The difficulties of judging what difference the Pupil Premium has made to school intakes and outcomes in England

References

• Allen, R. 2018. “The Pupil Premium Is Not Working.” https://rebeccaallen.co.uk/2018/09/10/the-pupil-premium-is-not-working/
   Google Scholar
• Baird, S., C. McIntosh, and B. Özler. 2011. “Cash or Condition? Evidence from a Cash Transfer Experiment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (4): 1709–1753. doi:10.1093/qje/qjr032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, H., I. Papps, J. Bragg, A. Dyson, D. Harris, K. Kerr, L. Todd, and K. Laing. 2013. Evaluation of Pupil Premium. London: DfE. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/18010/1/DFE-RR282.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chmielewskia, A. 2019. “The Global Increase in the Socioeconomic Achievement Gap, 1964 to 2015.” American Sociological Review 84: 517–544. doi:10.1177/0003122419847165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdry, H., E. Greaves, and L. Sibieta. 2010. “The Pupil Premium: Assessing the Options.” IFS Commentary C113. https://www.ifs.org.uk/comms/comm113.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, J. 2018. “A Critical Reflection on the Reasoning Behind, and Effectiveness Of, the Application of the Pupil Premium Grant within Primary Schools.” Management in Education. doi:10.1177/0892020618781234.
   Google Scholar
• Danhier, J. 2018. “How Big Is the Handicap for Disadvantaged Pupils in Segregated School Settings?” British Journal of Educational Studies 66 (3): 341–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Janvry, A., F. Finan, E. Sadoulet, and R. Vakis. 2006. “Can Conditional Cash Transfer Programs Serve as Safety Nets in Keeping Children at School and from Working When Exposed to Shocks?” Journal of Development Economics 79 (2): 349–373. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2006.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. 2018a. “Opportunity Area Programme.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/opportunity-area-programme-research-and-analysis
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2018b. “National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 2 in England, 2018 (revised).” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/764997/Key_stage_2_text_v7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2018c. “National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 2 in England, 2018 (revised).” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/764135/Key_stage_2_text_v6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2018d. “Revised GCSE and Equivalent Results in England, 2016 to 2017, SRF 01/2018.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/676596/SFR01_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE. 2019. “Pupil Premium: Funding and Accountability for Schools.” https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and-alternative-provision-settings?utm_source=2e5c52b2-c00c-4268-82c5-e809ff49194d&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=govuk-notifications&utm_content=immediate#measuring-the-effectiveness-of-your-approach
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, A., K. Maragkou, and S. McIntosh. 2018. “The Causal Effect of Secondary School Peers on Educational Aspirations.” CVER Discussion Paper Series - ISSN 2398-7553, October. http://cver.lse.ac.uk/textonly/cver/pubs/cverdp017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Education and Skills Funding Agency. 2018. “Pupil Premium Grant 2018 to 2019.” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pupil-premium-conditions-of-grant-2018-to-2019/pupil-premium-2018-to-2019-conditions-of-grant
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Foundation. 2017. “The Attainment Gap.” https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Annual_Reports/EEF_Attainment_Gap_Report_2018_-_print.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Education Policy Institute. 2017. “Closing the Gap? Trends in Educational Attainment and Disadvantage.” August.
   Google Scholar
• Exley, S. 2015. “Pupil Premium ‘has Failed to Close Attainment Gap’, Thinktank Claims.” Times Educational Supplement, September 4.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows, T., and M. Barton. 2018. “Spotlight on Disadvantage.” National Governance Association. https://www.nga.org.uk/About-Us/Campaigning/Spotlight-on-Disadvantage.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Foster, D., and R. Long. 2018. “The Pupil Premium.” House of Commons Library Briefing Paper 67007. file:///C:/Users/nbuser/Downloads/SN06700%20(1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, S., and S. Horner. 2008. “School Funding and Social Justice.” Policy Exchange. https://www.policyexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/school-funding-and-social-justice-oct-08-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., A. Protik, B. Teh, J. Bruch, J. Max, and E. Warner. 2013. “Transfer Incentives for High-performing Teachers: Final Results from a Multisite Randomized Experiment.” Executive Summary, NCEE 2014-4004. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 1999. “Keeping a Sense of Proportion: The “politician’s Error” in Analysing School Outcomes.” British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3): 235–246. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.00116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2005. “Academies as the ‘future of Schooling’: Is This an Evidence-based Policy?” Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 369–377. doi:10.1080/02680930500117321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2009. “Does the Index of Segregation Matter? the Composition of Secondary Schools in England since 1996.” British Educational Research Journal 35 (4): 639–652. doi:10.1080/01411920802642389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2012. “Who Is Eligible for Free School Meals?: Characterising FSM as a Measure of Disadvantage in England.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (6): 1003–1017. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.608118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2015. “The Complex Determinants of School Intake Characteristics, England 1989 to 2014.” Cambridge Journal of Education 46 (1): 131–146. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2015.1045446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2018. Education Policy: Evidence of Equity and Effectiveness. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., and N. Siddiqui. 2019. “How Trajectories of Disadvantage Help Explain School Attainment.” SAGE Open 9: 215824401882517. forthcoming. doi:10.1177/2158244018825171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., and C. Taylor. 2002. “What Is Segregation? A Comparison of Measures in Terms of Strong and Weak Compositional Invariance.” Sociology 36 (4): 875–895. doi:10.1177/003803850203600405.
   Google Scholar
• Gov.uk. 2010. “Government Announces Pupil Premium to Raise Achievement.” https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-pupil-premium-to-raise-achievement
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2014. “State Schools May Prioritise Poorest Pupils in Admissions Revamp.” The Guardian, July 22. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/jul/22/state-schools-prioritise-disadvantaged-pupils-admissions-reform
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., P. E. Peterson, L. M. Talpey, and L. Woessmann. 2019. “The Achievement Gap FAILS TO CLOSE: Half Century of Testing Shows Persistent Divide between Haves and Have-nots.” Education Next 19 (3): 8+.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G., C. Fortner, and C. Thompson. 2010. “Targeted Funding for Educationally Disadvantaged Students: A Regression Discontinuity Estimate of the Impact on High School Student Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 32 (2): 183–204. doi:10.3102/0162373710370620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw, P. 2018. “Call to Use FSM History to Better Target Pupil Premium.” SecEd, February 7. http://www.sec-ed.co.uk/news/call-to-use-fsm-history-to-better-target-pupil-premium/
   Google Scholar
• Hewstone, M., A. Ramiah, K. Schmid, C. Floe, M. van Zalk, R. Wolfer, and R. New. 2018. “Influence of Segregation versus Mixing: Intergroup Contact and Attitudes among White-British and Asian-British Students in High Schools in Oldham: England.” Theory and Research in Education 16: 179–203. doi:10.1177/1477878518779879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmlund, H., S. McNally, and M. Viarengo. 2010. “Does Money Matter for Schools?” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 1154–1164. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, H., and S. Loeb. 2013. “Can a District-level Teacher Salary Incentive Policy Improve Teacher Recruitment and Retention?” Policy Brief 13-4, Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/aer.101.3.460
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. 2004. “Secondary Education: School Admissions Fourth Report of Session 2003–04 Volume II.” https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeduski/58/58ii.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hutchings, M., C. Greenwood, S. Hollingworth, A. Mansaray, and S. Rose with Minty, S. and Glass, K. 2012. “Evaluation of the City Challenge Programme.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/184093/DFE-RR215.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lessof, C., A. Ross, R. Brind, C. Harding, E. Bell, and G. Kyriakopoulos. 2018. “Understanding KS4 Attainment and Progress: Evidence from LSYPE2.” Research report, DFE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/748514/Understanding_KS4_LSYPE2_research-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A., J. Easby, and H. Evans. 2013. “Pupils Not Claiming Free School Meals.” DfE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/266339/DFE-RR319.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mbiti, I., K. Muralidharan, M. Romero, Y. Schipper, C. Mandak, and R. Rajani. 2019. “Inputs, Incentives, and Complementarities in Education: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania.” NBER Working Paper No. 24876. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24876
   Google Scholar
• Morley, S., and D. Coady. 2003. From Social Assistance to Social Development: Targeted Education Subsidies in Developing Countries. Washington DC: Peterson Institute Press: All Books.
   Google Scholar
• NASEN. 2014. “The Pupil Premium A Quick Guide to Maximising the Impact of Additional Funding for Disadvantaged Pupils.” file:///C:/Users/czwc58/Downloads/pupil_premium.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2015. “Funding for Disadvantaged Pupils.” June, 11.
   Google Scholar
• NGA. 2018. “Characteristics of the Most Effective Pupil Premium Strategies Revealed in Research Report.” National Governance Association. https://www.nga.org.uk/News/NGA-News/July-2018-Sept-2018/Characteristics-of-the-most-effective-pupil-premiu.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Public Accounts Committee. 2015. “Funding for Disadvantaged Pupils.” HC 327, 9 October
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, D., L. Rutkowski, J. Wild, and N. Burroughs. 2018. “Poverty and Educational Achievement in the US.” Journal of Children and Poverty 24 (1): 47–67. doi:10.1080/10796126.2017.1401898.
   Google Scholar
• Social Mobility Commission. 2016. “State of the Nation 2016: Social Mobility in Great Britain.” November. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/569410/Social_Mobility_Commission_2016_REPORT_WEB__1__.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Social Mobility Commission. 2019. “State of the Nation 2018–19.” https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/798404/SMC_State_of_the_Nation_Report_2018-19.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Speck, D. 2019. “Schools Lose £93m a Year in Pupil Premium.” TES, June 7. https://www.tes.com/news/exclusive-schools-lose-ps93m-year-pupil-premium
   Google Scholar
• Staufenberg, J. 2019. “Re-focus Pupil Premium on Teacher Retention and CPD, Say MPs.” Schools Week, February 21. https://schoolsweek.co.uk/re-focus-pupil-premium-on-teacher-retention-and-cpd-say-mps/
   Google Scholar
• Steele, J., R. Murnane, and J. Willett. 2010. “Do Financial Incentives Help Low-performing Schools Attract and Keep Academically Talented Teachers? Evidence from California.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3): 451–478. doi:10.1002/pam.v29:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. 2010. “Do Some Schools Narrow the Gap?” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 21 (3): 289–314. doi:10.1080/09243451003732651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar