Mobile phones as life and thought companions

References

• Aagaard, J. 2016. “Mobile Devices, Interaction, and Distraction: A Qualitative Exploration of Absent Presence.” Al & Society 31 (2): 223–231. doi:10.1007/s00146-015-0638-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagaard, J. 2017. “Breaking down Barriers: The Ambivalent Nature of Technologies in the Classroom.” New Media & Society 19 (7): 1127–1143. doi:10.1177/1461444816631505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault, J. S. 2011. “Breaking up ‘Because of the Phone’ and the Transformative Potential of Information in Southern Mozambique.” New Media & Society 13 (3): 444–456. doi:10.1177/1461444810393906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biao, X. 2007. “How Far are The Left-behind Left Behind? A Preliminary Study in Rural China.” Population, Space and Place 13 (3): 179–191. doi: 10.1002/psp.437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, J. 1996. “Phenomenographic Research - Some Methodological Issues.” In Reflections on Phenomenography: Towards a Methodology?, edited by G. Dall’Alba and B. Hasselgren, 49–66. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. 2008. “Why Youth ♥ Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by D. Buckingham, 119–142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, H. 1997. “The Social Chicken and the Technological Egg: Educational Computing an the Technology/Society Divide.” Educational Theory 47 (1): 51–65. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.1997.00051.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. 2008. Social Research Methods. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. 2007. Beyond Technology: Children’s Learning in the Age of Digital Culture. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. 2008. “Introducing Identity.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by David Buckingham. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, 1–24. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K. (2010). Advanced sampling designs in mixed research: Current practices and emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences. In Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.), edited by A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie, 353 –378. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C. 2017. “Putting Technology in the Hands of Learners: Perspectives on Formal Education’s Initiatives around One-to-One Digital Technologies.” Oxford Review of Education 43 (3): 255–260. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1304919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. C., F. Atherton, C. Calderwood, and M. McBride. 2019. “United Kingdom Chief Medical Officers’ Commentary on ‘Screen-Based Activities and Children and Young People’s Mental Health and Psychosocial Wellbeing: A Systematic Map of Reviews’.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-cmo-commentary-on-screen-time-and-social-media-map-of-reviews
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, K., M. Richardson, I. Kwan, W. MacDowall, H. Burchett, C. Stansfield, G. Brunton, K. Sutcliffe, and J. Thomas. 2019. Screen-Based Activities and Children and Young People’s Mental Health: A Systematic Map of Reviews. London. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3748
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, P. 2004. “An Anthropology of Structural Violence.” Current Anthropology 45 (3): 305–325. doi:10.1086/382250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 1992. “Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power and Democracy.” Inquiry 35 (3–4): 301–322. doi:10.1080/00201749208602296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2003. “Modernity Theory and Technology Studies: Reflections on Bridging the Gap.” In Modernity and Technology, edited by T. J. Misa, P. Brey, and A. Feenberg, 73–104. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, H. 1996. “Advancing Phenomenography - Questions of Method.” In Reflections on Phenomenography: Toward a Methodology?, edited by G. Dall’Alba and B. Hasselgren, 35–47. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J. 2018. “Chinese Youth Performing Identities and Navigating Belonging Online.” Journal of Youth Studies 21 (2): 129–143. doi:10.1080/13676261.2017.1355444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. 2008. “Questioning the Generational Divide: Technological Exoticism and Adult Constructions of Online Youth Identity.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by David Buckingham. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, 71–92. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.  doi: 10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.071
   Google Scholar
• Hessler, P. 2001. River Town: Two Years on the Yangtze. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, H. A., and D. Miller. 2006. The Cell Phone: An Anthropology of Communication. Oxford; New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A. 2009. “Caregiving: The Odyssey of Becoming More Human.” The Lancet 373 (9660): 292–293. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60087-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A. 2012a. “Caregiving as Moral Experience.” The Lancet 380 (9853): 1550–1551. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61870-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A. 2012b. “Culture, Bereavement, and Psychiatry.” The Lancet 379 (9816): 608–609. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60258-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, R. S. 2012. Taken for Grantedness: The Embedding of Mobile Communication into Society. Cambridge, MA; London, England: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, F. 2011. “The Norm of the ‘Good’ Netizen and the Construction of the ‘Proper’ Wired Self: The Case of Chinese Urban Youth.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1177/1461444809360701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and M. Bober. 2006. “Regulating the Internet at Home: Contrasting the Perspectives of Children and Parents.” In Digital Generations: Children, Young People, and New Media, edited by D. Buckingham and R. Willett, 93–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F. 1994. “Phenomenography.” In The International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite, 4424–4429. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, D. P. 1993. The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli, M. 2015. “What is New in the Digital Divide? Understanding Internet Use by Teenagers from Different Social Backgrounds.” Communication and Information Technologies Annual 10: 55–87. doi:10.1108/S2050-206020150000010003.
   Google Scholar
• Newitz, A. 2007. “My Laptop.” In Evocative Objects: Things We Think With, edited by S. Turkle, 86–91. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Odgers, C. 2018. “Smartphones are Bad for Some Teens, Not All.” Nature 554 (7693): 432–434. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-02109-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orben, A., and A. K. Przybylski. 2019. “The Association between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use.” Nature Human Behaviour 3: 173–182. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, N., and T. J. Pinch. 2003. How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przybylski, A., and A. Orben. 2017. “Social Media is Nothing like Drugs, despite all the Horror Stories.” The Conversation, June 18. https://theconversation.com/social-media-is-nothing-like-drugs-despite-all-the-horror-stories-79382
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R. 1996. “Minding Action — Conceiving of the World versus Participating in Cultural Practices.” In Reflections on Phenomenography: Toward a Methodology?, edited by G. Dall’Alba and B. Hasselgren. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvig, C. 2013. “The Internet as Infrastructure.” In The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, edited by W. H. Dutton, 19–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 1999. “Why the Computer is not Dominating Schools: A Failure of Policy or A Failure of Practice?” Cambridge Journal of Education 29 (1): 77–91. doi:10.1080/0305764990290106.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2007. “Plus Ca Change, Plus C’est La Meme Chose - considering the Probable Future of Education Technology.” In Education and Technology: Critical Perspectives, Possible Futures, edited by D. W. Kritt and L. T. Winegar, 31–46. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2011a. Schools and Schooling in the Digital Age: A Critical Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2011b. “Technology, Media and Education: Telling the Whole Story.” Learning, Media and Technology 36 (3): 211–213. doi:10.1080/17439884.2011.572977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., S. Nemorin, S. Bulfin, and N. F. Johnson. 2017. “Left to Their Own Devices: The Everyday Realities of One-To-One Classrooms.” Oxford Review of Education 43 (3): 289–310. doi:10.1080/03054985.2017.1305047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohecker, C. 2007. “Knots.” In Evocative Objects: Things We Think With, edited by S. Turkle, 22–29. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tapscott, D. 2009. Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., and B. W. O’Bannon. 2015. “Looking across the New Digital Divide: A Comparison of Inservice and Preservice Teacher Perceptions of Mobile Phone Integration.” Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education 23 (4): 561–581.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 1995. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2007. Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M. 1996. “On the Philosophical Foundations of Phenomenography.” In Reflections on Phenomenography: Toward a Methodology?, edited by G. Dall’Alba and B. Hasselgren, 103–128. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Wajcman, J. 2008. “Life in the Fast Lane? Towards a Sociology of Technology and Time.” The British Journal of Sociology 59 (1): 59–77. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00182.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waytz, A., and K. Gray. 2018. “Does Online Technology Make Us More or Less Sociable? A Preliminary Review and Call for Research.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 (4): 473–491. doi:10.1177/1745691617746509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z. 2013. ‘You Are Too out!’: A Mixed Methods Approach to the Study of ‘Digital Divides’ in Three Chinese Senior Secondary Schools. Durham University. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/8456/
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. H., and A. Kleinman. 2008. “‘Face’ and the Embodiment of Stigma in China: The Cases of Schizophrenia and AIDS.” Social Science & Medicine 67 (3): 398–408. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar