The cell culture of titanium alloy surface modifications by micro-powder blasting and co-blast techniques

References

• Ishikawa K, Miyamoto Y, Nagayama M, et al. Blasting coating method: new method of coating titanium surface with hydroxyapatite at room temperature. J Biomed Mater Res Part A Appl Biomater. 1997;38:129–134. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199722)38:2<129::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO;2-S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano T, Ueyama Y, Ishikawa K, et al. Initial tissue response to a titanium implant coated with apatite at room temperature using a blast coating method. Biomaterials. 2002;23:1931–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00319-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuizzard S, Galli C, Martini D, et al. Different titanium surface treatment influences human mandibular osteoblast response. Periodontol J. 2004;75:273–282. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K, Linez P, Bigerelle M, et al. The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of Ti6Al4V surfaces on osteoblastic cell behavior. Biomaterials. 2000;21:1565–1577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Statistical demonstration of the relative effect of surface chemistry and roughness on human osteoblast short-term adhesion. J Mater Sci. 2006;17:471–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakada H, Sakes T, Legeros RZ, et al. Early tissue response to modified implant surface using back scattered imaging. Implant Dent. 2007;16:281–289. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3180e92a78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming D, O’Neill L, Byrne G, et al. Wear resistance enhancement of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V via a novel coincident microblasting process. Surf Coat Technol. 2011;205:4941–4947. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.04.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarirta EH, Rohr V, Stott FH, et al. Influence of glass bead blasting of 9% Cr steel substrate on development of aluminide diffusion coating. Surf Eng. 2006;22:472–480. doi: 10.1179/174327806X124726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung NP, Yoong CM, Low BH, et al. Abrasive blasting of metal matrix composites. Mater Manufact Proc. 1998;13:101–115. doi: 10.1080/10426919808935222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Bhardwaj D, Panchal j, et al. A research paper on study the MRR of soda line glass at different parameters of abrasive jet machine. Int J Enhanced Res Sci Technol Eng. 2014;3:307–318.
   Google Scholar
• Kohli R. Microabrasive technology for precision cleaning and processing. In Development in Surface Contamination and Cleaning (2nd edition), Vol. 1. 2016. p. 627–666. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-29960-2.00014-9
   Google Scholar
• Madhu S, Balasubramanian M. Influence of nozzle design and process parameters on surface roughness of CFRP machined by abrasive jet. Mater Manufact Proc. 2017;32:1011–1018. doi: 10.1080/10426914.2016.1257132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareidoost A, Yousefpour M, Ghaseme B, et al. The relationship of surface roughness and cell response of chemical surface modification of titanium. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:1479–1488. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4611-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousepour M, Zareidoost A. Evaluation of the effect of two-step acid etching on the surface treatment and improved bioactivity of nitinol. J Mash Dent Sch. 2016;40:281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Le Guehennec L, Lopez- Heredia MA, Enkel B, et al. Osreoblastic cell behavior on different titanium implant surfaces. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:535–543. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch-Fan X, Ou Z, Wieland M, et al. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2008;24:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Choi SH, Ryu JJ, et al. The biocompatibility of SLA-treated titanium implants. Biomed Mater. 2008;87A:25–32. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill L, O’Sullivan C, O’Hare P, et al. Deposition of substitute dapatites onto titanium surface using a novel blasting process. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;204:484–488. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hare P, Meenan BJ, Barke GA, et al. Biological responses to hydroxyapatite surface deposited via a ci-incident micro blasting technique. Biomaterials. 2010;31:515–522. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan C, O’Hare P, Byrne G, et al. A modified surface on titanium deposited by a blasting process. Coatings. 2011;1:53–71. doi: 10.3390/coatings1010053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne CF, Twomey B, O’Neill L, et al. Co-blasting of titanium surfaces with an abrasive and hydroxyapatite to produce bioactive coatings: substrate and coating characterization. Biomater J Appl. 2012;0:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tan F, Naciri M, Dowling D, et al. Osteoconductirity and growth factor production by MG63 osteoblastic cells on bioglass-coated orthopedic implants. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2011;108:454–464. doi: 10.1002/bit.22955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan F, Naciri M, Dowling D, et al. In vitro and in vitro bioacitivity of coblast hydroxyapatite coating and the effect of impaction on its osteoconductivity. Biotech Adv. 2012;108:352–362. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keady F, Murphy BP. Investigating the feasibility of using a grit blasting process to coat nitinol stents with hydroxyapatite. Mater J Sci Mater Med. 2012;10:1007. s10856-012-4775-3.
   Google Scholar
• Chrcanoric BB, Pedrosa AR, Martins MD. Chemical and topographic analysis of treated surfaces of five different commercial dental titanium implants. Mater Res. 2012;15:372–382. doi: 10.1590/S1516-14392012005000035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero-Climent M, Lazaro P, Rios JV, et al. Influence of acid-etching after grit-blasted on osseointegration of titanium dental implants: in vitro and in vivo studies. Mater J Sci Mater Med. 2013;10:1007. s10856-013-4935-0.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonca G, Mendonca DBS, Aragao FJL, et al. Advancing dental implant surface technology-from micron-to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3822–3835. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surface on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2004;15:683–692. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01054.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittens RA, Mclachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micro-/submicro-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials. 2011;32:3395–3403. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittens RA, Olivares-Navarrete R, Schwartz Z, et al. Implant osseointegration and the role of microroughness and nanostructures: Lessons for spine implants. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:3363–3371. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey JW. Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 1949;99:99–114. doi: 10.2307/3001913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadanaga K, Morinaga J, Matsuda A, et al. Superhydrophobic-superhydrophilic micropatterning on flowerlike alumina coating film by the sol-gel method. Chem Mater. 2000;12:590–592. doi: 10.1021/cm990643h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou NR, Lu C, Guan JJ, et al. Growth and alignment of polyaniline nanofibres with superhydrophobic, superhydrophilic and other properties. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:354–357. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, et al. Response of MG63 osteoblast-like cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials. 1998;19:2219–2232. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00144-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampin M, Warocquier R, Legris C, et al. Correlation between substrate roughness and wettabililty, cell adhesion and cell migration. Biomed Mater J Res. 1997;36:99–108. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<99::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar