Dialogic teaching to the high-stakes standardised test?

References

• Alexander, Robin J. 2008. Essays on Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Au, W. 2007. “High-stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis.” Educational Researcher 36 (5): 258–267.10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. 2013. “Rereading Comprehension Pedagogies: Toward a Dialogic Teaching Ethic That Honors Student Sensemaking.” Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 1: A1–A31. http://dpj.pitt.edu doi:10.5195/dpj.2013.9.
   Google Scholar
• Ayllon, T., and K. Kelly. 1972. “Effects of Reinforcement on Standardized Test Performance.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 5 (4): 477–484.10.1901/jaba.1972.5-477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–33.10.1111/soth.1998.16.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burbules, Nicholas C. 1993. Dialogue in Teaching: Theory and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dadds, Marion. 2001. “The Politics of Pedagogy.” Teachers and Teaching 7 (1): 43–58.10.1080/713698759
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 2011. “Opportunity Spaces for Dialogic Pedagogy in Test-oriented Schools: A Case Study of Teaching and Learning in High School.” In Bakhtinian Pedagogy: Opportunities and Challenges for Research, Policy and Practice in Education across the Globe, edited by E. Jayne White and Michael A. Peters, 69–90. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gottlieb, E., and S. Wineburg. 2012. “Between Veritas and Communitas : Epistemic Switching in the Reading of Academic and Sacred History.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 21 (1): 84–129.10.1080/10508406.2011.582376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulek, C. 2003. “Preparing for High-stakes Testing.” Theory into Practice 42 (1): 42–50.10.1207/s15430421tip4201_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., S. B. Nolen, and N. S. Haas. 1991. “Raising Standardized Achievement Test Scores and the Origins of Test Score Pollution.” Educational Researcher 20 (5): 2–7.10.3102/0013189X020005002
   Google Scholar
• Haroutunian-Gordon, Sophie. 2009. The Learning to Teach through Discussion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.10.12987/yale/9780300120004.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, B., M. Miller, and S. Wegmann. 2006. “Teaching to the Test … Not! Balancing Best Practice and Testing Requirements in Writing.” The Reading Teacher 60 (4): 310–319.10.1598/RT.60.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, K. D. 2014. “A Second Grade Teacher’s Innovations toward Multimodal Literacies in an Urban Primary School.” Language and Literacy 16 (1): 21–33.10.20360/G2WS3M
   Google Scholar
• Hollingworth, L. 2007. “Five Ways to Prepare for Standardized Tests without Sacrificing Best Practice.” The Reading Teacher 61 (4): 339–342.10.1598/RT.61.4.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasmine, J. 2004. How to Prepare Your Students for Standardized Tests.  Garden Grove, CA: Teacher Created Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Kontovourki, S., and C. Campis. 2010. “Meaningful Practice: Test Prep in a Third-grade Public School Classroom.” The Reading Teacher 64 (4): 236–245. doi:10.1598/RT.64.4.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. M. 2008. Measuring up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2000. Early Spelling: Between Convention and Creativity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2010. “More Helpful as Problem than Solution: Some Implications of Situating Dialogue in Classrooms.” In Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction, edited by K. Littleton and C. Howe, 170–191. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., and J. Snell. 2011a. “Classroom Discourse: The Promise and Complexity of Dialogic Practice.” In Insight and Impact: Applied Linguistics and the Primary School, edited by S. Ellis, E. McCartney, and J. Bourne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., and J. Snell. 2011b. “Promises and Problems of Teaching with Popular Culture: A Linguistic Ethnographic Analysis of Discourse Genre Mixing in a Literacy Lesson.” Reading Research Quarterly 46 (1): 40–69.10.1598/RRQ.46.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A., and J. Snell. 2014. Better Than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., and D. Figlio. 2011. “School Accountability.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education. Vol. 3, edited by E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessmann, 383–423. San Diego, CA: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. F. 1988. “The Distortion of Teaching and Testing: High-Stakes Testing and Instruction.” Peabody Journal of Education 65 (3): 29–46.10.1080/01619568809538611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matusov, Eugene. 2009. Journey into Dialogic Pedagogy. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Matusov, E., and K. Miyazaki. 2014. “Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy.” Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 2. http://dpj.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/dpj1/article/view/121.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. 2000. Contradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized Testing. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nystrand, M., A. Gamoran, R. Kachur, and C. Prendergast. 1997. Opening Dialogue: Understanding the Dynamics of Language and Learning in the English Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R. P., ed. 2005. Defending Standardized Testing, 55–90. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, B., J. Maybin, and C. Roberts. 2015. “Theory and Method in Linguistic Ethnography.” In Linguistic Ethnography: Interdisciplinary Explorations, edited by J. Snell, S. Shaw, and F. Copland. London: Palgrave. A working paper version is available at https://www.academia.edu/6155510/WP125_Rampton_Maybin_and_Roberts_2014._Methodological_foundations_in_linguistic_ethnography.
   Google Scholar
• Rudman, H. C. 1977. “The Standardized Test Flap.” Phi Delta Kappan 59 (3): 179–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F., and F. Hardman. 2003. “Using Computerised Observation as a Tool for Capturing Classroom Interaction.” Educational Studies 29 (1): 39–47.10.1080/03055690303264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., and A. Lefstein. 2011. “Computer-assisted Systematic Observation of Classroom Discourse & Interaction: Technical Report on the Systematic Discourse Analysis Component of the towards Dialogue Study.” Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, #77. London: King’s College London. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/wpull.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. 2008. Testing times: The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tileston, D. W., and S. K. Darling. 2008. Teaching Strategies That Prepare Students for High-stakes Tests. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Gordon. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511605895
   Google Scholar
• West, M. 2007. “Testing, Learning, and Teaching: The Effects of Test-based Accountability on Student Achievement and Instructional Time in Core Academic Subjects.” In Beyond the Basics: Achieving a Liberal Education for All Children, edited by C. E. Finn Jr. and D. Ravitch, 45–61. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar