More-than-human netnography

References

• Anderson, S., Hamilton, K., & Tonner, A. (2016). Social labour: Exploring work in consumption. Marketing Theory, 16(3), 383–400. doi:10.1177/1470593116640598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (Ed.). (1988). The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Araujo, L. (2007). Markets, market-making and marketing. Marketing Theory, 7(3), 211–226. doi:10.1177/1470593107080342
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand public. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 727–748. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajde, D. (2013). Consumer culture theory (re) visits actor–network theory: Flattening consumption studies. Marketing Theory, 13(2), 227–242. doi:10.1177/1470593113477887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bálint, K., Klausch, T., & Pólya, T. (2016). Watching closely: Shot scale influences theory of mind response in visual narratives. Journal of Media Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartl, M., Kannan, V. K., & Stockinger, H. (2016). A review and analysis of literature on netnography research. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 165–196. doi:10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075687
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, A. (2017). Vectors for fieldwork: Computational thinking and new modes of ethnography. In L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway, & G. Bell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 29–39). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. (2014). Digital consumption and the extended self. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(11–12), 1101–1118. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., Kothiyal, N., & Willmott, H. (2017). Methodology‐as‐technique and the meaning of rigour in globalized management research. British Journal of Management, 28(3), 534–550. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belz, F.-M., & Baumbach, W. (2010). Netnography as a method of lead user identification. Creativity & Innovation Management, 19(3), 304–313. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernius, M. (2012). Manufacturing and encountering “human” in the age of digital reproduction. In N. Whitehead & M. Wesch (Eds.), Human no more: Digital subjectivities, unhuman subjects, and the end of anthropology (pp. 49–70). Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Bettany, S. (2007). The material semiotics of consumption or where (and what) are the objects of consumer culture theory? In R. W. Belk & J. F. Sherry (Eds.), Consumer culture theory: Research in consumer behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 41–56). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettany, S. (2015). A commentary: Where (and what) is the critical in consumer-oriented actor–network theory? In R. Canniford & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets (pp. 187–197). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bettany, S., & Daly, R. (2008). Figuring companion-species consumption: A multi-site ethnography of the post-canine Afghan hound. Journal of Business Research, 61(5), 408–418. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany, S., & Kerrane, B. (2011). The (post-human) consumer, the (post-avian) chicken and the (post-object) Eglu: Towards a material-semiotics of anti-consumption. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1746–1756. doi:10.1108/03090561111167388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettany, S. M., & Kerrane, B. (2016). The socio-materiality of parental style: Negotiating the multiple affordances of parenting and child welfare within the new child surveillance technology market. European Journal of Marketing, 50(11), 2041–2066. doi:10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonilla, Y., & Rosa, J. (2015). # Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist, 42(1), 4–17. doi:10.1111/amet.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni, A. (2005). Shadowing software and clinical records: On the ethnography of non-humans and heterogeneous contexts. Organization, 12(3), 357–378. doi:10.1177/1350508405051272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. (2009). The field site as a network: A strategy for locating ethnographic research. Field Methods, 21(2), 181–199. doi:10.1177/1525822X08329699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caliandro, A. (2017). Digital methods for ethnography: Analytical concepts for ethnographers exploring social media environments. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0891241617702960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. The Sociological Review, 46(1_suppl), 1–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03468.x
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., & Law, J. (1982). On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science, 12(4), 615–625. doi:10.1177/030631282012004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, N., O’Driscoll, A., & Saren, M. (2010). The posthuman: The end and the beginning of the human. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(2), 86–101. doi:10.1002/cb.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canniford, R., & Bajde, D. (Eds.). (2016). Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canniford, R., & Shankar, A. (2013). Purifying practices: How consumers assemble romantic experiences of nature. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1051–1069. doi:10.1086/667202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers Thomas, T., Price, L. L., & Schau, H. J. (2013). When differences unite: Resource dependence in heterogeneous consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1010–1033. doi:10.1086/666616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao, B. (2015). Relevance and adoption of netnography in determining consumer behavior patterns on the web. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 2(6), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Charitsis, V. (2016). Prosuming (the) self. Ephemera, 16(3), 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 164–181. doi:10.1177/0263276411424420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrier, H., Szuba, M., & Özçağlar-Toulouse, N. (2012). Barriers to downward carbon emission: Exploring sustainable consumption in the face of the glass floor. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 397–419. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2012.658835
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. (2004). Is the modern consumer a Buridan’s donkey? Product packaging and consumer choice. In K. Ekström & H. Brembeck (Eds.), Elusive consumption (pp. 205–227). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. (2008). Calculation, qualculation, calqulation: Shopping cart arithmetic, equipped cognition and the clustered consumer. Marketing Theory, 8(1), 15–44. doi:10.1177/1470593107086483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corciolani, M. (2014). How do authenticity dramas develop? An analysis of Afterhours fans’ responses to the band’s participation in the Sanremo music festival. Marketing Theory, 14(2), 185–206. doi:10.1177/147059311452145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, L., McDermott, M.-L., & Wallace, R. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–12. doi:10.1177/1609406917700647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford Camiciottoli, B., Ranfagni, S., & Guercini, S. (2014). Exploring brand associations: An innovative methodological approach. European Journal of Marketing, 48(5/6), 1092–1112. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2011-0770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valck, K., Van Bruggen, G. H., & Wierenga, B. (2009). Virtual communities: A marketing perspective. Decision Support Systems, 47(3), 185–203. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, N., & Reyes, I. (2013). Virtuality as place and process. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(13–14), 1580–1591. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.834714
   Google Scholar
• Dholakia, N., Reyes, I., & Bonoff, J. (2015). Mobile media: From legato to staccato, isochronal consumptionscapes. Consumption Markets & Culture, 18(1), 10–24. doi:10.1080/10253866.2014.899216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietler, M., & Hayden, B. (Eds.). (2010). Feasts: Archaeological and ethnographic perspectives on food, politics, and power. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ekpo, A. E., Riley, B. K., Thomas, K. D., Yvaire, Z., Gerri, G. R. H., & Muñoz, I. I. (2015). As worlds collide: The role of marketing management in customer-to-customer interactions. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2010). The storied life of singularized objects: Forces of agency and network transformation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 820–837. doi:10.1086/603547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, A. M., Schau, H. J., & Price, L. L. (2014). The role of brands and mediating technologies in assembling long-distance family practices. Journal of Marketing, 78(3), 81–101. doi:10.1509/jm.12.0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epp, A. M., & Velagaleti, S. R. (2014). Outsourcing parenthood? How families manage care assemblages using paid commercial services. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 911–935. doi:10.1086/677892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertimur, B., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2015). Navigating the institutional logics of markets: Implications for strategic brand management. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 40–61. doi:10.1509/jm.13.0218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, K. V., Brittain, A. J., & Bennett, S. D. (2011). “Doing the duck”: Negotiating the resistant-consumer identity. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1779–1788. doi:10.1108/03090561111167414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104. doi:10.1145/2818717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, M. C., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). “My plastic dreams”: Towards an extended understanding of materiality and the shaping of consumer identities. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 191–207. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, B., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). The systemic creation of value through circulation in collaborative consumer networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 509–533. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandini, A. (2016). Digital work: Self-branding and social capital in the freelance knowledge economy. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 123–141. doi:10.1177/1470593115607942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, V., & Prothero, A. (2016). Beauty blogger selfies as authenticating practices. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1858–1878. doi:10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerhart, S. (2004). Do web search engines suppress controversy? First Monday, 9(1). doi:10.5210/fm.v9i1.1111
   Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365. doi:10.1177/1461444812472322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlitz, C., & Lury, C. (2014). Social media and self-evaluating assemblages: On numbers, orderings and values. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(2), 174–188. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.920267
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. Boczkowski, & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guesalaga, R., Pierce, M., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). Cultural influences on expectations and evaluations of service quality in emerging markets. International Marketing Review, 33(1), 88–111. doi:10.1108/IMR-08-2014-0283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society, 18(1), 117–137. doi:10.1177/1461444814538646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. (2011). Methodology: Who needs it? London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B. J. (2016). Peeking behind the mask of the prosumer: Theorizing the organization of consumptive and productive practice moments. Marketing Theory, 16(1), 3–20. doi:10.1177/1470593115581722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmond, A. (2013). The algorithmization of the hyperlink. Computational Culture, 3(3). Retrieved from http://computationalculture.net/article/the-algorithmization-of-the-hyperlink
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. (2001). Ethnography and the development of science and technology studies. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 234–245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, T., Canniford, R., & Mol, J. (2014). Non-representational marketing theory. Marketing Theory, 14(4), 377–394. doi:10.1177/1470593114533232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2017). From virtual ethnography to the embedded, embodied, everyday internet. In L. Hjorth, H. Horst, A. Galloway, & G. Bell (Eds.), The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (pp. 21–28). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2017). Consumer and object experience in the Internet-of-Things: An assemblage theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Tang, W. (2017). Virtual brand community engagement practices: A refined typology and model. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(3), 204–217. doi:10.1108/JSM-01-2016-0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Nam, Y., Peng, W., & Lee, K. M. (2012). Effects of screen size, viewing angle, and players’ immersion tendencies on game experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 617–623. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Rashid, J., & Lee, K. M. (2017). Cognitive map or medium materiality? Reading on paper and screen. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 84–94. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Janta, H., Lugosi, P., & Brown, L. (2014). Coping with loneliness: A netnographic study of doctoral students. Journal of Further & Higher Education, 38(4), 553–571. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2012.726972
   Google Scholar
• Jeacle, I., & Carter, C. (2011). In TripAdvisor we trust: Rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 36(4–5), 293–309. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. (2004). A nonhumanist disposition: On performativity, practical ontology, and intervention. Configurations, 12(2), 229–261. doi:10.1353/con.2006.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (1997). “I want to believe”: A netnography of the X-Philes’ subculture of consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 470–475.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research, 25, 366–371.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252–264. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V., Parmentier, M.-A., & Scaraboto, D. (2016). Evolving netnography. Retrieved March 2 2017, from http://www.jmmnews.com/evolving-netnography/
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R. (2016). Networks of desire: How technology increases our passion to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 659–682. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rocca, A., Mandelli, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Netnography approach as a tool for marketing research: The case of Dash-P&G/TTV. Management Decision, 52(4), 689–704. doi:10.1108/MD-03-2012-0233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, R., & Beckman, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 189–203. doi:10.1108/13522750510592454
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15–25). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology’. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Ruppert, E. (2013). The social life of methods: Devices. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 229–240. doi:10.1080/17530350.2013.812042
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2013). ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 485–502. doi:10.1007/s11133-013-9263-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, T., Dax, J., Pipek, V., & Randall, D. (2016). Work or leisure? Designing a user-centered approach for researching activity “in the wild”. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 20(4), 487–515. doi:10.1007/s00779-016-0935-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P. (2014). Mobilising identity and culture in experience co-creation and venue operation. Tourism Management, 40, 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P. (2016). Socio-technological authentication. Annals of Tourism Research, 58, 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2016.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P., & Erdélyi, P. (2009). From marketing to market practices: Assembling the ruin bars of Budapest. In A. Fyall, M. Kozak, L. Andreu, J. Gnoth, & S. Lebe (Eds.), Marketing innovations for sustainable destinations: Operations, interactions, experiences (pp. 299–310). Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P., Janta, H., & Watson, P. (2012). Investigative management and consumer research on the internet. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 24(6), 838–854. doi:10.1108/09596111211247191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lury, C. (2004). Brands: The logos of the global economy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., Gilardi, F., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Designing research in social science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2012). The redistribution of methods: On intervention in digital social research, broadly conceived. The Sociological Review, 60(1_suppl), 139–165. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N., & Weltevrede, E. (2013). Scraping the social? Issues in live social research. Journal of Cultural Economy, 6(3), 313–335. doi:10.1086/673196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2014). Consumption-driven market emergence. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 855–870. doi:10.1086/673196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. (2013). Status update: Celebrity, publicity and branding in the social media age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. (2015). Instafame: Luxury selfies in the attention economy. Public Culture, 27(1 75), 137–160. doi:10.1215/08992363-2798379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2015). Knowledge machines, digital transformations of the sciences and humanities. Cambridge, MASS: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (Ed.). (1998). Material cultures: Why some things matter. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (Ed.). (2005). Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21(1), 93–123. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. R., & Otnes, C. C. (2005). Exploring cross-cultural ambivalence: A netnography of intercultural wedding message boards. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 89–95. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00477-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmo, R. (2011). Actor-network theory and methodology: Social research in a more-than-human world. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(3), 108–119. doi:10.4256/mio.2011.010
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2014). What happens when evaluation goes online?: Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector. Organization Science, 25(3), 868–891. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without you, I’m nothing: Performances of the self on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 6(18), 1989–2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, M. A., & Fischer, E. (2015). Things fall apart: The dynamics of brand audience dissipation. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1228–1251. doi:10.1086/678907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentina, I., & Amos, C. (2011). The Freegan phenomenon: Anti-consumption or consumer resistance? European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1768–1778. doi:10.1108/03090561111167405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, S. M. (2008). Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation. First Monday, 13(3). doi:10.5210/fm.v13i3.2141
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. doi:10.1177/1329878X1214500114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton, S., & Wilson, D. (2016). Tensions and ties in social media networks: Towards a model of understanding business relationship development and business performance enhancement through the use of LinkedIn. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rageh, A., Melewar, T. C., & Woodside, A. (2013). Using netnography research method to reveal the underlying dimensions of the customer/tourist experience. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(2), 126–149. doi:10.1108/13522751311317558
   Google Scholar
• Ren, C. (2011). Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 858–881. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rokka, J., & Canniford, R. (2016). Heterotopian selfies: How social media destabilizes brand assemblages. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1789–1813. doi:10.1108/EJM-08-2015-0517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, M., Nickell, D., & Wei, J. (2014). Understanding salespeople’s learning experiences through blogging: A social learning approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 1063–1069. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., Law, J., & Savage, M. (2013). Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(4), 22–46. doi:10.1177/0263276413484941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarikakis, K., Krug, C., & Rodriguez-Amat, J. R. (2017). Defining authorship in user-generated content: Copyright struggles in The Game of Thrones. New Media & Society, 19(4), 542–559. doi:10.1177/1461444815612446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucv004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2013). Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1234–1257. doi:10.1086/668298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2016). Triggers, tensions and trajectories: Towards an understanding of the dynamics of consumer enrolment in uneasily intersecting assemblages. In R. Canniford & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets (pp. 172–186). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., Muñiz, J. A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2015.1117518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schembri, S., & Latimer, L. (2016). Online brand communities: Constructing and co-constructing brand culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7–8), 628–651. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2015.1117518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seraj, M. (2012). We create, we connect, we respect, therefore we are: Intellectual, social, and cultural value in online communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 209–222. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skandalis, A., Byrom, J., & Banister, E. (2016). Paradox, tribalism, and the transitional consumption experience: In light of post-postmodernism. European Journal of Marketing, 50(7/8), 1308–1325. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2014-0775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(3), 377–391. doi:10.1177/00027649921955326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiura, L., Pope, C., & Webber, C. (2012, June 22–24). Buying unlicensed slimming drugs from the web: A virtual ethnography. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, Evanston, IL (pp. 284–287). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Tunçalp, D., & Lê, L. (2014). (Re)Locating boundaries: A systematic review of online ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), 59–79. doi:10.1108/JOE-11-2012-0048
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/always-on-you: The tethered self. In J. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication and social change (pp. 121–137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Uprichard, E. (2012). Being stuck in (live) time: The sticky sociological imagination. The Sociological Review, 60(1_suppl), 124–138. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.002120.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uski, S., & Lampinen, A. (2016). Social norms and self-presentation on social network sites: Profile work in action. New Media & Society, 18(3), 447–464. doi:10.1177/1461444814543164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Davis, C. A., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2017). Online human-bot interactions: Detection, estimation, and characterization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03107.
   Google Scholar
• Veer, E. (2013). Virtually ‘secret’ lives in ‘hidden’ communities. In R. Belk & R. Llamas (Eds.), Routledge companion to digital consumption (pp. 148–158). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-S., Lee, W.-L., & Hsu, T.-H. (2017). Using netnography for the study of role-playing in female online games: Interpretation of situational context model. Internet Research, 27(4), 905–923. doi:10.1108/IntR-04-2016-0111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90. doi:10.1215/08992363-14-1-49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijo, H., Hietanen, J., & Mattila, P. (2014). New insights into online consumption communities and netnography. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2072–2078. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesch, M. (2012). Anonymous, anonymity, and the end(s) of identity and groups online. In N. Whitehead & M. Wesch (Eds.), Human no more: Digital subjectivities, unhuman subjects, and the end of anthropology (pp. 89–104). Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, N. L., & Wesch, M. (Eds.). (2012). Human no more: Digital subjectivities, unhuman subjects, and the end of anthropology. Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. F. (1993). Street corner society. The social structure of an Italian slum (4th ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., Crow, G., & Nind, M. (2013). But is it innovation?: The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research. Methodological Innovations Online, 8(1), 18–33. doi:10.4256/mio.2013.002
   Google Scholar
• Wilson-Barnao, C. (2017). How algorithmic cultural recommendation influence the marketing of cultural collections. Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(6), 559–574. doi:10.1080/10253866.2017.1331910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woermann, N., & Kirschner, H. (2015). Online livestreams, community practices, and assemblages. Towards a site ontology of consumer community. Advances in Consumer Research, 43, 438–442.
   Google Scholar
• Xun, J., & Reynolds, J. (2010). Applying netnography to market research: The case of the online forum. Journal of Targeting Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 18(1), 17–31. doi:10.1057/jt.2009.29
   Google Scholar
• Yim, C. K., Tse, D. K., & Chan, K. W. (2008). Strengthening customer loyalty through intimacy and passion: Roles of customer–Firm affection and customer–Staff relationships in services. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 741–756. doi:10.1509/jmkr.45.6.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar