Investigating the impact of classroom climate on UK school students taking part in a science inquiry-based learning programme – CREST

References

• Adey, P. 1992. “The Case Results: Implications for Science Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 14 (2): 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2010. “‘Doing’ Science versus “Being” a Scientist: Examining 10/11-Year-Old Schoolchildren’s Constructions of Science through the Lens of Identity.” Science Education 94: 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.v94:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1991. “Social Cognitive Theory of Self-regulation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 248–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beishuizen, J., and K. Steffens. 2011. “A conceptual framework for research on self-regulated learning.“ In Self-regulated Learning in Technology Enhanced Learning Environments, edited by Carneiro, R. et al., 3–19. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., and S. Hogarth. 2009. “Would you want to talk to a Scientist at a Party? High School Students’ Attitudes to School Science and to Science.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (14): 1975–1998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. L., and S. A. Karabenick. 2011. “Motivation and Students’ Use of Learning Strategies: Evidence of Unidirectional Effects in Mathematics Classrooms.” Learning and Instruction 21: 416–428. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M. 1997. “Self-Regulated Learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy Makers, Educators, Teachers, and Students.” Learning and Instruction 7: 161–186. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., and M. Niemivirta. 2000. “Self-Regulated Learning: Finding a Balance between Learning Goals and Ego-Protective Goals.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 417–450. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, S. R., and J. M. Cheek. 1986. “The Role of Factor Analysis in The Development and Evaluation of Personality Scales.” Journal of Personality 54 (1): 106–148. doi:10.1111/jopy.1986.54.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., and J. C. Stanley. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Company. London. Chicago, IL: Rand- McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, M. A. 2001. “Children’s Self-Efficacy, Motivational Intentions, and Attributions in Physical Education and Sport.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 72: 47–54. doi:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. W. T. 1998. “Synthesizing metacognitive interventions: What training characteristics can improve reading performance?“ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April.
   Google Scholar
• Chularut, P., and T. K. Debacker. 2004. “The Influence of Concept Mapping on Achievement, Self-Regulation, and Self-Efficacy in Students of English as a Second Language.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 29: 248–263. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2003.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., and B. J. Zimmerman. 2004. “Self-Regulation Empowerment Program: A School-Based Program to Enhance Self-Regulated and Self-Motivated Cycles of Student Learning.” Physchology in Schools 41 (5): 537–550. doi:10.1002/pits.10177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., and P. P. Chen. 2009. “Self-Regulation, Motivation, and Math Achievement in Middle School: Variations across Grade Level and Math Context.” Journal of School Psychology 47: 291–314. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. W. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G., F. Fidler, P. Kalinowski, and J. Lai. 2012. “The Statistical Recommendations of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis.” Australian Journal of Psychology 64: 138–146. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00037.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bilde, J., M. Vansteenkiste, and W. Lens. 2011. “Understanding The Association between Future Time Perspective and Self-regulated Learning Through The Lens of Self-determination Theory.” Learning and Instruction 21: 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, E., L. Verschaffel, and C. Masui. 2004. “The CLIA-model: A Framework for Designing Powerful Learning Environments for Thinking and Problem Solving.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 19: 365–384. doi:10.1007/BF03173216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. J. Vallerand, L. G. Pelletier, and R. M. Ryan. 1991. Motivation and Education: The self-determination Perspective. Educational Psychologist 26 (3&4): 325–346.
   Google Scholar
• DfE 2013 “National Curriculum for England.” [ electronic version]. www.education.gov.uk/schools/teachingandlearning/curriculum/secondary/b00198831/science/ks4
   Google Scholar
• Dignath, C., and G. Büttner. 2008. “Components of Fostering Self-Regulated Learning among Students. A Meta-Analysis on Intervention Studies at Primary and Secondary School Level.” Metacognition Learning 3: 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. 2008. “A Review of the Research on Practical Work in School Science.” Technical Report, King’s College London, London.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, R. 1989. “Students’ Conceptions and the Learning of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 11: 481–490. doi:10.1080/0950069890110501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., and V. Oldham. 1986. “A Constructivist Approach to Curriculum Development in Science.” Studies in Science Education 13: 105–122. doi:10.1080/03057268608559933.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A. G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41: 1149–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feise, R. J. 2002. Do Multiple Outcome Measures require P-value Adjustment? BMC Medical Research Methodology 2 (8): doi:10.1186/1471-2288-2-8.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A., and G. Hole 2003. How to design and report experiments. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., and J. S. Eccles. 2002. “Children’s Competence and Value Beliefs from Childhood through Adolescence: Growth Trajectories in Two Male-Sex-Types Domains.” Developmental Psychology 38: 519–533. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., D. Fuchs, K. Prentice, M. Burch, C. L. Hamlett, R. Owen, and K. Schroeter. 2003. “Enhancing Third-Grade Students Mathematical Problem Solving with Self-Regulated Learning Strategies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (2): 306–315. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Z., A. M. Lee, Solomon, T. Zhang. 2009. “Changes in Middle School Students’ Motivation toward Physical Education over One School Year.” Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 28 (4): 378–399. doi:10.1123/jtpe.28.4.378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, R. 2000. “Measuring Change in Students’ Attitudes toward Science Over Time: An Application of Latent Variable Growth Modeling.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 9 (3): 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, C., and J. C. Brunstein. 2007. “Improving Fourth-Grade Students’ Composition Skills: Effects of Strategy Instruction and Self-Regulation Procedures.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (2): 297–310. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., G. Taasoobshirazi, and P. Brickamn. 2009. “Science Motivation Questionnaire: Construct Validation with Nonscience Majors.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (2): 127–146. doi:10.1002/tea.20267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and K. R. Harris. 1993. “Self-Regulated Strategy Development: Helping Students with Learning Problems Develop as Writers.” The Elementrary School Journal 94 (2): 169–181. doi:10.1086/461758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2003. “The Many Faces of Lifelong Learning: Recent Education Policy Trends in Europe.“ Journal of Education Policy 17 (6): 611–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., and d’Oliveira, M. 1999. Learning to use Statistical tests in Psychology: A student’s guide. 2nd ed., p. 220. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haller, E., D. A. Child, and H. J. Walberg. 1988. “Can Comprehension Be Taught? A Quantitative Synthesis of “Metacognitive” Studies.” Educational Researcher 17 (8): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement, 379. London: Routledge, Taylor& Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., J. Biggs, and N. Purdie. 1996. “Effects of Learning Skills Interventions on Student Learning: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 66 (2): 99–136. doi:10.3102/00346543066002099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, C., and K. Pyle. 2010. A Literature Review of Assessment for Learning in Science. Slough: NFER. Online.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. 2003. “Time for Action: Science Education for an Alternative Future.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 645–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. E., S. Lanza, D. W. Osgood, J. S. Eccles, and A. Wigfield. 2002. “Changes in Children’s Self-competence and Values: Gender and Domain Differences across Grade One Through Twelve.” Child Development 73: 509–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. 2008. “Clarifying Metacognition, Self-Regulation, and Self-Regulated Learning: What’s the Purpose?” Educational Psychology Review 20: 477–484. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9087-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistner, S., K. Rakoczy, B. Otto, C. Dignath-van Ewijk, and G. Büttner. 2010. “Promotion of Self-Regulated Learning in Classrooms: Investigating Frequency, Quality, and Consequences for Student Performance.” Metacognition Learning 5: 157–171. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9055-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. 2011. “The Case Against Grades.” Educational Leadership 69 (3): 28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koretz, R. L. 2005. Is Statistical Significance always Significant? Nutrition in Clinical Practice 20 (3): 303–307.
   Google Scholar
• MacLellan, E. S., and R. Soden. 2006. “Facilitating Self-Regulation in Higher Education through Self-Report.” Learning Environments Research 9: 95–110. doi:10.1007/s10984-005-9002-4.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J., and A. McLellan. 2008. “The Educational Psychology of Self-regulation: A Conceptual and Critical Analysis.” The Study of The Philosophy of Education 27: 433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. S., C. C. Ponitz, and F. J. Morrison. 2009. “Early Gender Differences in Self-Regulation and Academic Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 689–704. doi:10.1037/a0014240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos, D. C., and A. Ringdal. 2012. “Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Literature Review on the Teacher’s Role.” Educational Research International, 2012, Article ID 423284: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Moote, J. 2017. Investigating the Longer-Term Impact of the CREST Inquiry-Based Learning Programme on Student Self-regulated Processes and Related Motivations: Views of Students and Teachers. Research in Science Education. 1–30. doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9621-7.
   Google Scholar
• Moote, J., J. Williams, and J. Sproule. 2013. When Students take Control: Investigating the impact of the CREST Inquiry-based Learning Program on Self-regulated Processes and Related Motivations in Young Science Students. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.2.178.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., S. Konstantopoulos, and L. V. Hedges. 2004. “How Large are Teacher Effects?” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26 (3): 237–257. doi:10.3102/01623737026003237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrow-Whiting, M., R. Edwards, and P. Slade. 2007. “Keeping up the Momentum: Modernising the Secondary Science Curriculum in England.” School Science Review 89 (326): 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., H. Cooper, and S. R. Wynn. 2010. “The Effectiveness and Relative Importance of Providing Choices in the Classroom.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102: 896–915. doi:10.1037/a0019545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. 2010. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., A. M. Ryan, and A. Kaplan. 2007. “Early Adolescents’ Perceptions of the Classroom Social Envirnoment, Motivational Beliefs, and Engagement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (1): 83–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2003. “A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts.” Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (4): 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2004. “A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-regulated Learning in College Students.” Educational Psychology Review 16 (4): 385–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and D. H. Schunk. 2002. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. De Groot. 1990. “Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randi, J., and L. Corno. 1997. “Teachers as Innovators.” In International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching, Vol. I, edited by B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, and I. F. Goodson, 1163–1221. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Reif, F. 2008. Applying Cognitive Science to Education: Thinking and Learning in Scientific and Other Complex Domains. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J., R. Millar, and J. Osborne. 1999. “Beyond 2000: Science/Biology Education for the Future.” Journal of Biological Education 33 (2): 68–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley, D. S., P. A. Schutz, R. S. Glanz, and C. E. Weinstein. 1992. “Self-Regulated Learning: The Interactive Influence of Metacognitive Awareness and Goal-Setting.” Journal of Experimental Education 60 (4): 293–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., R. Correnti, and R. Miller. 2002. What Large-Scale, Survey Research Tells Us about Teacher Effects in Student Achievement: Insights from the Prospects Study of Elementary Schools. Madison, WI: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Accessed 25 June 2017. http://www.cpre.org/images/stories/cpre_pdfs/rr51.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, J. S., A. Minnaert, and M. Boekaerts. 2005. “The Influence of Teacher Perceived Administration of Self-Regualted Learning on Students’ Motivation and Information-Processing.” Learning and Instruction 15: 141–160. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, A. M., and H. Patrick. 2001. “The Classroom Social Environment and Changes in Adolescents’ Motivation and Engagement during Middle School.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (2): 437–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder, J. 2002. “School Science Education for Citizenship: Strategies for Teaching about the Epistemology of Science.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 35 (6): 637–658. doi:10.1080/00220270210148434.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1990. “Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy during Self-Regulated Learning.” Educational Psychologist 25: 71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and P. A. Ertmer. 2000. “Self-Regulation and Academic Learning: Self- Efficacy Enhancing Interventions.” In Handbook of Self-Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 631–649. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and S. D. Miller. 2002. Self-efficacy and Adolescents’ motivation. In Adolescence and Education. Academic Motivation of Adolescents, edited by F. Pajares, and T. Urdan, Vol. 2, 29–52. Greenwich, CT7: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Skibbe, L. E., B. M. Phillis, S. L. Day, H. E. Brophy-Herb, and C. M. Connor. 2012. “Children’s Early Literacy Growth in Relation to Classmates’ Self-Regulation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (3): 541–553. doi:10.1037/a0029153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolkowski, K. 2013. “Gain Score Analysis.” Accessed 7 September 2017. http://homes.ori.org/keiths/Tips/Stats_GainScores.html
   Google Scholar
• Stoeger, H., and A. Ziegler. 2010. “Do Pupils with Differing Cognitive Abilities Benefit Similarly from a Self-Regulated Learning Training Program?” Gifted Education International 26 (1): 110–123. doi:10.1177/026142941002600113.
   Google Scholar
• Sugrue, C. 1997. “Student Teachers' Lay Theories and Teaching Identities: Their Implications for Professional Development.” European Journal of Teacher Education 20 (3): 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, S., W. Pan, and L. L. Wang. 2010. “A Comprehensive Review of Effect Size Reporting and Interpreting Practices in Academic Journals in Education and Psychology.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (4): 989–1004. doi:10.1037/a0019507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urdan, T., and E. Schoenfelder. 2006. “Classroom Effects on Student Motivation: Goal Structures, Social Relationships, and Competence Beliefs.” Journal of School Psychology 44: 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Veen, I., and T. Peetsma. 2009. “The Development in Self-Regulated Learning Behavior of First-Year Students in the Lowest Level of Secondary School in the Netherlands.” Learning and Individual Differences 19 (1): 34–46. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Horn, M. L., A. A. Fagan, T. Jaki, E. C. Brown, D. Hawkins, M. W. Arthur, R. D. Abbott, and R. F. Catalano. 2008. “Using Multilevel Mixtures to Evaluate Intervention Effects in Group Randomized Trials.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 43: 289–326. doi:10.1080/00273170802034893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanaspua, L., J. Stolk, and T. Harding. 2010. “Application of Self-determination and Self-regulation Theories to Course Design: Planting The Seeds for Adaptive Expertise.” International Journal of Engineering Education 26 (4): 914–929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., E. Sierens, B. Soenens, K. Luyckx, and W. Lens. 2009. “Motivational Profiles from a Self-Determination Perspective: The Quality of Motivation Matters.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101 (3): 671–688. doi:10.1037/a0015083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velayutham, S., J. M. Aldridge, and B. Fraser. 2012. “Gender Differences in Student Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 30: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., and N. Lazar. 2016. “The ASA’s Statement on p-Values. Context, Process, and Purpose.” The American Statistician 70 (2): 129–133. doi:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederiksen. 1998. “Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students.” Cognition and Instruction 16 (1): 3–118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2002. “Students’ Motivation during the Middle School Years.” In Improving Academic Achievement: Impact of Psychological Factors on Education, edited by J. Aronson, 395. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., and L. M. Binnie. 2003. “Children’s Concepts of Illness: An Intervention to Improve Knowledge.” British Journal of Health Pscyhology 7 (2): 129–147. doi:10.1348/135910702169402.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. 2010. Self-Regulated Learning and the 21st Century Competencies.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., and P. R. Pintrich. 1998. “Contextual Differences in Student Motivation and Self-regulated Learning in Mathematics, English, and Social Studies Classrooms.” Instructional Science 26: 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 1990. “Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview.” Educational Psychologist 25 (1): 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. “Attaining Self-Regulated Learning: A Social Cognitive Persepctive.” In Handbook of Self- Regulation, edited by M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, 13–39. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. 2002. “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learning: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41 (2): 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. W., and B. D. Zumbo. 1993. “The Relative Power of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Methods.” In A Handbook on Data Analysis in the Behavioral Sciences: Statistical Issues, edited by G. Karen and C. Lewis, 481–517. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, D. W. 1997. “A Note on Interpretation of the Paired-Samples T Test.” Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics 22 (3): 349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 2004. Higher Order Thinking in Science Classrooms: Students’ Learning and Teacher’ Professional Development. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and Y. Dori, eds. 2012. Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zusho, A., P. R. Pintrich, and B. Coppola. 2003. “Skill and Will: The Role of Motivation and Cognition in the Learning of College Chemistry.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1081–1094. doi:10.1080/0950069032000052207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar