Prospective utilisation of hydrated lime as a performance enhancer in concrete

References

• Oner A, Akyuz S. An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive strength of concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2007;29(6):505–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali L, Ali B, Ali A. Combined effects of supplementary cementitious materials (silica fume, GGBS, fly ash and rice husk ash) and steel fiber on the hardened properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2023;263(2020):120636. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120636.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor R, Richardson IG, Brydson RMD. Cement and concrete research composition and microstructure of 20-year-old ordinary Portland cement – ground granulated blast-furnace slag blends containing 0 to 100% slag. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40(7):971–983. doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandanam K, Biswal US, Dinakar P. Effect of Fly Ash, GGBS, and Metakaolin on mechanical and durability properties of self-compacting concrete made with 100% coarse recycled aggregate. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste. 2021;25(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Ma K, Long G, et al. Effect of packing density according to CPM on the rheology of cement – fly ash – slag paste. J Mater Civ Eng. 2021;33(8):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizarazo-marriaga J, Claisse P, Ganjian E. Effect of steel slag and Portland cement in the rate of hydration and strength of blast furnace slag pastes. J Mater Civ Eng. 2011;23(February):153–160.
   Google Scholar
• Elchalakani M, Basarir H, Karrech A. Green concrete with high-volume fly ash and slag with recycled aggregate and recycled water to build future sustainable cities. J Mater Civ Eng. 2017;29(2):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang K, Beattie G, Wilkinson S. Effects of curing temperature on the hydration of GGBS concrete and the use of electron microscope particle analysis. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chaitanya M, Manikandan P, Prem Kumar V, et al. Prediction of self-healing characteristics of GGBS admixed concrete using artificial neural network. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2020;1716:012019. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1716/1/012019.
   Google Scholar
• Lal D, Chatterjee A, Dwivedi A. Investigation of properties of cement mortar incorporating pond ash – an environmental sustainable material. Constr Build Mater. 2019;209:20–31. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman A, Barai A, Sarker A, et al. Light weight concrete from rice husk ash and glass powder. Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res. 2018;53(3):225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Manikandan P, Selija K, Vasugi V, et al. An artificial neural network based prediction of mechanical and durability characteristics of sustainable geopolymer composite. Adv Civ Eng. 2022;2022:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dadsetan S, Bai J. Mechanical and microstructural properties of self-compacting concrete blended with metakaolin, ground granulated blast-furnace slag and fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2017;146:658–667. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikandan P, Vasugi V. A critical review of waste glass powder as an aluminosilicate source material for sustainable geopolymer concrete production.Silicon. 2021;13:3649–3663.doi:10.1007/s12633-020-00929-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roychand R, Silva SD, Setunge S. Nanosilica modified high-volume fly ash and slag cement composite: environmentally friendly alternative to OPC. J Mater Civ Eng. 2018;30(4):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikanta C, Manikandan P, Duraimurugan S, et al. Pozzolanic properties of agro waste ashes for potential cement replacement predicted using ANN. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2020;1716:012018. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.10881742-6596/1716/1/012018.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Ph D, Shi H. Utilization of steel slag powder as a combined admixture with ground granulated blast-furnace slag in cement based materials. J Mat Civ Eng. 2013;16(December):1990–1993.
   Google Scholar
• Siddique R. Utilization (recycling) of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in concrete: strength and durability properties. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2014;16:460–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdemir M, Ibrahim H. Utilization and efficiency of ground granulated blast furnace slag on concrete properties – a review. Constr Build Mater. 2016;105:423–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasugi V, Manikandan P. The potential use of waste glass powder in slag based geopolymer concrete – an environmental friendly material. Int J Environ Waste Manag. 2022;1(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Manikandan P, Natrayan L, Duraimurugan S, et al. Influence of waste glass powder as an aluminosilicate precursor in synthesizing ternary blended alkali-activated binder. Silicon. 2022;14:0123456789. doi:10.1007/s12633-021-01533-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Wang Q, Xie C, et al. The effect of fineness on the hydration activity index of ground granulated blast furnace slag. Materials. 2019;12:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad S, Shah A, Limbachiya MC. Strength development characteristics of concrete produced with blended cement using ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) under various curing conditions. Sādhanā. 2017;42(7):1203–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın S, Türkel S, Yazıcı H, et al. Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete containing high volumes of ground granulated blast furnace slag. Cem Concr Compos. 2010;32:639–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saluja S, Kaur K, Goyal S, et al. Long-term drying shrinkage of GGBFS-incorporated RCC under various temperature exposures. J Mater Civ Eng. 2021;33(6):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-oran AAA, Safiee NA, Mohd NA. Fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete using metakaolin and GGBS as cement replacement. Eur J Environ Civ Eng. 2019;0(0):1–14. doi:10.1080/19648189.2019.1663268.
   Google Scholar
• Basumajumdar A, Das AK, Bandyopadhyay N, et al. Some studies on the reaction between fly ash and lime. Bull Mater Sci. 2005;28(2):131–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah MU, Usman M, Hanif MU, et al. Utilization of solid waste from brick industry and hydrated lime in self-compacting cement pastes. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(5):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SH, Kwon YH, Hong SG, et al. Hydrated lime activation on byproducts for eco-friendly production of structural mortars. J Clean Prod. 2019;231:1389–1398. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto AAM, Cincotto MA, Repette W. Mechanical properties, drying and autogenous shrinkage of blast furnace slag activated with hydrated lime and gypsum. Cem Concr Compos. 2010;32(4):312–318. doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2010.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIS:7320-1974. Specifications for concrete slump test apparatus. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi, India. 1974;(Reaffirmed 2008):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• IS 516:2014. Method of tests for strength of concrete. Bur Indian Stand New Delhi. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kisan M, Sangathan S, Nehru J, et al. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso FA, Fernandes HC, Pileggi RG, et al. Carbide lime and industrial hydrated lime characterization carbide lime and industrial hydrated lime characterization. Powder Technol. 2009;195(2):143–149. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.05.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikandan P VV. Potential utilization of waste glass powder as a precursor material in synthesizing ecofriendly ternary blended geopolymer matrix. J Clean Prod. 2022;355(August 2021):131860, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131860.
   Google Scholar
• Adesina PA, Olutoge FA. Structural properties of sustainable concrete developed using rice husk ash and hydrated lime. J Build Eng. 2019;25(May):100804, doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100804.
   Google Scholar
• Barbhuiya Aequzksa, Russell Pambmi. Properties of fly ash concrete modified with hydrated lime and silica fume. Constr Build Mater. 2009;23(10):3233–3239. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavía S, Aly M. Influence of aggregate and supplementary cementitious materials on the properties of hydrated lime (CL90s) mortars. Mater Construcc. 2016;66(324):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols A, Nichols J. The use of hydrated lime in concrete as a cement replacement: Effect on Compressive Strength. 2012;(November 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Majhi RK, Nayak AN. Production of sustainable concrete utilising high-volume blast furnace slag and recycled aggregate with lime activator. J Clean Prod. 2020;255:120188, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao JM, Qian CX, Liu HF, et al. ITZ microstructure of concrete containing GGBS. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(March 2004):1299–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Karadumpa CS, Pancharathi RK. Influence of particle packing theories on strength and microstructure properties of composite cement – based mortars. J Mat Civ Eng. 2021;33(10):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves GW. Microstructure and microanalysis of hardened cement pastes involving ground granulated blast-furnace slag. J Mater Sci. 1992;27:6204–6212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chee C, Kok C, Ramli M, et al. The engineering properties and microstructure development of cement mortar containing high volume of inter-grinded GGBS and PFA cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater. 2016;122:683–693. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar