Secondary electron hyperspectral imaging: nanostructure and chemical analysis for the LV-SEM

References

• Goldstein JI, Newbury DE, Michael JR, et al. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. 4th ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2018. p. 550.
   Google Scholar
• Müllerová I, Konvalina I. Collection of secondary electrons in scanning electron microscopes. J Microsc. 12 2009;236(3):203–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Inada H, Nakamura K, et al. Imaging single atoms using secondary electrons with an aberration-corrected electron microscope. Nat Mater. 2009;8(10):808–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin BJ. A comparison of conventional Everhart-Thornley style and in-lens secondary electron detectors-a further variable in scanning electron microscopy. Scanning. 5 2011;33(3):162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asahina S, Togashi T, Terasaki O, et al. High-resolution low-voltage scanning electron microscope study of nanostructured materials. Microsc Anal. 2012;26(7):12–14.
   Google Scholar
• Masters RC, Pearson AJ, Glen TS, et al. Sub-nanometre resolution imaging of polymer-fullerene photovoltaic blends using energy-filtered scanning electron microscopy. Nat Commun. 4 2015;6(22).
   Google Scholar
• Joy DC, Joy CS. Low voltage scanning electron microscopy. Micron. 6 1996;27(3–4):247–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy DC. Scanning electron microscopy: second best no more. Nat Mater. 2009;8(10):776–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerton RF, Li P, Malac M. Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. Micron. 2004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehling N, Masters R, Zhou Y, et al. New perspectives on nano-engineering by secondary electron spectroscopy in the helium ion and scanning electron microscope. MRS Commun. 23 6 2018;8(02):226–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy DC, Khanna N, Braski D. Secondary electron spectroscopy for microanalysis and defect review. Metrol, Insp, Process Control Microlithogr XIII. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Salim M, Hurst J, Montgomery M, et al. Airborne contamination of graphite as analyzed by ultra-violet photoelectron spectroscopy. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 1 8 2019;235:8–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters RC, Stehling N, Abrams KJ, et al. Mapping polymer molecular order in the SEM with secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. Adv Sci. 6 3 2019;6(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorusso GF, Ohashi T, Yamaguchi A, et al. “Enabling CD SEM metrology for 5 nm technology node and beyond,” in Metrology, inspection, and process control for microlithography XXXI. San Jose (CA); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• S. Labbé, T. Faouzi, J. Belissard and J. Hazart, Limits of model-based CD-SEM metrology. 34th European Mask and Lithography Conference. Grenoble; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham K. Inline SEM electron beam review accelerates LTPS display yield ramps. Nanochip Fab Solutions. 2016;11(1):32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schönjahn C, Humphreys CJ, Glick M. Energy-filtered imaging in a field-emission scanning electron microscope for dopant mapping in semiconductors. J Appl Phys. 2002;92(12):7667–7671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönjahn C, Broom RF, Humphreys CJ, et al. Optimizing and quantifying dopant mapping using a scanning electron microscope with a through-the-lens detector. Appl Phys Lett. 14 7 2003;83(2):293–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemian P, Mentink SAM, Rodenburg C, et al. Quantitative secondary electron energy filtering in a scanning electron microscope and its applications. Ultramicroscopy. 2 2007;107(2–3):140–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenburg C, Jepson MA, Inkson BJ, et al. Energy filtered scanning electron microscopy: applications to characterisation of semiconductors. J Phy: Conference Series. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Orji NG, Badaroglu M, Barnes BM, et al. Metrology for the next generation of semiconductor devices. Nat Electron. 2018;1:532–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. J. Garrat-Reed and D. C. Bell, Energy dispersive X-ray analysis in the electron microscope, 1st ed., M. Rainforth, editor, London: Garland Science; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer L. Scanning electron microscopy: physics of image formation and microanalysis. 2nd ed., Berlin: Springer; 1998. p. 527.
   Google Scholar
• Friel JJ, Lyman CE. X-ray mapping in electron-beam instruments. Microsc Microanal. 2006;12:2–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willich P, Bethke R. “Practical aspects and applications of EPMA at low electron energies,” in Microbeam and nanobeam analysis. Vienna: Springer; 1996. p. 631–638.
   Google Scholar
• Boyes ED. Analytical potential of EDS at low voltages. Mikrochim Acta. 2002;138:225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhaj M, Jbara O, Odof S, et al. An anomalous contrast in scanning electron microscopy of insulators: the pseudo-mirror effect. Scanning. 1 1 2000;22(6):352–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaing R. Application of electron probes to local chemical and crystalographic analysis [PhD Thesis]. Paris: University of Paris; 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Newbury DE, Ritchie NW. Is scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDS) quantitative? Scanning. 5 2013;35(3):141–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbury DE. Castaing’s electron microprobe and its impact on materials science. Microsc Microanal. 2001;7(2):178–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess S, Li X, Holland J. “High spatial resolution energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry in the SEM and the detection of light elements including lithium,” 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jany BR, Janas A, Krok F. Retrieving the quantitative chemical information at nanoscale from scanning electron microscope energy dispersive X-ray measurements by machine learning. Nano Lett. 2017;17(11):6520–6525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friel JJ, Lyman CE. Tutorial review: X-ray mapping in electron-beam instruments. Microsc Microanal. 2006;12:2–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi R, Llovet X. Electron probe microanalysis: a review of the past, present, and future. Microsc Microanal. 2015;21:1053–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terauchi M, Koshiya S, Satoh F, et al. Chemical state information of bulk specimens obtained by SEM-based soft-X-ray emission spectrometry. Microsc Microanal. 2014;20:692–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazaux J. Auger microscopy and electron probe microanalysis. In: Boekestein A, Pavićević MK, editors. Electron microbeam analysis. Mikrochimica Acta. vol. 12, Vienna: Springer; 1992. p. 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Meitner L. Uber den Zusammenhang zwischen β- und γ-Strahlen. L. Z. Physik. 1922;9(1):145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Auger P. Sur les rayons β secondaires produits dans un gaz par des rayons X. C.R.A.S. 1923;177:169–171.
   Google Scholar
• Auger P. The Auger effect. Surf Sci. 1 3 1975;48(1):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmberg PW. Optimisation of Auger electron spectroscopy in LEED systems. Appl Phys Lett. 1968;13:183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CC. Auger electron spectroscopy. Surf Sci. 3 1971;25(1):53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargeron CB. High vacuum scanning electron microscopy as a tool in surface analysis. Laurel (MD); 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Rades S, Hodoroaba VD, Salge T, et al. High-resolution imaging with SEM/T-SEM, EDX and SAM as a combined methodical approach for morphological and elemental analyses of single engineered nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 2014;4(91):49577–49587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor NJ. Auger electron spectrometer as a tool for surface analysis (contamination monitor). Citation: J Vac Sci Technol. 1969;6(241).
   Google Scholar
• Willis RF, Fitton B, Skinner DK. Study of carbon-fiber surfaces using Auger and secondary electron emission spectroscopy. J Appl Phys. 1972;43(11):4412–4419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer DR, Engelhard MH, Johnson GE, et al. Surface characterization of nanomaterials and nanoparticles: important needs and challenging opportunities. J Vac Sci Technol A: Vac Surf Films. 9 2013;31(5):050820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell CJ. Growth and trends in Auger-electron spectroscopy and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for surface analysis. Citation: J Vac Sci Technol A. 2003;21:42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cressey D. Tiny traits cause big headaches. vol. 467, Nature Publishing Group; 2010. pp. 264–265.
   Google Scholar
• Stefaniak AB, Hackley VA, Roebben G, et al. Nanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety measurements: needs, gaps and opportunities. Nanotoxicology. 7 12 2013;7(8):1325–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner NH, Schreifels JA. Surface analysis: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger electron spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 1992;64(12):302–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb LJ, Michalak DJ, Biteen JS, et al. High-resolution soft X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic studies and scanning Auger microscopy studies of the air oxidation of alkylated silicon (111) surfaces, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald NC, Waldrop JR. Auger electron spectroscopy in the scanning electron microscope: Auger electron images. Appl Phys Lett. 1971;19:315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Gomati MM, Prutton M. Monte Carlo calculations of the spatial resolution in a scanning Auger electron microscope. Surf Sci. 1 4 1978;72(3):485–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm R, Reinfandt B. Auger microanalysis in a conventional scanning electron microscope. Scanning. 1978;1(1):42–57.
   Google Scholar
• Jacka M. Scanning Auger microscopy: recent progress in data analysis and instrumentation. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2001;114-116:277–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann S. In: G Ertl, H Lüth, DL Mills, editors. Auger- and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy in materials science: a user-oriented guide,. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 528.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzer RA, Hjelen J. Backscattered electron imaging with an EBSD detector. Micros Today. 1 2015;23(1):12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Joy DC, Newbury DE, Davidson DL. Electron channeling patterns in the scanning electron microscope. J Appl Phys. 1982;53(8):81–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henini M. Scanning electron microscopy: an introduction. III-Vs Rev. 2000;13(4):40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Venables JA, Harland CJ. Electron back-scattering patterns – a new technique for obtaining crystallographic information in the scanning electron microscope. Philos Mag. 1973;27(5):1193–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suga M, Asahina S, Sakuda Y, et al. Recent progress in scanning electron microscopy for the characterization of fine structural details of nano materials. Prog Solid State Chem. 1 5 2014;42(1–2):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy DC. Contrast in high-resolution scanning electron microscope images. J Microsc. 2 1991;161(2):343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckay KG. Secondary electron emission. Adv Electron Electron Phys. 1948;1(C):65–130.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler H. Secondary electron emission in the scanning electron microscope. J Appl Phys. 1983;54(11):R1–R18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanaya K, Kawakatsu H. Secondary electron emission due to primary and backscattered electrons. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 1972;5:1727–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joens MS, Huynh C, Kasuboski JM, et al. Helium Ion microscopy (HIM) for the imaging of biological samples at sub-nanometer resolution. Sci Rep. 17 12 2013;3:3514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everhart TE, Wells OO, Oatley CW. Factors affecting contrast and resolution in the scanning electron microscope. J Electron Control. 1 8 1959;7(2):97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Everhart TE, Thornley RFM. Wide-band detector for micro-microampere low-energy electron currents. J Sci Instrum. 1960;37(7):246–248.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenburg C, Jepson MA, Bosch EG, et al. Energy selective scanning electron microscopy to reduce the effect of contamination layers on scanning electron microscope dopant mapping. Ultramicroscopy. 8 2010;110(9):1185–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth LJ. The energy distribution of secondary electrons from molybdenum. Phys Rev. 1 7 1935;48(1):88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kollath R. Zur Energieverteilung der Sekundärelektronen II. Meßergebnisse und Diskussion. Ann Phys. 1947;436(7-8):357–380.
   Google Scholar
• Röder A. Secondary electron microanalysis. Mikrochim Acta. 1992;107:105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy DC, Prasad MS, Meyer HM. Experimental secondary electron spectra under SEM conditions. J Microsc. 7 2004;215(1):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mil’shteinand S, Joy DC. Microanalysis using secondary electrons in scanning electron microscopy. Scanning. 7 12 2006;23(5):295–297.
   Google Scholar
• Bellissimo A, Pierantozzi GM, Ruocco A, et al. Secondary electron generation mechanisms in carbon allotropes at low impact electron energies. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno N, Sugita K, Seki K, et al. “Low-energy electron transmission and secondary-electron emission experiments on crystalline and molten long-chain alkanes,” 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman A, Nybergs GL, Prawert S. “High-energy angle-resolved secondary-electron emission spectroscopy of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite,” 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman A, Prawer S, Kalish R. Structural transformation of diamond induced by 1-keV Ar-ion irradiation as studied by Auger and secondary-electron spectroscopies and total-secondary-electron-yield measurements. Phys Rev B Condens Matter. 1992;45(22):12736–12745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams KJ, Dapor M, Stehling N, et al. Making sense of complex carbon and metal/carbon systems by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. Adv Sci. 7 10 2019;6(19):1900719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Schmidt WL, Schileo G, et al. Supplementary information: nano-scale mapping of bromide segregation on cross-sections of complex hybrid Perovskite photovoltaic films using secondary electron hyperspectral imaging in the Scanning Electron Microscope,” 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrón J, Vidal RA, Bajales N, et al. Role of HOPG density of empty electronic states above vacuum on electron emission spectra induced by ions and UV photons. Surf Sci. 1 7 2014;622:83–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr N, Pashneh-Tala S, Claeyssens F, et al. Characterising cross-linking within polymeric biomaterials in the SEM by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. (tbc) ACCEPTED. 2019;20.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Schmidt WL, Schileo G, et al. Nanoscale mapping of bromide segregation on the cross sections of complex hybrid perovskite photovoltaic films using secondary electron hyperspectral imaging in a scanning electron microscope. ACS Omega. 31 5 2017;2(5):2126–2133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapor M. Monte Carlo simulation of secondary electron emission from dielectric targets. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridzel OY, Astašauskas V, Werner WS. Low energy (1–100 eV) electron inelastic mean free path (IMFP) values determined from analysis of secondary electron yields (SEY) in the incident energy range of 0.1–10 keV. J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 2 2019;12.
   Google Scholar
• Demers H, Poirier-Demers N, Couture AR, et al. Three-dimensional electron microscopy simulation with the CASINO Monte Carlo software. Scanning. 5 2011;33(3):135–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin D, Couture AR, Joly D, et al. CASINO v2.42 – a fast and easy-to-use modeling tool for scanning electron microscopy and microanalysis users. Scanning. 5 2007;29(3):92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzolini M, Morresi T, Abrams K, et al. Anisotropic approach for simulating electron transport in layered materials: computational and experimental study of highly oriented pyrolitic graphite. J Phys Chem. 2018;122:10159–10166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapor M, Masters RC, Ross I, et al. Secondary electron spectra of semi-crystalline polymers – a novel polymer characterisation tool? J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena. 1 1 2018;222:95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono S, Kanaya K. The energy dependence of secondary emission based on the range-energy retardation power formula. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 1979;12:619–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiraishi M, Ata M. Work function of carbon nanotubes. Carbon N Y. 2001;39(12):1913–1917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy DC. Resolution in low voltage scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc. 12 1985;140(3):283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drouin D, Hovington P, Gauvin R. CASINO: a new monte carlo code in C language for electron beam interactions-part II: tabulated values of the mott cross section. Scanning. 7 12 1997;19(1):20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullejans H, Bleloch AL, Howie A, et al. Secondary electron coincidence detection and time of flight spectroscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 1993;52(3-4):360–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll M. Aufladepotentiel und sekundäremission elektronenbestrahlter körper. Zeitschrift für Technische Physik. 1935;16:467–475.
   Google Scholar
• Joy DC. Control of charging in low-voltage SEM. Scanning. 1989;11(1):1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker CG, El-Gomati MM, Assa’d AM, et al. The secondary electron emission yield for 24 solid elements excited by primary electrons in the range 250-5000 ev: a theory/experiment comparison. Scanning. 9 2008;30(5):365–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomati MMEL, Walker CGH, Assa’d AMD, et al. Theory experiment comparison of the electron backscattering factor from solids at low electron energy (250–5,000 eV). Scanning. 1 2008;30(1):2–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smaragdis P, Fevotte C, Mysore GJ, et al. Static and dynamic source separation using nonnegative factorizations: a unified view. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2014;31(3):66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowen AA, Marini F, Esquerre C, et al. Time series hyperspectral chemical imaging data: challenges, solutions and applications. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;705:272–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobigeon N, Brun N. Spectral mixture analysis of EELS spectrum-images. Ultramicroscopy. 9 2012;120:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnet N, Brun N, Colliex C. Extracting information from sequences of spatially resolved EELS spectra using multivariate statistical analysis. Ultramicroscopy. 7 1999;77(3-4):97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muto S, Yoshida T, Tatsumi K. Diagnostic nano-analysis of materials properties by multivariate curve resolution applied to spectrum images by S/TEM-EELS. Mater Trans. 2009;50(5):964–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiga M, Tatsumi K, Muto S, et al. Sparse modeling of EELS and EDX spectral imaging data by nonnegative matrix factorization. Ultramicroscopy. 1 11 2016;170:43–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Q, Abrams KJ, Masters RC, et al. Mapping nanostructural variations in silk by secondary electron hyperspectral imaging. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1703510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodenburg C, Jepson MAE, Inkson BJ, et al. Energy filtered scanning electron microscopy: applications to dopant contrast. J Phys Conf Ser. 2010;209:012053.
   Google Scholar
• Konvalina I, Mika F, Krátký S, et al. In-lens band-pass filter for secondary electrons in ultrahigh resolution SEM. Mater (Basel). 19 7 2019;12(14):2307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehling N, Abrams KJ, Holland C, et al. Revealing spider silk’s 3D nanostructure through low temperature plasma etching and advanced low-voltage SEM. Frontiers Mater. 1 2019;5(25).
   Google Scholar
• Khursheed A. Scanning electron microscope optics and spectrometers. World Scientific Publishing; 2011. p. 402.
   Google Scholar
• El-Gomati M, Zaggout F, Jayacody H, et al. Why is it possible to detect doped regions of semiconductors in low voltage SEM: a review and update. Surf Interface Anal. 1 11 2005;37(11):901–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto Y, Takeuchi S, Sunaoshi T, et al. Voltage contrast imaging with energy filtered signal in a field-emission scanning electron microscope. Ultramicroscopy. 2 2020;209(1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzing AA, Richter LJ, Anderson IM. 3D nanoscale characterization of thin-Film organic photovoltaic device structures via spectroscopic contrast in the TEM. J Phys Chemistry C. 21 10 2010;114(41):17501–17508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrams KJ, Wan Q, Stehling NA, et al. Nanoscale mapping of semi-crystalline polypropylene. Phys Status Solidi (C) Current Topics Solid State Phys. 1 12 2017;14(12).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Fox DS, Maguire P, et al. Quantitative secondary electron imaging for work function extraction at atomic level and layer identification of graphene. Sci Rep. 2 2016;6(16).
   Google Scholar