‘Is there a gap in the market, and is there a market in the gap?’ How advertising planning performs markets

References

• Araujo, L. (2007). Markets, market-making and marketing. Marketing Theory, 7(3), 211–226. doi:10.1177/1470593107080342
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, L., Finch, J., & Kjellberg, H. (Eds.). (2010). Reconnecting marketing to markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, L., & Kjellberg, H. (2009). Shaping exchanges, performing markets: The study of market-ing practices. In P. Maclaran, M. Saren, B. Stern, & M. Tadajewski (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of marketing theory (pp. 195–218). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ariztia, T. (2013). Unpacking insight: How consumers are qualified by advertising agencies. Journal of Consumer Culture. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1469540513493204
   Google Scholar
• Barrey, S., Cochoy, F., & Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2000). Designer, packager et merchandiser: Trois professionnels pour une même scène marchande. Sociologie du Travail, 42(3), 457–482. doi:10.1016/S0038-0296(00)01089-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, R. (2004). Should we worry about an ‘academic-practitioner divide’ in marketing?. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(5), 492–500. doi:10.1108/02634500410551879
   Google Scholar
• Breslau, D. (2013). Designing a market-like entity: Economics in the politics of market formation. Social Studies of Science, 43(6), 829–851. doi:10.1177/0306312713493962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlie, D., Hewer, P., & Ferguson, P. (2007). Theory into practice: Meditations on cultures of accountability and interdisciplinarity in marketing research. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(5–6), 395–409. doi:10.1362/026725707X212739
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the market (pp. 1–57). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative?. In D. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2008). Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: From prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies. In T. Pinch & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a material world: Economic sociology meets science and technology studies (pp. 29–56). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (2010). Performativity, misfires and politics. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 163–169. doi:10.1080/17530350.2010.494119
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. (1998). Another discipline for the market economy: Marketing as performative knowledge and know-how for capitalism. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the market (pp. 194–221). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. (2011). ‘Market-things inside’: Insights from progressive grocer (United States, 1929–1959). In D. Zwick & J. Cayla (Eds.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 58–84). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., & Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2013). The sociology of market work. Economic Sociology – The European Electronic Newsletter, 15(1), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P., & Lock, A. R. (2005). The uses of marketing theory: Constructs, research propositions, and managerial implications. Marketing Theory, 5(2), 165–184. doi:10.1177/1470593105052469
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, A. M. (2004). Regimes of mediation: Advertising practitioners as cultural intermediaries? Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(4), 349–369. doi:10.1080/1025386042000316315
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., & Mouritsen, J. (2009). What is the object of management? In C. S. Chapman, D. J. Cooper, & P. Miller (Eds.), Accounting, organizations, and institutions: Essays in honour of Anthony Hopwood (pp. 157–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do?: Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duymedjian, R., & Rüling, C.-C. (2010). Towards a foundation of bricolage in organization and management theory. Organization Studies, 31(2), 133–151. doi:10.1177/0170840609347051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40. doi:10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24. doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, J., & Geiger, S. (2011). Constructing and contesting markets through the market object. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 899–906. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice – A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47. doi:10.2307/258627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandclément, C., & Gaglio, G. (2011). Convoking the consumer in person: The focus group effect. In D. Zwick & J. Cayla (Eds.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 87–114). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, I., & McLeod, C. (2007). Advertising agency planning – Conceptualising network relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(5–6), 425–442. doi:10.1362/026725707X212757
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, J. (1982). A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. Journal of Marketing, 46(2), 60–72. doi:10.2307/3203341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller & C. Brooke-Rose (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality, and the self in western thought (pp. 161–171). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 351–383). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hackley, C. E. (2003a). Account planning: Current agency perspectives on an advertising enigma. Journal of Advertising Research, 43(2), 234–246. doi:10.1017/S0021849903030186
   Google Scholar
• Hackley, C. E. (2003b). From consumer insight to advertising strategy: The account planner’s integrative role in creative advertising development. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21(7), 446–452. doi:10.1108/02634500310504296
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E. (2005). The performative nature of consumer research: Consumers’ environmental awareness as an example. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(2), 179–201. doi:10.1007/s10603-005-2272-5
   Google Scholar
• Hennion, A., Méadel, C., & Bowker, G. (1989). The artisans of desire: The mediation of advertising between product and consumer. Sociological Theory, 7(2), 191–209. doi:10.2307/201895
   Google Scholar
• Igo, S. E. (2007). The averaged American: Surveys, citizens and the making of a mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaac, J. (2009). Tangled loops: Theory, history, and the human sciences in modern America. Modern Intellectual History, 6(2), 397–424. doi:10.1017/S1479244309002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker, B. H. (1960). Field work: An introduction to the social sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, H., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2006). Multiple versions of markets: Multiplicity and performativity in market practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(7), 839–855. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1996). Que peuvent apporter l’histoire et la sociologie des sciences aux sciences de gestion? Conférence aux XIIIe Journées Nationales des IAE, ESUG Toulouse.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256. doi:10.1177/1749975509105533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. doi:10.1080/0308514042000225716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R. M. (2010). The secret life of focus groups: Robert Merton and the diffusion of a research method. The American Sociologist, 41(2), 115–141. doi:10.1007/s12108-010-9090-1
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J. (2007). A market of opinions: The political epistemology of focus groups. The Sociological Review, 55(s2), 130–151. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00733.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilien, G. L., Rangaswamy, A., van Bruggen, G. H., & Wierenga, B. (2002). Bridging the marketing theory–practice gap with marketing engineering. Journal of Business Research, 55(2), 111–121. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00146-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D. (2006). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D. (2007). Is economics performative: Option theory and the construction of derivative markets. In D. Mackenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 54–86). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D. (2009). Material markets: How economic agents are constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maleyft, T. D. (2003). Models, metaphors and client relations: The negotiated meanings of advertising. In T. D. Maleyft & B. Moeran (Eds.), Advertising cultures (pp. 139–163). New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Maleyft, T. D., & Moeran, B. (Eds.). (2003). Advertising cultures. New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, G. (2009). Une relance de la critique en marketing: Science et performation. Économies et Sociétés, Série: ‘Économie de l’entreprise’, 12(1), 2115–2152.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1987). The focussed interview and focus groups: Continuities and discontinuities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(4), 550–566. doi:10.1086/269057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K., Fisk, M., & Kendall, P. (1956). The focused interview: A report of the bureau of applied social research. New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. (1994). Accounting and objectivity: The invention of calculating selves and calculable spaces. In A. Megill (Ed.), Rethinking objectivity (pp. 239–264). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013). Accounting, organizing, and economizing: Connecting accounting research and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 557–605. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.783668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997). Mobilizing the consumer: Assembling the subject of consumption. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–36. doi:10.1177/026327697014001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2005). The work of economics: How a discipline makes its world. European Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 297–320. doi:10.1017/S000397560500010X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeran, B. (1996). A Japanese advertising agency: An anthropology of media and markets. London: Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F., & Callon, M. (2008). La performativité des sciences economiques. CSI Working Paper No. 010, École des Mines de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• November, P. (2004). Seven reasons why marketing practitioners should ignore marketing academic research. Australasian Marketing Journal, 12(2), 39–50. doi:10.1016/S1441-3582(04)70096-8
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1999). Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(3), 367–396. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00367.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1989). Living in the material world: On realism and experimental practice. In D. Gooding, T. Pinch, & S. Schaffer (Eds.), The uses of experiment: Studies in the natural sciences (pp. 257–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1994). After representation: Science studies in the performative idiom. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1994, 413–419. doi:10.2307/192953
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., & Williams, R. (2009). The sociology of a market analysis tool: How industry analysts sort vendors and organize markets. Information and Organization, 19(2), 129–151. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (2008). Locating the domain of calculation. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(1), 39–50. doi:10.1080/17530350801913627
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. (2009). Technology as prospective ontology. Synthese, 168(3), 405–422. doi:10.1007/s11229-008-9449-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, D. (2002). Capturing markets from the economists. In P. du Gay & A. Pryke (Eds.), Cultural economy: Cultural analysis and commercial life (pp. 59–77). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stefflre, V. (1965). Simulation of people’s behavior toward new objects and events. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(9), 12–15. doi:10.1177/000276426500800905
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, R. (2010, Quarter 1, January). We can’t run away from the ethical debates in marketing. Market Leader, p. 48.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. (2011). Ethnography as work: Some rules of engagement. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 218–234. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosselman, E. (2013). The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: Towards a relational ontology of management accounting. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 181–203. doi:10.1080/00014788.2013.856748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, T. J. (2011). Ethnography, reality, and truth: The vital need for studies of ‘how things work’ in organizations and management. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 202–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00979.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G., LeMasters, K., & Heffring, M. (1982). Theory construction in marketing. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zwick, D., & Cayla, J. (2011). Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices. In D. Zwick & J. Cayla (Eds.), Inside marketing: Practices, ideologies, devices (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar