The role of dialogic pedagogy in teaching grammar

References

• Alexander, R. 2003. “Talk in in Teaching and Learning: International Perspectives.” In New Perspectives on Spoken English in the Classroom: Discussion Papers, edited by R. Hughes, 27–37. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2012. “Improving Oracy and Classroom Talk in English Schools: Achievements and Challenges.” http://www.robinalexander.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. 2015. “Dialogic Pedagogy at Scale: Oblique Perspectives.” In Socialising Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, and S. Clarke, 413–423. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. 2015. “The Australian Curriculum: English. Version 7.5.” Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. Accessed October 28 2015. http://www.robinalexander.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. “Discourse in the novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, edited by Michael Holquist, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batstone, R., and R. Ellis. 2009. “Principled Grammar Teaching.” System 37 (2): 194–204. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, C. 1997. “A Constructivist Approach to Grammar: Teaching Teachers to Teach Aspect.” The Modern Language Journal 81 (1): 50–66. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb01626.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, L., M. Swain, S. Lapkin, and I. Knouzi. 2010. “Mediating Between Scientific and Spontaneous Concepts Through Languaging.” Language Awareness 19 (2): 89–110. doi:10.1080/09658410903440755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., and P. Jones. 2012. “Understanding Metalinguistic Development: A Functional Perspective.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 9 (1): 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, I., A. Reece, K. Ahearn, and P. Jones. 2013. Grammar in the Early Years: A Games-based Approach, 1–12. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, R. 2008. “Teaching Grammar as a Liberating Force.” ELT Journal, 62 (3) : 221–230. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm042.
   Google Scholar
• Derewianka, B. 2012. “Knowledge about Language in the Australian Curriculum: English.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 35 (2): 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Eggins, S., and D. Slade. 1997. Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. 1998. “Teaching and Research: Options in Grammar Teaching.” TESOL Quarterly 32 (1): 39–60. doi:10.2307/3587901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. O. D. 2006. “Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly 40 (1): 83–107. doi:10.2307/40264512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerngross, G., H. Puchta, and S. Thornbury. 2007. Teaching Grammar Creatively. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. “Towards a Language-based Theory of Learning.” Linguistics and Education. 5: 93–116.10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and R. Hasan. 1985. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-semiotic Perspective. Deakin: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning: A Language-based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2004/1980. “Three Aspects of Children's Language Development: Learning Language, Learning through Language, Learning about Language.” In The Language of Early Childhood, edited by J. J. Webster, 308–326. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., and M. Macken-Horarik. 2001. “Teachers’ Voices, Teachers’ Practices: Insider Perspectives on Literacy Education.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 24: 112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., and P.Gibbons. 2005. “Putting Scaffolding to Work: The Contribution of Scaffolding in Articulating ESL Education.” Prospect. 20 (1): 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, H., and J. Rennie. 2008. “‘I Had to Go Out and Get Myself a Book on Grammar’: A Study of Pre-service Teachers' Knowledge about Language.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 32(1): 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hislam, J., and W. Cajkler. 2005. “Teacher Trainees’ Explicit Knowledge of Grammar and Primary Curriculum Requirements in England.” In Applied Linguistics and Language Teacher Education, edited by N. Bartels, 295–312. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jean, Gladys, and Daphnée Simard. 2013. “Deductive Versus Inductive Grammar Instruction: Investigating Possible Relationships Between Gains, Preferences and Learning Styles.” System 41 (4): 1023–1042. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2005. “Intersubjectivity and Learning: A Socio-semantic Investigation of Classroom Discourse.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2010. “Teaching, Learning and Talking: Mapping ‘The Trail of Fire’” English Teaching: Practice and Critique 9 (2): 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., and H. Chen. 2012.“Teachers’ Knowledge About Language: Issues of Pedagogy and Expertise." Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 35 (2): 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. T. 2014.“ Learning to Teach Grammatics: A Multimodal Ensemble Performance. Annual Review of Functional Linguistics 5 : 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Knouzi, I., M. Swain, S. Lapkin, and L. Brooks. 2010. “Self-scaffolding Mediated by Languaging: Microgenetic Analysis of High and Low Performers.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1): 23–49. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00227.x.
   Google Scholar
• Liamkina, O., and M. Ryshina-Pankova. 2012. “Grammar Dilemma: Teaching Grammar as a Resource for Making Meaning.” The Modern Language Journal 96 (2): 270–289. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01333_1.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. H., and J. Lee. 2015. “Data-driven Learning: Changing the Teaching of Grammar in EFL Classes.” ELT Journal 69 (3): 264–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., and N. Mercer. 2013. Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, S. 2012. “Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-focused Instruction in Communicative Context.” System 40 (2): 324–326. doi:10.1016/j.system.2012.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2000. “Misconceptions and Difficulties in the Acquisition of Metalinguistic Knowledge.” Language and Education 14 (3): 151–163.10.1080/09500780008666787
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2006. “Talk, Talk, Talk: Teaching and Learning in Whole Class Discourse.” Research Papers in Education 21 (1): 19–41.10.1080/02671520500445425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myhill, Debra. 2011. “‘The Ordeal of Deliberate Choice’: Metalinguistic Development in Secondary Writers.” In Past, Present and Future Contributions of Cognitive Writing Research to Cognitive Psychology, edited by V. Berninger, 247–274. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Curriculum Board. 2009. “Shape of the Australian Curriculum: English.” Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia. http://www.acara.edu.au/phase_1_-_the_australian_curriculum.html.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C. 1999. “Preparing for School: Developing a Semantic Style for Educational Knowledge.” In Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes, edited by F. Christie, 66–87. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C., B. Derewianka, and J. Torr. 2007. “From Microfunction to Metaphor: Learning Language and Learning through Language.” In Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective, edited by R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen, and J. Webster, 563–588. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips Galloway, E., J. Stude, and P. Uccelli. 2015. “Adolescents’ Metalinguistic Reflections on the Academic Register in Speech and Writing.” Linguistics and Education 31: 221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., S. Michaels, and C. O’Connor. 2010. “How (Well-structured) Talk Builds the Mind.” In From Genres to Context: New Discoveries about Learning from Education Research and Their Applications, edited by R. Sternberg and D. Preiss, 163–194. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. R. Martin. 2012. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge & Pedagogy in the Sydney School, 206–264. Sheffield: CT Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D., and J. R. Martin. 2013. Knowledge about Language Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge & Pedagogy in the Sydney School, 206–264. Sheffield: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2013. “The Role of Metalanguage in Supporting Academic Language Development.” Language Learning 63 (1): 153–170.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siraj, I., and B.Taggart. 2014. “Exploring Effective Pedagogy in Primary Schools: Evidence from Research.” London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B. 2006. Action Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2008. “Metatalk in a Pair Work Activity: Level of Engagement and Implications for Language Development.” Language Awareness 17 (2): 95–114.10.2167/la431.0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki, W., and N. Itagaki. 2009. “Languaging in Grammar Exercises by Japanese EFL Learners of Differing Proficiency.” System 37 (2): 217–225. doi:10.1016/j.system.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeo, A., and N. Spada. in press. “Is There a Better Time to Focus on Form? Teacher and Learner Views.” TESOL Quarterly. doi:10.1002/tesq.222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S., and R. J. Alexander. 2008. Argumentation and Dialogic Teaching: Alternative Pedagogies for a Changing World. London: Futurelab.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, C. 2010. Dimensions of Expertise: A Conceptual Exploration of Vocational Knowledge. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar