Is technology always helpful?: A critical review of the impact on learning outcomes of education technology in supporting formative assessment in schools

References

• Alcoholado, C., A. Diaz, A. Tagle, M. Nussbaum, and C. Infante. 2016. “Comparing the Use of the Interpersonal Computer, Personal Computer and Pen-and-paper When Solving Arithmetic Exercises.” British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (1): 91–105. doi:10.1111/bjet.12216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., R. Liam, D. R. Garrison, and W. Archer. 2001. “Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context.” JALN 5 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, E. L., National Center for Research on Evaluation, S., & Student, T. (2011). “Progress Report Year 4: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). The Development and Impact of POWERSOURCE[C]”. CRESST Report 795. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED522826&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Barrio, C. M., M. Muñoz-Organero, and J. S. Soriano. 2016. “Can Gamification Improve the Benefits of Student Response Systems in Learning? an Experimental Study.” IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 4 (3): 429–438. doi:10.1109/TETC.2015.2497459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becta. 2009. Home Access Programme: One Year On: Summary (December 2009). Coventry: Becta.
   Google Scholar
• Bhagat, K. K., W.-K. Liou, J. Michael Spector, and C.-Y. Chang. 2019. “To Use Augmented Reality or Not in Formative Assessment: A Comparative Study.” Interactive Learning Environments 27 (5–6): 830–840. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1489857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, Marshall, and Wiliam. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2010. “Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment.” Phi Delta Kappan 92 (1): 81–90. doi:10.1177/003172171009200119.
   Google Scholar
• Bojinova, E. D., and J. N. Oigara. 2011. “Teaching and Learning with Clickers: Are Clickers Good for Students? Interdisciplinary.” Journal of E-learning and Learning Objects 7 (1): 170–184.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. K., D. A. Klingbeil, and J. Ysseldyke. 2010. “The Effects of Technology‐enhanced Formative Evaluation on Student Performance on State Accountability Math Tests.” Psychology in the Schools 47 (6): 582–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, J., and E. Joung. 2018. “Digital Game‐based Learning for K–12 Mathematics Education: A Meta‐analysis.” School Science and Mathematics 118 (3–4): 113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Manzano, J. I., M. Castro-Nuño, L. López-Valpuesta, M. T. Sanz-Díaz, and R. Yñiguez. 2016. “Measuring the effect of ARS on academic performance: A global meta-analysis.“ Computers & Education 96: 109–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. H., A. S. Ha, J. Y. Ng, and D. R. Lubans. 2019. “The A+ FMS Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: An Assessment-based Intervention on Fundamental Movement Skills and Psychosocial Outcomes in Primary Schoolchildren.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 22 (8): 935–940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. M., and M. C. Chen. 2009. “Mobile Formative Assessment Tool Based on Data Mining Techniques for Supporting Web-based Learning.” Computers & Education 52 (1): 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. H., W. T. Tseng, and T. Y. Hsiao. 2018. “The Effectiveness of Digital Game‐based Vocabulary Learning: A Framework‐based View of Meta‐analysis.” British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (1): 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., L. Breslow, and J. DeBoer. 2018. “Analyzing Productive Learning Behaviors for Students Using Immediate Corrective Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment.” Computers & Education 117: 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, A., and R. E. Slavin. 2012. “The Effectiveness of Educational Technology Applications for Enhancing Reading Achievement in K-12 Classrooms„ A Meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research and Reform in Education, Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., and R. E. Slavin. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Educational Technology Applications for Enhancing Mathematics Achievement in K-12 Classrooms: A Meta-analysis.” Educational Research Review 9: 88–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. H., C. W. Kao, and B. L. Reynolds. 2012. “The Relative Effectiveness of Digital Game‐based Learning Types in English as A Foreign Language Setting: A Meta‐analysis.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (4): E104–E107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, P. N., C. C. Chang, and C. H. Lin. 2017. “BYOD or Not: A Comparison of Two Assessment Strategies for Student Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 74: 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. C. 2014. “Potential Negative Effects of Mobile Learning on Students’ Learning Achievement and Cognitive load—A Format Assessment Perspective.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 17 (1): 332–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H. C., J. M. Chen, and C. L. Tsai. 2017. “Effects of an Online Formative Peer-tutoring Approach on Students’ Learning Behaviors, Performance and Cognitive Load in Mathematics.” Interactive Learning Environments 25 (2): 203–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2003. Enriching Feedback in the Primary Classroom: Oral and Written Feedback from Teachers and Children. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, A. T., and J. R. Anderson (1989). “Feedback Timing and Student Control in the LISP Intelligent Tutoring System”. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Education, 64–72. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University. http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/168corbett_and_anderson_feedback.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, J., D. Butler, M. Leahy, G. Shiel, L. Kavanagh, and A. M. Creaven. 2014. The 2013 ICT Census in Schools–main Report. Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. 1988. “The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students.” Review of Educational Research 58: 438–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. 2019. Realising the Potential of Technology in Education: A Strategy for Education Providers and the Technology Industry. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DfES. 2006.Computers for Pupils. 2006-08. Guidance for LAs and Schools (Support Pack). London: DfES.
   Google Scholar
• Dunham, V. K. (2011). “The Impact of a Student Response System on Academic Performance (Pp. 1-82)”. Dissertation Thesis, South Carolina State University.
   Google Scholar
• Dzikovska, M. O., R. D. Nielsen, C. Brew, C. Leacock, D. Giampiccolo, L. Bentivogli, and H. T. Dang 2013, June. “SemEval-2013 Task 7: The Joint Student Response Analysis and 8th Recognizing Textual Embodiment Challenge.” In Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (* SEM): Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (Semeval 2013). Vol. 2. Atlanta, Georgia: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, J. M., and A. J. Visscher. 2018. “The Effects of a Digital Formative Assessment Tool on Spelling Achievement: Results of a Randomized Experiment.” Computers & Education 122: 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, J. M., H. Luyten, and A. J. Visscher. 2017. “The Effects of a Digital Formative Assessment Tool on Mathematics Achievement and Student Motivation: Results of a Randomized Experiment.” Computers & Education 106: 83–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., Z. Ren, X. Hu, and A. C. Graesser. 2019. “A Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of ALEKS on Learning.” Educational Psychology 39 (10): 1278–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanusi, A. D. (2016). “The Effect of ALEKS Math Support on Standardized Math Test Scores in Middle School”. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2016-17334-232&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., and D. Fuchs. 1986. “Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis.” Exceptional Children 53 (3): 199–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. S., and K. M. Dawson. 2017. “Student Response Systems for Formative Assessment: Literature-based Strategies and Findings from a Middle School Implementation.” Contemporary Educational Technology 8 (4): 370–389.
   Google Scholar
• Gedye, S. 2010. “Formative Assessment and Feedback: A Review.” Planet 23 (1): 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J. W., D. Morrow, and N. E. Davis. 2011. “Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature.” Computers & Education 57 (4): 2333–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorard, S. 2018. Education Policy: Evidence of Equity and Effectiveness. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., B. H. See, and N. Siddiqui. 2017. The Trials of Evidence-based Education: The Promises, Opportunities of Trials in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., B. H. See, and R. Morris (2016). “The Most Effective Approaches to Teaching in Primary Schools: Rigorous Evidence on Effective Teaching”. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing. Accessed online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308395031_The_most_effective_approaches_teaching_in_primary_schools_rigorous_evidence_on_effective_teaching
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). “Visible Learning: A Synthesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement (Google eBook)”.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2018). “Hattie Ranking: 252 Influences and Effect Sizes Related to Student Achievement”. Retrieved from https://visible-learning.org/hattie-ranking-influences-effect-sizes-learning-achievement/
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, S. (2015, September 15). “Why Access to Computers Do Not Automatically Boost Students’ Grades”. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/why-access-to-computers-wont-automatically-boost-childrens-grades-47521
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, S., Z. M. Xiao, and M. Katsipataki. 2012. The Impact of Digital Technology on Learning: A Summary for the Education Endowment Foundation. Durham, UK: Education Endowment Foundation and Durham University.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck, T., and G. Stobart. 2015. “Large Scale Implementation of Assessment for Learning.” Assessment in Education 22 (1): 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., and H. F. Chang. 2011. “A Formative Assessment-based Mobile Learning Approach to Improving the Learning Attitudes and Achievements of Students.” Computers & Education 56 (4): 1023–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instructure. 2017. Driving Digital Strategy in Schools: The White Paper. Salt Lake City: Canvas Instructure.
   Google Scholar
• Jadad, A. R., D. J. Cook, and G. P. Browman. 1997. “A Guide to Interpreting Discordant Systematic Reviews.” Cmaj 156 (10): 1411–1416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S., D. Henderson, and P. Sealover. 2009. ““Clickers” in the Classroom.” Teaching and Learning in Nursing 4 (1): 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. M., P. Katyal, X. Xie, M. P. Nicolas, E. M. Leung, D. M. Noland, and J. K. Montclare. 2019. “A ‘KAHOOT!’ Approach: The Effectiveness of Game-Based Learning for an Advanced Placement Biology Class.” Simulation & Gaming 50 (6): 832–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuning, H., J. Jeuring, and B. Heeren. 2018. “A Systematic Literature Review of Automated Feedback Generation for Programming Exercises.” ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 19 (1): 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., and B. Nash. 2011. „Formative assessment: A meta‐analysis and a call for research.„ Educational measurement: Issues and practice 30 (4): 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., and A. DeNisi. 1996. “The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, A Meta-analysis, and A Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koedinger, K. R., E. A. McLaughlin, and N. T. Heffernan. 2010. “A Quasi-experimental Evaluation of an On-line Formative Assessment and Tutoring System.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 43 (4): 489–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantopoulos, S., S. R. Miller, and A. Van Der Ploeg. 2013. “The Impact of Indiana’s System of Interim Assessments on Mathematics and Reading Achievement.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35 (4): 481–499. doi:10.3102/0162373713498930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortemeyer, G. 2016. “The Psychometric Properties of Classroom Response System Data: A Case Study.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (4): 561–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., and C. L. C. Kulik. 1988. “Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning.” Review of Educational Research 58 (1): 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., and J. D. Fletcher. 2016. “Effectiveness of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Review of Educational Research 86 (1): 42–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. C., Y. Hao, K. S. Lee, S. C. Sim, and C. C. Huang. 2019. “Investigation of the Effects of an Online Instant Response System on Students in a Middle School of a Rural Area.” Computers in Human Behavior 95: 217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, C., A. Smith, S. Morris, and E. Craig. 2019. Using Digital Technology to Improve Learning: Evidence Review. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., J. A. Rios, M. Heilman, L. Gerard, and M. C. Linn. 2016. “Validation of Automated Scoring of Science Assessments.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (2): 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., B. Bligh, A. Manches, S. Ainsworth, C. Crook, and R. Noss. 2012. Decoding Learning: The Proof, Promise and Potential of Digital Education. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., G. Bielby, M. Judkins, P. Rudd, and T. Benton. 2010. Evaluation of the Computers for Pupils Initiative: Final Report. Coventry: Becta.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, U., N. Wolf, and C. Randler. 2016. “Effects of a Computer-assisted Formative Assessment Intervention Based on Multiple-tier Diagnostic Items and Different Feedback Types.” Computers & Education 95: 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Máñez, I., E. Vidal-Abarca, and T. Martínez. 2019. “Does Computer-based Elaborated Feedback Influence the Students’ Question-answering Process?” Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology 17 (47): 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertes, E. S. (2014). “A Mathematics Education Comparative Analysis of ALEKS Technology and Direct Classroom Instruction”. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2014-99210-460&site=ehost-live
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R., J. Roschelle, M. Feng, and C. A. Mason. 2020. “Investigating Efficacy, Moderators and Mediators for an Online Mathematics Homework Intervention.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 13 (2): 235–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation-Grainger, S. 2017. “‘It’s Just PE’ till ‘It Felt like a Computer Game’: Using Technology to Improve Motivation in Physical Education.” Research Papers in Education 32 (4): 463–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikou, S. A., and A. A. Economides. 2016. “The Impact of Paper-based, Computer-based and Mobile-based Self-assessment on Students’ Science Motivation and Achievement.” Computers in Human Behavior 55: 1241–1248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2015) “New Approach Needed to Delivery on Technology’s Potential in Schools”. (http://www.oecd.org/education/new-approach-needed-to-deliver-on-technologys-potential-in-schools.htm)
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted (2011). “ICT in Schools 2008-11. An Evaluation of Information and Communication Technology Education in Schools in England 2008-11”. London: Ofsted. Retrieved from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/181223/110134.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, R. K., L. McCoy, M. Kinney, and F. N. Schwartz. 2015. “Student Perceptions of Gamified Audience Response System Interactions in Large Group Lectures and via Lecture Capture Technology.” BMC Medical Education 15 (1): 92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper, D., R. Buechter, P. Jerinic, and M. Eikermann. 2012. “Overviews of Reviews Often Have Limited Rigor: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65 (12): 1267–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, H. R., R. E. Mayer, V. A. Figueroa, and M. J. López. 2018. “Interactive Highlighting for Just-in-time Formative Assessment during Whole-class Instruction: Effects on Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension.” Interactive Learning Environments 26 (1): 42–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, S. E. (2017). How integrating digital formative assessment impacts the learning of sixth-grade science students. Hamline University, School of Education Capstone doctoral thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, J. L., G. A. Gunter, and C. Lacey. 2017. “Mobile Learning in Pre-kindergarten: Using Student Feedback to Inform Practice.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 20 (1): 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rorabaugh, R. T. (2017). Lowering the Cognitive Load through Differentiated Instruction Facilitated by Screen Casting in the Middle School Classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).
   Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., K. Rafanan, R. Bhanot, G. Estrella, B. Penuel, M. Nussbaum, and S. Claro. 2010. “Scaffolding Group Explanation and Feedback with Handheld Technology: Impact on Students’ Mathematics Learning.” Educational Technology Research and Development 58 (4): 399–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M., J. Nunnery, and E. Goldfeder. 2004. A Randomized Experiment on the Effects of Accelerated Reader/Reading Renaissance in an Urban School District: Final Evaluation Report. Memphis, TN: Center for Research in Educational Policy, The University of Memphis.
   Google Scholar
• Saffarian, R., and B. Gorjian. 2012. “Effect of Computer-based Video Games for Vocabulary Acquisition among Young Children: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Comparative Literature and Culture 1 (3): 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., M. Maris, and P. Hoogendoorn. 2014. “The Added Value of a Gaming Context and Intelligent Adaptation for a Mobile Learning Application for Vocabulary Learning.” Computers & Education 76: 119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2015). “School Technology Struggles to Make an Impact”. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34174795
   Google Scholar
• See, B. H. 2018. “Evaluating Evidence in Evidence-based Policy and Practice: Examples from Systematic Reviews of Literature.” Research in Education 102 (1): 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, B. H. 2020. “Why Is It Difficult to Get Evidence into Use? Chapter 7”. In Getting Evidence into Education: Evaluating the Routes into Policy and Practice, edited by S. Gorard, 84-99, 2020. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• See, B. H., S. Gorard, and N. Siddiqui. 2016. “Teachers’ Use of Research Evidence in Practice: A Pilot Study of Feedback to Enhance Learning.” Educational Research 58 (1): 56–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheard, M., and B. Chambers. 2011. “Self-paced Learning: Effective Formative Assessment.” In Report on Achievement Findings. York, UK: University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Sheard, M. K., and B. Chambers. 2014. “A Case of Technology-enhanced Formative Assessment and Achievement in Primary Grammar: How Is Quality Assurance of Formative Assessment Assured?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 43: 14–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheard, M. K., B. Chambers, and L. Elliott. 2012. Effects of Technology-enhanced Formative Assessment on Achievement in Primary Grammar. York, UK: Institute for Effective Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., and S. Rahimi. 2017. “Review of Computer-based Assessment for Learning in Elementary and Secondary Education.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 33 1: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, N., S. Gorard, and B. H. See. 2016. “Accelerated Reader as a Literacy Catch-up Intervention during the Primary to Secondary School Transition Phase.” Educational Review 68 (2): 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. (2020, April 16). “Cherry Picking or Making Better Trees?” https://robertslavinsblog.wordpress.com/2020/04/16/cherry-picking-or-making-better-trees/
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., and D. Smith. 2009. “The Relationship between Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes in Systematic Reviews in Education.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31 (4): 500–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., and N. A. Madden. 2011. “Measures Inherent to Treatments in Program Effectiveness Reviews.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 4 (4): 370–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, N. L. 2017. The Effect of a Student Response System on Sixth-Grade Reading, English, and Language Arts Achievement. Doctoral dissertation, Union University, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/openview/33b71cf232826fe44d62045cedf4ebca/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
   Google Scholar
• Song, D., E. Y. Oh, and K. Glazewski. 2017. “Student-generated Questioning Activity in Second Language Courses Using a Customized Personal Response System: A Case Study.” Educational Technology Research and Development. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9520-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and J. R. Sparks. 2019. “Building a Game-enhanced Formative Assessment to Gather Evidence about Middle School Students’ Argumentation Skills.” Educational Technology Research and Development 67 (5): 1175–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speckesser, S., J. Runge, F. Foliano, M. Bursnall, N. Hudson-Sharp, H. Rolfe, and J. Anders (2018). Embedding Formative Assessment: evaluation report and executive summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Srisawasdi, N., and P. Panjaburee. 2015. “Exploring Effectiveness of Simulation-based Inquiry Learning in Science with Integration of Formative Assessment.” Journal of Computers in Education 2 (3): 323–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J. C. Y., and P. H. Hsieh. 2018. “Application of a Gamified Interactive Response System to Enhance the Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation, Student Engagement, and Attention of English Learners.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21 (3): 104–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y. T., K. E. Chang, and T. C. Liu. 2016. “The Effects of Integrating Mobile Devices with Teaching and Learning on Students’ Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis’.” Computers & Education 94: 252–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, A., M. Broeks, M. Sim, E. Brown, E. Iakovidou, S. Ilie, H. Jarke, and J. Belanger. 2019. Digital Feedback in Primary Maths: Evaluation Report. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, P. M., and J. Saucerman. 2017. Enhancing Learning and Engagement through Gamification of Student Response Systems. Paper ID #18943. Columbus, Ohio, US: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
   Google Scholar
• The Scottish Government. 2015. Literature Review on the Impact of Digital Technology on Learning and Teaching. Edinburgh: Scottish Government.
   Google Scholar
• Timmers, C. F., A. Walraven, and B. P. Veldkamp. 2015. “The Effect of Regulation Feedback in a Computer-based Formative Assessment on Information Problem Solving.” Computers & Education 87: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokac, U., E. Novak, and C. G. Thompson. 2019. “Effects of Game‐based Learning on Students’ Mathematics Achievement: A Meta‐analysis.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35 (3): 407–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., and A. M. Fisher. 2003. “Computerised Formative Assessment of Reading Comprehension: Field Trials in the UK.” Journal of Research in Reading 26 (3): 267–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, F. H. 2013. “The Development and Evaluation of an Online Formative Assessment upon Single-Player Game in E-Learning Environment.” Journal of Curriculum and Teaching 2 (2): 94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, F. H., C. C. Tsai, and K. Y. Lin. 2015. “The Evaluation of Different Gaming Modes and Feedback Types on Game-based Formative Assessment in an Online Learning Environment.” Computers & Education 81: 259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsihouridis, C., D. Vavougios, and G. S. Ioannidis. 2017. “Assessing the Learning Process Playing with Kahoot–a Study with Upper Secondary School Pupils Learning Electrical Circuits.” In 20thInternational Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Budapest, Hungary, 602–612. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Turan, Z., and E. Meral. 2018. “Game-Based versus to Non-Game-Based: The Impact of Student Response Systems on Students’ Achievements, Engagements and Test Anxieties.” Informatics in Education 17 (1): 105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Education (2014) “Learning Technology Effectiveness”. Office of Educational Technology. https://tech.ed.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Learning-Technology-Effectiveness-Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vahdat, S., and A. R. Behbahani. 2013. “The Effect of Video Games on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning.” Reading 13 (1): 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Kleij, F. M., R. C. Feskens, and T. J. Eggen. 2015. “Effects of Feedback in A Computer-based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.” Review of Educational Research 85 (4): 475–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vásquez, A., M. Nussbaum, E. Sciarresi, T. Martínez, C. Barahona, and K. Strasser. 2017. “The Impact of the Technology Used in Formative Assessment: The Case of Spelling.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 54 (8): 1142–1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., and D. Thissen. 1993. “Combining Multiple-choice and Constructed-response Test Scores: Toward a Marxist Theory of Test Construction.” Applied Measurement in Education 6 (2): 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. I. 2015. “The Wear Out Effect of a Game-based Student Response System.” Computers & Education 82: 217–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. I., M. Zhu, and R. Sætre. 2017. Does Gamification of a Student Response System Boost Student Engagement, Motivation and Learning?–An Evaluation of the Game-based Student Response System Kahoot. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU Discovery.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K. H., T. H. Wang, W. L. Wang, and S. C. Huang. 2006. “Learning Styles and Formative Assessment Strategy: Enhancing Student Achievement in Web‐based Learning.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 (3): 207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. H. 2008. “Web-based Quiz-game-like Formative Assessment: Development and Evaluation.” Computers & Education 51 (3): 1247–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. H. 2014. “Developing an Assessment-centered e-Learning System for Improving Student Learning Effectiveness.” Computers & Education 73: 189–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, M., M. Sawtell, and J. Jerrim (2017). Learner Response System: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. London: Education Endowment Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Wongwatkit, C., N. Srisawasdi, G. J. Hwang, and P. Panjaburee. 2017. “Influence of an Integrated Learning Diagnosis and Formative Assessment-based Personalized Web Learning Approach on Students Learning Performances and Perceptions.” Interactive Learning Environments 25 (7): 889–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, P., C. Van Nimwegen, H. Van Oostendorp, and E. D. Van Der Spek. 2013. “A Meta-analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (2): 249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. H. 2017. “Learning Behavior and Achievement Analysis of a Digital Game-based Learning Approach Integrating Mastery Learning Theory and Different Feedback Models.” Interactive Learning Environments 25 (2): 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunus, M., and M. Azmanuddin Bin Azman. 2019. „Memory Stay Or Stray?: Irregular Verbs Learning Using Kahoot.„ Arab World English Journal 5 (5): 206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., M. Shujahat, H. Haruna, and S. K. W. Chu. 2020. “The Role of Gamified E-quizzes on Student Learning and Engagement: An Interactive Gamification Solution for a Formative Assessment System.” Computers & Education 145: 103729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., X. Li, L. Tian, and P. Cui. 2018. “The Effectiveness of Integrating Mobile Devices with Inquiry-based Learning on Students’ Learning Achievements: A Meta-analysis.” International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation 12 (1): 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., and D. Urhahne. 2018. “The Use of Learner Response Systems in the Classroom Enhances Teachers’ Judgment Accuracy.” Learning and Instruction 58: 255–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., H. S. Lee, T. Wang, O. L. Liu, V. Belur, and A. Pallant. 2017. “Investigating the Impact of Automated Feedback on Students’ Scientific Argumentation.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (12): 1648–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., O. L. Liu, and H. S. Lee. 2020. “The Effect of Automated Feedback on Revision Behavior and Learning Gains in Formative Assessment of Scientific Argument Writing.” Computers & Education 143: 103668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar