Web-based social movements contesting marketing strategy: The mobilisation of multiple actors and rhetorical strategies

References

• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. A., & Bernstein, M. (2008). Culture, power, and institutions: A multi-institutional politics approach to social movements. Sociological Theory, 26(1), 74–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., & Oliver, C. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2393353
   Google Scholar
• BBC Business News. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13431552
   Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777–799. doi: 10.1177/0170840699205004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, S. (1997). The rhetoric and counter rhetoric of a ‘bionic’ technology. Science Technology and Human Values, 22, 31–56. doi: 10.1177/016224399702200102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechler, S. M. (2000). Social movements in advanced capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, I., de Kervenoael, R., Perez del Aguila, R., Hallsworth, A., Jackson, P., & Kirkup, M. (2004). Retail competition and consumer choice: Contextualising the ‘food deserts’ debate. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 32, 89–99. doi: 10.1108/09590550410521761
   Google Scholar
• CompetitionCommission. (2000). Supermarkets: A report on the supply of groceries from multiple stores in the United Kingdom. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• CompetitionCommission. (2008). The supply of groceries in the UK market investigation. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cova, B., & Pace, S. (2006). Brand community of convenience products: New forms of customer empowerment – The case ‘my Nutella The Community’. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1087–1105. doi: 10.1108/03090560610681023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cova, B., & White, T. (2010). Counter-brand and alter-brand communities: The impact of Web 2.0 on tribal marketing approaches. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(3/4), 256–270. doi: 10.1080/02672570903566276
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. S., & Moorman, C. (2010). Strategy from the outside in: Profiting from customer value. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, R., Grove, S., Harris, L. C., Keeffe, D. A., Daunt, K. L., Russell-Bennett, R., & Wirtz, J. (2010). Customers behaving badly: A state of the art review, research agenda and implications for practitioners. Journal of Services Marketing, 24, 417–429. doi: 10.1108/08876041011072537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. (2002). Qualitative data analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golant, B. D., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2007). The constitution of organizational legitimacy: A narrative perspective. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1149–1167. doi: 10.1177/0170840607075671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. doi: 10.2307/3069285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guardian. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/apr/25/stokes-croft-tesco-bristol
   Google Scholar
• Haenfler, R., Johnson, B., & Jones, E. (2012). Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.640535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. http://www.jstor.org/stable/257008
   Google Scholar
• Hooley, G. J., Broderick, A., & Moller, K. (1998). Competitive positioning and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 6(2), 97. doi: 10.1080/09652549800000003
   Google Scholar
• Hooley, G. J., Lynch, J. E., Brooksbank, R. W., & Shepherd, J. (1988). Strategic market environments. Journal of Marketing Management, 4(2), 131–147. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964066
   Google Scholar
• Hooley, G. J., Piercy, N. F., & Nicoulaud, B. (2008). Marketing strategy and competitive positioning. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, R. (1983). An overview of trialectics within applications to psychology and public policy. In R. Horn (Ed.), Trialectics: Toward a practical logic of unity (pp. 1–39). Lexington, MA: Information Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K., & Lindblom, J. (2011). Moral reflexivity and dramaturgical action in social movement activism: The case of the plowshares and Animal Rights Sweden. Social Movement Studies, 11(1), 41–60. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2012.640529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2003). Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 23–55. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2005). Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review Social, 9, 527–548. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2946077
   Google Scholar
• Kolbe, R. H., & Burnett, M. S. (1991). Content-analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 243–250. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489559
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704. doi: 10.1086/425104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucuk, S. U. (2008). Consumer exit, voice, and ‘power’ on the Internet. Journal of Research for Consumers, 15, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.016
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Rogers, R. (2008). Subsuming the ground: How local realities of the Fergana Valley, the Narmada Dams and the BTC pipeline are put to use on the Web. Economy and Society, 37(2), 251–281. doi: 10.1080/03085140801933314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, C., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250060306
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, C. (1997). Media measurement models of protest event data. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 2(2), 165–184. http://mobilization.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&issn=1086-671X&volume=2&issue=2&spage=165
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, S. R., Richardson, B., & Collins, A. (2011). How brand communities emerge: The Beamish conversion experience. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(9–10), 891–912. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2011.565684
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, M., & Simmons, G. (2010). Strategists’ reactions and resistance towards the forces of inclusion: Soothing the anxiety of marketing (non-)influence. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(4), 317–336. doi: 10.1080/09652540903537006
   Google Scholar
• Patriotta, G., Gond, J.-P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justifications. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1804–1836. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickerill, J. (2007). ‘Autonomy online’: Indymedia and practices of alter-globalisation. Environment and Planning A, 39(11), 2668–2684. doi: 10.1068/a38227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portas, M. (2011). The Portas Review: An independent review into the future of our high streets, Department for Business. (pp. 1–51). London: Innovation and Skills.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reibstein, D. J., Day, G., & Wind, J. (2009). Guest Editorial: Is marketing academia losing its way? Journal of Marketing, 73, 1–3. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.73.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. (2002). Coffee and the business of pleasure: The case of Harbucks vs. Mr. Tweek. Culture and Organization, 8(4), 293–306. doi: 10.1080/14759550215611
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2002). Operating issue networks on the Web. Science as Culture, 11(2), 191–214. doi: 10.1080/09505430220137243
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Ben-David, A. (2008). The Palestinian–Israeli peace process and the trans-national issue networks: The complicated place of the Israeli NGO. New Media and Society, 10(1), 41–72. doi: 10.1177/1461444807085321
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Marres, N. (2000). Landscaping climate change: A mapping technique for understanding science and technology debates on the World Wide Web. Public Understanding Science, 9(2), 141–163. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Zelman, A. (2002). Surfing for knowledge in the information society. In G. Elmer (Ed.), Critical perspectives on the Internet. Lanham, MD: Littlefield & Rowman.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(4), 4–17. doi: 10.1002/dir.20046
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73, 30–51. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392880
   Google Scholar
• Sillince, J. A. A. (1999). The role of political language forms and language coherence in the organizational change process. Organization Studies, 20(3), 485–518. doi: 10.1177/0170840699203005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillince, J. A. A., & Brown, A. D. (2009). Multiple organizational identities and legitimacy: The rhetoric of police websites. Human Relations, 62(12), 1829–1856. doi: 10.1177/0018726709336626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sillince, J. A. A., Harindranath, G., & Harvey, C. E. (2001). Getting acceptance that radically new working practices are required: Institutionalization of arguments about change within a healthcare organization. Human Relations, 54(11), 1421–1454. doi: 10.1177/00187267015411002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, G. (2008). Marketing to postmodern consumers: Introducing the Internet chameleon. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 299–310. doi: 10.1108/03090560810852940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, G., Thomas, B., & Truong, Y. (2010). Managing i-branding to create brand equity. European Journal of Marketing, 44(9/10), 1260–1285. doi: 10.1108/03090561011062835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. http://www.jstor.org/stable/258788
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. doi: 10.1017/S1049096505050134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telegraph Politics. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/8471807/Its-time-Tesco-haters-stocked-up-on-facts.html
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. J., Rindfleisch, A., & Arsel, Z. (2006). Emotional branding and the strategic value of the doppelgänger brand image. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 50–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30162072
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A. (1981). The voice and the eye: An analysis of social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, Y., & Simmons, G. (2010). Perceived intrusiveness in digital advertising: Strategic marketing implications. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(3), 239–256. doi: 10.1080/09652540903511308
   Google Scholar
• Varadarajan, P. R. (2010). Strategic marketing and marketing strategy: Domain, definition, fundamental issues and foundational premises. Journal of the Academy of Marketing, 38, 119–140. doi: 10.1007/s11747-009-0176-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, T. J. (1995). Rhetoric, discourse and argument in organizational sense making: A reflexive tale. Organization Studies, 16(5), 805–821. doi: 10.1177/017084069501600503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2005). A toolkit for analyzing corporate cultural toolkits. Poetics, 33(3/4), 227–252. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, N., Branson, J., Murdock, A., & Clarke, G. (2009). Extending the Competition Commission’s findings on entry and exit of small stores in British high streets: Implications for competition and planning policy. Environment and Planning A, 41(9), 2063–2085. doi: 10.1068/a41326
   Google Scholar