792
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Relationships among instructional practices, students’ motivational beliefs and science achievement in Taiwan using hierarchical linear modelling

&
Pages 73-88 | Received 30 Sep 2015, Accepted 27 Jul 2016, Published online: 12 Oct 2016

References

  • Aguinis, H., R. K. Gottfredson, and S. A. Culpepper. 2013. “Best-practice Recommendations for Estimating Cross-level Interaction Effects Using Multilevel Modeling.” Journal of Management 39: 1490–1528.10.1177/0149206313478188
  • Areepattamannil, S., J. G. Freeman, and D. A. Klinger. 2011. “Influence of Motivation, Self-beliefs, and Instructional Practices on Science Achievement of Adolescents in Canada.” Social Psychology of Education 14: 233–259.10.1007/s11218-010-9144-9
  • Artino, A. R. 2012. “Academic Self-efficacy: From Educational Theory to Instructional Practice.” Perspectives on Medical Education 1: 76–85.10.1007/s40037-012-0012-5
  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Bietenbeck, J. C. 2011. “Teaching Practices and Student Achievement: Evidence from TIMSS.” Unpublished master thesis, Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI).
  • Biggs, J. B. 1996. “Western Misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage Learning Culture.” In The Chinese Learner: Culture, Psychological and Contextual Influences, edited by D. A. Watkins and J. B. Biggs, 45–68. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
  • Braun, H., R. Coley, Y. Jia, and C. Trapani. 2009. Exploring What Works in Science Instruction: A Look at the Eighth-grade Science Classroom. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Bryan, R. R., S. M. Glynn, and J. M. Kittleson. 2011. “Motivation, Achievement, and Advanced Placement Intent of High School Students Learning Science.” Science Education 95: 1049–1065.10.1002/sce.v95.6
  • Byrne, B. M., and R. J. Shavelson. 1986. “On the Structure of Adolescent Self-concept.” Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 474–481.10.1037/0022-0663.78.6.474
  • Chang, C.-Y., and W.-Y. Cheng. 2008. “Science Achievement and Students’ Self‐confidence and Interest in Science: A Taiwanese Representative Sample Study.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (9): 1183–1200.10.1080/09500690701435384
  • Chen, C., S.-Y. Lee, and H. W. Stevenson. 1995. “Response Style and Cross-cultural Comparisons of Rating Scales among East Asian and North American Students.” Psychological Science 6 (3): 170–175.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
  • Clark, R. E. 2009. “How Much and What Type of Guidance is Optimal for Learning from Instruction?” In Constructivist Theory Applied to Instruction: Success or Failure?, edited by S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy, 158–183. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.
  • Clark, R., and R. E. Mayer. 2008. E-learning and the Science of Instruction. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cobern, W. W., D. Schuster, B. Adams, B. Applegate, B. Skjold, A. Undreiu, C. C. Loving, and J. D. Gobert. 2010. “Experimental Comparison of Inquiry and Direct Instruction in Science.” Research in Science & Technological Education 28: 81–96.10.1080/02635140903513599
  • Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
  • Festinger, L. 1954. “A Theory of Social Comparison Processes.” Human Relations 7: 117–140.10.1177/001872675400700202
  • Foy, P., J. Galia, and I. Li. 2008. “Chapter 11: Scaling the Data from the TIMSS 2007 and Science Assessments.” In TIMSS 2007 Technical Report, edited by J. F. Olson, M. O. Martin and I. V. S. Mullis, 225–379. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Gee, K. A., and K. K. Wong. 2012. “A Cross National Examination of Inquiry and Its Relationship to Student Performance in Science: Evidence from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006.” International Journal of Educational Research 53: 303–318.10.1016/j.ijer.2012.04.004
  • Hänze, M., and R. Berger. 2007. “Cooperative Learning, Motivational Effects, and Student Characteristics: An Experimental Study Comparing Cooperative Learning and Direct Instruction in 12th Grade Physics Classes.” Learning and Instruction 17: 29–41.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004
  • Harter, S. 1981. “A Model of Mastery Motivation in Children: Individual Differences and Developmental Change.” In Aspects on the Development of Competence: The Minnesota Symposia and Child Psychology, edited by W. A. Collins, 215–255. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hidi, S., M. Ainley, B. Berndorff, and L. Del Favero. 2006. “The Role of Interest and Self-efficacy in Science-Related Expository Writing.” In Motivation and Interest in Writing, edited by S. Hidi and P. Boscolo, 201–216. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2004. “Problem-based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16: 235–266.10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., R. G. Duncan, and C. A. Chinn. 2007. “Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006).” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 99–107.10.1080/00461520701263368
  • Holmes, J. A. 2011. “Informal Learning: Student Achievement and Motivation in Science through Museum-Based Learning.” Learning Environments Research 14: 263–277.10.1007/s10984-011-9094-y
  • House, D. J. 2003. “Instructional Activities and Interest in Science Learning for Adolescent Students in Japan and the United States: Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS).” International Journal of Instructional Media 30 (4): 429–442.
  • Huang, C. 2011. “Self-concept and Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Relations.” Journal of School Psychology 49: 505–528.10.1016/j.jsp.2011.07.001
  • IEA (International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement). (2013). International Database Analyzer (version 3.1). Hamburg: IEA Data Processing and Research Center.
  • Jiang, F., and W. F. McComas. 2015. “The Effects of Inquiry Teaching on Student Science Achievement and Attitudes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis of PISA Data.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (3): 554–576.10.1080/09500693.2014.1000426
  • Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1990. “Cooperative Learning and Achievement.” In Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research, edited by S. Sharan, 173–202. New York: Praeger.
  • Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-based, Experiential, and Inquiry-based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  • Klahr, D., and M. Nigam. 2004. “The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning.” Psychological Science 15 (10): 661–667.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00737.x
  • Kuhn, D. 2007. “Is Direct Instruction an Answer to the Right Question?” Educational Psychologist 42 (2): 109–113.10.1080/00461520701263376
  • Lavonen, J., and S. Laaksonen. 2009. “Context of Teaching and Learning School Science in Finland: Reflections on PISA 2006 Results.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8): 922–944.10.1002/tea.v46:8
  • Lee, J. 2009. “Universals and Specifics of Math Self-concept, Math Self-Efficacy, and Math Anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 Participating Countries.” Learning and Individual Differences 19 (3): 355–365.10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009
  • Lee, H.-S., M. C. Linn, K. Varma, and O. L. Liu. 2010. “How Do Technology-enhanced Inquiry Science Units Impact Classroom Learning?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 71–90.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Liou, P.-Y. 2014a. “Examining the Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on Students’ Self-concept of Learning Science in Taiwan Based on the TIMSS Databases.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (12): 2009–2028.10.1080/09500693.2014.889331
  • Liou, P.-Y. 2014b. “Examining Measurement Properties of Attitudinal Items Related to Learning Science in Taiwan from TIMSS 2007.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 13 (6): 856–869.
  • Liou, P.-Y., and Y.-C. Hung. 2015. “Statistical Techniques Utilized in Analyzing PISA and TIMSS Data in Science Education from 1996 to 2013: A Methodological Review.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics 13 (6): 1449–1468.
  • Liou, P.-Y., and E. Z. F. Liu. 2015. “An Analysis of the Relationships between Taiwanese Eighth and Fourth Graders’ Motivational Beliefs and Science Achievement in TIMSS 2011.” Asia Pacific Education Review 16 (3): 433–445.10.1007/s12564-015-9381-x
  • Liu, O. L., H.-S. Lee, and M. C. Linn. 2010. “An Investigation of Teacher Impact on Student Inquiry Science Performance Using a Hierarchical Linear Model.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (7): 807–819.10.1002/tea.20372
  • Marsh, H. W., and R. J. Shavelson. 1985. “Self-concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure.” Educational Psychologist 20: 107–123.10.1207/s15326985ep2003_1
  • Martin, M. O., I. V. S. Mullis, and P. Foy, (with Olson, J. F., Erberber, E., Preuschoff, C., and Galia, J.). 2008. TIMSS 2007 International Science Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Massachusetts Department of Education. (1999). Partnerships Advancing the Learning of Mathematics and Science. Malden, MA: Mass. Dept. of Ed.
  • McConney, A., M. C. Oliver, A. Woods-McConney, R. Schibeci, and D. Maor. 2014. “Inquiry, Engagement, and Literacy in Science: A Retrospective, Cross-national Analysis Using PISA 2006.” Science Education 98 (6): 963–980.10.1002/sce.2014.98.issue-6
  • Nagengast, B., and H. W. Marsh. 2011. “The Negative Effect of School-Average Ability on Science Self-concept in the UK, the UK Countries and the World: The Big-Fish-Little-Pond-Effect for PISA 2006.” Educational Psychology 31 (5): 629–656.10.1080/01443410.2011.586416
  • Nagengast, B., and H. W. Marsh. 2012. “Big Fish in Little Ponds Aspire More: Mediation and Cross-cultural Generalizability of School-average Ability Effects on Self-concept and Career Aspirations in Science.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (4): 1033–1053.10.1037/a0027697
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Nie, Y., and S. Lau. 2010. “Differential Relations of Constructivist and Didactic Instruction to Students’ Cognition, Motivation, and Achievement.” Learning and Instruction 20: 411–423.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.04.002
  • Oliver, J. S., and R. D. Simpson. 1988. “Influences of Attitude toward Science, Achievement Motivation, and Science Self Concept on Achievement in Science: A Longitudinal Study.” Science Education 72 (2): 143–155.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Olson, J. F., M. O. Martin, and I. V. S. Mullis eds.. 2008. TIMSS 2007 Technical Report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
  • Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079.10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Painter, J. 2011. Autonomy, Competence, and Intrinsic Motivation in Science Education: A Self-determination Theory Perspective. Unpublished Doctoral diss., University of North Carolina.
  • Pintrich, P. R., and D. H. Schunk. 2002. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., A. S. Bryk, and R. Congdon. 2005. HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Relich, J. D., R. L. Debus, and R. Walker. 1986. “The Mediating Role of Attribution and Self-efficacy Variables for Treatment Effects on Achievement Outcomes.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 11: 195–216.10.1016/0361-476X(86)90017-2
  • Rutkowski, L., E. Gonzalez, M. Joncas, and M. von Davier. 2010. “International Large-scale Assessment Data: Issues in Secondary Analysis and Reporting.” Educational Researcher 39 (2): 142–151.10.3102/0013189X10363170
  • Schroeder, C. M., T. P. Scott, H. Tolson, T.-Y. Huang, and Y.-H. Lee. 2007. “A Meta-analysis of National Research: Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science in the United States.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (10): 1436–1460.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
  • Schunk, D. H. 1987. “Peer Models and Children’s Behavioral Change.” Review of Educational Research 57: 149–174.10.3102/00346543057002149
  • Schunk, D. H. 1991. “Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation.” Educational Psychologist 26: 207–231.10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133
  • Seidel, T., and R. J. Shavelson. 2007. “Teaching Effectiveness Research in the Past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-analysis Research.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 454–499.10.3102/0034654307310317
  • Shachar, H., and S. Fischer. 2004. “Cooperative Learning and the Achievement of Motivation and Perceptions of Students in 11th Grade Chemistry Classes.” Learning and Instruction 14: 69–87.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.003
  • Simpson, R. D., and J. S. Oliver. 1985. “Attitude toward Science and Achievement Motivation Profiles of Male and Female Science Students in Grades Six through Ten.” Science Education 69 (4): 511–525.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
  • Singh, K., M. Granville, and S. Dika. 2002. “Mathematics and Science Achievement: Effects of Motivation, Interest, and Academic Engagement.” The Journal of Educational Research 95 (6): 323–332.10.1080/00220670209596607
  • Sins, P. H. M., W. R. van Joolingen, E. R. Savelsbergh, and B. van Hout-Wolters. 2008. “Motivation and Performance within a Collaborative Computer-based Modeling Task: Relations between Students’ Achievement Goal Orientation, Self-efficacy, Cognitive Processing, and Achievement.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 33: 58–77.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004
  • Skaalvik, E. M., and S. Skaalvik. 2004. “Self-concept and Self-efficacy: A Test of the Internal/external Frame of Reference Model and Predictions of Subsequent Motivation and Achievement.” Psychological Reports 95: 1187–1202.
  • Song, H.-D., and B. L. Grabowski. 2006. “Stimulating Intrinsic Motivation for Problem Solving Using Goal-oriented Contexts and Peer Group Composition.” Educational Technology, Research and Development 54 (5): 445–466.10.1007/s11423-006-0128-6
  • Tao, Y., M. Oliver, and G. Venville. 2013. “A Comparison of Approaches to the Teaching and Learning of Science in Chinese and Australian Elementary Classrooms: Cultural and Socioeconomic Complexities.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (1): 33–61.10.1002/tea.v50.1
  • Tsai, C.-C., and P.-C. Kuo. 2008. “Cram School Students’ Conceptions of Learning and Learning Science in Taiwan.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (3): 351–373.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Walker, C. O., B. A. Greene, and R. A. Mansell. 2006. “Identification with Academics, Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation, and Self-effica cy as Predictors of Cognitive Engagement.” Learning and Individual Differences 16: 1–12.10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
  • Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 1992. “The Development of Achievement-task Values: A Theoretical Analysis.” Developmental Review 12 (3): 265–310.10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
  • Wijnia, L., S. M. M. Loyens, and E. Derous. 2011. “Investigating Effects of Problem-Based versus Lecture-based Learning Environments on Student Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36: 101–113.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.003
  • Wilkins, J. L. M. 2004. “Mathematics and Science Self-concept: An International Investigation.” The Journal of Experimental Education 72 (4): 331–346.10.3200/JEXE.72.4.331-346
  • Wilson, C. D., J. A. Taylor, S. M. Kowalski, and J. Carlson. 2010. “The Relative Effects and Equity of Inquiry-based and Commonplace Science Teaching on Students’ Knowledge, Reasoning, and Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (3): 276–301.
  • Zemelman, S., H. Daniel, and A. Hyde. 2005. Best Practice: Today’s Standards for Teaching Learning in America’s Schools. 3rd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Zeng, K. 1999. Dragon Gate: Comparative Examinations and Their Consequences. London: Cassell.
  • Zuckerman, M., J. Porac, D. Lathin, R. Smith, and E. L. Deci. 1978. “On the Importance of Self-determination for Intrinsically-motivated Behavior.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4: 443–446.10.1177/014616727800400317

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.