Share and succeed: the development of knowledge sharing and brokerage in data teams’ network structures

References

• Akkerman, Sanne F., and Arthur Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81 (2): 132–169. doi:10.3102/0034654311404435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkundi, Prasad, and David A. Harrison. 2006. “Ties, Leaders, and Time in Teams: Strong Inference about Network Structure’s Effects on Team Viability and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (1): 49–68.10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Steve P. 2002. Netdraw Network Visualization. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Steve P., Martin G. Everett, and Lin C. Freeman. 2002. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Deven, Geoffrey D. Borman, and Michelle Robinson. 2011. “A Multistate District Level Cluster Randomized Trial of the Impact of Data-driven Reform on Reading and Mathematics Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 33 (3): 378–398.10.3102/0162373711412765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, Cynthia E., and Jennifer L. Russell. 2008. “District Policy and Teachers’ Social Networks.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 30 (3): 203–235.10.3102/0162373708321829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, Cynthia E., Judith Touré, and Mika Yamashita. 2009. “Evidence, Interpretation, and Persuasion: Instructional Decision Making in the District Central Office.” Teachers College Record 111 (April): 1115–1161.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, Cynthia E., and Erica O. Turner. 2011. “Research on Data Use: A Framework and Analysis.” Measurement 9 (November): 173–206.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Alan J. 2012. “Data, Dyads and Dynamics: Exploring Data Use and Social Networks in Educational Improvement.” Teacher College Record 114 (November): 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, Alan J., Kara S. Finnigan, Jordan S. Stuart, Nienke M. Moolenaar, and Jing Che. 2014. “Misalignment and Perverse Incentives Examining the Politics of District Leaders as Brokers in the Use of Research Evidence.” Educational Policy 28 (March): 145–174. doi:10.1177/0895904813513149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datnow, Amanda, and Lea Hubbard. 2015. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning Instruction: Lessons from the past and Prospects for the Future.” Teachers College Record 117 (April): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, Amanda, Vicki Park, and Brianna Kennedy-Lewis. 2013. “Affordances and Constraints in the Context of Teacher Collaboration for the Purpose of Data Use.” Journal of Educational Administration 51: 341–362.10.1108/09578231311311500
   Google Scholar
• Degenne, Alain, and Michel Forse. 1999. Introducing Social Networks. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849209373
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Inspectorate of Education. 2014. De Staat van het Onderwijs [The State of Affairs in Education]. Utrecht: Inspectie van het Onderwijs.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, Lorna, and Steven Katz. 2006. Leading Schools in a Data-rich World: Harnessing Data for School Improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farley-Ripple, Elizabeth N., and Joan L. Buttram. 2015. “Developing Collaborative Data Use through Professional Learning Communities: Early Lessons from Delaware.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 42 (September): 41–53. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, Jay, and Rosann. Tung. 2001. “Whole School Reform: How Schools Use the Data-based Inquiry and Decision Making Process.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Finnigan, Kara S., and Alan J. Daly. 2012. “Mind the Gap: Organizational Learning and Improvement in an Underperforming Urban System.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 41–71. doi:10.1086/667700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, Kenneth A., William R. Penuel, and Ann Krause. 2015. “What is a “Good” Social Network For Policy Implementation? The Flow of Know-how for Organizational Change.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34 (2): 378–402. doi:10.1002/pam.21817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, Roger V., and Roberto M. Fernandez. 1989. “Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks.” Sociological Methodology 19 (January): 89–126.10.2307/270949
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, Robert A., and Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Alma. 2011. “System Improvement through Collective Capacity Building.” Journal of Educational Administration 49 (6): 624–636. doi:10.1108/09578231111174785.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, Meredith I. 2006. “Street-level Bureaucracy Revisited: Frontline District Central-office Administrators as Boundary Spanners in Education Policy Implementation.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 28 (4): 357–383. doi:10.3102/01623737028004357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, Meredith I., and Gina S. Ikemoto. 2008. “Adaptive Assistance for Learning Improvement Efforts: The Case of the Institute for Learning.” Peabody Journal of Education 83 (3): 328–363.10.1080/01619560802222327
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, Douglas, and Julie Kalnin. 2003. “Collaborative Inquiry to Make Data-based Decisions in Schools.” Teaching and Teacher Education 19 (6): 569–580.10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuning, Trynke, Marieke van Geel, Adrie Visscher, Jean-Paul Fox, and Nienke M. Moolenaar. 2016. “The Transformation of Schools’ Social Networks during a Data-based Decision-making Reform.” Teachers College Record 118 (9): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiper, Wilmad, Jan Van den Akker, Hans Hooghoff, and Jos Letschert. 2006. “Curriculum Policy and School Practice in a European Comparative Perspective.” In Curriculum Development Re-invented. Proceedings of the Invitational Conference on the Occasion of the 30 Years SLO 1975–2005, edited by J. F. M. Letschert,  56–77. Enschede: SLO.
   Google Scholar
• Lachat, Mary Ann, and Stephen Smith. 2005. “Practices That Support Data Use in Urban High Schools.” Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR) 10 (3): 333–349.10.1207/s15327671espr1003_7
   Google Scholar
• Lai, Mei K., and Kim Schildkamp. 2013. “Data-based Decision Making: An Overview” In Data-based Decision Making in Education, edited by K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, and L. Earl, 9–21. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3
   Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, Nienke M. 2012. “A Social Network Perspective on Teacher Collaboration in Schools: Theory, Methodology, and Applications.” American Journal of Education 119 (1): 7–39. doi:10.1086/667715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolenaar, N. M., A. J. Daly, and K. Finnigan. 2013. “The School District as a Complex Adaptive System: Exploring a Complexity Theory Perspective on Policy Implementation.” Invited paper presented at the International Congress on School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSEI), Santiago, Chile, January 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Muijs, Daniel, Mel West, and Mel Ainscow. 2010. “Why Network? Theoretical Perspectives on Networking.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1080/09243450903569692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, Janine, and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1997. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Creation of Value in Firms.” Academy of Management Review: 35–39 (April): doi:10.5465/ambpp.1997.4980592.
   Google Scholar
• Pitcher, Patricia, and Anne D. Smith. 2001. “Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies.” Organization Science 12 (1): 1–18.10.1287/orsc.12.1.1.10120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortman, Cindy L., and Kim Schildkamp. 2012. “Alternative Quality Standards in Qualitative Research?” Quality and Quantity 46 (6): 1727–1751. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9555-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portes, Alejandro, and Julia Sensenbrenner. 1993. “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6): 1320–1350.10.1086/230191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., and M. Ehren. 2013. “The Netherlands: From ‘Intuition’- to ‘Data’-driven Decision Making in Dutch Secondary Schools?” In Data-Based Decision Making in Education, edited by K. Schildkamp, M. K. Lai, and L. Earl, 49–67. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3
   Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, Kim, and Wilmad Kuiper. 2010. “Data-Informed Curriculum Reform: Which Data, What Purposes, and Promoting and Hindering Factors.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (3): 482–496. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, Kim, Cindy L. Poortman, and Adam Handelzalts. 2016. “Data Teams for School Improvement.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement: 228–254. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1056192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll, Louise. 2009. “Connecting Learning Communities: Capacity Building for Systemic Change.” In Second International Handbook of Educational Change, edited by A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, and D. Hopkins, 469–484. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, Charles, and Abbas Tashakkori. 2008. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Wenpin, and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1998. “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks.” Academy of Management Journal 41 (August): 464–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Cor, and Linda Odenthal. 2014. “Opbrengstgericht Werken en Onderzoeksmatig Leiderschap in PO en VO.” [DBDM and Research Leadership in Primary and Secondary Education.] In Leidinggeven Aan Onderzoekende Scholen [Leading Researching Schools], edited by M. Krüger, 67–78. Bussum: Coutinho.
   Google Scholar
• Visscher, Adrie, and Melanie Ehren. 2011. “De Eenvoud en Complexiteit van Opbrengstgericht Werken. Analyse in Opdracht van de Kenniskamer van het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap.” [The Simplicity and Complexity of Data Based Decision Making. Analysis commisioned by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science] Online document, Accessed July 13. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-enpublicaties/rapporten/2011/07/13/de-eenvoud-en-complexiteit-van-opbrengstgerichtwerken.html
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932
   Google Scholar