress corrosion cracking of 316 stainless steel in high temperature water. J Nucl Mater. 2018;498:290–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehockey EM, Palumbo G. On the creep behaviour of grain boundary engineered nickel 1. Mat Sci Eng A. 1997;237:168–172. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00126-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandreanu B, Was GS. The role of stress in the efficacy of coincident site lattice boundaries in improving creep and stress corrosion cracking. Scripta Mater. 2006;54:1047–1052. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Fujii H, Oikawa H, et al. Grain boundaries in rapidly solidified and annealed Fe-6.5 mass% Si polycrystalline ribbons with high ductility. Acta Metall. 1989;37:941–952. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90021-7
   Google Scholar
• Kumar M, Schwartz AJ, King WE. Microstructural evolution during grain boundary engineering of low to medium stacking fault energy fcc materials. Acta Mater. 2002;50:2599–2612. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TG, Xia S, Li H, et al. The highly twinned grain boundary network formation during grain boundary engineering. Mater Lett. 2014;133:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T. Approach to grain boundary design for strong and ductile polycrystals. Res Mech. 1984;11:47–84.
   Google Scholar
• Masoumi M, Santos LPM, Bastos IN, et al. Texture and grain boundary study in high strength Fe–18Ni–Co steel related to hydrogen embrittlement. Mater Design. 2016;91:90–97. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das A. Grain boundary engineering: fatigue fracture. Philos Mag. 2017;97:867–916. doi: 10.1080/14786435.2017.1285072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saylor D, El-Dasher B, Adams B, et al. Measuring the five-parameter grain-boundary distribution from observations of planar sections. Metall Mat Trans A. 2004;35:1981–1989. doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0147-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michiuchi M, Kokawa H, Wang ZJ, et al. Twin-induced grain boundary engineering for 316 austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2006;54:5179–5184. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi S, Kobayashi R, Watanabe T. Control of grain boundary connectivity based on fractal analysis for improvement of intergranular corrosion resistance in SUS316L austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2016;102:397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokita S, Kokawa H, Sato YS, et al. In situ EBSD observation of grain boundary character distribution evolution during thermomechanical process used for grain boundary engineering of 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Charact. 2017;131:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TG, Xia S, Li H, et al. Effect of initial grain sizes on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in Alloy 690. J Mater Res. 2013;28:1165–1176. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2013.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TG, Xia S, Li H, et al. Effect of the pre-existing carbides on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in a nickel based alloy. Mater Charact. 2014;91:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Xia S, Bai Q, et al. Effects of initial microstructure on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in Hastelloy N alloy. J Alloy Compd. 2017;704:724–733. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telang A, Gill AS, Kumar M, et al. Iterative thermomechanical processing of alloy 600 for improved resistance to corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. Acta Mater. 2016;113:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randle V. Mechanism of twinning-induced grain boundary engineering in low stacking-fault energy materials. Acta Mater. 1999;47:4187–4196. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind J, Li SF, Kumar M. Twin related domains in 3D microstructures of conventionally processed and grain boundary engineered materials. Acta Mater. 2016;114:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Xia S, Wang B, et al. Grain orientation statistics of grain-clusters and the propensity of multiple-twinning during grain boundary engineering. Mater Design. 2016;112:442–448. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsurekawa S, Nakamichi S, Watanabe T. Correlation of grain boundary connectivity with grain boundary character distribution in austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 2006;54:3617–3626. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telang A, Gill AS, Tammana D, et al. Surface grain boundary engineering of Alloy 600 for improved resistance to stress corrosion cracking. Mater Sci Eng A. 2015;648:280–288. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.09.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randle V. Grain boundary engineering: an overview after 25 years. Mater Sci Tech. 2010;26:253–261. doi: 10.1179/026708309X12601952777747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cayron C. Quantification of multiple twinning in face centred cubic materials. Acta Mater. 2011;59:252–262. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bober DB, Lind J, Mulay RP, et al. The formation and characterization of large twin related domains. Acta Mater. 2017;129:500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia S, Zhou BX, Chen WJ. Grain cluster microstructure and grain boundary character distribution in alloy 690. Metall Mater Trans A. 2009;40:3016–3030. doi: 10.1007/s11661-009-0035-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Xia S, Zhou B, et al. Three-dimensional characteristics of the grain boundary networks of conventional and grain boundary engineered 316L stainless steel. Mater Charact. 2017;133:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed BW, Kumar M, Minich RW, et al. Fracture roughness scaling and its correlation with grain boundary network structure. Acta Mater. 2008;56:3278–3289. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertsman VY, Henager CH. Grain boundary junctions in microstructure generated by multiple twinning. Interface Science. 2003;11:403–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1026191810431
   Google Scholar
• Meyers MA, Murr LE. A model for the formation of annealing twins in F.C.C. metals and alloys. Acta Metall. 1978;26:951–962. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(78)90046-9
   Google Scholar
• Mahajan S, Pande CS, Imam MA, et al. Formation of annealing twins in f.c.c. crystals. Acta Mater. 1997;45:2633–2638. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bystrzycki J, Przetakiewicz W. 3-Dimensional reconstruction of annealing twins shape in FCC metals by serial sectioning. Scripta Metall Mater. 1992;27:893–896. doi: 10.1016/0956-716X(92)90412-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm EA, Duxbury PM. Three-dimensional materials science. Scripta Mater. 2006;54:1035–1040. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos A, Zaefferer S, Raabe D. Three-dimensional EBSD study on the relationship between triple junctions and columnar grains in electrodeposited Co–Ni films. J Microsc. 2008;230:487–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02008.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaefferer S, Wright SI, Raabe D. Three-dimensional orientation microscopy in a focused ion beam-scanning electron microscope: a new dimension of microstructure characterization. Metall Mater Trans A. 2008;39:374–389. doi: 10.1007/s11661-007-9418-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon S, Lee S, Rollett A, et al. Measuring the five parameter grain boundary character distribution from three-dimensional orientation maps. Microsc Microanal. 2008;14:978–979. doi: 10.1017/S1431927608085139
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, Ferry M, Mateescu N, et al. Techniques for generating 3-D EBSD microstructures by FIB tomography. Mater Character. 2007;58:961–967. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral MV, Spanos G. Three-dimensional analysis of proeutectoid cementite precipitates. Acta Mater. 1999;47:711–724. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00321-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowenhorst DJ, Gupta A, Feng CR, et al. 3D crystallographic and morphological analysis of coarse martensite: Combining EBSD and serial sectioning. Scripta Mater. 2006;55:11–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.12.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis AC, Bingert JF, Rowenhorst DJ, et al. Two- and three-dimensional microstructural characterization of a super-austenitic stainless steel. Mat Sci Eng A. 2006;418:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.09.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo G, Aust KT. Structure-dependence of intergranular corrosion in high purity nickel. Acta Metall Mater. 1990;38:2343–2352. doi: 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90101-L
   Google Scholar
• Groeber M, Jackson M. DREAM.3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integr Mater Manuf Innov. 2014;3:1–17. doi: 10.1186/2193-9772-3-5
   Google Scholar
• Ayachit U. The paraview guide: a parallel visualization application. Clifton Park, NY, USA: Kitware; 2015. p. 1–276.
   Google Scholar
• Randle V. The effect of twinning interactions up to the seventh generation on the evolution of microstructure. J Mater Sci. 2006;41:653–660. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-6481-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazawa K, Iwasaki Y, Ito K, et al. Combination rule of Σ values at triple junctions in cubic polycrystals. Acta Crystallogr A. 1996;52:787–796. doi: 10.1107/S0108767396005934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh CA, Kumar M, King WE. Analysis of grain boundary networks and their evolution during grain boundary engineering. Acta Mater. 2003;51:687–700. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00447-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer GS, Randle V, Kim C-S, et al. Changes in the five-parameter grain boundary character distribution in α-brass brought about by iterative thermomechanical processing. Acta Mater. 2006;54:4489–4502. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doni EG, Bleris GL. Study of special triple junctions and faceted boundaries by means of the CSL model. Phys Status Solidi A. 1988;110:383–395. doi: 10.1002/pssa.2211100208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari Y, Sarkar S, Groeber M, et al. 3D polycrystalline microstructure reconstruction from FIB generated serial sections for FE analysis. Comp Mater Sci. 2007;41:222–235. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeber M, Ghosh S, Uchic MD, et al. A framework for automated analysis and simulation of 3D polycrystalline microstructures. Part 1: statistical characterization. Acta Mater. 2008;56:1257–1273. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah A, Liu GQ, Luan JH, et al. Three-dimensional visualization and quantitative characterization of grains in polycrystalline iron. Mater Charact. 2014;91:65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertsman VY. Coincidence site lattice theory of triple junctions and quadruple points. In: Ankem S., Pande C.S., Ovid'ko I., editors. Science and technology of interfaces. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002. p. 387–398.
   Google Scholar