Who has high science capital? An exploration of emerging patterns of science capital among students aged 17/18 in England

References

• Archer, L. 2017. “Happier Teachers and More Engaged Students? Reflections on The Possibilities Offered by a Pedagogical Approach Co-developed by Teachers and Researchers. Research in Teacher Education (Rite).” University of East London 7 (1): 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. 2015. “Science Capital”: a Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical Argument for Extending Bourdieusian Notions of Capital beyond the Arts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 922–948. doi: 10.1002/tea.21227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. Dewitt, and B. Willis. 2014. Adolescent Boys' Science Aspirations: Masculinity, Capital, and Power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1002/tea.21122.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, and Osborne, J. 2015. Is science for us? Black Students’ and Parents’ Views of Science and Science Careers. Science Education 99 (2): 199–237. doi: 10.1002/sce.21146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2012. “Science Aspirations, Capital and Family Habitus: How Families Shape Children's Engagement and Identification with Science.” American Educational Research Journal 49 (5): 881-908. doi: 10.3102/0002831211433290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. Moote, B. Francis, J. DeWitt, and L. Yeomans. 2017. Stratifying Science: a Bourdieusian Analysis of Student Views and Experiences of School Selective Practices in Relation to ‘Triple Science’ at Key Stage 4 in England. Research Papers in Education 32 (3): 296–315. doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1219382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. Moote, B. Francis, J. DeWitt, and L. Yeomans. 2017. The “Exceptional” Physics Girl: a Sociological Analysis of Multimethod Data from Young Women Aged 10-16 to Explore Gendered Patterns of Post-16 Participation.” American Educational Research Journal 54 (1): 88–126. doi: 10.3102/0002831216678379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aschbacher, P. R., E. Li, and E. J. Roth. 2010. “Is Science Me? High School Students’ Identities, Participation and Aspirations in Science, Engineering and Medicine.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (5): 564–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIS. 2014. Insights from International Benchmarking of the UK Science and Innovation System (analysis Paper Number 03). London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. January https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/277090/bis-14-544-insights-from-international-benchmarking-of-the-uk-science-and-innovation-system-bis-analysis-paper-03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2010. Sociology Is a Martial Art. New York, NY: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., and E. Tan. 2010. “We Be Burnin’!: Agency, Identity and Learning in a Green Energy Program.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 19 (2): 187–229. doi:10.1080/10508400903530044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese Barton, A., and K. Yang. 2000. “The Cultural of Power and Science Education: Learning from Miguel.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (8): 871–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., and J. C. Stanley. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Carlone, H. B. 2003. “Re)producing Good Science Students: Girls’ Participation in High School Physics.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 9 (1): 17–34. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v9.i1.20.
   Google Scholar
• Claussen, S., and J. Osborne. 2013. “Bourdieu’s Notion of Cultural Capital and Its Implications for the Science Curriculum.” Science Education 97 (1): 58–79. doi:10.1002/sce.21040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1999. “Moving beyond Gender: Intersectionality and Scientific Knowledge.” In Revisioning Gender, edited by M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, and B. B. Hess, pp. 261–284. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., L. Grant, and K. Bultitude. 2009. Girls into Physics - Action Research (research Brief DCSF-RB103). London: Department for Children, Schools and Families. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/12427
   Google Scholar
• Darke, K., B. Clewell, and R. Sevo. 2002. “Meeting the Challenge: The Impact of the National Science Foundation’s Program for Women and Girls.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 8 (3–4): 285–303. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v8.i3-4.30.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2019. Equity, Exclusion and Everyday Science Learning: The Experiences of Minoritised Groups. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., and J Osborne., L. Archer, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2011. Young children's aspiration in Science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education 35 (6): 1037–1063. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.608197
   Google Scholar
• Dewitt, J., and L. Archer. 2015. “Who Aspires to a Science Career? a Comparison of Survey Responses from Primary and Secondary School Students.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (13): 2170–2192. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., L. Archer, and A. Mau. 2016. “Dimensions of Science Capital: Exploring its Potential for Understanding Students’ Science Participation.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (16): 2431–2449. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1248520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., L. Archer, and J. Osborne. 2013. “Nerdy, Brainy and Normal: Children’s and Parents’ Constructions of those who are Highly Engaged with Science.” Research in Science Education 43 (4): 1455–1476. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9315-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., L. Archer, and J. Osborne. 2014. Science-related Aspirations across The Primary–secondary Divide: Evidence from Two Surveys in England. International Journal of Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.871659.
   Google Scholar
• Essex, J., and K. Haxton. 2018. “Characterising Patterns of Engagement of Different Participants in a Public STEM-based Analysis Project.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 8 (2): 178–191. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1423128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, N. W., and D. Meshoulam. 2014. “Science for What Public? Addressing Equity in American Science Museums and Science Centers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (3): 368–394. doi:10.1002/tea.21130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B., P. Connolly, L. Archer, J. Hodgen, A. Mazenod, B. Taylor, A. Tereshchenko, D. Pepper, and M. Travers. 2017. Attainment grouping as self-fulfilling prophesy? a mixed methods exploration of self confidence and set level among year 7 students. International Journal of Educational Research 86: 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Pérez, M. A., and V. Núñez-Antón. 2003. “Cellwise Residual Analysis in Two-way Contingency Tables.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 63 (5): 825–839. doi:10.1177/0013164403251280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazley, J. L., R. Remich, M. E. Naffziger-Hirsch, J. Keller, P. B. Campbell, and R. McGee. 2014. “Beyond Preparation: Identity, Cultural Capital, and Readiness for Graduate School in the Biomedical Sciences.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (8): 1021–1048. doi:10.1002/tea.21164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godec, S., H. King, and L. Archer (2017). The Science Capital Teaching Approach: Engaging Students with Science, Promoting Social Justice. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Gokpinar, T., and M. Reiss. 2016. “The Role of Outside-school Factors in Science Education: A Two-stage Theoretical Model Linking Bourdieu and Sen, with a Case Study.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (8): 1278–1303. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1188332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A., A. Danielsson, and H. Petterson. 2016. “Masculinities and Experimental Practices in Physics: The View from Three Case Studies.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 12 (020120): 1–15. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonsalves, A., J. Rahm, and A. Carvalho. 2013. “‘we Could Think of Things that Could Be Science’: Girls’ Re-figuring of Science in an Out-of-school-time Club.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (9): 1068–1097. doi:10.1002/tea.21105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haussler, P., and L. Hoffmann. 2002. “An Intervention Study to Enhance Girls’ Interest, Self-concept, and Achievement in Physics Class.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (9): 870–888. doi:10.1002/tea.10048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. 2011. The Plan for Growth. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills & HM Treasury. March https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/221514/2011budget_growth.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IOP (Institute of Physics). 2015. Opening Doors A Guide to Good Practice in Countering Gender Stereotyping in Schools. London: Institute of Physics. https://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2015/file_66429.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IOP (Institute of Physics). 2018. Why Not Physics? A Snapshot of Girls’ Uptake at A-level. London: Institute of Physics. https://www.iop.org/publications/iop/2018/file_71495.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ireson, J., S. Hallam, and C. Hurley. 2005. “What are the Effects of Ability Grouping on GCSE Attainment?” British Educational Research Journal 31 (4): 443–458. doi:10.1080/01411920500148663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luehmann, A. L. 2009. “Students’ Perspectives of a Science Enrichment Programme: Out-of-school Inquiry as Access.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (13): 1831–1855. doi:10.1080/09500690802354195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendick, H. 2005. “A Beautiful Myth? the Gendering of Being/doing ‘good at Maths’.” Gender and Education 17 (2): 203–219. doi:10.1080/0954025042000301465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moote, J., and L. Archer (2018). Failing to Deliver? Exploring The Current Status Of Career Education Provision in England. Research Papers in Education 33 (2). doi:10.1080/02671522.2016.1271005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujtaba, T., and M. J. Reiss. 2014. “A Survey of Psychological, Motivational, Family and Perceptions of Physics Education Factors that Explain 15-source-old Students’ Aspirations to Study Post-compulsory Physics in English Schools.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (2): 371–393. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9404-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujtaba, T., and M. J. Reiss. 2016. “‘I Fall Asleep in Class … but Physics Is Fascinating’: The Use of Large-Scale Longitudinal Data to Explore the Educational Experiences of Aspiring Girls in Mathematics and Physics.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 16 (4): 313–330. doi:10.1080/14926156.2016.1235743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujtaba, T., R. Sheldrake, M. Reiss, and S. Simon. 2018. “Students’ Science Attitudes, Beliefs, and Context: Associations with Science and Chemistry Aspirations.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (6): 644–667. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1433896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAO (National Audit Office). 2018. Delivering STEM (science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Skills for the Economy. London: National Audit Office. https://www.nao.org.uk/report/delivering-stem-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-skills-for-the-economy/
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., P. Bryant, S. Strand., J. Hillier, R. Barros, and J. Miller-Friedmann. 2017. A Review of SES and Science Learning in Formal Educational Settings. London: Educational Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2007. “Science Education for the Twenty First Century.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 3 (3): 173–184. doi:10.12973/ejmste/75396.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., and S. J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society 18 (4): 510–531. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J. 2014. Still Searching: Job Vacancies and STEM Skills. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2014/07/stem/job%20vacancies%20and%20stem%20 skills.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Royal Academy of Engineering. 2016. The UK STEM Education Landscape: A Report for the Lloyd’s Register Foundation from the Royal Academy of Engineering Education and Skills Committee. London: Royal Academy of Engineering. //www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/uk-stem-education-landscape>
   Google Scholar
• Smart, S., and J. Rahman. 2009. Bangladeshi Girls Choosing Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths: An Exploration of Factors that Affect Bangladeshi Girls’ Achievement In, Engagement With, and Aspirations in STEM Subject Areas (research Conducted in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets 2007–2008). Reading, UK: CfBT Education Trust. https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/~/media/cfbtcorporate/files/research/2008/r-bangladeshi-girls-choosing-stem-full-2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2010a. “Do We Need More Scientists? A Long-term View of Patterns of Participation in UK Undergraduate Science Programmes.” Cambridge Journal of Education 40 (3): 281–298. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2010.502886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. 2010b. “Is There a Crisis in School Science Education in the UK?” Educational Review 62 (2): 189–202. doi:10.1080/00131911003637014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen-Hu, S., M. C. Makel, and P. Olszewski-Kubilius. 2016. “What One Hundred Years of Research Says about the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement: Findings of Two Second-Order Meta-Analyses.” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 849–899. doi:10.3102/0034654316675417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. 2007. Minority Ethnic Students in the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (research Report RR‐002). Schools and Families: London: Department for Children.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, S. 2011. “The Limits of Social Class in Explaining Ethnic Gaps in Educational Attainment.” British Educational Research Journal 37 (2): 197–229. doi:10.1080/01411920903540664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S. 2017. “Identifying the Link between Socio-economic Disadvantage and Participation and Attainment in Science: An Analysis of the England National Pupil Database (NPD).” In A Review of SES and Science Learning in Formal Educational Settings, edited by T. Nunes, P. Bryant, S. Strand., J. Hillier, R. Barros, and J. Miller-Friedmann. London: Educational Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E., A. Calabrese Barton, E. Turner, and M. Varley Gutiérrez. 2012. Empowering Science and Mathematics Education in Urban Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• UK Commission for Employment and Skills. 2014. Careers of the Future. London: UK Commission for Employment and Skills. December.
   Google Scholar
• US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010). “Report to the President: Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) for America’s Future.” https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/administration/eop/ostp/pcast/docsreports
   Google Scholar
• Vedder-Weiss, D. 2018. “Won’t You Give up Your Snack for the Sake of Science?” Emerging Science Identities in Family Everyday Interaction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55: 1211–1235. doi:10.1002/tea.21449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, B. 2012. “Identifying with Science: A Case Study of Two 13-year-old ‘high Achieving Working Class’ British Asian Girls.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (1): 43–65. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.551671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, B. 2015. “Careers “from” but Not “in” Science: What are Aspirations to Be a Scientist Challenging for Minority Ethnic Students?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 979–1002. doi:10.1002/tea.21231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar