Phonics: reading policy and the evidence of effectiveness from a systematic ‘tertiary’ review

References

• Adams, M. J. 1990. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beard, R., G. Brooks, and J. Ampaw-Farr (Forthcoming). “How Linguistically-informed Are Phonics Programmes?” Literacy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, G., M. Cook, A. Littlefair, with replies from D. Wyse, and M. Styles. 2007. “Responses to Wyse and Styles’ Article, “Synthetic Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: The Debate Surrounding England’s ‘Rose Report’” (Literacy, 41, 1, April 2007).” Literacy 41 (3): 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. [1967] 1989. Learning to Read: The Great Debate. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Darnell, C. A., J. E. Solity, and H. Wall. 2017. “Decoding the Phonics Screening Check.” British Educational Research Journal 43 (3): 505–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science. 1989. English in the National Curriculum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 1995. English in the National Curriculum. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2011. Year 1 Phonics Screening Check Pilot Evaluation. London: Department for Education. Accessed February 5, 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/year-1-phonics-screening-check-pilot-evaluation
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2013. English Programmes of Study: Key Stages 1 and 2 National Curriculum in England. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2014. Phonics: Choosing a Programme. London: Department for Education. Accessed February 5, 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/phonics-choosing-a-programme
   Google Scholar
• DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). 1998. National Literacy Strategy. London: Department for Education and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• DfEE (Department for Education and Employment). 1999. The National Curriculum Handbook for Primary Teachers in England. London: Department for Education and Employment & Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2004. Playing with Sounds. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2006. Primary National Strategy. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• DfES (Department for Education and Skills). 2007. Letters and Sounds. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P., and W. Tunmer. 1986. “Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability.” Remedial and Special Education 7: 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hartung, J., G. Knapp, and G. M. Sinha. 2008. Statistical Meta-analysis with Application. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., and I. Olkin. 1985. Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. 2005. Teaching Children to Read (Eighth Report of Session 2004–05). London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. E., and F. L. Schmidt. 2004. Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. S., and J. E. Watson. 2004. “Accelerating the Development of Reading, Spelling and Phonemic Awareness Skills in Initial Readers.” Reading and Writing 17: 327–357.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, K. (2017, 2 February). Letter in The Guardian newspaper. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/feb/01/invest-in-libraries-not-phonics-tests.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, S., S. McNally, and M. Viarengo. 2016. “Teaching to Teach” Literacy. London: London School of Economics Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper No 1425.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLoS Med 6 (7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRP (National Reading Panel). 2000. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Child Health and Human Development Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education). 2002. The National Literacy Strategy: The First Four Years 1998–2002. London: Office for Standards in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. 2006. Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading. Final Report. London: Department for Education and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Schwippert, K., and J. Lenkeit, eds. 2012. Progress in Reading Literacy in National and International Context. the Impact of PIRLS 2006 in 12 Countries. Munster: Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. 2000. Progress in Understanding Reading: Scientific Foundations and New Frontiers. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M. 2006. “Teaching Reading: Why Start with Systematic Phonics Teaching?” Psychology of Education Review 30: 6–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, M., and R. Stainthorp. 2016. Reading Development & Teaching. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z., A. Kasim, and S. Higgins. 2016. “Same Difference? Understanding Variation in the Estimation of Effect Sizes from Educational Trials.” International Journal of Educational Research 77: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adesope, O. O., T. Lavin, T. Thompson, and C. Ungerleider. 2011. “Pedagogical Strategies for Teaching Literacy to ESL Immigrant Students: A Meta-analysis.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 81 (4): 629–653.10.1111/bjep.2011.81.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camilli, G., S. Vargas, and M. Yurecko. 2003. “‘Teaching Children to Read’: The Fragile Link between Science and Federal Education Policy.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 11 (15). doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n15.2003.
   Google Scholar
• Camilli, G., P. M. Wolfe, and M. L. Smith. 2006. “Meta-analysis and Reading Policy: Perspectives on Teaching Children to Read.” The Elementary School Journal 107 (1): 27–36.10.1086/509525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C., S. R. Nunes, S. A. Stahl, and D. M. Willows. 2001. “Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 71 (3): 393–447.10.3102/00346543071003393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galuschka, K., E. Ise, K. Krick, and G. Schulte-Koerne. 2014. “Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.” PLoS ONE 9 (2). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, D. D., and L. H. Swanson. 2006. “The National Reading Panel’s Meta-analysis of Phonics Instruction: Another Point of View.” The Elementary School Journal 107 (1): 17–26.10.1086/509524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, I. 2010. Evidence-based Reading Instruction for English Language Learners in Preschool through Sixth Grades: A Meta-analysis of Group Design Studies. University of Minnesota, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2009. 3371852.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, G., P. M. Eve, K. Jones, E. Banales, S. Kohnen, T. Anandakumar, and A. Castles. 2012. “Phonics Training for English-speaking Poor Readers.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,  CD009115 (12 December 2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, K. H. 2007. “A Meta-analysis of Interventions for Phonemic Awareness and Phonics Instruction for Delayed Older Readers.” University of Oregon, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2007: 3285626.
   Google Scholar
• Suggate, S. P. 2010. “Why What We Teach Depends on When: Grade and Reading Intervention Modality Moderate Effect Size.” Developmental Psychology 46 (6): 1556–1579.10.1037/a0020612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suggate, S. P. 2016. “A Meta-analysis of the Long-term Effects of Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, and Reading Comprehension Interventions.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 49 (1): 77–96.10.1177/0022219414528540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgerson, C., G. Brooks, and J. Hall. 2006. “A Systematic Review of the Research Literature on the Use of Phonics in the Teaching of Reading and Spelling.” (ISBN: 1844786595 9781844786596). http://catalogue.bishopg.ac.uk/custom_bgc/files/JKEC_phonics_review.pdf.
   Google Scholar