Loading-direction dependence of interaction types between different twin variants in AZ31 alloy

References

• Liu XY, Mao PL, Wu XX, et al. Dynamic compression behaviour and constitutive description of fine-grain Mg–4Zn–1Y alloy. Mater Sci Tech. 2022;38:1605–1616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri B, Abbasi M, Abdollahzadeh A, et al. A comparative study between friction stir processing and friction stir vibration. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2020;27:1133–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi M, Bagheri B, Sharifi F. Simulation and experimental study of dynamic recrystallization process during friction stir vibrationwelding of magnesium alloys. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2021;31:2626–2650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri B, Abbasi M. Development of AZ91/SiC surface composite by FSP: effect of vibration and process parameters on microstructure and mechanical characteristics. Adv Manuf. 2020;8:8–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai SW, Wang F, Du XD, et al. Effect of alternating magnetic fields on hot tearing susceptibility of Mg–4Zn–1.5Ca alloy. Mater Sci Tech. 2023;39:50–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahzadeh A, Bagheri B, Abbasi M, et al. Mechanical, wear and corrosion behaviors of AZ91/SiC composite layer fabricated by friction stir vibration processing. Surf Topogr: Metrol Prop. 2021;9:035038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri B, Abbasi M, Abdollahzadeh A, et al. Effect of second-phase particle size and presence of vibration on AZ91/SiC surface composite layer produced by FSP. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2020;30:905–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koushki A, Heydarinia H, Emamy M, et al. Tailoring the tensile properties of AZ91 magnesium alloy via grain refinement. Mater Sci Tech. 2022;38:1434–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Hao HL, Fu GY, et al. Microstructure and mechanical property of Hot-rolled Mg–2Ag alloy prepared with multi-pass rolling. Acta Metall Sin. (Engl. Lett.). 2022. doi:10.1007/s40195-022-01462-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulacia I, Dudamell NV, Gálvez F, et al. Mechanical behavior and microstructural evolution of a Mg AZ31 sheet at dynamic strain rates. Acta Mater. 2010;58:2988–2998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XQ, Qiao XG, Pei RS, et al. Role of extrusion rate on the microstructure and tensile properties evolution of ultrahigh-strength low-alloy Mg-1.0Al-1.0Ca-0.4Mn (wt-%) alloy. J Magnes Alloy. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Lee T, Song SW, et al. Enhancing yield strength by suppressing detwinning in a rolled Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy with {101¯2} twins. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;619:328–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian BY, Wu RZ, Sun JF, et al. Evolutions of microstructure and mechanical properties in Mg-5Li-1Zn-0.5Ag-0.5Zr-xGd alloy. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2023. doi:10.1007/s40195-022-01509-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu W, Xie W, Li QF, et al. Effect of vanadium nitride (VN) particles on microstructure and mechanical properties of extruded AZ31 Mg alloy. Acta Metall Sin (Engl Lett). 2022. doi:10.1007/s40195-022-01476-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Li YX, Liu YX, et al. The effect of basal <a > dislocation on {112¯1} twin boundary evolution in a Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy. J Mater Sci Technol. 2021;81:212–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou MH, Xu YH, Liu Y, et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg-15Gd-1Zn-0.4Zr alloys treated by ultrasonic surface rolling process. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;828:141881–141897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan M, Luo Y, Liu Y. Microstructural evolution of AZ31 Mg alloy with surface mechanical attrition treatment: grain and texture gradient. J Alloys Compd. 2020;823:153691–153702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi GQ, Zhang J, Luo Y, et al. Study on the twinning/De-twining behavior of diferent types of twin–twin interaction via experiments and molecular dynamics simulation. Met Mater Int. 2022. doi:10.1007/s12540-022-01275-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi GQ, Jin JD, Ma YL, et al. Interaction between {101¯2} and {303¯4} twin in magnesium alloy. J Mater Sci. 2022;57:15109–15120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang H, Li QA, Chen XY, et al. Hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of Mg-Gd-Y(-Sm)-Zr alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FL, Gu YJ, McCabe RJ, et al. 〈c+a〉 Dislocations in {101¯2} twins in Mg: a kinematic and energetic requirement. Acta Mater. 2020;19:13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XD, Chen J, Liu XL, et al. Effect of twin boundary-dislocation and twin boundary-solute atom interaction on detwinning of Mg-2Gd-2Y-0.3Zr alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;770:483–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Ventur NM, Della Ventur S, Casari D, et al. Maeder X. {101¯2} twinning mechanism during in situ micro-tensile loading of pure Mg: role of basal slip and twin-twin interactions. Mater. Des. 2021;97:109206–109275.
   Google Scholar
• Xi GQ, Zhang J, Wu JQ, et al. Observations on the intersection between {101¯1} And {101¯2} twin in deformed magnesium alloy. Kovove Mater. 2021;59:231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett C D, El Kadiri H. Impact of deformation faceting on {101¯2}, {101¯1}, and {101¯3} embryonic twin nucleation in hexagonal closed-packed metals. Acta Mater. 2014;70:137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar MA, Gong M, Beyerlein IJ, et al. Role of local stresses on co-zone twin-twin junction formation in HCP magnesium. Acta Mater. 2019;168:353–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong MY, Xu S, Jiang YY, et al. Structural characteristics of {101¯2} non-cozone twin-twin interactions in magnesium. Acta Mater. 2018;159:65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Wang J, Jiang Y, et al. Twin–twin interactions in magnesium. Acta Mater. 2014;77:28–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Wang J, Jiang YY, et al. Co-zone {101¯2} twin interaction in magnesium single crystal. Mater. Res. Letter. 2013;2:82–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang K, Tomé N, Capolungo L. The {101¯2} non-cozone twin-twin interactions in Mg: A stability and mobility study using 3-D atomistic simulations. Scr. Mater. 2021;200:113913–113918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo XQ, Ma C, Zhao LY, et al. Effect of pre-deformation on the activation stress of {101¯2} twinning in Mg–3Al–1Zn alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;800:140384–140397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QH, Jiang B, Zhao J, et al. Pre-strain effect on twinning and de-twinning behaviors of Mg-3Li alloy traced by quasi-in-situ EBSD. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020;798:140069–140079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaya M. Assessment of local deformation using EBSD: quantification of accuracy of measurement and definition of local gradient. Ultramicroscopy. 2011;111:1189–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Xi GQ, Wan X, et al. The dislocation-twin interaction and evolution of twin boundary in AZ31 Mg alloy. Acta Mater. 2017;133:208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che B, Lu LW, Zang JL, et al. Investigation on microstructure and mechanical properties of hot-rolled AZ31 Mg alloy with various cryogenic treatments. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;19:4557–4570.
   Google Scholar
• Hou DW, Liu TM, Shi DF, et al. Study of twinning behaviors of rolled AZ31 magnesium alloy by interrupted in situ compressive tests. Mater Sci Eng A. 2016;653:108–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Kadiri H, Kapil J, Oppedal AL, et al. The effect of twin–twin interactions on the nucleation and propagation of {101¯2} twinning in magnesium. Acta Mater. 2013;61:3549–3563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan XH, Wang LF, Lu PB, et al. Unveiling the planar deformation mechanisms for improved formability in pre-twinned AZ31 Mg alloy sheet at warm temperature. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2022.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui YW, Li QA, Xue YB, et al. Twin-twin geometric structure effect on the twinning behavior of an Mg-4Y-3Nd-2Sm-0.5Zr alloy traced by quasi-in-situ EBSD. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2021.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong W, Zheng RX, Harjo S, et al. In-situ observation of twinning and detwinning in AZ31 alloy. J Magnes Alloy. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2022.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WD, Bratton NR, Paudel Y, et al. In situ characterization of the effect of twin-microstructure interactions on {101¯2} tension and {101¯1} contraction twin nucleation, growth and damage in magnesium. Metals (Basel). 2020;10:1403–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang QH, Li JG, Jiang K, et al. Gradient structure induced simultaneous enhancement of strength and ductility in AZ31 Mg alloy with twin-twin interactions. J. Magnes. Alloy. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jma.2021.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar