Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review

References

• Alexander, P. A. 2020. “Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews.” Review of Educational Research 90 (1): 6–23. doi:10.3102/0034654319854352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Anat, K., K. Einav, and R. Shirley. 2020. “Development of Mathematics Trainee Teachers’ Knowledge while Creating a MOOC.” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 51 (6): 939–953. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2019.1688402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annis, L. F. 1983. “The Processes and Effects of Peer Learning.” Human Learning 2 (1): 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• *Bachelet, R., D. Zongo, and A. Bourelle. 2015. “Does Peer Grading Work? How to Implement and Improve It? Comparing Instructor and Peer Assessment in MOOC GdP.” Paper delivered at European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit 2015, May 2015, Mons, Belgium. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01146710v2
   Google Scholar
• *Backhouse, A., I. Wilson, and D. Mackley. 2015. “Using iPads to Increase the Level of Student Engagement in the Peer Review and Feedback Process.” In Ipads in Higher Education: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference, edited by N. Souleles and C. Pillar. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/24654/1/24654%20iPads%20in%20HE%20ABackhouse.p
   Google Scholar
• *Bonk, C. J., K. Daytner, G. Daytner, V. Dennen, and S. Malikowski. 2001. “Using Web-based Cases to Enhance, Extend, and Transform Preservice Teacher Training: Two Years in Review.” Computers in the Schools 18 (1): 189–211. doi: 10.1300/J025v18n01_01
   Google Scholar
• *Borowczak, M., and A. C. Burrows. 2016. “Enabling Collaboration and Video Assessment: Exposing Trends in Science Preservice Teachers’ Assessments.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal) 16 (2): 127–150. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/161911
   Google Scholar
• Bozkurt, A., E. Akgün-Özbek, and O. Zawacki-Richter. 2017. “Trends and Patterns in Massive Open Online Courses: Review and Content Analysis of Research on MOOCs (2008–2015).” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/download/3080/4284?inline=1.MOO
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., A. Carroll, R. M. Gillies, and J. Hattie. 2019. “A Matrix of Feedback for Learning.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 44 (4): 14–32. doi:10.14221/ajte.2018v44n4.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Çelik, S., E. Baran, and O. Sert. 2018. “The Affordances of Mobile-App Supported Teacher Observations for Peer Feedback.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning,10 (2): 36–49. doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.2018040104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chang, C. C. 2002. “Assessing and Analyzing the Effects of WBLP on Learning Processes and Achievements: Using the Electronic Portfolio for Authentic Assessment on University Students’ Learning.” In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, edited by P. Barker and S. Rebelsky, 265–270. Denver, CO: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/9865
   Google Scholar
• *Chen, C. H. 2010. “The Implementation and Evaluation of a Mobile Self- and Peer-Assessment System.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 229–236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chen, Y. C., and C. C. Tsai. 2009. “An Educational Research Course Facilitated by Online Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46 (1): 105–117. doi: 10.1080/14703290802646297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, K. H., and C. C. Tsai. 2012. “Students’ Interpersonal Perspectives On, Conceptions of and Approaches to Learning in Online Peer Assessment.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 28 (4). doi:10.14742/ajet.830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. “Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness: How Teacher Performance Assessments Can Measure and Improve Teaching”. ERIC Number: ED535859. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535859.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., S. P. Newton, and R. C. Wei. 2013. “Developing and Assessing Beginning Teacher Effectiveness: The Potential of Performance Assessments”. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25: 179–204. doi:10.1007/s11092-013-9163-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *De Marsico, M., F. Sciarroni, A. Sterbini, and M. Temperini. 2018. “Peer Assessment and Knowledge Discovering in a Community of Learners.” Paper given at 10th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Seville, Spain. doi: 10.5220/0007229401190126.
   Google Scholar
• *Demir, M. 2018. “Using Online Peer Assessment in an Instructional Technology and Material Design Course through Social Media.” Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research 75 (3): 399–414. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0146-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneen, C. C., G. W. Fulmer, G. T. L. Brown, K. Tan, W. S. Leong, and H. Y. Tay. 2019. “Value, Practice and Proficiency: Teachers’ Complex Relationship with Assessment for Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education, 80: 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.0220742-051X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Double, K. S., J. A. McGrane, and T. N. Hopfenbeck. 2020. “The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Control Group Studies.” Educational Psychology Review, 32: 481–509. doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPPI-Centre. 2004. “A Systematic Review of the Evidence of Reliability and Validity of Assessment by Teachers Used for Summative Purposes”. London: Institute of Education, University of London. http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/ass_rv3.pdf?ver=2006-03-02-124720-170
   Google Scholar
• *Ersöz, Y., and S. N. Sad. 2018. “Facebook as A Peer-Assessment Platform: A Case Study in Art Teacher Education Context.” International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 5 (4): 740–753. doi: 10.21449/ijate.478277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 287–322. doi:10.3102/00346543070003287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Foschi, L. C., and G. Cecchinato. 2019. “Validity and Reliability of Peer-Grading in In-Service Teacher Training.” Italian Journal of Educational Research 177–194. https://80.211.104.80/index.php/sird/article/view/3276
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B. A., P. L. Cox, and L. Maher. 2008. “An Expectancy Theory Motivation Approach to Peer Assessment.” Journal of Management Education, 32: 580–612. doi:10.1177/1052562907310641 5
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q. K., C. J. Lin, and G. J. Hwang. 2019. “Research Trends and Applications of Technology-Supported Peer Assessment: A Review of Selected Journal Publications from 2007 to 2016.” Journal of Computers in Education 6 (2): 191–213. doi:10.1007/s40692-019-00131-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gamage, D., M. E. Whiting, T. Rajapakshe, H. Thilakarathne, P. Indika, and S. Fernando. 2017. “Improving Assessment on Moocs through Peer Identification and Aligned Incentives.” Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@Scale. doi: 10.1145/3051457.3054013
   Google Scholar
• Gielen, S., F. Dochy, and P. Onghena. 2011. “An Inventory of Peer Assessment Diversity.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 137–155. doi:10.1080/02602930903221444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Goeze, A., J. M. Zottmann, F. Vogel, F. Fischer, and J. Schrader. 2014. “Getting Immersed in Teacher and Student Perspectives? Facilitating Analytical Competence Using Video Cases in Teacher Education.” Instructional Science 42 (1): 91–114. doi 10.1007/s11251-013-9304-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Gogoulou, A., E. Gouli, M. Grigoriadou, M. Samarakou, and D. Chinou. 2007. “A Web-Based Educational Setting Supporting Individualized Learning, Collaborative Learning and Assessment.” Educational Technology and Society 10 (4): 242–256. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.4.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt, G., A. D. Oxman, E. A. Akl, R. Kunz, G. Vist, J. Brozek, S. Norris, et al. 2011. “GRADE Guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE Evidence Profiles and Summary of Findings Tables.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 64 (4): 383–394. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2005. “Trusting Teachers’ Judgement: Research Evidence of the Reliability and Validity of Teachers’ Assessment Used for Summative Purposes”. Research Papers in Education 20 (3): 245–270. doi:10.1080/02671520500193744.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, H. T., T. F. Yu, F. D. Chiang, Y. H. Lin, K. E. Chang, and C. C. Kuo. 2020. “Development and Evaluation of Mindtool-Based Blogs to Promote Learners’ Higher Order Cognitive Thinking in Online Discussions: An Analysis of Learning Effects and Cognitive Process.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 58 (2): 343–363. doi:10.1177/0735633119830735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, J. 2014. “The Disruptive Potential of the Massive Open Online Course: A Literature Review.” Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning 18 (1): 73. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148551
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. 2013. “On the Reliability of High-Stakes Teacher Assessment.” Research Papers in Education 28 (1): 91–105. doi:10.1080/02671522.2012.754229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. 2014. “Characteristics of Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs): A Research Review, 2009-2012.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 13 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• *Lamb, P., K. Lane, and D. Aldous. 2012. “Enhancing the Spaces of Reflection: A Buddy Peer-Review Process within Physical Education Initial Teacher Education.” European Physical Education Review 19 (1): 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Laurillard, D. 2016. “The Educational Problem that MOOCs Could Solve: Professional Development for Teachers of Disadvantaged Students.” Research in Learning Technology 24 (1): 29369. doi:10.3402/rlt.v24.29369.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, C. V. Hunter, X. Guo, and R. Tywoniw. 2020. “Does Peer Assessment Promote Student Learning? A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 193–211. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2017. “The Role of Anonymity in Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 645–656, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Y. Liu, and Y. C. Zhou 2012. “Give and Take: A Re‐Analysis of Assessor and Assessee’s Roles in Technology‐Facilitated Peer Assessment.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (3): 376–384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lin, G. Y. 2016. “Effects that Facebook-Based Online Peer Assessment with Micro-Teaching Videos Can Have on Attitudes toward Peer Assessment and Perceived Learning from Peer Assessment.” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 12 (9): 2295–2307. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1280a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Liu, X. Y., and L. Li. 2014. “Assessment Training Effects on Student Assessment Skills and Task Performance in a Technology-Facilitated Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (3): 275–292, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.823540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Luo, H., A. C. Robinson, and J. Y. Park. 2014. Peer Grading in a MOOC: Reliability, Validity, and Perceived Effects. Online Learning Journal 18 (2): 1–14. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183756
   Google Scholar
• Luxton-Reilly, A. 2009. “A Systematic Review of Tools that Support Peer Assessment.” Computer Science Education 19 (4): 209–232. doi: 10.1080/08993400903384844.
   Google Scholar
• McLuckie, J., and K. Topping. (2004). “Transferable Skills for Online Peer Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (5): 563–584. doi: 10.1080/02602930410001689144
   Google Scholar
• *Mohamed, M. H., and M. Hammond. 2018. “Moocs: A Differentiation by Pedagogy, Content and Assessment.” International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 35 (1): 2–11. doi:10.1108/IJILT-07-2017-0062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLoS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ng, E. M. W. 2016. “Fostering Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Regulated Learning through Self- and Peer Assessment of Wiki Projects.” Computers & Education 98: 180–191. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, A. M., and K. J. Topping. 1998. “Peers Assessing Peers: Possibilities and Problems.” In Peer-Assisted Learning, edited by K. Topping and S. Ehly. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Okumuş, K., and L. H. Yurdakal. 2016. “Peer Feedback through SNSs (Social Networking Sites): Student Teachers’ Views about Using Facebook for Peer Feedback on Microteachings.” Elementary Education Online 15 (4): 1206–1216. doi: 10.17051/io.2016.17666
   Google Scholar
• Orwin, R. G. 1983. “A Fail-Safe N for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 8 (2): 157–159. doi:10.3102/10769986008002157.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S. A., A. C. Hutchison, L. A. Hall, A. W. Parsons, S. T. Ives, and A. B. Leggett. 2019. “U.S. Teachers’ Perceptions of Online Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 82 (1: 33–42. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecheone, R. L., and R. R. Chung. 2006. “Evidence in Teacher Education: The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT)”. Journal of Teacher Education 57 (1): 22–36. doi:10.1177/0022487105284045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Picci, P., A. Calvani, and G. Bonaiuti. 2012. The Use of Digital Video Annotation in Teacher Training: The Teachers’ Perspectives.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69: 600–613. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.452.
   Google Scholar
• *Põldoja, H., T. Väljataga, M. Laanpere, and K. Tammets. 2012. “Web-based Self- and Peer-Assessment of Teachers’ Digital Competencies.” World Wide Web 17 (2): 255–269. doi: 10.1007/s11280-012-0176-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ramdani, J. M., and H. P. Widodo. 2019. “Student Teachers’ Engagement in Facebook-Assisted Peer Assessment in an Initial Teacher Education Context: Speaking 2.0.” Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy 45 (3): 348–352. doi: 10.1080/09589236.2019.1599503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Savas, P. 2012. Micro-teaching Videos in EFL Teacher Education Methodology Courses: Tools to Enhance English Proficiency and Teaching Skills among Trainees.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55: 730–738. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.558
   Google Scholar
• *Seifert, T., and O. Feliks. 2019. “Online Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment as a Tool to Enhance Student-Teachers’ Assessment Skills.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (2): 169–185. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1487023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sert, O., and A. Aşık. 2020. “A Corpus Linguistic Investigation into Online Peer Feedback Practices in CALL Teacher Education.” Applied Linguistics Review 11 (1): 55–78. doi:10.1515/applirev-2017-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *So, W. M., H. K. Hung, and Y. W. Yip. 2008. “The Digital Video Database: A Virtual Learning Community for Teacher Education.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 24 (1): 73–90. doi:10.14742/ajet.1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sterbini, A., and M. Temperini. 2013. “Peer-assessment and Grading of Open Answers in a Web-Based E-Learning Setting.” 2013 12th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), October, 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ITHET.2013.6671056
   Google Scholar
• Tenorio, T., I. I. Bittencourt, S. Isotani, and A. P. Silva. 2016. “Does Peer Assessment in On-Line Learning Environments Work? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Computers in Human Behavior 64: 94–107. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in College and University.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2018. “Student Assessment for Educators Series.” In Using Peer Assessment to Inspire Reflection and Learning, edited by J. H. MacMillan. New York & London: Routledge. ISBN: 978-0-8153-6765-9 (pbk). www.routledge.com/9780815367659
   Google Scholar
• *Tsai, C. C. 2012. “The Development of Epistemic Relativism versus Social Relativism via Online Peer Assessment, and Their Relations with Epistemological Beliefs and Internet Self-Efficacy.” Educational Technology & Society 15 (2): 309–316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.2.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tsai, C. C., and J. C. Liang. 2009. “The Development of Science Activities via On-Line Peer Assessment: The Role of Scientific Epistemological Views.” Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences 37 (3): 293–310. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tsai, C. C., S. S. J. Lin, and S. M. Yuan. 2002. “Developing Science Activities through a Networked Peer Assessment System.” Computers & Education 38 (1–3): 241–252. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00069-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Tsai, C. C., E. Z. F. Liu, S. S. J. Lin, and S. M. Yuan. 2001. “A Networked Peer Assessment System Based on A Vee Heuristic.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 38 (3): 220–230. doi: 10.1080/14703290110051415
   Google Scholar
• *Tsivitanidou, O. E., and C. P. Constantinou. 2016. “A Study of Students’ Heuristics and Strategy Patterns in Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Assessment for Science Learning.” The Internet and Higher Education, 29: 12–22. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Popta, E., M. Kral, G. Camp, R. L. Martens, and P. R. Simons. 2017. “Exploring the Value of Peer Feedback in Online Learning for the Provider.” Educational Research Review 20: 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., and P. Shepherdson. 2016. “A Systematic Analysis and Synthesis of the Empirical MOOC Literature Published in 2013–2015.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17 (2): 198–221. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v17i2.2448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Vivian, R., K. Falkner, and N. Falkner. 2014. Addressing the Challenges of a New Digital Technologies Curriculum: MOOCs as a Scalable Solution for Teacher Professional Development.” Research in Learning Technology 22: 1–19. doi:10.3402/rlt.v22.24691.
   Google Scholar
• Vu, L. T. 2017. “A Case Study of Peer Assessment in A MOOC-based Composition Course: Students’ Perceptions, Peers’ Grading Scores versus Instructors’ Grading Scores, and Peers’ Commentary versus Instructors’ Commentary.” Doctor of Philosophy Degree Dissertation, Southern Illinois University Carbondale. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http://www.jurn.org/&httpsredir=1&article=2398&context=dissertations
   Google Scholar
• *Welsh, M. 2012. “Student Perceptions of Using the Pebblepad E-Portfolio System to Support Self- and Peer-Based Formative Assessment.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 21 (1): 57–83. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2012.659884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wen, M. C. L., and C. C. Tsai. 2008. “Online Peer Assessment in an Inservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 55–67. doi: 10.1080/13562510701794050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wopereis, I. G. J. H., P. B. Sloep, and S. H. Poortman. 2010. “Weblogs as Instruments for Reflection on Action in Teacher Education.” Interactive Learning Environments 18 (3): 245–261. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.500530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wu, C. C., and H. C. Kao. 2008. “Streaming Videos in Peer Assessment to Support Training Pre-Service Teachers.” Educational Technology & Society 11 (1): 45–55. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.11.1.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim, S., and Y. Cho. 2016. Predicting Pre-Service Teachers’ Intention of Implementing Peer Assessment for Low-Achieving Students Asia Pacific Education Review 17 (1): 63–72. doi: 10.1007/s12564-016-9416-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F. Y. 2011. “Multiple Peer-Assessment Modes to Augment Online Student Question-Generation Processes.” Computers & Education 56 (2): 484–494. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S. L., and I. Lee. 2016. “Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing (2005–2014).” Language Teaching 49 (4): 461–493. doi:10.1017/S0261444816000161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L. Q., X. Zhang, and P. P. Cui. 2020. “The Role of Technology-Facilitated Peer Assessment and Supporting Strategies: A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (3): 372–386. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1644603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Y. Zheng, and J. Tai. 2020. “Grudges and Gratitude: The Social-Affective Impacts of Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (3): 345–358. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar